Results of an Independent Evaluation of Project ALERT Delivered in Schools by Cooperative Extension
- First Online:
- 364 Downloads
Reported are results of an independent effectiveness study of the Project ALERT drug prevention program implemented in eight Pennsylvania middle schools by outside program leaders employed by Cooperative Extension. In this randomized, 2-cohort longitudinal evaluation, 1,649 seventh-grade students completed a pretest and four waves of posttests over the 2-year program and 1-year follow-up. Project ALERT's effectiveness was tested through a 3-level hierarchical linear model. Analyses failed to yield any positive effects for substance use or mediators for use in the adult or teen-assisted delivery of the curriculum. An extensive set of additional analyses detected no differential program effects by student risk level, gender, school, or level of implementation quality. Potential explanations for outcomes relative to Project ALERT's original effectiveness trial are discussed, as well as implications for future research, including the need to conduct independent effectiveness studies of previously validated programs in a variety of contexts.
KEY WORDS:substance use prevention evaluation effectiveness study Project ALERT
- CYFAR (Children, Youth, & Families) Annual Report (2001) (Web Page). Retrieved from http://www.reeusda.gov/4h/cyfar/annual_report.htm.
- Ellickson, P. L., Miller, L., Robyn, A., Wildflower, L. A., & Zellman, G. L. (2000). Project ALERT. Los Angeles, CA: The BEST Foundation for a Drug-Free Tomorrow.Google Scholar
- Hallfors, D. (2004). Findings from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial of “Reconnecting Youth.” Paper presented at the 12th Annual Society for Prevention Research Meeting, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
- Hallfors, D., Pankratz, M., & Sporer, A. (2001). Drug free schools survey II: Report of results. Chapel Hill, NC: Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
- Harrington, N. G., Giles, S. M., Hoyle, R. H., Feeney, G. J., & Yungbluth, S. C. (2001). Evaluation of the All Stars character education and problem behavior prevention program: Effects on mediator and outcome variables for middle school students. Health Education and Behavior, 28(5), 533–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2003). Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2003: Volume I, Secondary school students (NIH Publication No. 04-5507). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
- Mayer, J. P., & Davidson, W. S., II. (2000). Dissemination of innovation as social change. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology. (pp. 421–438). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
- Miller, P. A. (1988). To our colleagues in the land-grant universities: A statement on the crisis of youth in America. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models, (2nd Edn). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Society for Prevention Research. (2004). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Falls Church, VA.Google Scholar
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2003). National Registry of Effective Programs. Retrieved July 26, 2004 from http://www.modelprograms.samhsa.gov/template.cfm?page = nrepbutton.
- U.S. Department of Education, Safe and Drug-Free School Program (1998). Notice of final principles of effectiveness. Federal Register, 63(104), 29901–29906.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Education (2001). Exemplary and promising safe, disciplined and drug free schools program 2001. Retrieved July 26, 2004 from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/safety/exemplary01/report_pg3.html.