Assessment of the position accuracy of a single-frequency GPS receiver designed for electromagnetic induction surveys
- 157 Downloads
In precision agriculture (PA), compact and lightweight electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors have extensively been used to investigate the spatial variability of soil, to evaluate crop performance, and to identify management zones by mapping soil apparent electrical conductivity (ECa), a surrogate for primary and functional soil properties. As reported in the literature, differential global positioning systems (DGPS) with sub-metre to centimetre accuracy have been almost exclusively used to geo-reference these measurements. However, with the ongoing improvements in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) technology, a single state-of-the-art DGPS receiver is likely to be more expensive than the geophysical sensor itself. In addition, survey costs quickly multiply if advanced real time kinematic correction or a base and rover configuration is used. However, the need for centimetre accuracy for surveys supporting PA is questionable as most PA applications are concerned with soil properties at scales above 1 m. The motivation for this study was to assess the position accuracy of a GNSS receiver especially designed for EMI surveys supporting PA applications. Results show that a robust, low-cost and single-frequency receiver is sufficient to geo-reference ECa measurements at the within-field scale. However, ECa data from a field characterized by a high spatial variability of subsurface properties compared to repeated ECa survey maps and remotely sensed leaf area index indicate that a lack of positioning accuracy can constrain the interpretability of such measurements. It is therefore demonstrated how relative and absolute positioning errors can be quantified and corrected. Finally, a summary of practical implications and considerations for the geo-referencing of ECa data using GNSS sensors are presented.
KeywordsSingle-frequency GPS receiver GNSS position accuracy Electromagnetic induction (EMI) survey ECa
This study was supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Competence network for phenotyping science-CROP.SENSe.net). The contributions of B.P. Marchant are published with the permission of the Executive Director of the British Geological Survey (NERC).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Brevik, E. C. (2001). Evaluation of selected factors that may infl ue nce the application of electromagnetic induction technology to soil science investigations in Iowa. Retrospective Theses and Dissertations, 416. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/416.
- Corwin, D. L. (2008). Past, present, and future trends of soil electrical conductivity measurements using geophysical methods. In B. Allred, J. J. Daniels, & M. R. Ehsani (Eds.), Handbook of agricultural geophysics (pp. 17–44). Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Ehrl, M., Stempfhuber, W., Auernhammer, H., & Demmel, M. (2003). Quality assessment of agricultural positioning and communication systems. In J. V. Stafford & A. Werner (Eds.), Precision agriculture: Proceedings of the 4th European conference on precision agriculture (pp. 205–210). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- El-Rabbany, A. (2006). Introduction to GPS: The global positioning system (Vol. 2). Norwood, MA, USA: Artech House.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, E. D., & Hegarty, C. J. (2006). Understanding GPS—Principles and applications (2nd ed.). Norwood, MA, USA: Artech House.Google Scholar
- Kobayashi, M., Ingels, F., & Bennett, G. (1992). Determination of the probability density function of GPS (Global Positioning Systems) positioning error. In Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the institute of navigation (pp. 219–232). Dayton, OH.Google Scholar
- Leick, A., Rapoport, L., & Tatarnikov, D. (2015). GPS satellite surveying (4th ed.). New York, NJ, USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Matérn, B. (1986). Spatial variation (Vol. 36)., Lecture Notes in Statistics New York, USA: Springer.Google Scholar
- Matias, B., Oliveira, H., Almeida, J., Dias, A., Ferreira, H., Martins, A., et al. (2015). High-accuracy low-cost RTK-GPS for an unmannned surface vehicle. In OCEANS15 MTS (pp. 1–4). Genova: IEEE.Google Scholar
- McLoud, P. R., Gronwald, R., & Kuykendall, H. (2007). Precision agriculture: NRCS support for emerging technologies., Agronomy Technical Note No.1 Washington, DC, USA: USDA-NRCS.Google Scholar
- National Marine Electronics Association. (2012). NMEA 0183, The Standard for Interfacing Marine Electronics. Retrieved May 01, 2017, from https://www.nmea.org/content/nmea_standards/nmea_2000_ed3_10.asp.
- NovAtel Inc. (2003). GPS position accuracy measures. Calgary, Canada: NovAtel Inc.Google Scholar
- O’Leary, G. (2006). Standards for electromagnetic induction mapping in the grains industry. In J. Peters (Ed.), GRDC precision agriculture manual Barton. Barton, Australia: Grains Research and Development Corporation.Google Scholar
- Pesyna, K. M. J., Heath, R. W. J., & Humphreys, T. E. (2014). Centimeter positioning with a smartphone-quality GNSS Antenna. In 27th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the Institute of Navigation (pp. 1568–1577). Tampa, FL: ION Publications.Google Scholar
- Takasu, T., & Yasuda, A. (2008). Evaluation of RTK-GPS performance with low-cost single-frequency GPS receivers. In International symposium on GPS/GNSS, Tokyo, Japan (pp. 852–861). Tweed Heads, Australia: IGNSS.Google Scholar
- Takasu, T., & Yasuda, A. (2009). Development of the low-cost RTK-GPS receiver with an open source program package RTKLIB. In International symposium on GPS/GNSS, Jeju, Korea (pp. 4–6). Tweed Heads, Australia: IGNSS.Google Scholar
- Ublox. (2010). LEA-6 u-blox 6 GPS modules data sheet. Thalwil, Switzerland: Ublox.Google Scholar
- Ublox. (2016). U-center: GNSS evaluation software for Windows. Thalwil, Switzerland: Ublox.Google Scholar
- von Hebel, C., Rudolph, S., Mester, A., Huisman, J. A., Kumbhar, P., Vereecken, H., et al. (2014). Three-dimensional imaging of subsurface structural patterns using quantitative large-scale multiconfiguration electromagnetic induction data. Water Resources Research, 50(3), 2732–2748. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013wr014864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weltzien, C., Noack, P. O., & Persdson, K. (2003). GPS receiver accuracy test—dynamic and static for best comparison of results. In J. Stafford & A. Werner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th European conference on precision agriculture (pp. 717–722). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar