Prevention Science

, 6:187 | Cite as

The Effects of the Going Places Program on Early Adolescent Substance Use and Antisocial Behavior

  • Bruce Simons-Morton
  • Denise Haynie
  • Keith Saylor
  • Aria Davis Crump
  • Rusan Chen
Research Article


This study evaluated the effects of a school-based intervention on growth trajectories of smoking, drinking, and antisocial behavior among early adolescents. Seven middle schools were randomized to intervention or comparison conditions and students in two successive cohorts (n = 1484) provided five waves of data from sixth to ninth grade. The Going Places Program, included classroom curricula, parent education, and school environment components. Latent growth curve analyses demonstrated significant treatment group effects, including reducing increases in friends who smoke, outcome expectations for smoking, and smoking progression, but had non-significant effects on drinking or antisocial behavior. The Going Places Program was effective in preventing increases in smoking progression, but its efficacy as a more cross-cutting problem behavior preventive intervention was not confirmed.


adolescents intervention problem behavior schools 


  1. Addington, L. A., Ruddy, S. A., Miller, A. K., DeVoe, J. F., & Chandler, K. A. (2002). Are America's schools safe? Students speak out: 1999 school crime supplement: statistical analysis report. National Center for Educational Statistics, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education, NCES Publication no. 2002–331.Google Scholar
  2. Aunola, K., Stattin, H., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2000). Adolescents' achievement strategies, school adjustment, and externalizing and internalizing problem behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescent, 29(3), 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, : Prentice-Hall NJGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Botvin, G. J. (2000). Preventing drug abuse in schools: Social and competence enhancement approaches targeting individual—Level etiologic factors. Addictive Behaviors, 25(6), 887–897.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Caplan, M., Weissberg, R. P., Grober, J. S., Sivo, P., Grady, K., & Jacoby, C. (1992). Social competence promotion with inner-city and suburban young adolescents: Effects on social adjustment and alcohol use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 56–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chassin, L., Presson C. C., Sherman, S. J., & Edwards, D. A. (1990). The natural history of cigarette smoking: predicting young-adult smoking outcomes from adolescent smoking patterns. Health Psychology, 9(6), 701–716.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. DuRant, R. H., Krowchuk, D. P., Kreiter, S., Sinal, S. H., & Woods, C. R. (1999). Weapon carrying among middle school students. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 153(1), 21–26.Google Scholar
  9. Gottfredson, G. D. (1986). An empirical test of school-based environmental and individual interventions to reduce the risk of delinquent behavior. Criminology, 24, 705–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gruber, E., DiClemente, R. J., Anderson, M. M., & Lodico, M. (1996). Early drinking onset and its association with alcohol use and problem behavior in late adolescence. Preventive Medicine, 25, 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansen, W. B. (1992). School-based substance abuse prevention: a review of the sate of the art in curriculum, 1980–1990. Health Education Research, 7(3), 403–430.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hansen, W. B., Graham, J. H., Wolkenstein, B. H., & Rohrbach, L. A. (1991). Program integrity as a moderator of Prevention progam effectiveness: Results for Fifth-grade students in the adolescent alcohol prevention trial. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 52(6), 568–579.Google Scholar
  13. Harrington, N. G., Giles, S. M., Hoyle, R. H., Feeney, G. J., & Yungbluth, S. C. (2001). Evaluation of the all stars character education and problem behavior prevention program: Effects on outcome variables for middle school students. Health Education and Behavior, 28(5), 533–546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haynie, D. L., Nansel, T., Eitel, P., Crump, A. D., Saylor, K., Yu, K., & Simons-Morton, B. G. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully—victims: Distinct groups of youth at risk. Journal of Early Adolescent, 21(1), 95–107.Google Scholar
  15. Huizinga, D., Loeber, R., Thornberry, T. P., & Cothern, L. (2000). Co-occurrence of delinquency and other problem behaviors. Juvenile Justice Bulletin, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, OJP, USDJ, November, 1–5.Google Scholar
  16. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, C. A., MacKinnon, D. P., & Pentz, M. A. (1996). Breadth of program and outcome effectiveness in drug abuse prevention. American Behavioral Scientist, 39(7), 884–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (2003). Monitoring the future study national survey results on drug use, 1975–2002. Vol. I: Secondary school students. NIH Pub. NO. 03-5375. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  19. Kumpfer, K. L., & Turner, C. W. (1991) The social ecology model of adolescent substance abuse: Implications for prevention. The International Journal of the Addictions, 25(4A), 435–563.Google Scholar
  20. Lockman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2002). The coping power program at the middle-school transition: Universal and indicated prevention effects. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16(Suppl. 4), S40–S54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., & Petechuk, (2003). Child delinquency: Early intervention and Prevention. Child Delinquency Bulletin Series, Office of Jevenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, USDJ, 1–18 (also available at Scholar
  22. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Morrison, G. M., Robertson, L., Laurie, B., & Kelly, J. (2002). Protective factors related to antisocial behavior trajectories. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 277–290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Muthen, B., & Curran, P. J. (1997). General longitudinal modeling of individual differences in experimental designs: A latent variable framework for analysis and power estimation. Psychological Methods, 2, 371–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2001). Mplus user's guide. Muthen & Muthen: Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  26. Muthen, B. (2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1–33). Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Muthen, B., Brown, C. H., Masyn, K., Jo, B., Khoo, S. T., Yang, C. C., Wang, C. P., Kellam, S., Carlin, J., & Liao, J. (2002). General growth mixture modeling for randomized preventive interventions. Biostatistics, 3, 459–475.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among U.S. youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA, 285(16), 2094–2100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nation, M., Crusto, C., Wandersman, A., Kumpfer, K. L., Seybolt, D., Morrissey-Kane, E., & Davino, K. (2003). What works in prevention: Principles of Effective Prevention Programs. American Psychologist, 58(6/7), 449–456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Paetsch, J. J., & Bertrand, L. D. (1997). The relationship between peer, social, and school factors, and delinquency among youth. Journal of School Health, 67(1), 27–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
  32. Perry, C. L, Klepp, K. I., Halper, A., Hawkins, K. G., & Murray, D. M. (1986). A process evaluation study of peer leaders in health education. Journal of School Health, 56, 62–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raudenbush, W. R., & Byrk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Schinke S. P., Botvin G. J., & Orlandi, M. A. (1991). Substance abuse in children and adolescents: Evaluation and intervention. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Simons-Morton, B. G. (in press). Prospective association of peer influence, school engagement, alcohol expectancies, and parent expectations with drinking initiation among sixth graders. Addictive Behaviors.Google Scholar
  36. Simons-Morton, B. G. (2002). Prospective Analysis of Peer and Parent Influences on Smoking Initiation Among Early Adolescents. Prevention Science, 3(4), 275–283.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Simons-Morton, B. G., & Crump, A. D. (2003). The association of parental involvement and social competence with school adjustment and engagement among sixth graders. Journal of School Health, 73(3), 121–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Simons-Morton, B. G., Crump, A. D., Haynie, D., Eitel, P., Saylor, K., & Yu, K. (1999). Psychosocial, school, and parent factors associated with smoking among early adolescent boys and girls. Preventive Medicine, 28, 138–148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Simons-Morton, B. G., Hartos, J., & Haynie, D. L. (2004). Factors Related to Minor Aggression Among Sixth Graders. Health Education and Behavior, 31(1), 22–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Simons-Morton, B. G., & Haynie, D. (2002). Growing up drug free: A developmental challenge. In M. H. Bornstein, L. Davidson, C. L. M. Keyes, K. A. Moore, & The Center for Child Well-being. Well-being: Positive development across the life course, (pp. 109–122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. Simons-Morton, B. G., & Haynie, D. L. (2003). Proportional odds analysis of psychosocial predictors of increased smoking during sixth grade. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27(6), 592–602.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Simons-Morton, B. G., Haynie, D., Crump, A. D., Eitel, P., & Saylor, K. (2001). Peer and parent influences on smoking and drinking among early adolescents. Health Education and Behavior, 28(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Simons-Morton, B. G., Haynie, D., Crump, A. D., Eitel, P., Saylor, K., & Yu, K. (1999). Expectancies and other psychosocial factors associated with alcohol use among early adolescent boys and girls. Addictive Behaviors, 24(2), 229–238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Snyder, H. N., & Sickmond, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 National Report. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, National Center for Juvenile Justice (also available at
  45. Tobler, N.S. (1986). Meta-analysis of 143 adolescent drug prevention programs: Quantitative outcome results of program participants compared to a control or comparison group. The Journal of Drug Issues, 16(4),537-567.Google Scholar
  46. Tobler, N. S., & Statton, H. H. (1997). Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: A meta-analysis of the research. Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 71–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vazsonyi, A. T., & Flannery, D. J. (1997). Early adolescent delinquent behaviors: Associations with family and school domains. Journal of Early Adolescence, 17(3), 271–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weisberg, R. P., Kumpfer, K. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2003). Prevention That Works for Children and Youth: An Introduction. American Psychologist, 58 (6/7), 425–432.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Wenter, D. L., Ennett S. T., & Ribisl K. M. (2002). Comprehensiveness of substance use prevention programs in U.S. middle schools. Journal of Adolescent Heatlh, 30(6), 455–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce Simons-Morton
    • 1
    • 5
  • Denise Haynie
    • 1
  • Keith Saylor
    • 2
  • Aria Davis Crump
    • 3
  • Rusan Chen
    • 4
  1. 1.Prevention Research Branch DESPR, NICHD, NIHRockvilleUnited States
  2. 2.NeuroScience, IncBethesdaUnited States
  3. 3.Prevention Research Branch National Institute of Drug Abuse, NIHRockvilleUnited States
  4. 4.Georgetown UniversityWashington, District of ColumbiaUnited States
  5. 5.Prevention Research Branch DESPR, NICHD, NIHRockvilleUnited States

Personalised recommendations