Advertisement

Precision Agriculture

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 4–18 | Cite as

Public–private collaboration toward research, education and innovation opportunities in precision agriculture

  • M. A. YostEmail author
  • K. A. Sudduth
  • C. L. Walthall
  • N. R. Kitchen
Brief Communication
  • 179 Downloads

Abstract

Regular assessment of precision agriculture (PA) knowledge gaps and opportunities, of PA’s relationship to decision and sustainable agriculture, and of the roles of various research and educational institutions helps advance the development, use and adoption of this science. It also helps to limit redundancy in a science that is rapidly evolving. Such assessments were conducted during a 2016 roundtable discussion by 32 public-sector and industry scientists, administrators and stakeholders predominately from the United States but also from Brazil, Canada, Germany, Israel, New Zealand, South Korea, and the United Kingdom. This article synthesizes those discussions and presents perspectives on developing coordinated, useable decisions from PA to meet sustainable agriculture goals. It concludes with milestones needed to advance PA research and development. Results will guide both public and private researchers and other stakeholders seeking to develop PA to help meet national and global sustainability goals for agriculture. These efforts will also act as a catalyst for regular discussions on PA research, education and development opportunities and coordination between public and private institutions in international forums on PA. Expected impacts include global action to help bring PA techniques and technologies into the mainstream of farming systems and acceleration of the interaction of genetics, environment, management and socioeconomic [(G × E × M) S] approach to sustainably intensify agriculture.

Keywords

Knowledge gaps Decision support systems Sustainability Milestones Vision Metrics 

Abbreviations

DSS

Decision-support system

EC

Electrical conductivity

IP

Intellectual property

PA

Precision agriculture

PAWC

Plant available water capacity

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the USDA-ARS Office of International Research Programs and the International Society of Precision Agriculture (ISPA) for hosting the roundtable, the contributions of all roundtable participants, and the helpful comments of Raj Khosla, founding president of ISPA, on an early version of the manuscript.

References

  1. American Society of Agronomy (ASA). (January 1989). Decision reached on sustainable agriculture. Agronomy News, p. 15. (ASA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA).Google Scholar
  2. Bongiovanni, R., & Lowenberg-Deboer, J. (2004). Precision agriculture and sustainability. Precision Agriculture, 5, 359–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brant, W. L., & Walker, O. L. (1967). Extending the representative farm concept in farm management education. Journal of Farm Economics, 49(5), 1516–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cahoon, J., Ferguson, J., Edwards, D., & Tacker, P. (1990). A microcomputer-based irrigation scheduler for the humid mid-South region. Applied Engineering and Agriculture, 6(3), 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cassman, K. G. (1999). Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: Yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(11), 5952–5959.  https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.96.11.5952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conway, L. S., Yost, M. A., Kitchen, N. R., Sudduth, K. A., Thompson, A. L., & Massey, R. E. (2017). Topsoil thickness effects on corn, soybean, and switchgrass production on claypan soils. Agronomy Journal, 109(3), 782–794.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2016.06.0365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crookston, R. K. (2006). A top 10 list of developments and issues impacting crop management and ecology during the past 50 years. Crop Science, 46(5), 2253–2262.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.11.0416gas.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davidson, J. I., Jr., Lamb, M. C., Sternitzke, D. A., Butts, C. L., & Valentine, H. (2002). Irrigator pro 1.0 vs. irrigator pro 2.0. American Peanut Research and Education Society Abstracts.Google Scholar
  9. Erickson, B., & Widmar, D. A. (2015). Precision agricultural services: Dealership survey results, draft. Purdue University. http://agribusiness.purdue.edu/files/resources/2015-crop-life-purdue-precision-dealer-survey.pdf.
  10. European Commission. (2015). EIP-AGRI focus group precision farming final report. https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri-eip/files/eip-agri_focus_group_on_precision_farming_final_report_2015.pdf.
  11. Hatfield, J. L., & Walthall, C. L. (2015). Meeting global food needs: Realizing the potential via genetics × environment × management interactions. Agronomy Journal, 107(4), 1215–1226.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission. (2014). Precision agriculture: An opportunity for EU farmers-potential support with the cap 2014–2020. European Union.  https://doi.org/10.2861/58758.Google Scholar
  13. Kitchen, N. R. (2008). Emerging technologies for real-time and integrated agriculture decisions. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 61(1), 1–3.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2007.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kitchen, N. R., Snyder, C. J., Franzen, D. W., & Wiebold, W. J. (2002). Educational needs of precision agriculture. Precision Agriculture, 3(4), 341–351.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021588721188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koch, B., Khosla, R., Westfall, D. G., Frasier, M., & Inman, D. (2004). Economic feasibility of variable rate N application in irrigated corn. Agronomy Journal, 96(6), 1572–1580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindblom, J., Lundstrom, C., Ljung, M., & Jonsson, A. (2017). Promoting sustainable intensification in precision agriculture: Review of decision support systems development and strategies. Precision Agriculture, 18, 309–331.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-016-9491-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Massey, R. E., Myers, D. B., Kitchen, N. R., & Sudduth, K. A. (2008). Profitability maps as an input for site-specific management decision making. Agronomy Journal, 100(1), 52–59.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2007.0057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G., & Swift, M. J. (1997). Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science, 277(5325), 504–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McBratney, A. B., Whelan, B., Ancev, T., & Bouma, J. (2005). Future directions of precision agriculture. Precision Agriculture, 6, 7–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-005-0681-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mulla, D. J. (2013). Twenty five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: Key advances and remaining knowledge gaps. Biosystems Engineering, 114(4), 358–371.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.08.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. National Research Council. (1997). Precision agriculture in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.  https://doi.org/10.17226/5491.Google Scholar
  22. Pierce, F. J., & Sadler E. J. (Eds.). (1997). The state of site-specific management for agriculture. 31 October 1995, St. Louis, MO. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
  23. Pierce, F. J., & Nowak, P. (1999). Aspects of precision agriculture. Advances in Agronomy, 67, 1–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60513-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Plaxico, J. S., & Tweeten, L. G. (1963). Representative farms for policy and projection research. Journal of Farm Economics, 45(5), 1458.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1236844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robert, P. C., Rust R. H., & Larsen, W. E. (Eds.). (1992). Soil specific crop management: A workshop on research and development issues. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
  26. Robert, P. C., Rust R. H., & Larsen, W. E. (Eds.). (1994). Proceedings of site-specific management for agricultural systems. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
  27. Schimmelpfennig, D. (2016). Farm profits and adoption of precision agriculture. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. ERR-217.Google Scholar
  28. U.S. Congress. Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990. Public Law 101–624: U.S. Farm Bill.Google Scholar
  29. Velten, S., Leventon, J., Jager, N., & Newig, J. (2015). What is sustainable agriculture? A systematic review. Sustainability, 7(6), 7833–7865.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su7067833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Walbridge, M. R., & Shafer, S. R. (2011). A long-term agro-ecosystem research (LTAR) network for agriculture. In Proceedings of the fourth interagency conference on research in the watersheds, Fairbanks. Fairbanks, AK, USA: USGS.Google Scholar
  31. Williams, J. R., Izaurralde, R. C., & Steglich, E. M. (2012). Agricultural policy/environmental extender model. Theoretical documentation. Temple, TX: Texas A&M AgriLife Blackland Research and Extension Center.Google Scholar
  32. Yang, C., Odvody, G. N., Thomasson, J. A., Isakeit, T., & Nichols, R. L. (2016). Change detection of cotton root rot infection over 10-year intervals using airborne multispectral imagery. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 123(C), 154–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.02.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang, N., Wang, M., & Wang, N. (2002). Precision agriculture-a worldwide overview. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 36, 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply  2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Yost
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. A. Sudduth
    • 2
  • C. L. Walthall
    • 3
  • N. R. Kitchen
    • 2
  1. 1.Plants, Soils, and Climate DepartmentUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit, U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 269 Agricultural Engineering Bldg.University of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research ServiceNatural Resources and Sustainable Agriculture SystemsBeltsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations