Prevention Science

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 275–286 | Cite as

Parent Recruitment and Retention in a Universal Prevention Program for Child Behavior and Emotional Problems: Barriers to Research and Program Participation

  • Nina HeinrichsEmail author
  • Heike Bertram
  • Annett Kuschel
  • Kurt Hahlweg

Despite the potential of parent training as a prevention and behavioral family intervention strategy, there are a number of important issues related to implementation (e.g., recruitment and retention of families). This paper presents recruitment and retention data from families enrolling in a randomized controlled universal prevention trial for child behavior problems conducted in Germany. The recruitment rate averaged 31% (general project participation), with families of lower socioeconomic status (SES) participating at a lower rate. Project-declining families most often reported intrusion of privacy as their primary concern. In contrast, once parents were enrolled in the project, participation among those randomized to the parent training group averaged 77% (program/intervention participation); non-participation was mostly due to logistical issues. Parents accepting the offer of parent training were more likely to report child behavior problems than did declining parents. Although parents from more disadvantaged areas had a lower overall level of participation in the project once recruited, parents with children having higher levels of behavior problems indeed were more likely to participate in the intervention. Different recruitment methods may be required to engage high-risk families from socioeconomically disadvantaged areas to further improve community-level impact on child mental health.


implementation recruitment triple p child behavior problems 



This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; German Research Foundation), HA 1400/14-1. We are very grateful to Don Baucom and Lynlee Tanner for their comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.


  1. Achenbach, T. M., & Resorla, C. A. (2000). Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms and profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont.Google Scholar
  2. Barrera, M., Jr., Biglan, A., Taylor, T. K., Gunn, B. K., Smolkowski, K., Black, C., et al. (2002). Early elementary school intervention to reduce conduct problems: A randomized trial with hispanic and non-hispanic children. Prevention Science, 3, 83–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bäse, B. (1995). Die sozialräumliche Gliederung der Stadt Braunschweig. Methodik und Durchführung sozialgeographischer Analysen im städtischen Wohnumfeld auf Grundlage des Zensus von 1987 [The social-ecological structure of the city of Brunswick. Method and procedure of socio-geographical analyses in urban living areas based upon the census of 1987]. Dissertation, Technische Universität Braunschweig.Google Scholar
  4. Bronstein, P., Duncan, P., Clauson, J., Abrams, C. C., Yannett, N., Ginsburg, G., & Milne, M. (1998). Preventing middle school adjustment problems for children from lower income families: A program for aware parenting. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19, 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyle, M. H., & Lipman, E. L. (2002). Do places matter? Socioeconomic disadvantage and behavioral problems of children in Canada. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 378–389.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Charlebois, P., Vitaro, F., Normandeau, S., & Rondeau, N. (2001). Predictors of persistence in a longitudinal preventive intervention program for young disruptive boys. Prevention Science, 2, 133–143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1999a). Initial impact of the Fast Track prevention trial for conduct problems: I. The high-risk sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 631–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1999b). Initial impact of the fast track prevention trial for conduct problems: II. Classroom effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 648–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dumka, L. E., Garza, C. A., Roosa, M. W., & Stoerzinger, D.H. (1997). Recruitment and retention of high-risk families into a preventive parent training intervention. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Forehand, R., Miller, K., Dudra, R., & Chance, M. W. (1997). Role of parenting in adolescent deviant behavior: Replication across and within two ethnic group. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 1036–1041.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Furr-Holden, C. D. M., Ialongo, N. S., Anthony, J. C., Petras, H., & Kellam, S. G. (2004). Developmentally inspired drug prevention: Middle school outcomes in a school-based randomized prevention trial. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 73, 149–158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenberg, M. T., Domitrovich, C., & Bumbarger, B. (2001). The prevention of mental disorders in school-aged children: Current state of the field. Prevention & Treatment, 4, Article 1. Retrieved from Scholar
  14. Grossman, D. C., Neckerman, H. J., Koepsell, T. D., Liu, P., Asher, K. N., Beland, K., et al. (1997). Effectiveness of a violence prevention curriculum among children in elementary school. JAMA, 277, 1605–1611.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Guyll, M., Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (in press). The effects of incentives and research requirements on participation rates for a community-based preventive intervention research study. Journal of Primary Prevention. Google Scholar
  16. Ingoldsby, E. M., & Shaw, D. S. (2002). Neighborhood contextual factors and early-starting antisocial pathways. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 21–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Sydney: Paul H. Brooks.Google Scholar
  18. Hinshaw, S. P. (2003). Intervention research, theoretical mechanisms, and causal processes related to externalizing behavior patterns. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 789–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2001). Kaufman assessment battery for children (K-ABC). Deutschsprachige Fassung von P. Melchers & U. Preuß. 5., korr. und erg. Auflage. Leiden: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  20. Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhood they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 309–337.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., & Lynam, D. (2001). Male mental health problems, psychopathy, and personality traits: Key findings from the first 14 years of the Pittsburgh youth study. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 4, 273–297.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mason, W. A., Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J. D., Haggerty, K. P., & Spoth, R. L. (2003). Reducing adolescents'growth in substance use and delinquency: Randomized trial effects of a parent-training prevention intervention. Prevention Science, 4, 203–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McLoyd, V. C. (1998). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist, 53, 185–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Metropolitan Area Conduct Research Group. (2002). A cognitive-ecological approach to preventing aggression in urban settings: Initial outcomes for high-risk children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Offord, D. R., Boyle, M. H., Szatmari, P., et al. (1987). Ontario Child Health Study: Six month prevalence of disorder and rates of service utilization. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 832–836.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Offord, D. R., Kraemer, H. C., Kazdin, A. E., Jensen, P. S., & Harrington, R. (1998). Lowering the burden of suffering from child psychiatric disorder: Trade-offs among clinical targeted, and universal interventions. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 37, 686–694.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Olson, S., Bates, J., Sandy, J., & Schilling, E. (2002). Early developmental precursors of impulsive and inattentive behavior: From infancy to middle childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 435–447.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Prinz, R. J., Smith, E. P., Dumas, J. E., Laughlin, J. E., White, D. W., & Barron, R. (2001). Recruitment and retention of participants in prevention trials involving family-based interventions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20, 31–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Reid, J. B., Eddy, J. M., Fetrow, R. A., & Stoolmiller, M. (1999). Description and immediate impacts of a preventive intervention for conduct problems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 483–517.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rutter, M. L. (1999). Psychosocial adversity and child psychopathology. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 480–493.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rutter, M. L., Giller, H., & Hagell, A. (1998). Antisocial behavior by young people. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sanders, M. R. (1999). Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: Towards an empirically validated multilevel parenting and family support strategy for the prevention of behavior and emotional problems in children. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2, 71–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanders, M. R., Markie-Dadds, C., Tully, L. A., & Bor, W. (2000). The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: A comparison of enhanced, standard, and self-directed behavioural family intervention for parents of children with early onset conduct problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 624–640.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Snell-Johns, J., Mendez, J. L., & Smith, B. H. (2004). Evidence-based solutions for overcoming access barriers, decreasing attrition, and promoting change with underserved families. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 19–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (1993). Study of participation barriers in family-focused prevention: Research issues and preliminary results. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 13, 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (1994). Effective recruitment of parents into family-focused prevention research: A comparison of two strategies. Psychology and Health: An International Journal, 9, 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (1995). Parent motivation to enrolll in parenting skills programs: A model of family context and health belief predictors. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 294–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (2000). Research on family engagement in preventive interventions: Toward improved use of scientific findings in primary prevention practice. Journal of Primary Prevention, 21, 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Hockaday, C., & Shin, C. (1996). Barriers to participation in family skills preventive interventions and their evaluations: A replication and extension. Family Relations, 45, 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (2000). Modeling factors influencing enrolllment in family-focused preventive intervention research. Prevention Science, 1, 213–225.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Webster-Stratton, C. (1990). Long-term follow-up of families with young conduct problem children: From preschool to grade school. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 19, 144–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Webster-Stratton, C., & Taylor, T. (2001). Nipping early risk factors in the bud: Preventing substance abuse, delinquency, and violence in adolescence through interventions targeted at young children (0–8 years). Prevention Science, 2, 165–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Prevention Research 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nina Heinrichs
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Heike Bertram
    • 1
  • Annett Kuschel
    • 1
  • Kurt Hahlweg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and AssessmentTechnical University of BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and AssessmentTechnical University of BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations