Advertisement

Photosynthesis Research

, Volume 139, Issue 1–3, pp 239–251 | Cite as

Phenotyping of isogenic chlorophyll-less bread and durum wheat mutant lines in relation to photoprotection and photosynthetic capacity

  • Marek Zivcak
  • Marian BresticEmail author
  • Lenka Botyanszka
  • Yang-Er Chen
  • Suleyman I. AllakhverdievEmail author
Original article

Abstract

In our experiments, we examined high light responses and photosynthetic capacity of chlorophyll-less isogenic mutant lines of hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and tetraploid durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) in comparison to parental lines representing the wild type (WT), in two growth phases and two environments. In young plants, we observed a typical yellow-green phenotype with low chlorophyll content, significantly lower CO2 assimilation rate, elevated chlorophyll a-to-b ratio and insufficient regulation of linear electron transport. In the mutants grown in a moderate light in the growth chamber, a typical “chlorina” phenotype almost disappeared or, at least, was significantly alleviated in later growth stages, including the values of CO2 assimilation and the majority of the measured parameters related to photoprotective responses. On the other hand, in the case of the mutant lines grown in direct sunlight and fluctuating environment, the chlorophyll-less phenotype was evident also in latter growth phases. The chlorophyll-less phenotype was more severe in the durum wheat mutant lines compared to the bread wheat. For example, the durum wheat mutant lines grown outdoors expressed lower flexibility of photoprotective responses, including lower non-photochemical quenching and low rate of cyclic electron flow compared to WT or bread wheat mutants. Based on the analyses, we have identified a set of parameters providing information on the specific photosynthetic traits typical for the chlorophyll-less phenotype. Thus, the proposed way of phenotyping may serve for efficient selection of mutant genotypes for future research or screening activities. As a general result, we observed that the decrease of the chlorophyll content due to mutation was always associated with improper regulation of linear electron transport and a limited ability to prevent over-reduction of PSI acceptor side, regardless of the genotype, environment, and growth stage. This can partly explain why the low chlorophyll mutants were not successful in the evolution of higher plants, despite the photosynthetic capacity observed is high enough and they are fully competitive with wild-type plants in non-fluctuating controlled environment.

Keywords

Chlorina Bread wheat Durum wheat Photosystem I Photoinhibition Phenotyping 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the projects VEGA-1-0923-16, VEGA-1-0831-17, and APVV-15-0721. SIA was supported by grants from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (No: 17-04-01289). We thank Prof. N. Watanabe, College of Agriculture, Ibaraki University, Inashiki, Japan, for providing the seeds of the mutants and their characteristics. We also thank our former colleague Kristina Kunderlikova for her participation in the measurements.

Author contributions

MZ, MB, and SIA wrote the paper. MZ and LB conducted the statistical analyses and analyses of photosynthetic parameters. PH provided unique biological material and led the field experiments. MB, YCh, and SIA contributed to experimental design and interpretation of results, and helped to draft the manuscript. Neither the manuscript nor any part of its content has been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Andrews JR, Fryer MJ, Baker NR (1995) Consequences of LHC II deficiency for photosynthetic regulation in chlorina mutants of barley. Photosynth Res 44:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asada K (1999) The water–water cycle in chloroplasts: scavenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Annu Rev Plant Phys 50:601–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker NR (2008) Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Ann Rev Plant Biol 59:89–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brestic M, Zivcak M, Olsovska K, Repkova J (2008) Functional study of PS II and PS I energy use and dissipation mechanisms in barley wild type and Chlorina mutants under high light conditions. In Photosynthesis. Energy from the Sun. Springer, Netherlands, pp. 1407–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brestic M, Zivcak M, Kunderlikova K, Sytar O, Shao H, Kalaji HM, Allakhverdiev SI (2015) Low PSI content limits the photoprotection of PSI and PSII in early growth stages of chlorophyll b-deficient wheat mutant lines. Photosynth Res 125:151–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brestic M, Zivcak M, Kunderlikova K, Allakhverdiev SI (2016) High temperature specifically affects the photoprotective responses of chlorophyll b-deficient wheat mutant lines. Photosynth Res 130:251–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brestic M, Zivcak M, Hauptvogel P, Misheva S, Kocheva K, Yang X, Li X, Allakhverdiev SI (2018) Wheat plant selection for high yields entailed improvement of leaf anatomical and biochemical traits including tolerance to non-optimal temperature conditions. Photosynth Res 136:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cruz JA, Avenson TJ, Kanazawa A, Takizawa K, Edwards GE, Kramer DM (2005) Plasticity in light reactions of photosynthesis for energy production and photoprotection. J Exp Bot 56:395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Driever SM, Lawson T, Andralojc PJ, Raines CA, Parry MAJ (2014) Natural variation in photosynthetic capacity, growth, and yield in 64 field-grown wheat genotypes. J Exp Bot 65:4959–4973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubcovsky J, Dvorak J (2007) Genome plasticity a key factor in the success of polyploid wheat under domestication. Science 316:1862–1866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Falbel TG, Staehelin LA (1996) Partial blocks in the early steps of the chlorophyll synthesis pathway: a common feature of chlorophyll b-deficient mutants. Physiol Plant 97:311–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Falbel TG, Meehl JB, Staehelin LA (1996) Severity of mutant phenotype in a series of chlorophyll-deficient wheat mutants depends on light intensity and the severity of the block in chlorophyll synthesis. Plant Physiol 112:821–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Georgieva K, Fedina I, Maslenkova L, Peeva V (2003) Response of chlorina barley mutants to heat stress under low and high light. Funct Plant Biol 30:515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghirardi ML, Melis A (1988) Chlorophyll b deficiency in soybean mutants. I. Effects on photosystem stoichiometry and chlorophyll antenna size. Biochim Biophys Acta 932:130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilmore AM, Hazlett TL, Debrunner PG (1996) Photosystem II chlorophyll a fluorescence lifetimes and intensity are independent of the antenna size differences between barley wild-type and chlorina mutants: photochemical quenching and xanthophyll cycle-dependent nonphotochemical quenching of fluorescence. Photosynt Res 48:171–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grieco M, Tikkanen M, Paakkarinen V, Kangasjärvi S, Aro EM (2012) Steady-state phosphorylation of light-harvesting complex II proteins preserves Photosystem I under fluctuating white light. Plant Physiol 160:1896–1910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrison MA, Nemson JA, Melis A (1993) Assembly and composition of the chlorophyll a–b light-harvesting complex of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): immunochemical analysis of chlorophyll bless and chlorophyll b-deficient mutants. Photosynth Res 38:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang W, Yang YJ, Hu H, Zhang SB (2015) Different roles of cyclic electron flow around photosystem I under sub-saturating and saturating light intensities in tobacco leaves. Front Plant Sci 6:923Google Scholar
  19. Huang W, Yang YJ, Zhang JL, Hu H, Zhang SB (2017) Superoxide generated in the chloroplast stroma causes photoinhibition of photosystem I in the shade-establishing tree species Psychotria henryi. Photosynth Res 132:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang W, Cai YF, Wang JH, Zhang SB (2018) Chloroplastic ATP synthase plays an important role in the regulation of proton motive force in fluctuating light. J Plant Physiol 226:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson GN (2011) Physiology of PSI cyclic electron transport in higher plants. Biochim Biophys Acta 1807:384–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joliot P, Johnson GN (2011) Regulation of cyclic and linear electron flow in higher plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:13317–13322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klughammer C, Schreiber U (1994) Saturation pulse method for assessment of energy conversion in PS I. Planta 192:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kosuge K, Watanabe N, Kuboyama T (2011) Comparative genetic mapping of the chlorina mutant genes in genus Triticum. Euphytica 179:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koval SF (1997) The catalogue of near-isogenic lines of Novosibisskaya 67 common wheat and principles of their use in experiments. Russ J Genet 33:995–1000Google Scholar
  26. Kramer DM, Cruz JA, Kanazawa A (2003) Balancing the central roles of the thylakoid proton gradient. Trends Plant Sci 8:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kramer DM, Johnson G, Kiirats O, Edwards GE (2004) New fluorescence parameters for the determination of QA redox state and excitation energy fluxes. Photosynth Res 79:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kunderlikova K, Brestic M, Zivcak M, Kusniarova P (2016) Photosynthetic responses of sun-and shade-grown chlorophyll b deficient mutant of wheat. J Cent Eur Agric 17:950–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li Z, Wakao S, Fischer BB, Niyogi KK (2009) Sensing and responding to excess light. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li J, Wang Y, Chai J, Wang L, Wang C, Long W, Wang D, Wang Y, Zheng M, Peng C (2013) Green-revertible Chlorina 1 (grc1) is required for the biosynthesis of chlorophyll and the early development of chloroplasts in rice. J Plant Biol 56:326–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li X, Cai J, Liu F, Zhou Q, Dai T, Cao W, Jiang D (2015) Wheat plants exposed to winter warming are more susceptible to low temperature stress in the spring. Plant Growth Regul 77:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li XN, Brestic M, Tan DX, Zivcak M, Zhu XC, Liu SQ, Song FB, Reiter RJ, Liu FL (2018) Melatonin alleviates low PS I-limited carbon assimilation under elevated CO2 and enhances the cold tolerance of offspring in chlorophyll b-deficient mutant wheat. J Pineal Res 64:e12453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lichtenthaler HL (1987) Chlorophyll and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Method Enzymol 148:350–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lin ZF, Peng CL, Lin GZ, Ou ZY, Yang CW, Zhang JL (2003) Photosynthetic characteristics of two new chlorophyll b-less rice mutants. Photosynthetica 41:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Long SP, Marshall-Colon A, Zhu XG (2015) Meeting the global food demand of the future by engineering crop photosynthesis and yield potential. Cell 161:56–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Longin CF, Reif JC (2014) Redesigning the exploitation of wheat genetic resources. Trends Plant Sci 19(10):631–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mitrofanova OP (1991) Creation of the bank of soft wheat marker genes. 1. Analysis of chlorophyll mutations. In: Koval SF (ed) Near-isogenic lines of cultivated species. ICG SO AN SSSR, Novosibirsk, pp 47–57Google Scholar
  38. Miyake C, Miyata M, Shinzaki Y, Tomizawa KI (2005) CO2 response of cyclic electron flow around PSI (CEF-PSI) in tobacco leaves—relative electron fluxes through PSI and PSII determine the magnitude of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of Chl fluorescence. Plant Cell Physiol 46:629–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ort DR, Zhu XG, Melis A (2011) Optimizing antenna size to maximize photosynthetic efficiency. Plant Physiol 155:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE (1989) Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectrometry. Biochim Biophys Acta 975:384–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rajagopal S, Joly D, Gauthier A, Beauregard M, Carpentier R (2005) Protective effect of active oxygen scavengers on protein degradation and photochemical function in photosystem I submembrane fractions during light stress. FEBS J 272:892–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rassadina VV, Averina NG, Koval SF (2005) Disturbance of chlorophyll formation at the level of 5-aminolevulinic acid and mg-containing porphyrin synthesis in isogenic lines of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) marked with genes cn-A1 and cn-D1. Dokl Biol Sci 405:472–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schauer N, Semel Y, Roessner U, Gur A, Balbo I, Carrari F et al (2006) Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nat Biotechnol 24:447–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scheller HV, Haldrup A (2005) Photoinhibition of photosystem I. Planta 221:5–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schreiber U (1986) Detection of rapid induction kinetics with a new type of high-frequency modulated chlorophyll fluorometer. Photosynth Res 9:261–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shikanai T (2014) Central role of cyclic electron transport around photosystem I in the regulation of photosynthesis. Curr Opin Biotech 26:25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Song Q, Wang Y, Qu M, Ort DR, Zhu XG (2017) The impact of modifying photosystem antenna size on canopy photosynthetic efficiency-development of a new canopy photosynthesis model scaling from metabolism to canopy level processes. Plant Cell Environ 40:2946–2957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sonoike K (2010) Photoinhibition of photosystem I. Physiol Plant 142:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Suorsa M, Jarvi S, Grieco M, Nurmi M, Pietrzykowska M, Rantala M, Kangasjarvi S, Paakkarinen V, Tikkanen M, Jansson S, Aro EM (2012) Proton gradient regulation5 is essential for proper acclimation of Arabidopsis photosystem I to naturally and artificially fluctuating light conditions. Plant Cell 24:2934–2948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Takagi D, Takumi S, Hashiguchi M, Sejima T, Miyake C (2016) Superoxide and singlet oxygen produced within the thylakoid membranes both cause photosystem I photoinhibition. Plant Physiol 171:1626–1634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Terao T, Katoh S (1996) Antenna sizes of photosystem I and photosystem II in chlorophyll b-deficient mutants of rice. Evidence for an antenna function of photosystem II centers that are inactive in electron transport. Plant Cell Physiol 37:307–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Terao T, Yamashita A, Katoh S (1985) Chlorophyll b-deficient mutants of rice I. Absorption and fluorescence spectra and chlorophyll a/b ratios. Plant Cell Physiol 26:1361–1367Google Scholar
  53. Terao T, Sonoike K, Yamazaki JY, Kamimura Y, Katoh S (1996) Stoichiometries of photosystem I and photosystem II in rice mutants differently deficient in chlorophyll b. Plant Cell Physiol 37:299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tikkanen M, Grieco M, Nurmi M, Rantala M, Suorsa M, Aro EM (2012) Regulation of the photosynthetic apparatus under fluctuating growth light. Philos Trans R Soc B 367:3486–3493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tikkanen M, Mekala NR, Aro EM (2014) Photosystem II photoinhibition-repair cycle protects Photosystem I from irreversible damage. Biochim Biophys Acta 1837:210–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang Y, Zheng W, Zheng W et al (2018) Physiological and transcriptomic analyses of a yellow-green mutant with high photosynthetic efficiency in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Funct Integr Genomics 18:175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Watanabe N, Koval SF (2003) Mapping of chlorina mutant genes on the long arm of homoeologous group 7 chromosomes in common wheat with partial deletion lines. Euphytica 129:259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhu XG, Long SP, Ort DR (2010) Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:235–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zivcak M, Brestic M, Kalaji HM, Govindjee (2014) Photosynthetic responses of sun-and shade-grown barley leaves to high light: is the lower PSII connectivity in shade leaves associated with protection against excess of light? Photosynth Res 119:339–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zivcak M, Olsovska K, Brestic M (2017) Photosynthetic responses under harmful and changing environment: practical aspects in crop research. In: Photosynthesis: structures, mechanisms, and applications. Springer, Netherlands, pp. 203–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant PhysiologySlovak University of AgricultureNitraSlovakia
  2. 2.College of Life SciencesSichuan Agricultural UniversityYa’anChina
  3. 3.Institute of Plant Physiology Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  4. 4.Institute of Basic Biological ProblemsRussian Academy of SciencesPushchinoRussia
  5. 5.Department of Plant PhysiologyM.V. Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  6. 6.Moscow Institute of Physics and TechnologyDolgoprudnyRussia
  7. 7.Institute of Molecular Biology and BiotechnologyAzerbaijan National Academy of SciencesBakuAzerbaijan

Personalised recommendations