Variable rate nitrogen fertilizer response in wheat using remote sensing
- 1.2k Downloads
Nitrogen (N) fertilizer application can lead to increased crop yields but its use efficiency remains generally low which can cause environmental problems related to nitrate leaching as well as nitrous oxide emissions to the atmosphere. The objectives of this study were to: (i) to demonstrate that properly identified variable rates of N fertilizer lead to higher use efficiency and (ii) to evaluate the capability of high spectral resolution satellite to detect within-field crop N response using vegetation indices. This study evaluated three N fertilizer rates (30, 70, and 90 kg N ha−1) and their response on durum wheat yield across the field. Fertilizer rates were identified through the adoption of the SALUS crop model, in addition to a spatial and temporal analysis of observed wheat grain yield maps. Hand-held and high spectral resolution satellite remote sensing data were collected before and after a spring side dress fertilizer application with FieldSpec, HandHeld Pro® and RapidEye™, respectively. Twenty-four vegetation indices were compared to evaluate yield performance. Stable zones within the field were defined by analyzing the spatial stability of crop yield of the previous 5 years (Basso et al. in Eur J Agron 51: 5, 2013). The canopy chlorophyll content index (CCCI) discriminated crop N response with an overall accuracy of 71 %, which allowed assessment of the efficiency of the second N application in a spatial context across each management zone. The CCCI derived from remotely sensed images acquired before and after N fertilization proved useful in understanding the spatial response of crops to N fertilization. Spectral data collected with a handheld radiometer on 100 grid points were used to validate spectral data from remote sensing images in the same locations and to verify the efficacy of the correction algorithms of the raw data. This procedure was presented to demonstrate the accuracy of the satellite data when compared to the handheld data. Variable rate N increased nitrogen use efficiency with differences that can have significant implication to the N2O emissions, nitrate leaching, and farmer’s profit.
KeywordsCCCI Nitrogen uptake NUE Wheat yield Spatial and temporal variability Mediterranean environment Precision agriculture
The study was funded with the support of the S.I.Cer.Me project, Italian Ministry of Agriculture.
- Analytical Spectral Devices, A. (2002). FieldSpec User’s guide, ASD Part#600000. Boulder CO: Rev. C.Google Scholar
- Basso, B., Ritchie, J. T., Grace, P. R., & Sartori, L. (2006). Simulation of tillage systems impact on soil biophysical properties using SALUS model. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 4, 11.Google Scholar
- Blackmer, T. M., Schepers, J. S., Varvel, G. E., & Walter-Shea, E. A. (1996). Nitrogen deficiency detection using reflected shortwave radiation from irrigated corn canopies. Agronomy Journal, 88, 4.Google Scholar
- Eitel, J. U. H., Long, D. S., Gessler, P. E., & Smith, A. M. S. (2007). Using in situ measurements to evaluate new RapidEye satellite series for prediction of wheat nitrogen status. Internationl Journal Remote Sensing, 28, 7.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2008). Current world fertilizer trends and outlook to 2011/12. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
- IFA. (2008). 76th IFA annual conference. In: I.F.A. Industry (Ed.), Vienna.Google Scholar
- Labsphere. (1998). Reflectance characteristics of spectralon panels. Reflectance calibration laboratory. Sutton: Labsphere Inc.Google Scholar
- Rodriguez, D., Fitzgerald, G. J., Belford, R., & Christensen, L. K. (2006). Detection of nitrogen deficiency in wheat from spectral reflectance indices and basic crop eco-physiological concepts. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 57, 8.Google Scholar
- Senthilkumar, S., Basso, B., Kravchenko, A. N., & Robertson, G. P. (2009). Contemporary evidence of soil carbon loss in the U.S. Corn Belt. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 73, 8.Google Scholar
- Staff, S. S. (1999). Soil taxonomy (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: USDA, National natural resources Conservation Service.Google Scholar
- The MathWorks Inc. (2010). MATLAB version 7.10.0. Natick: MathWorks Inc.Google Scholar