Advertisement

Comparison of two noninvasive methods for measuring the pigment content in foliose macrolichens

  • Shuai Liu
  • Su LiEmail author
  • Xiao-Yang Fan
  • Guo-Di Yuan
  • Tao Hu
  • Xian-Meng Shi
  • Jun-Biao Huang
  • Xiao-Yan Pu
  • Chuan-Sheng Wu
Technical Communication
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Chlorophyll content in lichens is routinely used as an accurate indicator of lichen vigor, interspecific differences, and the effect of site-related environmental parameters. Traditional methods of chlorophyll extraction are destructive, time-consuming, expensive, and inoperable, especially when measuring large quantities of chlorophyll. However, non-destructive methods of measurement using portable chlorophyll meters are rarely used for lichens. Considering the characteristics of lichens such as rough blade surface and absence of chlorophyll b in cyanolichens, we compared the non-destructive methods with traditional methods and evaluated their applicability in studying lichen pigment content. Two instruments, SPAD-502 and CCM-300, were used to measure the pigment content of seven foliose lichen species. These pigment readings were compared with those determined using the dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) extraction method. Significant correlations were observed between SPAD/CCM values and pigments (chlorophyll and total carotenoids) extracted from chlorolichens, especially species with a smooth surface. The CCM-300 was more accurate in detecting the pigment content of foliose chlorolichens. However, both instruments showed certain limitations in the determination of pigment content in cyanolichens, especially gelatinous species. For example, CCM-300 often failed to give specific values for some cyanolichen samples, and both instruments showed low measurement accuracy for cyanolichens. Based on the high correlation observed between chlorophyll meter readings and pigments extracted from chlorolichens, equations obtained in this study enabled accurate prediction of pigment content in these lichens.

Keywords

CCM-300 Carotenoids Chlorophyll Dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) Foliose macrolichens SPAD-502 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31770494, 31400384 and 31600390), Yunnan Natural Science Foundation (2016FB056), Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) (2017441), CAS ‘Light of West China’ Program and CAS 135 program (2017XTBG-T01 and 2017XTBG-F01). We thank Messrs. Fu-Ming Ke and Shi-Shun Li for their assistance with the field experiment. We thank the Biogeochemistry Laboratory of the Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Ailao Mountains National Nature Reserve and Ailaoshan Station for Subtropical Forest Ecosystem Studies for granting us permissions and facilitating this research work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Azia F, Stewart K (2001) Relationships between extractable chlorophyll and SPAD values in muskmelon leaves. J Plant Nutr 24:961–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes JD, Balaguer L, Manrique E, Elvira S, Davison AW (1992) A reappraisal of the use of DMSO for the extraction and determination of chlorophylls a, and b, in lichens and higher plants. Environ Exp Bot 32:85–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barták M, Hájek J, Gloser J (2000) Heterogeneity of chlorophyll fluorescence over thalli of several foliose macrolichens exposed to adverse environmental factors: interspecific differences as related to thallus hydration and high irradiance. Photosynthetica 38:531–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beltman IH, Kok LJD, Kuiper PJC, Hasselt PRV (1980) Fatty acid composition and chlorophyll content of epiphytic lichens and a possible relation to their sensitivity to air pollution. Oikos 35:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg AKVD, Perkins TD (2004) Evaluation of a portable chlorophyll meter to estimate chlorophyll and nitrogen contents in sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) leaves. For Ecol Manag 200:113–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruinsma J (1961) A comment on the spectrophotometric determination of chlorophyll. Biochim Biophys Acta 52:576–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunialti G, Frati L (2007) Biomonitoring of nine elements by the lichen Xanthoria parietina in Adriatic Italy: a retrospective study over a 7-year time span. Sci Total Environ 387:289–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bullock DG, Anderson DS (1998) Evaluation of the Minolta SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter for nitrogen management in corn. J Plant Nutr 21:741–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell RJ, Mobley KN, Marini RP, Pfeiffer DG (1990) Growing conditions alter the relationship between SPAD-501 values and apple leaf chlorophyll. HortScience 63:330–331Google Scholar
  10. Cartelat A, Cerovic ZG, Goulas Y, Meyer S, Lelarge C, Prioul JL, Barbottin A, Jeuffroy MH, Gate P, Agati G, Moya I (2005) Optically assessed contents of leaf polyphenolics and chlorophyll as indicators of nitrogen deficiency in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Field Crop Res 91:35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cerovic ZG, Masdoumier G, Ghozlen NB, Latouche G (2012) A new optical leaf-clip meter for simultaneous non-destructive assessment of leaf chlorophyll and epidermal flavonoids. Physiol Plant 146:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapman SC, Barreto HJ (1997) Using a chlorophyll meter to estimate specific leaf nitrogen of tropical maize during vegetative growth. Agron J 89:557–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chettri MK, Cook CM, Vardaka E, Sawidis T, Lanaras T (1998) The effect of Cu, Zn and Pb on the chlorophyll content of the lichens Cladonia convoluta and Cladonia rangiformis. Environ Exp Bot 39:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coste S, Baraloto C, Leroy C, Marcon É, Renaud A, Richardson AD, Roggy JC, Schimann H, Uddling J, Hérault B (2010) Assessing foliar chlorophyll contents with the SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter: a calibration test with thirteen tree species of tropical rainforest in French Guiana. Ann For Sci 67:607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dwyer LM, Tollenaar M, Houwing L (1991) A nondestructive method to monitor leaf greenness in corn. Can J Plant Sci 71:505–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dwyer LM, Anderson AM, Ma BL, Stewart DW, Tollenaar M, Gregorich E (1995) Quantifying the nonlinearity in chlorophyll meter response to corn leaf nitrogen concentration. Can J Plant Sci 75:179–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eisenberg D, Crothers D (1979) Physical chemistry with applications to the life sciences. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  18. Esposti MDD, de Sequeira DL, Pereira PRG, Venegas VHA, Salomao LCC, Filho JAM (2003) Assessment of nitrogenized nutrition of Citrus rootstocks using chlorophyll concentrations in the leaf. J Plant Nutr 26:1287–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gauslaa Y (1984) Heat resistance and energy budget in different Scandinavian plants. Holarct Ecol 7:1–78Google Scholar
  20. Gauslaa Y, Coxson DS (2011) Interspecific and intraspecific variations in water storage in epiphytic old forest foliose lichens. Botany 89:787–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gauslaa Y, Solhaug KA (2000) High-light-intensity damage to the foliose lichen Lobaria pulmonaria within a natural forest: the applicability of chlorophyll fluorescence methods. Lichenologist 32:271–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gauslaa Y, Solhaug KA (2001) Fungal melanins as a sun screen for symbiotic green algae in the lichen Lobaria pulmonaria. Oecologia 126:462–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gitelson AA, Gritz Y, Merzlyak MN (2003) Relationships between leaf chlorophyll content and spectral reflectance and algorithms for non-destructive chlorophyll assessment in higher plant leaves. J Plant Physiol 160:271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gonçalves JFDC, Silva EAD (2008) Evaluation of a portable chlorophyll meter to estimate chlorophyll concentrations in leaves of tropical wood species from Amazonian forest. Hoehnea 35:185–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gonzalez CM, Pignata ML (1994) The influence of air pollution on soluble proteins, chlorophyll degradation, MDA, sulphur and heavy metals in a transplanted lichen. Chem Ecol 9:105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gratani L (1992) A non-destructive method to determine chlorophyll content of leaves. Photosynthetica 26:469–473Google Scholar
  27. Hauck M (2010) Ammonium and nitrate tolerance in lichens. Environ Pollut 158:1127–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hawkins TS, Gardiner ES, Comer GS (2009) Modeling the relationship between extractable chlorophyll and SPAD-502 readings for endangered plant species research. J Nat Conserv 17:72–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hiscox JD, Israelstam GF (1979) A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Can J Bot 57:1332–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Honegger R (1993) Tansley Review No. 60. Developmental biology of lichens. New Phytol 125:659–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Honegger R, Peter M, Scherrer S (1996) Drought induced structural alterations at the mycobiont-photobiont interface in a range of foliose macrolichens. Protoplasma 190:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hu T, Li S, Liu S, Liu WY, Chen X, Song L, Chen Q (2016) Water relations and photosynthetic characteristics in different functional groups of epiphytic lichens in montane forest of Ailaoshan. Chin J Plan Ecolo 40:810–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Inskeep WP, Bloom PR (1985) Extinction coefficients of chlorophyll a and b in N, N-dimethylformamide and 80% acetone. Plant Physiol 77:483–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jifon JL, Syvertsen JP, Whaley E (2005) Growth environment and leaf anatomy affect nondestructive estimates of chlorophyll and nitrogen in Citrus sp. leaves. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 130:152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lang SI, Cornelissen JHC, Hölzer A, Braak CJFT, Ahrens M, Callaghan TV, Aerts R (2009) Determinants of cryptogam composition and diversity in Sphagnum-dominated peatlands: the importance of temporal, spatial and functional scales. J Ecol 97:299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Legaz ME, Vicente C, Ascaso C, Pereira EC, Filho LX (1986) Pigment analysis of sun and shade populations of Cladonia verticillaris. Biochem Syst Ecol 14:575–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li S, Liu WY, Li DW (2013) Epiphytic lichens in subtropical forest ecosystems in southwest China: species diversity and implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 159:88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR (1983) Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans 11:591–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ling Q, Huang W, Jarvis P (2011) Use of a SPAD-502 meter to measure leaf chlorophyll concentration in Arabidopsis thaliana. Photosynth Res 107:209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marenco RA, Antezana-Vera SA, Nascimento HCS (2009) Relationship between specific leaf area, leaf thickness, leaf water content and SPAD-502 readings in six Amazonian tree species. Photosynthetica 47:184–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Markwell J, Osterman JC, Mitchell JL (1995) Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter. Photosynth Res 67:647–655Google Scholar
  42. Marquard RD, Tipton JL (1987) Relationship between extractable chlorophyll and an in situ method to estimate leaf greenness. HortScience 22:1327Google Scholar
  43. McEvoy M, Solhaug KA, Gauslaa Y (2007) Solar radiation screening in usnic acid-containing cortices of the lichen Nephroma arcticum. Symbiosis 43:143–150Google Scholar
  44. Moran R, Porath D (1980) Chlorophyll determination in intact tissues using N, N-dimethylformamide. Plant Physiol 65:478–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nadkarni NM, Solano R (2002) Potential effects of climate change on canopy communities in a tropical cloud forest: an experimental approach. Oecologia 13:580–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Netto AT, Campostrini E, Oliveira JGD, Bressan-Smith RE (2005) Photosynthetic pigments, nitrogen, chlorophyll a, fluorescence and SPAD-502 readings in coffee leaves. Sci Hortic 104:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Palmqvist K (2000) Carbon economy in lichens. New Phytol 148:11–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parry C, Blonquist JM, Bugbee B (2014) In situ measurement of leaf chlorophyll concentration: analysis of the optical/absolute relationship. Plant Cell Environ 37:2508–2520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peng S, García FV, Laza RC, Cassman KG (1993) Adjustment for specific leaf weight improves chlorophyll meter’s estimate of rice leaf nitrogen concentration. Agron J 85:987–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Phillips HC (1969) Annual growth rates of three species of foliose lichens determined photographically. Bull Torrey Bot Club 96:202–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Purvis OW, Dubbin W, Chimonides PD, Jones GC, Read H (2008) The multi-element content of the lichen Parmelia sulcata, soil, and oak bark in relation to acidification and climate. Sci Total Environ 390:558–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Qiu XZ, Xie SC (1998) Studies on the forest ecosystem in the Ailao Mountains, Yunnan. Yunnan Sciences and Technology Press, Kunming (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  53. Renhorn KE, Esseen PA, Palmqvist K, Sundberg B (1997) Growth and vitality of epiphytic lichens I. Responses to microclimate along a forest edge-interior gradient. Oecologia 109:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Richardson AD, Duigan SP, Berlyn GP (2002) An evaluation of noninvasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content. New Phytol 153:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schaper H, Chacko EK (1991) Relation between extractable chlorophyll and portable chlorophyll meter readings in leaves of eight tropical and subtropical fruit-tree species. J Plant Physiol 138:674–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shoaf WT, Lium BW (1976) Improved extraction of chlorophyll a and b from algae using dimethylsulfoxide. Limnol Oceanogr 21:926–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Showman RE (1975) Lichens as indicators of air quality around a coal-fired power generating plant. Bryologist 78:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sibley JL, Eakes DJ, Gilliam CH, Keever GJ, Dozier WAJ, Himelrick DG (1996) Foliar SPAD-502 meter values, nitrogen levels, and extractable chlorophyll for red maple selections. HortScience 31:468–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Simorte V, Bertoni G, Dupraz C, Masson P (2001) Assessment of nitrogen nutrition of walnut trees using foliar analysis and chlorophyll measurements. J Plant Nutr 24:1645–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Solhaug KA, Larsson P, Gauslaa Y (2010) Light screening in lichen cortices can be quantified by chlorophyll fluorescence techniques for both reflecting and absorbing pigments. Planta 231:1003–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tretiach M, Brown DH (1995) Morphological and physiological differences between epilithic and epiphytic populations of the lichen Parmelia pastillifera. Ann Bot 75:627–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Uddling J, Gelang-Alfredsson J, Piikki K, Pleijel H (2007) Evaluating the relationship between leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter readings. Photosynth Res 91:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang QB, Chen MJ, Li YC (2004) Nondestructive and rapid estimation of leaf chlorophyll and nitrogen status of peace lily using a chlorophyll meter. J Plant Nutr 27:557–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wellburn AR (1994) The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. J Plant Physiol 144:307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Xu W, Rosenow DT, Nguyen HT (2000) Stay green trait in grain sorghum: relationship between visual rating and leaf chlorophyll concentration. Plant Breed 119:365–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesKunmingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Ailaoshan Station for Subtropical Forest Ecosystem StudiesJingdongPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Embryo Development and Reproductive Regulation, Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Environmental Hormone and ReproductionFuyang Normal UniversityFuyangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations