Advertisement

On the Essential Self-Adjointness of Singular Sub-Laplacians

  • Valentina FranceschiEmail author
  • Dario Prandi
  • Luca Rizzi
Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

We prove a general essential self-adjointness criterion for sub-Laplacians on complete sub-Riemannian manifolds, defined with respect to singular measures. We also show that, in the compact case, this criterion implies discreteness of the sub-Laplacian spectrum even though the total volume of the manifold is infinite. As a consequence of our result, the intrinsic sub-Laplacian (i.e. defined w.r.t. Popp’s measure) is essentially self-adjoint on the equiregular connected components of a sub-Riemannian manifold. This settles a conjecture formulated by Boscain and Laurent (Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 63(5), 1739–1770, 2013), under mild regularity assumptions on the singular region, and when the latter does not contain characteristic points.

Keywords

Sub-Laplacian Hörmander-type operators Singular measure Popp’s measure Quantum confinement 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Primary: 47B25, 53C17, 58J60 Secondary: 35Q40, 81Q10 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by the Grant ANR-15-CE40-0018 of the ANR, by the iCODE institute (research project of the Idex Paris-Saclay). The first author has been partially supported by the GNAMPA Indam project “Problemi nonlocali e degeneri nello spazio euclideo” and by “Fondazione Ing. Aldo Gini”, Università degli Studi di Padova. This research benefited from the support of the “FMJH Program Gaspard Monge in optimization and operation research” and from the support to this program from EDF. This work has been partially supported by the ANR project ANR-15-IDEX-02. A proceeding version of this paper appeared in [15], whose last section contains also some remarks on the difficulties arising in presence of tangency points on the singular region.

References

  1. 1.
    Agrachev, A., Barilari, D., Boscain, U.: On the Hausdorff volume in sub-Riemannian geometry. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Eq. 43(3-4), 355–388 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agrachev, A.A., Barilari, D., Boscain, U.: A comprehensive introduction to sub-Riemannian geometry. Cambridge University Press (2019)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agrachev, A., Boscain, U., Gauthier, J.-P., Rossi, F.: The intrinsic hypoelliptic Laplacian and its heat kernel on unimodular lie groups. J. Funct. Anal. 256(8), 2621–2655 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Agrachev, A., Boscain, U., Neel, R., Rizzi, L.: Intrinsic random walks in riemannian and sub-Riemannian geometry via volume sampling. ESAIM: COCV 24(3), 1075–1105 (2018)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Agrachev, A., Boscain, U., Sigalotti, M.: A Gauss-Bonnet-like formula on two-dimensional almost-Riemannian manifolds. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 20(4), 801–822 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agrachev, A.A., Sachkov, Y.L.: Control Theory from the Geometric Viewpoint, Volume 87 of Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences. Springer, Berlin (2004). Control Theory and Optimization, IICrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arcozzi, N., Ferrari, F., Montefalcone, F.: Regularity of the distance function to smooth hypersurfaces in some two-step Carnot groups. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 42(1), 339–356 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barilari, D., Rizzi, L.: A formula for Popp’s volume in sub-Riemannian geometry. Anal. Geom. Metr. Spaces 1, 42–57 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boscain, U., Laurent, C.: The laplace-Beltrami operator in almost-Riemannian geometry. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 63(5), 1739–1770 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boscain, U., Neel, R., Rizzi, L.: Intrinsic random walks and sub-Laplacians in sub-Riemannian geometry. Adv. Math. 314, 124–184 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boscain, U., Prandi, D.: Self-adjoint extensions and stochastic completeness of the Laplace-Beltrami operator on conic and anticonic surfaces. J. Differential Equations 260(4), 3234–3269 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burago, D., Burago, Y., Ivanov, S.: A course in metric geometry, volume 33 of graduate studies in mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Colin de Verdière, Y., Truc, F.: Confining quantum particles with a purely magnetic field. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 60(7), 2333–2356 (2010/2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Evans, L.C., Gariepy, R.F.: Measure theory and fine properties of functions. Textbooks in mathematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2015). revised editionzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Franceschi, V., Prandi, D., Rizzi, L.: Recent results on the essential self-adjointness of sub-Laplacians, with some remarks on the presence of characteristic points. Séminaire de Théorie spectrale et géométrie (Grenoble) 33, 1–15 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Franchi, B., Hajłasz, P., Koskela, P.: Definitions of Sobolev classes on metric spaces. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 49(6), 1903–1924 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Franchi, B., Serapioni, R., Serra Cassano, F.: Approximation and imbedding theorems for weighted Sobolev spaces associated with Lipschitz continuous vector fields. Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. B (7) 11(1), 83–117 (1997)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garofalo, N., Nhieu, D.-M.: Lipschitz continuity, global smooth approximations and extension theorems for Sobolev functions in carnot-Carathéodory spaces. J. Anal. Math. 74, 67–97 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghezzi, R., Jean, F.: On measures in sub-Riemannian geometry. Séminaire de Théorie spectrale et géométrie (Grenoble) 33, 17–46 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gordina, M., Laetsch, T.: Sub-Laplacians on sub-Riemannian manifolds. Potential Anal. 44(4), 811–837 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hörmander, L.: Hypoelliptic second order differential equations. Acta Math. 119, 147–171 (1967)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Montgomery, R.: A tour of subriemannian geometries, their geodesics and applications, volume 91 of mathematical surveys and monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nenciu, G., Nenciu, I.: On confining potentials and essential self-adjointness for Schrödinger operators on bounded domains in \(\mathbb {R}^{n}\). Ann. Henri Poincaré 10(2), 377–394 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Prandi, D., Rizzi, L., Seri, M.: Quantum confinement on non-complete Riemannian manifolds. J. Spectr. Theory 8(4), 1221–1280 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reed, M., Simon, B.: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. I. Functional analysis. Academic Press, London (1972)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reed, M., Simon, B.: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. II. Fourier analysis, self-adjointness. Academic Press [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], London (1975)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reed, M., Simon, B.: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. IV. Analysis of operators. Academic Press [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], London (1978)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ritoré, M.: Tubular neighborhoods in the sub-Riemannian Heisenberg groups. Advances in Calculus of Variations, 0(0), pp. -. Retrieved 7 Jan. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1515/acv-2017-0011 (2017)
  29. 29.
    Rothschild, L.P., Stein, E.M.: Hypoelliptic differential operators and nilpotent groups. Acta Math. 137, 247–320 (1976)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Strichartz, R.S.: Sub-Riemannian geometry. J. Differential Geom. 24(2), 221–263 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Mathématique d’Orsay & Fondation Mathématiques Jacques HadamardUniversité Paris SudOrsayFrance
  2. 2.CNRS, Laboratoire des Signaux & Systémes, CentraleSupélecGif-sur-YvetteFrance
  3. 3.CNRS, Institut FourierUniv. Grenoble AlpesGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations