Public–private collaboration toward research, education and innovation opportunities in precision agriculture
- 179 Downloads
Regular assessment of precision agriculture (PA) knowledge gaps and opportunities, of PA’s relationship to decision and sustainable agriculture, and of the roles of various research and educational institutions helps advance the development, use and adoption of this science. It also helps to limit redundancy in a science that is rapidly evolving. Such assessments were conducted during a 2016 roundtable discussion by 32 public-sector and industry scientists, administrators and stakeholders predominately from the United States but also from Brazil, Canada, Germany, Israel, New Zealand, South Korea, and the United Kingdom. This article synthesizes those discussions and presents perspectives on developing coordinated, useable decisions from PA to meet sustainable agriculture goals. It concludes with milestones needed to advance PA research and development. Results will guide both public and private researchers and other stakeholders seeking to develop PA to help meet national and global sustainability goals for agriculture. These efforts will also act as a catalyst for regular discussions on PA research, education and development opportunities and coordination between public and private institutions in international forums on PA. Expected impacts include global action to help bring PA techniques and technologies into the mainstream of farming systems and acceleration of the interaction of genetics, environment, management and socioeconomic [(G × E × M) S] approach to sustainably intensify agriculture.
KeywordsKnowledge gaps Decision support systems Sustainability Milestones Vision Metrics
Plant available water capacity
The authors appreciate the USDA-ARS Office of International Research Programs and the International Society of Precision Agriculture (ISPA) for hosting the roundtable, the contributions of all roundtable participants, and the helpful comments of Raj Khosla, founding president of ISPA, on an early version of the manuscript.
- American Society of Agronomy (ASA). (January 1989). Decision reached on sustainable agriculture. Agronomy News, p. 15. (ASA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA).Google Scholar
- Cassman, K. G. (1999). Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: Yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(11), 5952–5959. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.96.11.5952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Davidson, J. I., Jr., Lamb, M. C., Sternitzke, D. A., Butts, C. L., & Valentine, H. (2002). Irrigator pro 1.0 vs. irrigator pro 2.0. American Peanut Research and Education Society Abstracts.Google Scholar
- Erickson, B., & Widmar, D. A. (2015). Precision agricultural services: Dealership survey results, draft. Purdue University. http://agribusiness.purdue.edu/files/resources/2015-crop-life-purdue-precision-dealer-survey.pdf.
- European Commission. (2015). EIP-AGRI focus group precision farming final report. https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri-eip/files/eip-agri_focus_group_on_precision_farming_final_report_2015.pdf.
- Mulla, D. J. (2013). Twenty five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: Key advances and remaining knowledge gaps. Biosystems Engineering, 114(4), 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.08.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pierce, F. J., & Sadler E. J. (Eds.). (1997). The state of site-specific management for agriculture. 31 October 1995, St. Louis, MO. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
- Robert, P. C., Rust R. H., & Larsen, W. E. (Eds.). (1992). Soil specific crop management: A workshop on research and development issues. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
- Robert, P. C., Rust R. H., & Larsen, W. E. (Eds.). (1994). Proceedings of site-specific management for agricultural systems. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
- Schimmelpfennig, D. (2016). Farm profits and adoption of precision agriculture. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. ERR-217.Google Scholar
- U.S. Congress. Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990. Public Law 101–624: U.S. Farm Bill.Google Scholar
- Walbridge, M. R., & Shafer, S. R. (2011). A long-term agro-ecosystem research (LTAR) network for agriculture. In Proceedings of the fourth interagency conference on research in the watersheds, Fairbanks. Fairbanks, AK, USA: USGS.Google Scholar
- Williams, J. R., Izaurralde, R. C., & Steglich, E. M. (2012). Agricultural policy/environmental extender model. Theoretical documentation. Temple, TX: Texas A&M AgriLife Blackland Research and Extension Center.Google Scholar
- Yang, C., Odvody, G. N., Thomasson, J. A., Isakeit, T., & Nichols, R. L. (2016). Change detection of cotton root rot infection over 10-year intervals using airborne multispectral imagery. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 123(C), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.02.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar