Determinants affecting ferry users’ waiting time at ferry terminals

  • Thor-Erik Sandberg HanssenEmail author
  • Finn Jørgensen
  • Berner Larsen


The paper develops a model to examine how different factors influence ferry users’ waiting time at the terminals. The estimations are based on interviews of 10,952 Norwegian ferry travellers just after they boarded the ferries. The interviews were conducted in 2013 at 16 of the most important ferry connections in Norway. The average headway and waiting time at the terminals were 52 and 15 min, respectively. By comparison, average sailing time at the services in question was 38 min, indicating that waiting-time costs at the terminals make up a large proportion of ferry users’ time costs. The model’s results show that the users’ waiting time at the terminals increases concavely with the ferries’ headway and distance travelled to the terminals, that is, the marginal effects of these factors diminish when their values increase. The first result indicates that the proportion of ferry users arriving randomly at the terminals decreases with the ferries’ headway. The model also reveals that a large proportion (20%) of the waiting times at the terminals is due to the travellers being unable to board their desired departure because of the ferries’ capacity restrictions. Other variables, like the mode of transport travellers’ used to get to the terminals, their income, and how often they used the service, influence waiting time significantly in the hypothesised directions, even though some (e.g. income and trip frequency) have very moderate influences on waiting time.


Capacity problems Ferry services Headway time Public transport Waiting time 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. Andersen, S.N., Tørset, T.: Waiting time in ferry services: an empirical study from a Norwegian context. In: TRB 2018 Annual Meeting (2017)Google Scholar
  2. Bergland, H., Pedersen, P.A.: The design and implementation of driving time regulation. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 4(18), 413–432 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. Button, K.: Transport Economics, 3rd edn. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2010)Google Scholar
  4. Daskalakis, N.G., Stathopoulos, A.: Users´ perceptive evaluation of bus arrival time deviations in stochastic networks. J. Public Transp. 11(4), 25–38 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Denstadli, J.M., Engebretsen, Ø., & Dybedal, P.: Passenger survey on state highway ferries (TØI report: 1282/2013) (2013)Google Scholar
  6. Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J.: Chapter 113 men, women and risk aversion: experimental evidence. In: Plott, C.R., Smith, V.L. (eds.) Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, vol. 1, pp. 1061–1073. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fan, W., MacHemehl, R.B.: Do transit users just wait for buses or wait with strategies? Some numerical results that transit planners should see. In. Transportation Research Record (pp. 169–176) (2009)Google Scholar
  8. Fan, Y., Guthrie, A., Levinson, D.: Waiting time perceptions at transit stops and stations: effects of basic amenities, gender, and security. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 88, 251–264 (2016). Google Scholar
  9. Fox, J.: Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models. Sage, London (2016)Google Scholar
  10. Gunn, H.F.: An introduction to the valuation of travel time-savings and losses. In: Hensher, D.A., Button, K.J. (eds.) Handbook of Transport Modelling, pp. 503–517. Elsevier Ltd., Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  11. Harris, N.G.: Railway planning and operations. In: Teodorovic, D. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Transportation, pp. 290–306. Routledge, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  12. Ingvardson, J.B., Nielsen, O.A., Raveau, S., Nielsen, B.F.: Passenger arrival and waiting time distributions dependent on train service frequency and station characteristics: a smart card data analysis. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 90, 292–306 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jansson, K.: Optimal public transport price and service frequency. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 27(1), 33–50 (1993)Google Scholar
  14. Jørgensen, F., Solvoll, G.: Determining optimal frequency at ferry crossings. Transp. Policy 63, 200–208 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jørgensen, F., Sæterdal, S.: Kollektiv transportstandard i Mosjøen, Mo, Bodø og Narvik (Public transport standard in Mosjøen, Mo, Bodø and Narvik) (Nordland Research Institute 8/1983) (1983)Google Scholar
  16. Knudsen, T.: Trafikkberegning og samfunnsøkonomisk nytte av ferjeavløsningsprosjekter (1995) (Traffic estimates and social surplus of replacing ferries with fixed connections), Asplan ViakGoogle Scholar
  17. Mathisen, T., Solvoll, G.: Service quality aspects in ferry passenger transport-examples from Norway. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 10(2), 142–157 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. Nathanail, E.: Measuring the quality of service for passengers on the hellenic railways. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 42(1), 48–66 (2008). Google Scholar
  19. NPRA: Ferjedatabanken. Retrieved from (2017)
  20. Nygaard, M.F., Tørset, T.: Waiting time strategy for public transport passengers. In: Selected Proceedings from the Annual Transport Conference at Aalborg University, pp. 1–14 (2016)Google Scholar
  21. O`Flaherty, C., Mangan, D.: Bus passenger waiting times in central areas. Traffic Eng. Control 11, 419–421 (1970)Google Scholar
  22. Salek, M.-D., Machemehl, R.B.: Characterizing Bus Transit Passenger Wait Times (Research Report 167211-1) (1999)Google Scholar
  23. Small, K.A.: Valuation of travel time. Econ. Transp. 1(1–2), 2–14 (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. UITP: Statistics brief—local public transport in the European Union (2015)Google Scholar
  25. Wardman, M.: A review of British evidence on time and service quality valuations. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 37(2), 107–128 (2001). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wardman, M., Chintakayala, V.P.K., de Jong, G.: Values of travel time in Europe: review and meta-analysis. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 94, 93–111 (2016). Google Scholar
  27. Welding, P.I.: The instability of a close-interval service. OR 8(3), 133–142 (1957). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wheeler, B., Torchiano, M.: lmPerm: Permutation Tests for Linear Models (2016)Google Scholar
  29. Zeileis, A.: Econometric computing with HC and HAC covariance matrix estimators. J. Stat. Softw. 11(10), 1–17 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolNord UniversityBodøNorway

Personalised recommendations