High-throughput pyrosequencing of the chloroplast genome of a highly neutral-lipid-producing marine pennate diatom, Fistulifera sp. strain JPCC DA0580
- 556 Downloads
The chloroplast genome of the highly neutral-lipid-producing marine pennate diatom Fistulifera sp. strain JPCC DA0580 was fully sequenced using high-throughput pyrosequencing. The general features and gene content were compared with three other complete diatom chloroplast genomes. The chloroplast genome is 134,918 bp with an inverted repeat of 13,330 bp and is slightly larger than the other diatom chloroplast genomes due to several low gene-density regions lacking similarity to the other diatom chloroplast genomes. Protein-coding genes were nearly identical to those from Phaeodactylum tricornutum. On the other hand, we found unique sequence variations in genes of photosystem II which differ from the consensus in other diatom chloroplasts. Furthermore, five functional unknown ORFs and a putative serine recombinase gene, serC2, are located in the low gene-density regions. SerC2 was also identified in the plasmids of another pennate diatom, Cylindrotheca fusiformis, and in the plastid genome of the diatom endosymbiont of Kryptoperidinium foliaceum. Exogenous plasmids might have been incorporated into the chloroplast genome of Fistulifera sp. by lateral gene transfer. Chloroplast genome sequencing analysis of this novel diatom provides many important insights into diatom evolution.
KeywordsDiatom Chloroplast genome Next-generation DNA sequencing Lateral gene transfer Endosymbiosis
This work was supported by JST, CREST.
- Guillard RRL (1975) Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates. In: Smith WL, Chanley MH (eds) Culture of marine invertebrate animals. Plenum Press, New York, pp 26–60Google Scholar
- Tangphatsornruang S, Sangsrakru D, Chanprasert J, Uthaipaisanwong P, Yoocha T, Jomchai N, Tragoonrung S (2010) The chloroplast genome sequence of mungbean (Vigna radiata) determined by high-throughput pyrosequencing: structural organization and phylogenetic relationships. DNA Res 17(1):11–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar