Mapping within-field variability in wheat yield and biomass using remote sensing vegetation indices
This paper explored the ability of remote sensing (RS) and meteorological data to map the variability of yield/biomass in cultivated wheat (Triticum aestivum). The methodology integrated a time series of RS-based vegetation indices (VI) into a simple model based on the water productivity. Thus, the study analyzed if the biophysical parameters deduced from the VI could be used for the quantification of the differences in crop growth and yield assuming that in operative scenarios, the spatial distribution of the factors limiting the crop growth is unknown. The results of the model were analyzed in terms of the absolute values and the within-field variability with respect to space-continuous measurements of yield and biomass data. The variability registered in the fields was quantified as the ratio between actual yield or biomass in any given location and the mean value for the analyzed variable in each field. The good correlation between measured and modelled variability demonstrated the potential of the proposed approach to reproduce variability even under stress conditions. The proposed approach defined differences in crop growth similar to the ground measurements. The additional evidence obtained point to the necessity of considering the individual time-trajectory of each pixel for the assessment of within field variability. This approach requires the identification of the beginning and the end of the growing cycle. The proposed methodology, based on thresholds of VI offered promising results.
KeywordsNDVI Crop coefficient Water use efficiency AQUACROP
This research was developed in the framework of the projects HERMANA (HERramientas para el MAnejo sostenible de fertilización Nitrogenada y Agua), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (AGL2015-68700-R) and FATIMA (FArming Tools for external nutrient Inputs and water MAnagement), funded by the European Union´s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement No 633945). The authors of this paper are the persons that collaborate actively analyzing the data and preparing the manuscript, but we must acknowledge the effort of the persons involved in the data collection and processing (E. Sánchez from IDR-UCLM and F.M. Jara, I. Narro, F. Alonso, B. Quirós, H. Alcaraz, E. Pareja and P. Avilés from Instituto Técnico Agronómico Provincial) and the development of the software TONI (D. Guerrero from UCLM-IDR). The authors thank the three anonymous reviewers and the editor for their insightful comments and suggestions.
- Allen, R.G., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
- Campos, I., González, L., Villodre, J., Calera, M., Campoy, J., Jiménez, N., et al. (2017a). Mapping within-field biomass variability: a remote sensing-based approach. In J. Taylor, D. Cammarano, A. Prashar, & A. Hamilton. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Precision Agriculture, Advances in Animal Bioscience. vol. 8, (pp. 764–769).Google Scholar
- Dalla Marta, A., Grifoni, D., Mancini, M., Orlando, F., Guasconi, F., & Orlandini, S. (2013). Durum wheat in-field monitoring and early-yield prediction: assessment of potential use of high resolution satellite imagery in a hilly area of Tuscany, Central Italy. Journal of Agricultural Science., 153, 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dixon, J., & McCann, M. (1997). Precision Agriculture in the 21st century, Geospatial and information technologies in crop management. Washington DC, USA: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Duchemin, B., Hadria, R., Er-Raki, S., Boulet, G., Maisongrande, P., Chehbouni, A., et al. (2006). Monitoring wheat phenology and irrigation in central Morocco: On the use of relationships between evapotranspiration, crop coefficients, leaf area index and remotely-sensed vegetation indices. Agricultural Water Management, 79, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Iqbal, M. A., Shen, Y., Stricevic, R., Pei, H., Sun, H., Amiri, E., et al. (2014). Evaluation of the FAO AquaCrop model for winter wheat on the North China Plain under deficit irrigation from field experiment to regional yield simulation. Agricultural Water Management, 135, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jin, X., Li, Z., Yang, G., Yang, H., Feng, H., Xu, X., et al. (2017). Winter wheat yield estimation based on multi-source medium resolution optical and radar imaging data and the AquaCrop model using the particle swarm optimization algorithm. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 126, 24–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T., & Fereres, E. (2011). Aquacrop reference manual. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
- Ritchie, J. T., Singh, U., Godwin, D. C., & Bowen, W. T. (1998). Cereal growth, development and yield. In G. Y. Tsuji, G. Hoogenboom, & P. K. Thornton (Eds.), Understanding options for agricultural production. Systems approaches for sustainable agricultural development (pp. 79–98). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sadras, V., Cassman, K., Grassini, P., Hall, A., Bastiaanssen, W., Laborte, A., et al. (2015). Yield gap analysis of rainfed and irrigated crops: Methods and case studies. FAO water reports 41. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
- Steduto, P., Hsiao, T., Fereres, E., & Raes, D. (2012). Crop yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 66. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
- Steduto, P., Raes, D., Hsiao, T. C., Fereres, E., Heng, L. K., Howell, T. A., et al. (2009). Concepts and applications of AQUACROP: the FAO crop water productivity model. In W. Cao, J. W. White, & E. Wang (Eds.), Crop modeling and decision support (pp. 175–191). Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar