Advertisement

Photosynthesis Research

, Volume 138, Issue 2, pp 177–189 | Cite as

Blue light reduces photosynthetic efficiency of cyanobacteria through an imbalance between photosystems I and II

  • Veerle M. Luimstra
  • J. Merijn Schuurmans
  • Antonie M. Verschoor
  • Klaas J. Hellingwerf
  • Jef HuismanEmail author
  • Hans C. P. Matthijs
Open Access
Original Article

Abstract

Several studies have described that cyanobacteria use blue light less efficiently for photosynthesis than most eukaryotic phototrophs, but comprehensive studies of this phenomenon are lacking. Here, we study the effect of blue (450 nm), orange (625 nm), and red (660 nm) light on growth of the model cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, the green alga Chlorella sorokiniana and other cyanobacteria containing phycocyanin or phycoerythrin. Our results demonstrate that specific growth rates of the cyanobacteria were similar in orange and red light, but much lower in blue light. Conversely, specific growth rates of the green alga C. sorokiniana were similar in blue and red light, but lower in orange light. Oxygen production rates of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 were five-fold lower in blue than in orange and red light at low light intensities but approached the same saturation level in all three colors at high light intensities. Measurements of 77 K fluorescence emission demonstrated a lower ratio of photosystem I to photosystem II (PSI:PSII ratio) and relatively more phycobilisomes associated with PSII (state 1) in blue light than in orange and red light. These results support the hypothesis that blue light, which is not absorbed by phycobilisomes, creates an imbalance between the two photosystems of cyanobacteria with an energy excess at PSI and a deficiency at the PSII-side of the photosynthetic electron transfer chain. Our results help to explain why phycobilisome-containing cyanobacteria use blue light less efficiently than species with chlorophyll-based light-harvesting antennae such as Prochlorococcus, green algae and terrestrial plants.

Keywords

Blue light Cyanobacteria Photosynthesis Photosystems Phycobilisomes Synechocystis PCC 6803 

Introduction

Almost 140 years ago, professor Theodor Engelmann showed that light color plays an important role in photosynthesis (Engelmann 1882). In his classic experiment, Engelmann placed a filamentous green alga from the genus Cladophora on a microscopic slide, which he illuminated through a prism glass, thus dividing sunlight into separate wavelengths across the filament. By introducing aerotactic bacteria and observing in which regions of visible light these bacteria aggregated, he established that photosynthetic oxygen (O2) production occurred in red and blue light, thereby creating the first “living” action spectrum of chlorophyll.

In the following years, Engelmann continued his studies with cyanobacteria from the genus Oscillatoria, demonstrating that in these cyanobacteria, not only red and blue light but also orange light resulted in high O2 production rates (Engelmann 1883, 1884). Engelmann’s findings were criticized for many years, but 60 years later, his results were confirmed by Emerson and Lewis, who showed that the phycobiliproteins of cyanobacteria and red algae play a key role in light-harvesting for photosynthesis (Emerson and Lewis 1942). We now know that these phycobiliproteins make up specialized light-harvesting antennae, called phycobilisomes (PBSs), consisting of an allophycocyanin core and stacked rods of phycocyanin often in combination with phycoerythrin. These phycobiliproteins consist of an apo-protein and one or more chromophores, also known as bilins, including phycocyanobilin absorbing orange light (620 nm), phycoerythrobilin absorbing green light (545 nm), and phycourobilin absorbing blue-green light (495 nm) (Grossman et al. 1993; Tandeau de Marsac 2003; Six et al. 2007). Recent reviews on the structure and function of PBSs are provided by Tamary et al. (2012), Watanabe and Ikeuchi (2013), and Stadnichuk and Tropin (2017).

Light energy absorbed by PBSs is effectively transferred via allophycocyanin to the chlorophyll a (Chl a) pigments in the photosystems (Arnold and Oppenheimer 1950; Duysens 1951; Lemasson et al. 1973). It has long been assumed that most PBSs transfer their energy to photosystem II (PSII). It is now well established, however, that cyanobacteria are able to re-balance excitation energy by moving PBSs between photosystem I (PSI) and PSII in a process called state transitions (van Thor et al. 1998; Mullineaux 2008). As a consequence of these state transitions, which occur at time scales of seconds to minutes, the PBSs associate with PSII (state 1) or PSI (state 2) and transfer the absorbed light energy to the reaction center of the photosystem they are associated with (Kirilovsky 2015). At longer time scales, cyanobacteria can also adjust their PSI:PSII ratio to optimize their photosynthetic activity under different environmental conditions (Fujita 1997). In cyanobacteria, the PSI:PSII ratio generally ranges between 5:1 and 2:1 depending on light quality and intensity, which is higher than the approximately 1:1 ratio often found in eukaryotic phototrophs (Shen et al. 1993; Murakami et al. 1997; Singh et al. 2009; Allahverdiyeva et al. 2014; Kirilovsky 2015).

Since blue and red light are both strongly absorbed by Chl a, and the intermediate wavelengths by the different phycobiliproteins, one would expect that these light colors are all used for photochemistry at approximately equal efficiency. However, several studies have described that blue light yields lower O2 production rates than red light in cyanobacteria (Lemasson et al. 1973; Pulich and van Baalen 1974; Jørgensen et al. 1987; Tyystjärvi et al. 2002), in cyanolichens (Solhaug et al. 2014), and also in PBS-containing red algae (Ley and Butler 1980; Figueroa et al. 1995). Furthermore, other studies noted that blue light resulted in lower growth rates in a variety of cyanobacteria (Wyman and Fay 1986), including Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (Wilde et al. 1997; Singh et al. 2009; Bland and Angenent 2016), Synechococcus sp. (Choi et al. 2013), and Spirulina platensis (Wang et al. 2007; Chen et al. 2010).

A possible explanation for their poor performance in blue light might be that most chlorophyll of cyanobacteria is located in PSI (Myers et al. 1980; Fujita 1997; Solhaug et al. 2014; Kirilovsky 2015), and hence, blue light induces high PSI but low PSII activity. This phenomenon is also known from fluorescence studies, where the use of blue measuring light complicates interpretation of the fluorescence signal of cyanobacteria (Campbell et al. 1998; Ogawa et al. 2017). However, although several of the above-cited studies measured growth rates and/or pigment composition in different light colors, they did not report on, e.g., O2 production, PSI:PSII ratios, or state transitions. Conversely, other studies measured O2 production rates or PSI:PSII ratios but did not measure growth rates or other relevant parameters. To our knowledge, more comprehensive studies of the photophysiological response of cyanobacteria to blue light are largely lacking, and no clear consensus has yet been reached on the question why their photosynthetic activity might be hampered by blue light.

In this study, we compare the effect of blue light with that of orange and red light on the model cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. This cyanobacterium uses Chl a in its photosystems and phycocyanin but not phycoerythrin in its phycobilisomes, and hence effectively absorbs blue, orange, and red light. We investigate its photosynthetic performance, the composition of its photosynthetic machinery, and its growth rate at different light intensities for all three colors, and compare these results with growth of the green alga Chlorella sorokiniana and of other cyanobacteria containing phycocyanin and phycoerythrin. The experiments will make use of blue, orange, and red LED light with narrow-band wavelengths, which allows more precise investigation of the photosynthetic response to different light colors than the broad-band light filters used in the older literature. Our results demonstrate that blue light has a major impact on the photophysiology of cyanobacteria.

Materials and methods

Strains and culture conditions

The freshwater cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 and green alga Chlorella sorokiniana 211-8K were pre-grown in light-limited continuous cultures (1.8 L) as described by Huisman et al. (2002). The continuous cultures were provided with BG-11 medium supplemented with 5 mM Na2CO3 and maintained at 30 °C at a dilution rate of D = 0.015 h−1 (0.36 day−1). Steady-state culture densities were 7.8 × 107 cells mL−1 for Synechocystis and 2.4 × 107 cells mL−1 for C. sorokiniana. The cultures were mixed by bubbling with CO2-enriched air (2% v/v) flowing at a rate of 30 L h−1. Lighting was provided by white fluorescent tubes (Philips Master TL-D 90 De Luxe 18 W/965, Philips Lighting B.V., Eindhoven, The Netherlands) at an incident light intensity of 35 µmol photons m−2 s−1. Light intensities (PAR) were measured with an LI-250 light meter (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). The CO2 concentration of the gas mixture was regularly monitored using an Environmental Gas Monitor for CO2 (EGM-4; PP Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA).

The marine cyanobacteria Synechococcus sp. strain CCY 9201 (formerly known as BS4) and Synechococcus sp. strain CCY 9202 (formerly known as BS5) were pre-grown in Erlenmeyer flasks at 21 °C with incident white light of 15 µmol photons m−2 s−1. Both Synechococcus strains were grown in brackish medium as described by Stomp et al. (2004).

For batch experiments using Synechocystis and C. sorokiniana, samples from each starter culture were diluted in fresh BG-11 medium supplemented with 20 mM NaHCO3. For batch experiments using Synechococcus sp. CCY 9201 and CCY 9202, samples from each pre-culture were diluted in fresh brackish medium. Each culture was diluted to an OD750 of 0.04 to allow light acclimation already in early cell generations, before density increases could be detected.

Batch experiments using an incubation shaker

To allow semi-high throughput screening of growth rates, an incubation shaker (Multitron Pro, Infors-HT, Velp, The Netherlands) was adapted at the University of Amsterdam Technology Centre for use with LED lighting (Fig. 1). The incubator was divided into three color zones separated by black curtains, with LED lamps (custom made by Philips Lighting B.V., Eindhoven, The Netherlands) positioned above each zone (Fig. 1a, b). The three color zones were illuminated by blue (450 nm), orange (625 nm), or red (660 nm) LED light, each with a full width at half maximum of ~ 20 nm. Emission spectra of the three LED light sources are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 1

Experimental setup for the batch-culture experiments. a Schematic overview of the incubation shaker adapted for controlled experiments with phototrophic microorganisms. LED lights are placed above the incubator, which is partitioned into three color zones each containing a glass vessel mounted on a platform. b The incubation shaker in use with orange, blue, and red LED light. c Each glass vessel contains two six-well plates with a lid on which neutral density (ND) filters are attached to create different light intensities. Here, we show an example of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 batch cultures in blue light using 1.2, 0.6, 0.3, and 0.15 ND filters resulting in light intensities of 6, 22, 44, and 70 µmol photons m−2 s−1, respectively; each light intensity is applied in triplicate. d Photodiodes below each well provide automated recording of the light attenuation by each batch culture, from which high-resolution growth curves were calculated (Fig. S2). The growth curves shown here were calculated from the batch cultures in 70 µmol photons m−2 s−1 of red, orange, and blue light. Each growth curve is the average of three biological replicates

Fig. 2

Light absorption spectra of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (black line) and the green alga C. sorokiniana 211-8K (grey line) acclimated to 35 µmol photons m−2 s−1 white light. Light absorption peaks of Chl a, Chl b, and phycocyanin (PC) are indicated. Light absorption is normalized to minimum absorbance at 750 nm and maximum absorbance. Dashed lines show emission spectra of the blue (450 nm), orange (625 nm), and red (660 nm) LED light sources used in the experiments, each with a full width at half maximum of ~ 20 nm

Each color zone contained a glass vessel mounted on a rotating platform. Each glass vessel contained two six-well plates (Corning Costar, Sigma) for batch experiments, with lids on which neutral density (ND) filters (Controllux Lichttechniek BV, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) were attached to create different light intensities. The six-well plates were sterilized prior to the experiments using 70% ethanol and air-dried in a laminar flow hood. We applied four light intensities (6, 22, 44, 70 µmol photons m−2 s−1) per color zone using 1.2, 0.6, 0.3, and 0.15 ND filters, respectively (Fig. 1c). Each light intensity was applied in triplicate. In addition, each glass vessel held a twelve-well plate, without lid, containing sterilized milli-Q water to maintain a high humidity within the vessel. CO2-enriched air (2000 ppm) was provided to the incubation shaker through a sterile 0.20 µm Midisart 2000 filter (Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) to minimize the risk of infection. Temperature in the incubation shaker was maintained at 30 °C and rotation speed of the platform was 100 RPM.

Silicon photodiodes (OSI Optoelectronics, Hawthorne, CA, USA) fixed under each well measured light transmission at hourly intervals, thereby providing automated monitoring of the culture density in the wells. For each photodiode measurement, the applied treatment light was switched off while LED measurement light of 660 nm was switched on at the highest intensity of 185 ± 10 µmol photons m−2 s−1 for 2–4 s to allow a standardized comparison of the culture density between wells exposed to different treatments.

At the start of the experiments, samples taken from the pre-cultures were diluted in fresh mineral medium to an OD750 of 0.04. Subsequently, 5 mL culture of OD750 = 0.04 was transferred to each well in the six-well plates to initiate the batch experiments.

Growth curves

Photodiodes converted the light intensity transmitted through the wells into a voltage signal. To calculate the specific growth rate, first the minimum recording was subtracted to remove the background signal of the photodiodes. The remaining signal can be interpreted as the light intensity I(t) measured at time t, transmitted through a well containing a cell density X(t) at time t. According to Lambert–Beer’s law, this light intensity can be written as,
$$I(t)={I_{\hbox{max} }}\exp \left( { - kX\left( t \right)z} \right),$$
where Imax is the light intensity transmitted through the well when filled with mineral medium without cells, k is the specific light attenuation coefficient of the cells, and z is path length. Photodiode reads were normalized by dividing the signal I(t) by Imax, and then ln-transformed and multiplied by − 1. This gives,
$$\ln \left( {{I_{\hbox{max} }}/I\left( t \right)} \right)=kX(t)z.$$
Hence, in case of exponential cell growth, we obtain the following:
$$\ln \left( {{I_{\hbox{max} }}/I\left( t \right)} \right)=kz{X_0}{e^{\mu t}},$$
where X0 is the cell density at time 0 and µ is the specific growth rate. Accordingly, the transformed signal ln(Imax/I(t)) was fitted to an exponential trend line, and the specific growth rate, µ, was estimated from the coefficient in the exponent. More specifically, we established the exponential growth phase by plotting the transformed signal ln(Imax/I(t)) on a logarithmic scale and used the data in the exponential growth phase to calculate the specific growth rate. Some illustrations of these calculations for batch experiments at 70 µmol photons m−2 s−1 of blue and red light are provided in Supplemental Fig. S2.

Sampling procedures

To assess differences in photophysiology of Synechocystis cells exposed to blue, orange, and red light, samples were taken in the exponential growth phase. Each experiment was run two times, using three wells per treatment to obtain triplicate measurements. The first run was used to calculate the specific growth rate and determine the timing of the exponential growth phase based on visual inspection of the transformed signal ln(Imax/I(t)) plotted on a logarithmic scale. The next run was used to sample the wells during the exponential growth phase.

Samples were taken by opening the culture vessel within the incubator. First, 500 µL was transferred from each well to a fluorescence cuvette prefilled with 2.5 mL 30% glycerol. After mixing by pipetting up and down three times the cuvettes were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. This procedure was performed within 20 s to minimize disturbance, ensuring 77 K fluorescence measurements reflected the actual cell status at the moment of sampling. The cuvettes were kept submerged in liquid nitrogen until 77 K fluorescence analysis. Thereafter, an additional 1 mL sample was taken from each well and transferred to a separate cuvette for measurements of absorbance and cell counts.

Oxygen production rates

O2 production by Synechocystis cells was measured with samples taken directly from the steady-state continuous culture acclimated to white light. Fresh samples were taken every 30 min and cell densities were determined after each measurement. Chl a content was measured spectrophotometrically after extraction in 80% (v/v) acetone/5% (v/v) DMSO (Porra et al. 1989).

Three samples of 3 mL each were transferred simultaneously to three double-walled 3.2 mL glass chambers (UvA TC, Amsterdam) equipped with Firesting Optodes (Pyroscience, Aachen, Germany). Temperature was controlled by continuously pumping 30 °C water through the double wall. LED lamps were positioned on both sides of the three glass chambers to minimize shading. The LED lamps and O2-optodes were computer-controlled and the percentage of dissolved O2 was converted to µmol O2. The value for 0% O2 was set by flushing a water sample with pure nitrogen gas for at least 15 min and the 100% saturation value was set by flushing with compressed air (containing 20.9 vol% O2) for at least 15 min. O2-saturated BG-11 medium of 30 °C contains 234 µM O2 at one atmosphere.

Starting with 3 min darkness, samples were exposed to increasing light intensities from 0 to 450 µmol photons m−2 s−1 while O2 concentrations in the chamber were measured. The light intensity was increased every 3 min. The change in O2 concentration was calculated 20 s after the light intensity was set until 20 s before the next change in light intensity. O2 production rates (P) are presented as µmol O2 per mg Chl a per minute versus light intensity (I). The maximum rate of oxygen production (Pmax), photosynthetic efficiency (α, the initial slope of the curve at low light intensity) and oxygen consumption rate in darkness (Rd) were estimated by fitting a hyperbolic tangent function to the data (Platt and Jassby 1976):
$$P={P_{\hbox{max} ~}}\tanh \left( {\frac{{\alpha ~I}}{{{P_{\hbox{max} }}}}} \right) - {R_{\text{d}}}.$$

The fits were based on a nonlinear least-squares regression using R version 3.3.3 (R Development Core Team 2017).

Cell counts

Cells were counted and their biovolume measured using a CASY 1 TTC cell counter with a 60 µm capillary (Schärfe Systems GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany), after diluting the samples to ~ 5×104 cells mL−1 in Casyton solution.

Absorption and 77 K fluorescence spectra

Light absorption spectra from 400 to 750 nm were measured with an updated Aminco DW2000 photospectrometer (OLIS, Bogart, GA, USA).

Samples for 77 K fluorescence measurements were analyzed using an OLIS DM45 spectrofluorimeter (OLIS, Bogart, GA, USA) equipped with a dewar cell. Cuvettes were kept submerged in liquid nitrogen and transferred to the measuring cell of the fluorimeter one at a time. We used 440 nm light to excite Chl a in the photosystems and 590 nm light to excite PBSs. Fluorescence emission was measured from 630 to 750 nm, yielding emission peaks at 695 and 725 nm for PSII and PSI, respectively, and two merged peaks around 650 to 665 nm for uncoupled PBSs and (allo)phycocyanin not involved in light harvesting. The ratios of the surface areas of these emission peaks are known to reflect the actual protein ratios quite accurately (Murakami 1997; Schuurmans et al. 2017).

Results

Light-harvesting pigments

Figure 2 shows light absorption spectra of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 and the green alga Chlorella sorokiniana 211-8K, when acclimated to 35 µmol photons m−2 s−1 of white light. The cyanobacterium has absorption peaks in the blue and red part of the spectrum (440 and 680 nm) due to chlorophyll a (Chl a), and in the orange part (620 nm) due to phycocyanin. Similar to the cyanobacterium, the green alga also has absorption peaks in the blue and red part of the spectrum (440 and 680 nm) due to Chl a. Adjacent to its Chl a peaks it has shoulders at 450–500 and 650–670 nm due to Chl b, while it lacks pigments specifically absorbing in the orange part of the spectrum. Both species also contain carotenoids, which absorb in the blue-green part (400–525 nm) of the spectrum but are not recognizable as separate peaks.

Growth rates in blue, orange and red light

To assess the growth rates of Synechocystis and C. sorokiniana in relation to light absorption by their major light-harvesting pigments, both species were grown in triplicate in batch cultures exposed to four different intensities of either blue (450 nm), orange (625 nm) or red light (660 nm) (Fig. 1).

Specific growth rates of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 were similar in orange and red light, but much lower in blue light at all four intensities (Fig. 3a). Specific growth rates of the green alga C. sorokiniana were similar in blue and red light, but lower in orange light (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3

Specific growth rates of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (a) and the green alga C. sorokiniana 211-8K (b) in batch cultures exposed to blue (blue diamonds), orange (orange circles) and red light (red triangles) at four different light intensities. Results are averages of three biological replicates ± SD; error bars are not visible when SD is smaller than symbol size

Could addition of a minor amount of red light alleviate the inefficiency of blue light in Synechocystis? To address this question, we performed additional batch experiments in which Synechocystis and C. sorokiniana were exposed to mixtures of blue light (450 nm) and red light (660 nm) with a total intensity of 70 µmol photons m−2 s−1 (Fig. 4). The specific growth rate of C. sorokiniana did not change with the percentage red light. In contrast, the specific growth rate of Synechocystis strongly increased with the percentage red light, up to 65% red light, and then gradually saturated (Fig. 4). We conjecture that growth rate saturated above 65% red light (i.e., ~ 45 µmol photons m−2 s−1), because this percentage provided sufficient red light to saturate the photosynthetic rate (see Fig. 5). Hence, we did not observe a distinct enhancement effect in Synechocystis when blue and red light were combined, but rather a saturating increase of the growth rate in response to the relative availability of red to blue light.

Fig. 4

Specific growth rates of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (black circles) and the green alga C. sorokiniana (grey diamonds) in batch cultures exposed to different combinations of red and blue light with a total light intensity of 70 µmol photons m−2 s−1. Results are averages of three biological replicates ± SD; error bars are not visible when SD is smaller than the symbol size. The data were fitted to a polynomial trendline (using a third-order polynomial for Synechocystis and a constant for C. sorokiniana)

Fig. 5

Net O2 production by Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 exposed to blue (blue diamonds), orange (orange circles) and red light (red triangles) at different light intensities. Synechocystis cells were sampled from a steady-state continuous culture acclimated to white light, and subsequently exposed to the different light colors in an airtight glass chamber to measure O2 production using optodes. Data show the averages of three biological replicates ± SD; error bars are not visible when SD is smaller than the symbol size. Solid lines represent fitted pI curves using the hyperbolic tangent function; see Table 1 for parameter estimates

Table 1

Photosynthetic parameters estimated by fitting a hyperbolic tangent to the O2 production rates (in µmol O2 mg Chl a−1 min−1)

Light source

P max

α

R d

Blue

79.5

0.37

4.4

Orange

85.9

3.38

5.1

Red

86.4

2.38

2.9

Oxygen production is lower in blue light

To investigate the effects of blue light in further detail, O2 production rates of Synechocystis were measured at increasing intensities of blue (450 nm), orange (625 nm) and red light (660 nm). For this purpose, samples pre-acclimated to white light were transferred to temperature-controlled and airtight flasks, where they were exposed to blue, orange and red light while monitoring O2 concentrations.

The O2 production rates of Synechocystis responded in the same way to light color as the specific growth rates. The increase in O2 production with irradiance (i.e., the slope α of the pI curve) was similar in orange and red light, but much lower in blue light (Fig. 5; Table 1). Photosynthetic O2 production saturated at ~ 50 µmol photons m−2 s−1 in orange and red light but continued to increase with intensity up to ~ 300 µmol photons m−2 s−1 in blue light. Interestingly, at these high intensities, photosynthetic activity in blue light approached an almost similar maximum O2 production rate (i.e., similar Pmax) as in orange and red light (Fig. 5; Table 1).

Absorption spectra and PSI:PSII stoichiometry

Absorption spectra and 77 K fluorescence emission spectra were measured in batch cultures of Synechocystis exposed to either blue, orange or red light at four different light intensities (Figs. 6, 7). The absorption spectra show that the ratio between the phycocyanin peak at 620 nm and Chl a peak at 680 nm was higher in blue than in orange and red light, indicating that the phycocyanin content increased relative to Chl a when cells were grown in blue light. Furthermore, the absorption shoulder at 470–500 nm, indicative of carotenoids, increased with light intensity in red light and to a lesser extent also in orange light, but not in blue light (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6

Absorption spectra of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 in batch cultures exposed to a blue light, b orange light, and c red light at four different light intensities (6, 22, 44 and 70 µmol photons m−2 s−1). Light absorption peaks by Chl a and phycocyanin (PC) are indicated. Spectra show the averages of three biological replicates, and are normalized to minimum absorbance at 750 nm and maximum absorbance at 440 nm

Fig. 7

Low-temperature (77 K) fluorescence emission spectra of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 in batch cultures exposed to a, d blue light, b, e orange light, and c, f red light at four different light intensities (6, 22, 44 and 70 µmol photons m−2 s−1). ac Excitation of Chl a at 440 nm yields fluorescence emission peaks at 695 nm for PSII and at 720 nm for PSI. df Excitation of phycocyanin at 590 nm yields fluorescence emission peaks at 695 nm when PBSs are coupled to PSII (state 1) and at 720 nm when coupled to PSI (state 2). PBSs that are decoupled from the photosystems, or phycocyanin that is not incorporated into PBSs, result in fluorescence emission from phycocyanin and allophycocyanin at 650–665 nm. Spectra show the averages of three biological replicates, and are normalized to the minimum and maximum emission of each spectrum

PSI:PSII ratios of Synechocystis were studied by means of low-temperature (77 K) fluorescence spectroscopy (Fig. 7a–c). By freezing cells at 77 K immediately after sampling, the positions of the photosynthetic components are fixed. However, excitation energy can still be transferred to the reaction centers. The subsequent fluorescence emission by the reactions centers of PSI and PSII provides insight into the relative amounts of the two photosystems.

Figure 7a–c show fluorescence emission spectra upon excitation of Chl a at 440 nm, which yields fluorescence emission peaks at 695 nm for PSII and at 725 nm for PSI. Synechocystis cells acclimated to orange and red light showed very similar results (Fig. 7b, c), with a PSI:PSII fluorescence emission ratio of ~ 4:1 at all four light intensities. In contrast, Synechocystis cells acclimated to blue light showed a less characteristic photosystem stoichiometry, with a PSI:PSII fluorescence emission ratio of ~ 1.2:1 at 6, 22 and 44 µmol photons m−2 s−1 and of ~ 1.4:1 at 70 µmol photons m−2 s−1, (Fig. 7a). Hence, blue light reduced the PSI:PSII ratio of Synechocystis.

Changes in state transitions

Low-temperature (77 K) fluorescence also provides insight into the coupling of phycobilisomes (PBSs) to the reaction centers of PSI and PSII, and hence into state transitions. Figure 7d–f show fluorescence emission spectra upon excitation at 590 nm of phycocyanin, which is the major phycobiliprotein in PBSs of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. If PBSs are decoupled from the reaction centers, or phycocyanin is not incorporated into PBSs, excitation of phycocyanin results in fluorescence emission at 650–665 nm. If PBSs are coupled to the reaction centers, the excitation energy is transferred from the PBSs to the reaction centers, resulting in fluorescence emission peaks at 695 nm when coupled to PSII (state 1) or at 725 nm when coupled to PSI (state 2).

In Synechocystis cells acclimated to blue light, fluorescence emission by PSII at 695 nm was much higher than fluorescence emission by PSI at 725 nm (Fig. 7d). This indicates that, in blue light, most PBSs transferred their harvested light energy to PSII. By contrast, the difference in fluorescence emission by PSII and PSI was much less pronounced in cells exposed to orange and red light (Fig. 7e, f), indicating that in orange and red light the excitation energy harvested by the PBSs was distributed more or less evenly over both photosystems. We further note that in orange and red light a relatively large fraction of the PBSs seemed not functional in light-harvesting, as fluorescence emission at 650–665 nm was quite prominent (Fig. 7e, f).

Comparison with other picocyanobacteria

To assess whether the low growth efficiency in blue light is a common phenomenon in cyanobacteria, growth rates were also determined for two marine Synechococcus strains, CCY 9201 (formerly known as BS4) and CCY 9202 (formerly BS5). These two picocyanobacteria are of considerable interest, because of their very close genetic relatedness based on the 16S rRNA-ITS operon, while they absorb different parts of the light spectrum because of their different phycobiliproteins (Stomp et al. 2004; Haverkamp et al. 2009). Synechococcus sp. CCY 9201 has a similar pigmentation as Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803: both utilize the orange-light absorbing phycocyanin in their light-harvesting antennae. In contrast, Synechococcus sp. CCY 9202 contains high amounts of phycoerythrin, with which it strongly absorbs in the green part (525–575 nm) of the spectrum (Supplemental Fig. S1).

Synechococcus sp. CCY 9201 had its lowest growth rate in blue light, and an eight-fold higher specific growth rate in orange and red light (Fig. 8). The specific growth rate of the phycoerythrin-rich strain CCY 9202 was also lowest in blue light, and it had a three- to four-fold higher specific growth rate in orange and red light, respectively. Hence, both Synechococcus strains displayed a qualitatively similar growth response as Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. These results show that the diminished growth rate in blue light is not unique to phycocyanin-rich cyanobacteria, but can also be found in phycoerythrin-rich cyanobacteria.

Fig. 8

Specific growth rates of the green alga C. sorokiniana 211-8K and the cyanobacteria Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, Synechococcus sp. CCY 9201 and Synechococcus sp. CCY 9202 in batch cultures exposed to blue, orange and red light at an intensity of 44 µmol photons m−2 s−1. Light absorption spectra of these four species are provided in Supplemental Fig. S1. Results show the averages of three biological replicates ± SD

Discussion

Our results show that the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 absorbs blue light to at least a similar extent as orange and red light (Figs. 2, 6), but uses the absorbed blue light much less effectively for oxygenic photosynthesis and growth (Figs. 3, 4, 5). The poor photosynthetic performance of cyanobacteria in blue light has also been reported by several earlier studies (e.g., Lemasson et al. 1973; Wyman and Fay 1986; Wilde et al. 1997; Tyystjärvi et al. 2002; Wang et al. 2007; Singh et al. 2009; Chen et al. 2010; Choi et al. 2013; Solhaug et al. 2014; Bland and Angenent 2016), but in-depth investigations were still lacking. Our results support the hypothesis that blue light creates an imbalance between the two photosystems, with an excess of energy at the PSI-side and a deficiency at the PSII-side of the photosynthetic electron transport chain of cyanobacteria (e.g., Solhaug et al. 2014; Kirilovsky 2015). This hypothesis is explained below.

In orange and red light, cyanobacteria usually have 2–5 times more PSI than PSII (Fig. 7a–c; see also Singh et al. 2009; Allahverdiyeva et al. 2014; Kirilovsky 2015). Furthermore, cyanobacterial PSI contains around 100 molecules of Chl a (Jordan et al. 2001; Kennis et al. 2001), while a single PSII contains only about 35 Chl a molecules (Guskov et al. 2009; Umena et al. 2011). Hence, cyanobacteria invest much more of their chlorophyll in PSI than in PSII, and, therefore, PSI will absorb more photons than PSII (e.g., Myers et al. 1980; Fujita 1997). This dissimilarity between the two photosystems is compensated for by the light-harvesting PBSs, which tend to be associated mostly with PSII and hence transfer most of their absorbed photons to PSII (van Thor et al. 1998; Joshua et al. 2005; Mullineaux 2008). In this way, cyanobacteria can maintain linear electron flow by balancing excitation energy between the two photosystems, which will enable the production of both ATP and NADPH required for growth (Allen 2003; Nogales et al. 2012; Mullineaux 2014).

In blue light, the PBSs do not absorb photons very effectively, because the short wavelength of 450 nm does not match the absorption spectrum of phycocyanin (Fig. 2; see also, e.g., Tandeau de Marsac 2003; Six et al. 2007). Hence, in blue light, the PBSs hardly transfer any light energy to PSII. In contrast, the chlorophylls of the more abundant PSI still absorb blue light effectively. Moreover, in cyanobacteria, β-carotenes absorbing blue and green wavelengths are also more abundant in PSI than PSII and further contribute to photosynthetic light harvesting by PSI (Ritz et al. 2000; Takaichi 2011; Stamatakis et al. 2014). Hence, most blue photons are absorbed at PSI, while in comparison PSII has a severe shortage of photons, which will suppress linear electron transport. This is supported by the low O2 production rates that we measured when the cyanobacteria were exposed to limiting levels of blue light. Interestingly, once the intensity of blue light was high enough to saturate PSII, the O2 production rate in blue light approached the rate found in orange and red light (Fig. 5).

The important role of PBS in the distribution of excitation energy over the two photosystems is illustrated by a study of Campbell (1996) on complementary chromatic adaptation of the cyanobacterium Calothrix sp. strain PCC 7601. When acclimated to green light the PBSs of this species contain mostly phycoerythrin, while they contain mostly phycocyanin when adapted to red light. Rates of photosynthesis were similar in both light colors, but 77 K fluorescence emission revealed major differences in the distribution of light by the PBSs. Similar to our experimental results, red light (600–750 nm) applied by Campbell (1996) was absorbed by both Chl a and (allo)phycocyanin, and the PBSs of red-light acclimated cells were mostly associated with PSII while Chl a harvested light for PSI. In contrast, green light (500–575 nm) was only absorbed by phycoerythrin, and the phycoerythrin-containing PBSs of green-light acclimated cells transferred light energy to both PSI and PSII to maintain the balance between these two photosystems.

Our results indicate that blue-light acclimated cells attempt to restore the balance between the two photosystems in a similar way. Fluorescence emission by the two photosystems after excitation of Chl a at 440 nm showed that blue-light acclimated cells decrease their PSI:PSII ratio (Fig. 7a–c), which will increase light absorption by PSII relative to PSI. Furthermore, fluorescence emission after excitation of phycocyanin at 590 nm revealed that blue-light acclimated cells associate even more of their PBSs with PSII than cells acclimated to orange and red light (Fig. 7d–f). All these results indicate that cells exposed to blue light try to increase the transfer of light energy to PSII, to restore the balance. Yet, the low O2 production rates indicate that cells in blue light are still unable to sustain a high rate of linear electron flow in comparison to those in orange and red light, unless saturating amounts of blue light are provided.

Previous research has shown that in high CO2 conditions, cyanobacteria decrease their PSI:PSII ratio and increase phycocyanin relative to Chl a (MacKenzie et al. 2004; Eisenhut et al. 2007). These changes are similar to the changes we observed in blue-light acclimated cultures, indicative of an increased transfer of light energy to PSII at high CO2 conditions. Since our experiments were also performed at high CO2 conditions, the results of MacKenzie et al. (2004) and Eisenhut et al. (2007) suggest that the photosynthetic efficiency of cyanobacteria in blue light might be even lower under carbon-limiting conditions.

Since red light is also absorbed by Chl a, why did red light not give the same results as blue light? The answer is probably related to the wavelength of 660 nm that we used as the red-light source in our experiments. This wavelength is already longer than the 620–650 nm-red light used in many previous studies (Wyman and Fay 1986; Figueroa et al. 1995; Wang et al. 2007; Singh et al. 2009; Chen et al. 2010; Choi et al. 2013; Solhaug et al. 2014; Zavřel et al. 2017). This range of wavelengths around 660 nm is absorbed not only by chlorophyll, but also very effectively by allophycocyanin in the core of the PBS (Lemasson et al. 1973; Glazer and Bryant 1975; MacColl 2004). Hence, the PBSs can still redistribute photons of 660 nm over both photosystems, as indicated by the 77 K fluorescence data of the red-light acclimated cells after excitation of the PBSs (Fig. 7f). One would expect that cells grown with red light at a longer wavelength of 680 nm, which is much less absorbed by allophycocyanin and hence specifically targets Chl a, would display similar results as our blue-light exposed cells. Indeed, other studies provide support for this hypothesis. For instance, Murakami (1997) showed that Synechocystis sp. PCC 6714 had a substantially lower PSI:PSII ratio when grown at 680-nm red light than at 650-nm red light, resembling the low PSI:PSII ratio that we found for Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 in blue light. Bland and Angenent (2016) found that Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 had a lower specific growth rate at 680 nm than at 660 nm, although the growth rate was even lower in blue light (440 and 460 nm). Blue-light absorbing β-carotenes are more abundant in PSI than in PSII, and in cyanobacteria they contribute to light harvesting only for PSI (Stamatakis et al. 2014). Hence, we speculate that blue light causes an even stronger imbalance between PSI and PSII than red light of 680 nm, which may explain their observation (Bland and Angenent 2016) that the growth rate was even lower in blue light than in red light of 680 nm.

Our findings show that the poor performance in blue light is not specific for the freshwater cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, but also applies to marine cyanobacteria including both phycocyanin-rich strains such as Synechococcus sp. CCY 9201 and phycoerythrin-rich strains such as Synechococcus sp. CCY 9202 (Fig. 8). The low rates of growth and photosynthesis in blue light even extend to red algae which also possess PBSs composed of phycocyanin and phycoerythrin (Ley and Butler 1980; Figueroa et al. 1995). Hence, although the chromophores phycoerythrobilin and phycourobilin absorb green light (absorption peak at 545 nm) and blue-green light (495 nm), respectively, these organisms are not able to absorb and redistribute deep blue light (< 450 nm) very effectively between the two photosystems.

In green algae, growth rates in blue and red light are comparable (Fig. 3b; see also Teo et al. 2014; Yan and Zheng 2014; Zhao et al. 2015; de Mooij et al. 2016), thus blue light does not seem to result in an excitation imbalance between their PSII and PSI. Green algae maintain a lower PSI:PSII ratio than cyanobacteria (Murakami et al. 1997; Kirilovsky 2015) and utilize light-harvesting antennae composed of Chl a and b (Kühlbrandt et al. 1994). Additionally, green algae are able to use blue light more efficiently due to a wider variety of light-harvesting carotenoids, in their photosystems and light-harvesting antennae, which also absorb photons in the blue-green part of the visible light spectrum (Takaichi 2011). Contrary to cyanobacteria, these carotenoids harvest light energy not only for PSI, but also for PSII (Goedheer 1969). Hence, in contrast to the cyanobacterial PBSs, the light-harvesting antennae of green algae absorb both blue and red light, and transfer the absorbed light energy to both PSI and PSII in a balanced way.

Our results help to explain why Prochlorococcus species dominate over Synechococcus species in the oligotrophic oceans (Partensky et al. 1999; Biller et al. 2015). Because red light is strongly absorbed by water molecules, blue light (400–500 nm) prevails in the deeper water layers of the open ocean (Stomp et al. 2007). Instead of PBSs, Prochlorococcus utilizes light-harvesting antennae composed of divinyl Chl a and b (Chisholm et al. 1992; Ting et al. 2002). Consequently, like green algae, they can balance the amply available blue light between both photosystems. In contrast, Synechococcus species utilize blue light much less effectively. The PBSs of marine Synechococcus strains of the oligotrophic ocean often contain high contents of phycourobilin (Palenik 2001; Everroad et al. 2006; Six et al. 2007; Grébert et al. 2018), with which they do absorb blue-green light (495 nm). However, none of the phycobiliproteins described so far extends its absorption to the deep-blue wavelengths (< 450 nm) that form a major part of the underwater light spectrum characteristic of the oligotrophic ocean. Hence, not only does blue light offer a suitable habitat for the chlorophyll-based light-harvesting antennae of Prochlorococcus, as has been described by many previous studies (Scanlan and West 2002; Ting et al. 2002; Rocap et al. 2003; Stomp et al. 2007), but blue light (< 450 nm) is also less suitable for phycobilisome-containing cyanobacteria such as Synechococcus.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This manuscript is dedicated to the memory of our dear colleague and co-author Dr. Hans C. P. Matthijs, who initiated and encouraged the research reported here. We are most grateful to Tania S. Darphorn and Joris Solleveld for their help with the experiments and to Theo van Lieshout, Gerrit Hardeman, Mattijs Bakker and Johan Mozes of the Technology Centre of the University of Amsterdam for their help in designing and manufacturing the experimental incubator. We thank Douglas Campbell and an anonymous reviewer for constructive comments on the manuscript, and participants of the Wetsus research theme “Algae” and the FAME department of the University of Amsterdam for fruitful discussions. This work has been performed in the cooperation framework of Wetsus, European Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Water Technology (http://www.wetsus.eu). Wetsus is co-funded by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment, the Province of Fryslân and the Northern Netherlands Provinces.

Author contributions

VML, HCPM and AMV conceived the original research plan; HCPM, JMS and VML designed the experiments; VML performed the experiments and analyzed the data, with technical assistance from JMS and scientific supervision by HCPM, KJH and JH; VML, JMS and JH wrote the manuscript, and all authors except our late co-author HCPM commented on the final version.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11120_2018_561_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (505 kb)
Supplementary material 1. Fig. S1 Light absorption spectra of three cyanobacteria and a green alga. All four species have absorption peaks for Chl a (440 and 680 nm) and carotenoids (400-525 nm). The cyanobacteria Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (black solid line) and Synechococcus sp. CCY 9201 (black dashed line) have an additional absorption peak for phycocyanin (PC) at 620 nm. The cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. CCY 9202 (grey dotted line) has an additional absorption peak for phycoerythrin (PE) at 565 nm. The green alga C. sorokiniana (grey solid line) has additional absorption shoulders for Chl b at 450-500 nm and 650-670 nm. The species were all grown at 35 μmol photons·m-2·s-1 of white light (PDF 504 KB)
11120_2018_561_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (581 kb)
Supplementary material 2. Fig. S2 Calculation of the specific growth rate from photodiode reads of batch cultures in the incubation shaker. Here we show examples for three replicate batch cultures of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 grown in blue (a-d) and red light (e-h) at 70 μmol photons·m-2·s-1. a,e The photodiodes record voltage as a measure of light intensity. b,f First, the minimum recording was subtracted to remove the background signal of the photodiodes and, subsequently, the photodiode reads were normalized by dividing the data by the recording of mineral medium without cells. c,g Next, data were ln-transformed and multiplied by -1. d,h Finally, the ln-transformed data were presented on a logarithmic scale and we used the linear part of these growth curves to calculate the specific growth rate by fitting an exponential trendline to the data. The three replicates resulted in three specific growth rates for each experimental condition (PDF 580 KB)

References

  1. Allahverdiyeva Y, Suorsa M, Tikkanen M, Aro EM (2014) Photoprotection of photosystems in fluctuating light intensities. J Exp Bot 66:2427–2436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen JF (2003) Cyclic, pseudocyclic and noncyclic photophosphorylation: new links in the chain. Trends Plant Sci 8:15–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold W, Oppenheimer JR (1950) Internal conversion in the photosynthetic mechanism of blue-green algae. J Gen Physiol 33:423–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biller SJ, Berube PM, Lindell D, Chisholm SW (2015) Prochlorococcus: the structure and function of collective diversity. Nature Rev Microbiol 13:13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bland E, Angenent LT (2016) Pigment-targeted light wavelength and intensity promotes efficient photoautotrophic growth of cyanobacteria. Biores Technol 216:579–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell D (1996) Complementary chromatic adaptation alters photosynthetic strategies in the cyanobacterium Calothrix. Microbiology 142:1255–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell D, Hurry V, Clarke AK, Gustafsson P, Öquist G (1998) Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis of cyanobacterial photosynthesis and acclimation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:667–683PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen HB, Wu JY, Wang CF, Fu CC, Shieh CJ, Chen CI, Wang CY, Liu YC (2010) Modeling on chlorophyll a and phycocyanin production by Spirulina platensis under various light-emitting diodes. Biochem Eng J 53:52–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chisholm SW, Frankel SL, Goericke R, Olson RJ, Palenik B, Waterbury JB, West-Johnsrud L, Zettler ER (1992) Prochlorococcus marinus nov. gen. nov. sp.: an oxyphototrophic marine prokaryote containing divinyl chlorophyll a and b. Arch Microbiol 157:297–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Choi CY, Kim NN, Shin HS, Park HG, Cheon S, Kil G (2013) The effect of various wavelengths of light from light-emitting diodes on the antioxidant system of marine cyanobacteria, Synechococcus sp. Mol Cell Toxicol 9:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Mooij T, de Vries G, Latsos C, Wijffels RH, Janssen M (2016) Impact of light color on photobioreactor productivity. Algal Res 15:32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duysens LNM (1951) Transfer of light energy within the pigment systems present in photosynthesizing cells. Nature 168:548–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eisenhut M, Von Wobeser EA, Jonas L, Schubert H, Ibelings BW, Bauwe H, Matthijs HCP, Hagemann M (2007) Long-term response toward inorganic carbon limitation in wild type and glycolate turnover mutants of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803. Plant Physiol 144:1946–1959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emerson R, Lewis CM (1942) The photosynthetic efficiency of phycocyanin in Chroococcus, and the problem of carotenoid participation in photosynthesis. J Gen Physiol 25:579–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engelmann TW (1882) Über sauerstoffausscheidung von pflanzenzellen im mikrospektrum. Pflug Arch Eur J Phys 27:485–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Engelmann TW (1883) Farbe und assimilation. I. Assimilation findet nur in den farbstoffhaltigen plasmatheilchen statt. II. Näherer zusammenhang zwischen lichtabsorption und assimilation. III. Weitere folgerungen. Bot Zeit 41:1–29Google Scholar
  17. Engelmann TW (1884) Untersuchungen über die quantitativen beziehungen zwischen absorption des lichtes und assimilation in pflanzenzellen. Bot Zeit 44:43–52Google Scholar
  18. Everroad C, Six C, Partensky F, Thomas JC, Holtzendorff J, Wood AM (2006) Biochemical bases of type IV chromatic adaptation in marine Synechococcus spp. J Bacteriol 188:3345–3356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Figueroa FL, Aguilera J, Niell FX (1995) Red and blue light regulation of growth and photosynthetic metabolism in Porphyra umbilicalis (Bangiales, Rhodophyta). Eur J Phycol 30:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fujita Y (1997) A study on the dynamic features of photosystem stoichiometry: accomplishments and problems for future studies. Photosynth Res 53:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glazer AN, Bryant DA (1975) Allophycocyanin B (λmax 671, 618 nm). Arch Microbiol 104:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goedheer JC (1969) Energy transfer from carotenoids to chlorophyll in blue-green, red and green algae and greening bean leaves. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioeng 172:252–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grébert T, Doré H, Partensky F, Farrant GK, Boss ES, Picheral M, Guidi L, Pesant S, Scanlan DJ, Wincker P, Acinas SG, Kehoe DM, Garczarek L (2018) Light color acclimation is a key process in the global ocean distribution of Synechococcus cyanobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717069115 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Grossman AR, Schaefer MR, Chiang GG, Collier JL (1993) The phycobilisome, a light-harvesting complex responsive to environmental conditions. Microbiol Rev 57:725–749PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Guskov A, Kern J, Gabdulkhakov A, Broser M, Zouni A, Saenger W (2009) Cyanobacterial photosystem II at 2.9-Å resolution and the role of quinones, lipids, channels and chloride. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16:334–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haverkamp THA, Schouten D, Doeleman M, Wollenzien U, Huisman J, Stal LJ (2009) Colorful microdiversity of Synechococcus strains (picocyanobacteria) isolated from the Baltic Sea. ISME J 3:397–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huisman J, Matthijs HCP, Visser PM, Balke H, Sigon CAM, Passarge J, Weissing FJ, Mur LR (2002) Principles of the light-limited chemostat: theory and ecological applications. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 81:117–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jordan P, Fromme P, Witt HT, Klukas O, Saenger W, Krauß N (2001) Three-dimensional structure of cyanobacterial photosystem I at 2.5 Å resolution. Nature 411:909–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jørgensen BB, Cohen Y, Des Marais DJ (1987) Photosynthetic action spectra and adaptation to spectral light distribution in a benthic cyanobacterial mat. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:879–886PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Joshua S, Bailey S, Mann NH, Mullineaux CW (2005) Involvement of phycobilisome diffusion in energy quenching in cyanobacteria. Plant Physiol 138:1577–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kennis JTM, Gobets B, van Stokkum IHM, Dekker JP, van Grondelle R, Fleming GR (2001) Light harvesting by chlorophylls and carotenoids in the photosystem I core complex of Synechococcus elongatus: a fluorescence upconversion study. J Phys Chem 105:4485–4494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kirilovsky D (2015) Modulating energy arriving at photochemical reaction centers: orange carotenoid protein-related photoprotection and state transitions. Photosynth Res 126:3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kühlbrandt W, Wang DAN, Fujiyoshi Y (1994) Atomic model of plant light-harvesting complex by electron crystallography. Nature 367:614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lemasson C, Tandeau de Marsac N, Cohen-Bazire G (1973) Role of allophycocyanin as light-harvesting pigment in cyanobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3130–3133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ley AC, Butler WL (1980) Effects of chromatic adaptation on the photochemical apparatus of photosynthesis in Porphyridium cruentum. Plant Physiol 65:714–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MacColl R (2004) Allophycocyanin and energy transfer. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioeng 1657:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. MacKenzie TDB, Burns RA, Campbell DA (2004) Carbon status constrains light acclimation in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus. Plant Physiol 136:3301–3312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mullineaux CW (2008) Phycobilisome-reaction centre interaction in cyanobacteria. Photosynth Res 95:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mullineaux CW (2014) Co-existence of photosynthetic and respiratory activities in cyanobacterial thylakoid membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1837:503–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Murakami A (1997) Quantitative analysis of 77 K fluorescence emission spectra in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6714 and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with variable PS I/PS II stoichiometries. Photosynth Res 53:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Murakami A, Kim SJ, Fujita Y (1997) Changes in photosystem stoichiometry in response to environmental conditions for cell growth observed with the cyanophyte Synechocystis PCC 6714. Plant Cell Physiol 38:392–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Myers J, Graham JR, Wang RT (1980) Light harvesting in Anacystis nidulans studied in pigment mutants. Plant Physiol 66:1144–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nogales J, Gudmundsson S, Knight EM, Palsson BO, Thiele I (2012) Detailing the optimality of photosynthesis in cyanobacteria through systems biology analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:2678–2683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ogawa T, Misumi M, Sonoike K (2017) Estimation of photosynthesis in cyanobacteria by pulse-amplitude modulation chlorophyll fluorescence: problems and solutions. Photosynth Res 133:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Palenik B (2001) Chromatic adaptation in marine Synechococcus strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:991–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Partensky F, Hess WR, Vaulot D (1999) Prochlorococcus, a marine photosynthetic prokaryote of global significance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63:106–127PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Platt T, Jassby AD (1976) The relationship between photosynthesis and light for natural assemblages of coastal marine phytoplankton. J Phycol 12:421–430Google Scholar
  48. Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE (1989) Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioeng 975:384–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pulich WM, van Baalen C (1974) Growth requirements of blue-green algae under blue light conditions. Arch Microbiol 97:303–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. R Development Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  51. Ritz T, Damjanović A, Schulten K, Zhang JP, Koyama Y (2000) Efficient light harvesting through carotenoids. Photosynth Res 66:125–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rocap G, Larimer FW, Lamerdin J, Malfatti S, Chain P, Ahlgren NA, Arellano A, Coleman M, Hauser L, Hess WR (2003) Genome divergence in two Prochlorococcus ecotypes reflects oceanic niche differentiation. Nature 424:1042–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scanlan DJ, West NJ (2002) Molecular ecology of the marine cyanobacterial genera Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 40:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schuurmans RM, Matthijs HCP, Hellingwerf KJ (2017) Transition from exponential to linear photoautotrophic growth changes the physiology of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Photosynth Res 132:69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shen G, Boussiba S, Vermaas WF (1993) Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 strains lacking photosystem I and phycobilisome function. Plant Cell 5:1853–1863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Singh AK, Bhattacharyya-Pakrasi M, Elvitigala T, Ghosh B, Aurora R, Pakrasi HB (2009) A systems-level analysis of the effects of light quality on the metabolism of a cyanobacterium. Plant Physiol 151:1596–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Six C, Thomas JC, Garczarek L, Ostrowski M, Dufresne A, Blot N, Scanlan DJ, Partensky F (2007) Diversity and evolution of phycobilisomes in marine Synechococcus spp.: a comparative genomics study. Genome Biol 8:R259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Solhaug KA, Xie L, Gauslaa Y (2014) Unequal allocation of excitation energy between photosystem II and I reduces cyanolichen photosynthesis in blue light. Plant Cell Physiol 55:1404–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stadnichuk IN, Tropin IV (2017) Phycobiliproteins: structure, functions and biotechnological applications. Appl Biochem Microbiol 53:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stamatakis K, Tsimilli-Michael M, Papageorgiou GC (2014) On the question of the light-harvesting role of β-carotene in photosystem II and photosystem I core complexes. Plant Physiol Biochem 81:121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stomp M, Huisman J, De Jongh F, Veraart AJ, Gerla D, Rijkeboer M, Ibelings BW, Wollenzien UI, Stal LJ (2004) Adaptive divergence in pigment composition promotes phytoplankton biodiversity. Nature 432:104–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stomp M, Huisman J, Stal LJ, Matthijs HCP (2007) Colorful niches of phototrophic microorganisms shaped by vibrations of the water molecule. ISME J 1:271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Takaichi S (2011) Carotenoids in algae: distributions, biosyntheses and functions. Mar Drugs 9:1101–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tamary E, Kiss V, Nevo R, Adam Z, Bernát G, Rexroth S, Rögner M, Reich Z (2012) Structural and functional alterations of cyanobacterial phycobilisomes induced by high-light stress. Biochim Biophys Acta 1817:319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tandeau de Marsac N (2003) Phycobiliproteins and phycobilisomes: the early observations. Photosynth Res 76:193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Teo CL, Atta M, Bukhari A, Taisir M, Yusuf AM, Idris A (2014) Enhancing growth and lipid production of marine microalgae for biodiesel production via the use of different LED wavelengths. Biores Tech 162:38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ting CS, Rocap G, King J, Chisholm SW (2002) Cyanobacterial photosynthesis in the oceans: the origins and significance of divergent light-harvesting strategies. Trends Microbiol 10:134–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tyystjärvi T, Tuominen I, Herranen M, Aro EM, Tyystjärvi E (2002) Action spectrum of psbA gene transcription is similar to that of photoinhibition in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. FEBS Lett 516:167–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Umena Y, Kawakami K, Shen J, Kamiya N (2011) Crystal structure of oxygen-evolving photosystem II at a resolution of 1.9 Å. Nature 473:55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. van Thor JJ, Mullineaux CW, Matthijs HCP, Hellingwerf KJ (1998) Light harvesting and state transitions in cyanobacteria. Plant Biol 111:430–443Google Scholar
  71. Wang CY, Fu CC, Liu YC (2007) Effects of using light-emitting diodes on the cultivation of Spirulina platensis. Biochem Eng J 37:21–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Watanabe M, Ikeuchi M (2013) Phycobilisome: architecture of a light-harvesting supercomplex. Photosynth Res 116:265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wilde A, Churin Y, Schubert H, Börner T (1997) Disruption of a Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 gene with partial similarity to phytochrome genes alters growth under changing light qualities. FEBS Lett 406:89–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wyman M, Fay P (1986) Underwater light climate and the growth and pigmentation of planktonic blue-green algae (Cyanobacteria) II. The influence of light quality. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 227:381–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yan C, Zheng Z (2014) Performance of mixed LED light wavelengths on biogas upgrade and biogas fluid removal by microalga Chlorella sp. Appl Energy 113:1008–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zavřel T, Očenášová P, Červený J (2017) Phenotypic characterization of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 substrains reveals differences in sensitivity to abiotic stress. PLoS ONE 12:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhao Y, Sun S, Hu C, Zhang H, Xu J, Ping L (2015) Performance of three microalgal strains in biogas slurry purification and biogas upgrade in response to various mixed light-emitting diode light wavelengths. Biores Tech 187:338–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Freshwater and Marine Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem DynamicsUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Wetsus, European Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Water TechnologyLeeuwardenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Swammerdam Institute for Life SciencesUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.KWR Watercycle Research InstituteNieuwegeinThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations