Photosynthesis Research

, Volume 113, Issue 1–3, pp 287–295 | Cite as

Plasticity of photosynthetic performance of the Indian tree Butea monosperma TAUB. at three sites with different microclimates

  • Melanie Mikosch
  • Nilima Kumari
  • Tripti Sharma
  • Vinay Sharma
  • Arthur Gessler
  • Elke Fischer-Schliebs
  • Ulrich Lüttge
Regular Paper


The Fabaceae tree Butea monosperma (TAUB.; syn. Erythrina monosperma (LAM.)) is widely distributed in Central and West-India. We studied it at three sites, i.e. at two locations with contrasting exposure (NE and SW, respectively) in a small mountain range with poor soil on highly drained rocky slopes and at a third location in a plane with deeper soils and better water supply. The two mountain range sites differed in the light climate where the NE-slope obtained more day-integrated irradiance. Chlorophyll fluorescence was measured with a portable fluorometer and leaf samples for stable isotope analyses (δ13C, δ15N, δ18O) were collected. No differences were seen in carbon and nitrogen contents of leaves at the three sites. N and O isotope signatures of the leaves were similar at the two rocky hill slope sites. More positive values for both signatures were obtained in the leaves in the plane. For all sites saturation of ETR was only achieved well above a PPFD of 1,000 μmol m−2 s−1 indicating that the leaves were sun-type leaves. The photosynthetic performance of Butea at the plane was very similar to that at the SW-slope of the mountain range and higher ETRs were obtained at the NE-slope. Ecophysiological flexibility allows Butea to perform well in a variety of habitats and yet gives it particular fitness at specific sites. The best performance was observed in the highly insolated steep rocky hill site (NE-slope) underlining the suitability of the tree for reforestation.


Chlorophyll fluorescence Ecological amplitude Reforestation Ribulose-bis-phosphate carboxylase/oxygenase Stable isotope ratios Stomatal control 



The remarks of two anonymous reviewers helped to improve the presentation. We thank the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (DST) and Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) for support of the work in the scope of the “Project Based Personnel Exchange Programme” between the University of Banasthali Vidyapith, India, and the Darmstadt University of Technology, Germany.


  1. Agarwal SK, Garg RK, Vyas NL (1996) Structure and function of forest ecosystem of South Rajasthan. In: Vyas NL, Garg RK, Purohit SD (eds) Contributions to the environmental sciences. Himanshu Publ., Udaipur, pp 1–23Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal AK, Tripathi DM, Sahai R, Gupta N, Saxena RP, Puri A, Singh M, Misra RN, Dubey CB, Saxena KC (1997) Management of giardiasis by a herbal drug ‘Pippali Rasayana’: a clinical study. J Ethnopharmacol 56:233–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandara BM, Kumar NS, Samaranayke KM (1989) An antifungal constituent from the stem bark of Butea monosperma. J Ethnopharmacol 25:73–75Google Scholar
  4. Barbour M (2007) Review: stable oxygen isotope composition of plant tissue: a review. Funct Plant Biol 34:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhattacharjee SK (1998) Handbook of medical plants, Pointer Publ. Jaipur, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  6. Bilger W, Björkman O (1990) Role of the xanthophyll cycle in photoprotection elucidated by measurements of light-induced absorbance changes, fluorescence and photosynthesis in leaves of Hedera canariensis. Photosynth Res 25:173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bilger W, Schreiber U, Bock M (1995) Determination of the quantum efficiency of photosystem II and of non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in the field. Oecologia 102:425–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bole PV (1999) Butea monosperma. In: Schütt P, Schuck H, Aas G, Lang U (eds) Enzyklopädie der Holzgewächse 15, ecomed Verlagsgesellschaft, DeutschlandGoogle Scholar
  9. Choudhary RK, Saroha AE, Swarnkar PI (2011) Screening of endogenous antioxidants in some medical plants. Toxicol Environ Chem 93:656–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaudhury RR (1993) The quest for a herbal contraceptive. Natl Med J India 6:199–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cherdshewasart W, Nimsakul N (2003) Clinical trial of Butea superba, an alternative herbal treatment for erictile dysfunction. Asian J Androl 5:243–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi WJ, Arshad MA, Chang SX, Kim TH (2006) Grain 15N of crops applied with organic and chemical fertilizers in a four-year rotation. Plant Soil 284:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dastur JF (1997) Medical plants of India and Pakistan, 4th reprint. D.B. Taraporevala Sons & Co, Private LTD, BombayGoogle Scholar
  14. Demmig B, Björkman O (1987) Comparison of the effect of excessive light on chlorophyll fluorescence (77 K) and photon yield of O2 evolution in leaves of higher plants. Planta 171:171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farquhar GD, O’Leary MH, Berry JA (1982) On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the inter-cellular carbon-dioxide concentration in leaves. Aust J Plant Physiol 9:121–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40:503–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Genty B, Briantais J-M, Baker NR (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta 990:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gessler A, Nitschke R, de Mattos EA, Zaluar HLT, Scarano FR, Rennenberg H, Lüttge U (2008) Comparison of the performance of three different ecophysiological life forms in a sandy coastal restinga ecosystem of SE-Brazil: a nodulated N2-fixing C3-shrub (Andira legalis (Vell.) Toledo), a CAM-shrub (Clusia hilariana Schltdl.) and a tap root C3-hemicryptophyte (Allagoptera arenaria (Gomes) O. Ktze.). Trees 22:105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hirpara DD, Ramoliya KJ, Patel AD, Pandey AN (2005) Effect of salinisation of soil on growth and macro- and micronutrient accumulation in seedlings of Butea monosperma (Fabaceae). Anal Biol 27:3–14Google Scholar
  20. Kale MP, Roy PS (2012) Net primary productivity estimation and its relationship with tree diversity for tropical dry deciduous forests of central India. Biodivers Conserv 21:1199–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumari N, Sharma V, Mikosch M, Unfried C, Geßler A, Fischer-Schliebs E, Lüttge U (2005) Seasonal photosynthetic performance and nutrient relations of Butea monosperma TAUB: in comparison to two other woody species of a seasonal deciduous forest in SE-Rajasthan and to planted trees in the area. Indian J For 28:116–126Google Scholar
  22. Lieth H, Berelkamp J, Fuest S, Riediger S (1999) Climate diagram world atlas, 1st edn. Backhuys Publisher, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  23. Mehta BK, Dubey A, Bokadia MM, Mehta SC (1983) Isolation and in vitro antimicrobial efficiency of Butea monosperma seed oil on human pathogenic bacteria and phytopathogenic fungi. Acta Microbiol Hung 30:75–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakano A, Uehara Y, Yamauchi A (2003) Effect of organic and inorganic fertigation on yields, δ 15N values, and δ13C values of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Saturn). Plant Soil 255:343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pandey BP (1989) Plants for human kind: sacred plants of India. Shree Publ House, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  26. Rascher U, Liebig M, Lüttge U (2000) Evaluation of instant light-response curves of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters obtained with a portable chlorophyll fluorometer on site in the field. Plant Cell Environ 23:1397–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Razdan MK, Kapila K, Bhide NK (1969) Antifertility effect and some pharmacological actions of Butea frondosa seed extracts. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 13:239–249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Scheidegger Y, Saurer M, Bahn M, Siegwolf R (2000) Linking stable oxygen and carbon isotopes with stomatal conductance and photosynthetic capacity: a conceptual model. Oecologia 125:350–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schreiber U, Bilger W (1993) Progress in chlorophyll fluorescence research: major developments during the past years in retrospect. Prog Bot 54:151–173Google Scholar
  30. Schreiber U, Bilger W, Neubauer C (1995) Chlorophyll fluorescence as a non-intrusive indicator for rapid assessment of in vitro photosynthesis. In: Schulze E-D, Caldwell M (eds) Ecophysiology of photosynthesis. Springer, Berlin, pp 49–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vaghela PM, Patel NT, Pandey IB, Pandey AN (2010) Implications of calcium nutrition on the response of Butea monosperma (Fabaceae) to soil salinity. Anal Biol 32:15–27Google Scholar
  32. Walter H, Breckle S-W (1999) Vegetation und Klimazonen. Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 35–41Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melanie Mikosch
    • 1
  • Nilima Kumari
    • 2
  • Tripti Sharma
    • 2
  • Vinay Sharma
    • 2
  • Arthur Gessler
    • 3
  • Elke Fischer-Schliebs
    • 4
  • Ulrich Lüttge
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre for Organismal Studies HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Department of Bioscience and BiotechnologyBanasthali VidyapithVidyapithIndia
  3. 3.Institute for Landscape BiogeochemistryLeibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)MünchebergGermany
  4. 4.Institute of BotanyDarmstadt University of TechnologyDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations