Precision Agriculture

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 327–342

Site-specific production functions for variable rate corn nitrogen fertilization

  • Matías L. Ruffo
  • Germán A. Bollero
  • David S. Bullock
  • Donald G. Bullock


Specific recommendations for variable rate nitrogen (VRN) fertilization in corn (Zea mays L.) are required to realize the potential environmental and economic benefits of this technology. However, recommendations based on algorithms that consider the processes controlling crop response to nitrogen fertilizer (NF) within fields have not yet been developed. The objectives of this study were to develop site-specific corn yield production functions for VRN fertilization and to determine the site-specific variables controlling corn response to NF. The experiments were conducted on eight commercial production fields. Fields were divided into 13–20 sections composed of five plots. Each plot received one NF rate. Site-specific variables included primary and secondary terrain attributes, and the Illinois Soil Nitrogen Test (ISNT). Nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased corn yield and it interacted with at least one site-specific variable. The ISNT was the site-specific variable that interacted with NF in most fields where the CV of ISNT was larger than 10%. The parameter estimates indicate that ISNT had a positive effect on corn yield and that it reduced the response to NF. Terrain attributes also affected corn yield and its response to NF. In general, parameter estimates indicated that well drained areas (i.e. small specific catchment area, moderate slopes) had higher yields and responded less to NF than areas where water is expected to accumulate. These results indicate that terrain attributes as surrogates for soil water content and the ISNT as a measure of soil mineralizable nitrogen are site-specific characteristics that affect corn yield and its response to NF.


Illinois soil nitrogen test Production function Management zones 


  1. Anselin L, Bongiovanni R, Lowenberg-DeBoer J (2004) A spatial econometric approach to the economics of site-specific nitrogen management in corn production. Am J Agric Econ 86:675–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bullock DS, Bullock DG (2000) From agronomic research to farm management guidelines, a primer on the economics of information and precision technology. Precis Agric 2:71–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bullock DS, Lowenberg-DeBoer J, Swinton SM (2002) Adding value to spatially managed inputs by understanding site-specific yield response. Agric Econ 27:233–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, Boston, USA, pp 75Google Scholar
  5. Campbell CA, De Jong R, Zentner RP (1984) Effect of cropping, summerfallow and fertilizer nitrogen on nitrate-nitrogen lost by leaching on a brown chernozemic loam. Can J Soil Sci 64:61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaplot V, Walter C, Curmi P, Hollier-Larousse A (2000) The use of auxiliary geophysical data to improve soil-landscape model. Soil Sci 165:961–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox MS, Gerard PD, Wardlaw MC, Abshire MJ (2003) Variability of selected soil properties and their relationship with soybean yield. Soil Sci Soc Am J 7:1296–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) GSLIB, Geostatistical software library and user’s guide. (2nd ed). Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  9. Dinnes DL, Karlen DL, Jaynes DB, Kaspar TC, Hatfield JL, Colvin TS, Cambardella CA (2002) Nitrogen management strategies to reduce nitrate leaching in tile-drained Midwestern soils. Agron J 94:153–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drury CF, Zhang TQ, Kay BD (2003) The non-limiting and least limiting water ranges for soil nitrogen mineralization. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1388–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farrell RE, Sandrock PJ, Pennock DJ, van Kessel C (1996) Landscape-scale variations in leached nitrate, relationship to denitrification and natural nitrogen-15 abundance. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:1410–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferguson RB, Hergert GW, Schepers JS, Gotway CA, Cahoon JE, Peterson TA (2002) Site-specific nitrogen management of irrigated maize, yield and soil residual nitrate effects. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:544–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoeft RG, Mulvaney RL, Khan SA (2002) Update on the Illinois N test. In: Bundy L (ed) Proceedings of the thirty-second North Central extension-industry soil fertility conference. Potash and Phosphate Institute, Brookings, SD, USA, pp 92–101Google Scholar
  14. Hoeft RG, Nafziger E (2004) Online Agronomy Handbook. Last accessed 21/6/2005. Scholar
  15. Jaynes DB, Colvin TS (1997) Spatiotemporal variability of corn and soybean yield. Agron J 89:30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaspar TC, Colvin TS, Jaynes DB, Karlen DL, James DE, Meek DW, Pulido D, Butler H (2003) Relationship between six years of corn yields and terrain attributes. Precis Agric 4:87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaspar TC, Pulido DJ, Fenton TE, Colvin TS, Karlen DL, Jaynes DB, Meek DW (2004) Relationship of corn and soybean yield to soil and terrain properties. Agron J 96:700–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Khan SA, Mulvaney RL, Hoeft RG (2001) A simple soil test for detecting sites that are nonresponsive to nitrogen fertilization. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1751–1760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kitchen NR, Hughes DF, Sudduth KA, Birrell SJ (1995) Comparison of variable rate to single rate nitrogen fertilization application, corn production and residual soil NO3-N. In: Robert PC, Rust RH, Larson WE (eds) Site-specific management for agricultural systems, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference. ASA/CSSA/SSSA, Madison, WI, USA, pp 427–442Google Scholar
  20. Kravchenko AN, Bullock DG (2000) Correlation of corn and soybean grain yield with topography and soil properties. Agron J 92:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lark R (2000) Regression analysis with spatially autocorrelated error, simulation studies and application for mapping soil organic matter. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 14:247–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lentz RD, Dowdy RH, Rust RH (1993) Soil property patterns and topographic parameters associated with ephemeral gully erosion. J Soil Water Conserv 48:354–358Google Scholar
  23. Littell RC, Milliken GA. Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS Inst., Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  24. Mamo M, Malzer GL, Mulla DJ, Huggins DR, Strock J (2003) Spatial and temporal variation in economically optimum nitrogen rate for corn. Agron J 95:958–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moore ID, Burch GJ, Mackenzie DH (1988) Topographic effects on the distribution of surface soil water and the location of ephemeral gullies. Trans ASAE 31:1098–1107Google Scholar
  26. Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modeling. A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Processes 5:3–30Google Scholar
  27. Moore ID, Gessler PE, Nielsen GA, Peterson GA (1993) Terrain analysis for soil specific crop management. In: Robert PC, Rust RH, Larson WE (eds) Soil specific crop management. A workshop on research and development issues. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI, USA, pp 27–55Google Scholar
  28. Mulla DJ, Schepers JS (1997) Key processes and properties for site-specific soil and crop management. In: Pierce FJ, Sadler EJ (eds) The state of site-specific management for agriculture. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI, USA, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  29. Pachepsky YA, Timlin DJ, Rawls WJ (2001) Soil water retention as related to topographic variables. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1787–1795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pan WL, Huggins DR, Malzer GL, Douglas CL, Smith JL (1997) Field heterogeneity in soil–plant relationships, implications for site-specific management. In: Pierce FJ, Sadler EJ (eds) The state of site-specific management for agriculture. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI, USA, pp 81–99Google Scholar
  31. Pennock D, Walley F, Solohub M, Si B, Hnatowich G (2001) Topographically controlled yield response of canola to nitrogen fertilizer. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1838–1845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pennock DJ, van Kessel C, Farrell RE, Sutherland RA (1992) Landscape-scale variations in denitrification. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:770–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Power JF, Wiese R, Flowerday D (2000) Managing nitrogen for water quality-lessons from management systems evaluation area. J Environ Qual 29:355–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Redulla CA, Havlin JL, Kluitenberg GJ, Zhang N, Schrock MD (1996) Variable nitrogen management for improving groundwater quality. In: Robert PC, Rust RH, Larson WE (eds) Site-specific management for agricultural systems, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference. ASA, Madison, WI, USA, pp 1101–1110Google Scholar
  35. Robert PC (2002) Precision agriculture, a challenge for crop nutrition management. Plant Soil 247:143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ruffo ML, Bollero GA, Bullock DG, Hoeft RG (2005) Spatial variability of the Illinois soil nitrogen test: implications for soil sampling. Agron J 97:1484–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sadler EJ, Busscher WJ, Bauer PJ, Karlen DL (1998) Spatial scale requirements for precision farming, a case study in the Southeastern USA. Agron J 90:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. SAS Institute (2003) The SAS system for windows. Version 9.1. SAS Inst., Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  39. Scharf , PC, Kitchen NR, Sudduth KA, Davis JG, Hubbard VC, Lory JA (2005) Field-scale variability in optimal nitrogen fertilizer rate for corn. Agron J 97:452–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schepers AR, Shanahan JF, Liebig MA, Schepers JS, Johnson SH, Luchiari, Jr, A (2004) Appropriateness of management zones for characterizing spatial variability of soil properties and irrigated corn yields across years. Agron J 96:195–203Google Scholar
  41. Schmidt JP, DeJoia AJ, Ferguson RB, Taylor RK, Young RK and. Havlin JL (2002) Corn yield response to nitrogen at multiple in-field locations. Agron J 94:798–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52:591–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sinai G, Zaslavsky D, Golany P (1981) The effect of soil surface curvature on moisture and yield – Beer Sheba observation. Soil Sci 132:367–375Google Scholar
  44. Tarboton DG (1997) A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in digital elevation models. Water Resour Res 33:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Timlin DJ, Pachepsky Y, Snyder VA, Bryant RB (1998) Spatial and temporal variability of corn grain yield on a hillslope. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:764–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Western AW, Grayson RB, Blöschl G, Willgoose GR, McMahon TA (1999) Observed spatial organization of soil moisture and its relation to terrain indices. Water Resour Res 35:797–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson JP, Gallant JC (2000) Digital Terrain Analysis. In: Wilson JP, Gallant JC (eds) Terrain analysis, principles and applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY, USA, pp 1–28Google Scholar
  48. Zimmerman DL, Harville DA (1991) A random field approach to the analysis of field-plot experiments and other spatial experiments. Biometrics 47:223–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matías L. Ruffo
    • 1
  • Germán A. Bollero
    • 1
  • David S. Bullock
    • 2
  • Donald G. Bullock
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Crop SciencesUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural and Consumer EconomicsUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations