Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 115–124 | Cite as

Gender Similarities and Differences in the Association Between Risk and Protective Factors and Self-Reported Serious Delinquency

  • Abigail A. FaganEmail author
  • M. Lee Van Horn
  • J. David Hawkins
  • Michael W. Arthur
Original Paper

Abstract

Boys consistently report higher rates of serious offending during late adolescence than do girls, yet research is mixed regarding the ways in which males and females may differentially experience risk and protection in their families, schools, peer groups, and as individuals. This article examines gender differences in 22 psychosocial risk and protective factors associated with serious delinquency. Based on self-reported information from 7,829 10th-grade students completing the Communities That Care Youth Survey, all psychosocial factors were significantly related to serious delinquency for both sexes. For 12 of the 22 factors, the strength of the association was significantly greater for males, and, for 18 factors, boys reported higher levels of risk exposure and lower levels of protection than did girls. Together, these findings suggest that boys’ greater involvement in serious delinquency is due to the combination of experiencing more risk and less protection than girls and the greater association of these predictors with serious delinquency for boys compared to girls. Implications for prevention programming are discussed.

Keywords

Gender and crime Prevention science Risk and protective factors Delinquency 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by research grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA10768-01A1), and (R01 DA015183-01A1) with co-funding from the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute on Child Health and Development, the National Institute on Mental Health, and the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology in Nashville, TN.

References

  1. Arnold, R. A. (1990). Processes of victimization and criminalization of black women. Social Justice, 17, 153–166.Google Scholar
  2. Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., Pollard, J. A., Catalano, R. F., & Baglioni Jr., A. J. (2002). Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors: The Communities That Care Youth Survey. Evaluation Review, 26, 575–601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belknap, J. (2001). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and criminal justice (2nd edn.). Cincinnati, OH: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  4. Blitstein, J. L., Murray, D. M., Lytle, L. A., Birnbaum, A. S., & Perry, C. L. (2005). Predictors of violent behavior in an early adolescent cohort: Similarities and differences across genders. Health Education and Behavior, 32, 175–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blum, J., Ireland, M., & Blum, R. W. (2003). Gender differences in youth violence: A report from Add Health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 32, 234–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bottcher, J. (1995). Gender as social control: A qualitative study of incarcerated youths and their siblings in greater Sacramento. Justice Quarterly, 12, 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canter, R. J. (1982). Family correlates of male and female delinquency. Criminology, 20, 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cernkovich, S., & Giordano, P. C. (1987). Family relationships and delinquency. Criminology, 25, 295–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chesney-Lind, M. (1997). The female offender: Girls, women and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Daly, K., & Chesney-Lind, M. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5, 497–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elliott, D. S. (1994). Serious violent offenders: Onset, developmental course, and termination-The American Society of Criminology 1993 Presidential Address. Criminology, 32, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fagan, A. A. (2001). The gendered cycle of violence: Comparing the effects of child abuse and neglect on criminal offending for males and females. Violence and Victims, 16, 457–474.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Farrington, D. P., & Painter, K. A. (2003). Gender differences in offending: implications for risk-focused prevention. London: Home Office RDA Online Report OLR09/04.Google Scholar
  14. Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2002). Male and female offending trajectories. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 159–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glaser, R. R., Van Horn, M. L., Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2005). Measurement properties of the Communities That Care Youth Survey across demographic groups. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham, J. W., Cumsille, P. E., & Elek-Fisk, E. (2003). Methods for handling missing data. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 2. Research methods in psychology (pp. 87–114). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  17. Greenfeld, L. A., & Snell, T. L. (1999). Women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
  18. Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Communities That Care prevention strategies guide. South Deerfield, MA: Channing Bete.Google Scholar
  19. Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T. I., Farrington, D. P., Brewer, D., Catalano, R. F., & Harachi, T. W. (1998). A review of predictors of youth violence. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders (pp. 106–146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T. I., Farrington, D. P., Brewer, D., Catalano, R. F., Harachi, T. W., et al. (2000). Predictors of youth violence. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  21. Heimer, K. (1995). Gender, race, and the pathways to delinquency: an interactionist perspective. In J. Hagan & R. D. Peterson (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 140–173). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Liu, X., & Kaplan, H. B. (1999). Explaining the gender difference in adolescent delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of mediating mechanisms. Criminology, 37, 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1986). Family factors as correlates and predictors of juvenile conduct problems and delinquency. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: Vol. 7 (pp. 29–149). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mazerolle, P. (1998). Gender, general strain, and delinquency: An empirical examination. Justice Quarterly, 15, 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mears, D. P., Ploeger, M., & Warr, M. (1998). Explaining the gender gap in delinquency: Peer influence and moral evaluations of behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller, J., & White, N. A. (2003). Gender and adolescent relationship violence: A contextual examination. Criminology, 41, 1207–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behaviour: Conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study. Cambridge Studies in Criminology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Muthén, B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrica, 54, 557–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 376–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2004). Mplus 3.1 (Version 3.1). Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  32. Piquero, N. L., & Sealock, M. D. (2004). Gender and general strain theory: A preliminary test of Broidy and Agnew's Gender/GST hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 21, 125–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Resnick, M. D., Ireland, M., & Borowsky, I. (2004). Youth violence perpetration: What protects? What predicts? Findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 424.e421–424.e410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Richie, B. E. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of Black battered women. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Rowe, D. C., Vazsonyi, A. T., & Flannery, D. J. (1995). Sex differences in crime: Do means and within-sex variation have similar causes? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, D. A., & Paternoster, R. (1987). The gender gap in theories of deviance: Issues and evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 140–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Snyder, H. N. (2003). Juvenile arrests 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  38. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69.Google Scholar
  39. Widom, C. S. (1989). The cycle of violence. Science, 244, 160–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wiebush, R. G., Baird, C., Kinsberg, B., & Onek, D. (1995). Risk assessment and classification for serious, violent and chronic juvenile offenders. In J. C. Howell, B. Krisberg, J. D. Hawkins, & J. J. Wilson (Eds.), Serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders: A sourcebook (pp. 171–212). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Wothke, W. (2000). Longitudinal and multi-group modeling with missing data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multiple group data: Practical issues, applied approaches and specific examples (pp. 219–240, 269–281). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Prevention Research 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abigail A. Fagan
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Lee Van Horn
    • 2
  • J. David Hawkins
    • 1
  • Michael W. Arthur
    • 1
  1. 1.Social Development Research GroupUniversity of Washington, School of Social WorkSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations