Advertisement

Improving nitrogen assessment with an RGB camera across uncertain natural light from above-canopy measurements

  • 203 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

The farming activities in developing countries are mostly conducted in daytime with varying intensities of natural light throughout the day. Also, the shade trees can further increase the uncertainty of natural light exposure on plants. This research proposes an appropriate method to standardize index values obtained from an RGB digital camera for assessing biophysical properties, especially nitrogen content. Nutrient content in plants is an important factor that characterizes plant yields and health. Determining the status of plant nutrients often requires field observation. The conventional laboratory methods and remote sensing applications (i.e. satellite, airborne and spectrometer) are still expensive. Also, weather and field condition significantly affect the quality of measurement results. The use of consumer-grade digital cameras has been explored as an alternative low-cost tool for non-scientific end users; however, the use of a camera for above-canopy measurement is severely constrained by unfavorable weather condition coupled with limited time available for the measurement that depends on the intensity of incident light and the condition of plantation area. Furthermore, shade trees present in plantation areas reduce the quality of measurement results. By using this newly proposed method, measurement accuracy is improved and the potential use of Red, Green, and Blue (RGB) cameras during daytime is explored. Since many studies showed that the Hue index was a potential tool for estimating biological properties, this study used exposure value (EV) to adjust the digital number (DN) and Hue index to observe the potential of calibrated and standardized DN and Indices for estimating greenness of Robusta coffee plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Aasen, H., Burkart, A., Bolten, A., & Bareth, G. (2015). Generating 3D hyperspectral information with lightweight UAV snapshot cameras for vegetation monitoring: From camera calibration to quality assurance. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,108, 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.08.002.

  2. Bourgeon, M.-A., Paoli, J.-N., Jones, G., Villette, S., & Gée, C. (2016). Field radiometric calibration of a multispectral on-the-go sensor dedicated to the characterization of vineyard foliage. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,123, 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.02.019.

  3. Campanha, M. M., Santos, R. H. S., de Freitas, G. B., Martinez, H. E. P., Garcia, S. L. R., & Finger, F. L. (2004). Growth and yield of coffee plants in agroforestry and monoculture systems in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Agroforestry Systems,63(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000049435.22512.2d.

  4. Coudun, C., Gégout, J.-C., Piedallu, C., & Rameau, J.-C. (2006). Soil nutritional factors improve models of plant species distribution: an illustration with Acer campestre (L.) in France. Journal of Biogeography,33(10), 1750–1763. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01443.x.

  5. ICCRI. (1999). Field School of Integrated Pest ManagementField Guide 2: Coffee Commodity. Material Set of CRASH COURSE: Book Edition 1. Jember, Indonesia: Indonesian Coffee and Cocoa Research Institute.

  6. Jia, L., Buerkert, A., Chen, X., Roemheld, V., & Zhang, F. (2004). Low-altitude aerial photography for optimum N fertilization of winter wheat on the North China Plain. Field Crops Research,89(2–3), 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.02.014.

  7. Lebourgeois, V., Bégué, A., Labbé, S., Mallavan, B., Prévot, L., & Roux, B. (2008). Can commercial digital cameras be used as multispectral sensors? A crop monitoring test. Sensors,8(11), 7300–7322. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8117300.

  8. Masunga, R. H., Uzokwe, V. N., Mlay, P. D., Odeh, I., Singh, A., Buchan, D., et al. (2016). Nitrogen mineralization dynamics of different valuable organic amendments commonly used in agriculture. Applied Soil Ecology,101, 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.01.006.

  9. McNeil, B. E., Pisek, J., Lepisk, H., & Flamenco, E. A. (2016). Measuring leaf angle distribution in broadleaf canopies using UAVs. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,218–219, 204–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.12.058.

  10. Muñoz-Huerta, R. F., Guevara-Gonzalez, R. G., Contreras-Medina, L. M., Torres-Pacheco, I., Prado-Olivarez, J., & Ocampo-Velazquez, R. V. (2013). A review of methods for sensing the nitrogen status in plants: Advantages, disadvantages and recent advances. Sensors,13(8), 10823–10843. https://doi.org/10.3390/s130810823.

  11. Nguy-Robertson, A. L., Buckley, E. M. B., Suyker, A. S., & Awada, T. N. (2016). Determining factors that impact the calibration of consumer-grade digital cameras used for vegetation analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1199061.

  12. Raun, W. R., & Johnson, G. V. (1999). Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agronomy Journal,91(3), 357–363.

  13. Reinhard, E., Adhikhmin, M., Gooch, B., & Shirley, P. (2001). Color transfer between images. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications,21(4), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.946629.

  14. Rigon, J. P. G., Capuani, S., Fernandes, D. M., & Guimarães, T. M. (2016). A novel method for the estimation of soybean chlorophyll content using a smartphone and image analysis. Photosynthetica, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-016-0214-x.

  15. Sakamoto, T., Gitelson, A. A., Nguy-Robertson, A. L., Arkebauer, T. J., Wardlow, B. D., Suyker, A. E., et al. (2012). An alternative method using digital cameras for continuous monitoring of crop status. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,154–155, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.10.014.

  16. Sakamoto, T., Gitelson, A. A., Wardlow, B. D., Arkebauer, T. J., Verma, S. B., Suyker, A. E., et al. (2011a). Application of day and night digital photographs for estimating maize biophysical characteristics. Precision Agriculture,13(3), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-011-9246-1.

  17. Sakamoto, T., Shibayama, M., Kimura, A., & Takada, E. (2011b). Assessment of digital camera-derived vegetation indices in quantitative monitoring of seasonal rice growth. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,66(6), 872–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.08.005.

  18. Sakamoto, T., Shibayama, M., Takada, E., Inoue, A., Morita, K., Takahashi, W., et al. (2010). Detecting seasonal changes in crop community structure using day and night digital images. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing,76(6), 713–726. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.76.6.713.

  19. Toth, C., & Jóźków, G. (2015). Remote sensing platforms and sensors: A survey. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,115, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.10.004.

  20. Vesali, F., Omid, M., Kaleita, A., & Mobli, H. (2015). Development of an android app to estimate chlorophyll content of corn leaves based on contact imaging. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,116, 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.06.012.

  21. Vesali, F., Omid, M., Mobli, H., & Kaleita, A. (2016). Feasibility of using smart phones to estimate chlorophyll content in corn plants. Photosynthetica, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-016-0677-9.

  22. Widjaja Putra, B. T., & Soni, P. (2017). Evaluating NIR-Red and NIR-Red edge external filters with digital cameras for assessing vegetation indices under different illumination. Infrared Physics and Technology,81, 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2017.01.007.

  23. Widjaja Putra, B. T., & Soni, P. (2018). Enhanced broadband greenness in assessing Chlorophyll a and b, Carotenoid, and Nitrogen in Robusta coffee plantations using a digital camera. Precision Agriculture,19(2), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-017-9513-x.

  24. Willson, C. (1985). Coffee: botany, biochemistry and production of beans and beverage. In M. N. Clifford & K. C. Willson (Eds.), (pp. 135–156). Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6657-1_6.

  25. Winston, E., Op de Laak, J., Marsh, T., Lempke, H., & Chapmen, K. (2005). Arabica coffee manual for Lao. RAP Publication 2005/08. Bangkok, Thailand: FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the General Directorate of Higher Education (DIKTI-Indonesia) and the Asian Institute of Technology (Thailand). The authors would also like to acknowledge the support received from Indonesian Coffee and Cocoa Research Institute (ICCRI) for assisting field data collection.

Author information

Correspondence to Peeyush Soni.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Putra, B.T.W., Soni, P. Improving nitrogen assessment with an RGB camera across uncertain natural light from above-canopy measurements. Precision Agric 21, 147–159 (2020) doi:10.1007/s11119-019-09656-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Broadband greenness
  • Standardization
  • Above-canopy measurement
  • Chlorophyll
  • Nitrogen content
  • Coffee plant