Advertisement

GIS-based spatial nitrogen management model for maize: short- and long-term marginal net return maximising nitrogen application rates

  • E. Memic
  • S. Graeff
  • W. Claupein
  • W. D. Batchelor
Article
  • 86 Downloads

Abstract

Crop growth models including CERES-Maize and CROPGRO-Soybean have been used in the past to evaluate causes of spatial yield variability and to evaluate economic consequences of variable rate prescriptions. In this work, a nitrogen prescription program has been developed that simulates the consequences of different nitrogen prescriptions using the DSSAT crop growth models. The objective of this paper is to describe a site-specific nitrogen prescription and economic optimizer program developed for computing spatially optimum N rates over long periods of weather and plant population for maize (Zea mays L.) using the CERES-Maize model. The application of the model was demonstrated on a field in Germany and another one in the USA to evaluate the concept across different environmental conditions. The user can determine the short- and the long-term optimal spatial nitrogen prescription based on crop price and nitrogen cost. The program simulated short-term optimum N applications that averaged 9% (McGarvey field, USA) and 48% (Riech field, Germany) lower than the uniform rates actually applied in the fields. The program indicated different site-specific N management options for low and high yielding fields under the assumed prices for maize and N. The implementation of a site-specific plant population management was investigated. A site-specific-optimization of plant population showed a higher profitability in the heterogeneous field in Germany. Hard pan depth, hard pan factor, root distribution factor and the percentage of available soil water across the heterogeneous field were useful indicators in predicting the magnitude of site-specific plant population benefits over uniform rates.

Keywords

CERES-Maize Nitrogen management Plant population Nitrogen balance Marginal net return 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Project is supported by funds of the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) based on a decision of the Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany via the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) under the Innovation Support Program (GZ 313-06.01-28-1-57.054-15) and by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, US Department of Agriculture, Hatch Project (ALA014-1-16016).

References

  1. Batchelor, W. D., Paz, J. O., & Thorp, K. R. (2004). Development and evaluation of a decision support system for precision agriculture. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on precision agriculture. Madison, WI, USA: ASA–CSSA–SSSA (CDROM).Google Scholar
  2. Duncan, W. G. (1958). The relationship between corn population and yield. Agronomy Journal, 50, 82–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. FAOSTAT. (2014). Statistical database of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. Retrieved August 2018, from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#country/.
  4. QGIS Development Team. (2009). QGIS geographic information system. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. Retrieved August 2018, from https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/geospatialsimulation/.
  5. Jones, J. W., Hoogenboom, G. J., Porter, C., Boote, K. J., Batchelor, W. D., Hunt, L. A., et al. (2003). DSSAT cropping system model. Special Edition of European Journal of Agronomy, 18, 235–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Link, E. J., Graeff, S., & Batchelor, W. D. (2008). Evaluation of current and model-based site-specific nitrogen applications on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield and environmental quality. Precision Agriculture, 9, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Link, E. J., Graeff, S., Batchelor, W. D., & Claupein, W. (2006). Evaluating the economic and environmental impact of a German compensation payment policy under uniform and variable-rate nitrogen management strategies using a crop model. Agricultural Systems, 91, 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Link, E. J., Graeff, S. S., & Claupein, W. (2013). Comparison of uniform control and site-specific model-based nitrogen prescription in term of grain yield, nitrogen efficiency and economic aspects in a heterogeneous corn field. Journal of Cultivated Plants, 65(6), 236–247.Google Scholar
  9. Miao, Y., Mulla, D. J., Batchelor, W. D., Paz, J. O., & Robert, P. C. (2006). Evaluating management zone optimal N rates with a crop growth model. Agronomy Journal, 98(3), 545–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Olson, R. A., & Sanders, D. H. (1988). Maize production. In G. F. Spraggue & J. W. Dudley (Eds.), Corn and corn improvement (pp. 639–686). Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
  11. Paz, J. O., Batchelor, W. D., Colvin, T. S., Logsdon, S. D., Kaspar, T. C., Karlen, D. L., et al. (1999). Model-based techniques to determine variable rate nitrogen for corn. Agricultural Systems, 60, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Paz, J. O., Batchelor, W. D., & Tylka, G. L. (2001). Method to use crop growth models to estimate potential return for variable-rate management in soybeans. Transactions of the ASAE, 44(5), 1335–1341.Google Scholar
  13. Tetio-Kagho, F., & Gardner, F. P. (1988). Response of maize to plant population density: II. Reproductive development, yield and yield adjustment. Agronomy Journal, 80, 935–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Thorp, K. R., Batchelor, W. D., Paz, J. O., Steward, B. L., & Caragea, P. C. (2006). Methodology to link production and environmental risks of precision nitrogen management strategies in corn. Agricultural Systems, 89(2–3), 272–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Thorp, K. R., & Bronson, K. (2013). A model-independent open-source geospatial tool for managing point-based environmental model simulations at multiple spatial locations. Environmental Modeling and Software, 50, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Thorp, K. R., DeJonge, K. C., Kaleita, A. L., Batchelor, W. D., & Paz, J. O. (2008). Methodology for the use of DSSAT models for precision agriculture decision support. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 64, 276–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HohenheimStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.Biosystems Engineering DepartmentAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations