Prevention Science

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 409–420 | Cite as

How Substance Use Differs Among American Secondary Schools

  • Patrick M. O’Malley
  • Lloyd D. Johnston
  • Jerald G. Bachman
  • John E. Schulenberg
  • Revathy Kumar
Original Paper

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine (1) the extent to which student drug use and related measures vary among American secondary schools, and (2) how substance use varies among schools by certain school characteristics. Data come from the Monitoring the Future project’s annual surveys of nationally representative samples of 8th-, 10th-, and 12th-grade students from 1991 to 2002.

The results show that the preponderance of variance in drug use and related variables lies within schools; only a relatively small amount of variance is between schools. Although the variance lies primarily within schools, there remain important school-to-school differences in the extent to which students are exposed to drug use.

The analyses of school characteristics show that schools do indeed differ in drug use by their students, particularly by school type, socioeconomic status, and race/ethnicity. Eighth and 10th grade (but not 12th grade) students in public schools are more likely to be cigarette smokers than students in private schools. Students in public middle schools are at higher risk for use of alcohol and marijuana; however, among 12th graders, students in Catholic schools are at higher risk. School size is generally unrelated to substance use, with few exceptions. For the most part, there is a negative association between school socioeconomic status and student substance use among 8th graders; but by 12th grade, the association tends to be positive or not significant. Racial/ethnic composition is significantly associated with student substance use, with majority African American schools typically showing the lowest rates of use at all grades.

Keywords

Substance use School characteristics Intraclass correlation 

References

  1. Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., & O’Malley, P. M. (2001). The Monitoring the Future Project after twenty-seven years: Design and procedures. (Monitoring the Future Occasional Paper No. 54). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  2. Emery, S., Wakefield, M. A., Terry-McElrath, Y., Saffer, H., Szczypka, G., O’Malley, P. M., et al. (2005). Televised state-sponsored anti-tobacco advertising and youth smoking beliefs and behavior in the United States, 1999–2000. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159, 639–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ennett, S. T., Flewelling, R. L., Lindrooth, R. C., & Norton, E. C. (1997). School and neighborhood characteristics associated with school rates of alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 55–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Friend, K., & Levy, D. T. (2000). Reductions in smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption associated with mass-media campaigns. Health Education Research, 17, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2005). Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2004. Volume I: Secondary school students (NIH Pub. No. 05-5727). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  6. Kumar, R., O’Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D., Schulenberg, J. E., & Bachman, J. G. (2002). Effect of school-level norms on student substance use. Prevention Science, 3, 105–124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mauss, A. L. (1969). Anticipatory socialization toward college as a factor in adolescent marijuana use. Social Problems, 16, 357–364.Google Scholar
  8. Murray, D. M., & Short, B. J. (1996). Intraclass correlation among measures related to alcohol use by school aged adolescents: Estimates, correlates and applications in intervention studies. Journal of Drug Education, 26, 207–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Murray, D. M., & Short, B. J. (1997). Intraclass correlation among measures related to tobacco use by adolescents: Estimates, correlates, and applications in intervention studies. Addictive Behaviors, 22, 1–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Murray, D. M., Alfano, C. M., Zbikowski, S. M., Padgett, L. S., Robinson, L. A., & Klesges, R. (2002). Intraclass correlation among measures related to cigarette use by adolescents: Estimates from an urban and largely African American cohort. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 509–527.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1988). Student drug use in America: Differences among high schools 1986–1987. (Monitoring the Future Occasional Paper No. 24). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  12. SAS Institute. (1999). SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Scheier, L. M., Griffin, K. W., Doyle, M. M., & Botvin, G. J. (2002). Estimates of intragroup dependence for drug use and skill measures in school-based drug abuse prevention trials: An empirical study of three independent samples. Health Education and Behavior, 29, 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schulenberg, J., & Maggs, J. L. (2002). A developmental perspective on alcohol use and heavy drinking during adolescence and the transition to young adulthood. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement, 14, 54–70.Google Scholar
  15. Siddiqui, O., Hedeker, D., Flay, B., & Hu, F. (1996). Intraclass correlation estimates in a school-based smoking prevention study: Outcome and mediating variables, by sex and ethnicity. American Journal of Epidemiology, 144, 425–433.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Skager, R., & Fisher, D. G. (1989). Substance use among high school students in relation to school characteristics. Addictive Behaviors, 14, 129–138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wallace, J. M., Jr., Bachman, J. G., O’Malley, P. M., Schulenberg, J., Cooper, S. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2003). Gender and ethnic differences in smoking, drinking, and illicit drug use among American 8th, 10th, and 12th grade students, 1976–2000. Addictions, 98, 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick M. O’Malley
    • 1
    • 3
  • Lloyd D. Johnston
    • 1
  • Jerald G. Bachman
    • 1
  • John E. Schulenberg
    • 1
  • Revathy Kumar
    • 2
  1. 1.The University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.The University of Michigan, University of ToledoToledoUSA
  3. 3.Institute for Social ResearchSurvey Research CenterAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations