Prevention Science

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 89–99

Effects of Presenting Heavy Drinking Norms on Adolescents’ Prevalence Estimates, Evaluative Judgments, and Perceived Standards

Article

Abstract

Correcting normative information about the prevalence of heavy drinking is a key element in many prevention programs. To isolate the influence of normative information on older high school students’ (n = 230) alcohol-related judgments, the effects of delivering normative information in different contexts (no normative information, normative information only, normative information plus a self-focusing comparison to one’s drinking) and under different measurement conditions (public, private) were examined. First, relative to presenting no norms, presenting norms both with and without a self-focus reduced the underestimation of the percent of high school students who never drink heavily. Second, effects on both positive and negative evaluations of heavy drinking were examined independently. Heavy drinking students more strongly endorsed positive evaluations of heavy drinking than did non-heavy drinking students, but this self-serving bias was limited to the normative information only condition. Normative information failed to impact negative evaluations of heavy drinking for students at all drinking levels. Third, in judging the acceptable number of heavy drinking days approved by others, presenting the normative information in both contexts (relative to presenting no norms) led to more conservative judgments. Yet, only the normative context that added a self-focus to the norm led students to adopt more conservative personal standards for the acceptable number of heavy drinking days. Finally, public versus private measurement did not affect any of the dependent variables. The findings are discussed as they relate to confrontational versus empathic styles in delivering interventions.

Keyword

normative feedback self-focusing comparison self-serving biases confrontational versus empathic interventions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agostinelli, G., Brown, J. M., & Miller, W. R. (1995). Effects of normative feedback on consumption among heavy drinking college students. Journal of Drug Education, 25, 31–40.Google Scholar
  2. Agostinelli, G., Grube, J. W., & Morgan, M. (2003). Social distancing in adolescents’ perceptions of alcohol use and social disapproval: The moderating roles of culture and gender. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1–20.Google Scholar
  3. Agostinelli, G., & Miller, W. R. (1994). Drinking and thinking: How does personal drinking affect judgments of prevalence and risk? Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55, 327–337.Google Scholar
  4. Agostinelli, G., Sherman, S. J., Presson, C. C., & Chassin, L. (1992). Self-protection and self-enhancement biases in estimates of population prevalence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 631–642.Google Scholar
  5. Botvin, G. J., Baker, E., Dusenbury, L., Tortu, S., & Botvin, E. M. (1990). Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multimodal cognitive-behavioral approach: Results of a 3-year study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 437–446.Google Scholar
  6. Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56–71.Google Scholar
  7. Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401–423.Google Scholar
  8. Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3–25.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, J. D. (1986). Similarity and uniqueness: The effects of attribute type, relevance, and individual differences in self-esteem and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 281–294.Google Scholar
  10. Collins, S. E., Carey, K. B., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2002). Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 559–567.Google Scholar
  11. Donaldson, S. I., Graham, J. W., Piccinin, A. M., & Hansen, W. B. (1995). Resistance skills training and onset of alcohol use: Evidence for beneficial and potentially harmful effects in public schools and in private catholic schools. Health Psychology, 14, 291–300.Google Scholar
  12. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, G. A. (1988). Problems in the use and interpretation of product variables. In J. S. Long (Ed.), Common problems/proper solutions: Avoiding error in quantitative research (pp. 84–107). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Goethals, G. R. (1986). Fabricating and ignoring social reality: Self-serving estimates of consensus. In J. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario Symposium on Social Cognition: IV (pp. 135–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Graham, J. W., Marks, G., & Hansen, W. B. (1991). Social influence processes affecting adolescent substance use. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 291–298.Google Scholar
  17. Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603–618.Google Scholar
  18. Grube, J. W., Mayton, D. M., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1994). Inducing changes in values, attitudes, and behaviors: Belief system theory and the method of value self-confrontation. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 153–173.Google Scholar
  19. Gur, R. C., & Sackeim, H. A. (1979). Self-deception: A concept in search of a phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 147–169.Google Scholar
  20. Hansen, W. B. (1994). Prevention of alcohol use and abuse. Preventive Medicine, 23, 683–687.Google Scholar
  21. Hansen, W. B., & Graham, J. W. (1991). Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: Peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms. Preventive Medicine, 20, 414–430.Google Scholar
  22. Hansen, W. B., & O’Malley, P. M. (1996). Drug use. In R. J. DiClemente, W. B. Hansen, & L. E. Ponton (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent health risk behavior (pp. 161–192). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hibell, B., Andersson, B., Ahlström, S., Balakireva, O., Bjarnason, T., Kokkevi, A., & Morgan, M. (2000). The 1999 ESPAD Report: Alcohol and other drug use among students in 30 european countries. Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs (CAN), The Pomipdou Group at the Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  24. Kanfer, F. H. (1986). Implications of a self-regulation model of therapy for treatment of addictive behaviors. In W. R. Miller & N. Heather (Eds.), Treating addictive behaviors: Processes of change (pp. 29–47). New York and London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kanfer, F. H., & Gaelic, L. (1986). Self-management methods. In F. H. Kanfer & A. P. Goldstein (Eds.), Helping people change (pp. 283–345). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kanfer, F. H., & Grimm, L. G. (1980). Managing clinical change: A process model of therapy. Behavior Modification, 4, 419–444.Google Scholar
  27. Kaplan, K. J. (1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 361–372.Google Scholar
  28. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.Google Scholar
  29. Marks, G., Graham, J. W., & Hansen, W. B. (1992). Social projection and social conformity in adolescent alcohol use: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 96–101.Google Scholar
  30. Mardsen, P. V. (1981). Conditional effects in regression models. In P. V. Mardsen (Ed.), Linear models in social research (pp. 97–116). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Miller, W. R., Benefield, R. G., & Tonigan, J. S. (1993). Enhancing motivation for change in problem drinking: A controlled comparison of two therapist styles. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 455–461.Google Scholar
  32. Nye, E. C., Agostinelli, G., & Smith, J. E. (1999). Enhancing alcohol problem recognition: A self-regulation model for the effects of self-focusing and normative information. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 60, 685–693.Google Scholar
  33. Patterson, G. R., & Forgatch, M. S. (1985). Therapist behavior as a determinant for client noncompliance: A paradox for the behavior modifier. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 846–851.Google Scholar
  34. Petraitis, J., Flay, B. R., & Miller, T. Q. (1995). Reviewing theories of adolescent substance use: Organizing pieces in the puzzle. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 67–86.Google Scholar
  35. Rosenberg, M. J. (1969). The conditions and consequences of evaluation apprehension. In R. Rosenthal & R. L. Rosnow (Eds.), Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rohsenow, D. J. (1983). Drinking habits and expectancies about alcohol’s effects for self versus others. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 51, 752–756.Google Scholar
  37. Seal, D. W., & Agostinelli, G. (1996). College students’ perceptions of the prevalence of risky sexual behavior. AIDS Care, 8, 453–466.Google Scholar
  38. Suls, J., & Wan, C. K. (1987). In search of the false uniqueness phenomenon: Fear and estimates of social consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 211–217.Google Scholar
  39. Swann, W. B., Jr., & Read, S. J. (1981). Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-conceptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 351–370.Google Scholar
  40. Windle, M., Shope, J. T., & Bukstein, O. (1996). Alcohol use. In R. J. DiClemente, W. B. Hansen, & L. E. Ponton (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent health risk behavior (pp. 115–159). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Prevention Research CenterBerkeley
  2. 2.Prevention Research CenterBerkeley

Personalised recommendations