Advertisement

Cycling culture and socialisation: modelling the effect of immigrant origin on cycling in Denmark and the Netherlands

  • Sonja HausteinEmail author
  • Maarten Kroesen
  • Ismir Mulalic
Article
  • 85 Downloads

Abstract

This paper focusses on travel socialisation by examining the effect of immigrant origin on cycling in two distinct European cycling cultures: Denmark and the Netherlands. Based on data from both countries’ national travel surveys, the empirical analyses show that people of immigrant origin cycle less compared to natives. While in Denmark this effect is significant only for people of non-Western origin, in the Netherlands it is also true for people of Western origin, probably because they originate to a greater extent from non-European countries (e.g., Indonesia). In the Netherlands, the effect of non-Western origin is larger for women than for men, while we do not find a significant gender interaction in the Danish data. Individuals with residence in neighbourhoods with a higher share of people of non-Western origin are less likely to cycle, probably as the national norm to cycle is less salient here. The results cannot be fully explained by differences in socioeconomic status, car access, or level of urbanisation. We assume that cultural norms mediated by parents play a relevant role. The results lend support to policies focused on stimulating the use of the bicycle among immigrants and especially women of non-Western origin.

Keywords

Mode choice Cycling Immigrants Cycling culture National travel survey Travel socialization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Statistics Denmark and Statistics Netherlands for providing the data. The usual disclaimer applies.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aldred, R., Woodcock, J., Goodman, A.: Does more cycling mean more diversity in cycling? Trans. Rev. 36(1), 28–44 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barajas, J.M.: Supplemental infrastructure: how community networks and immigrant identity influence cycling. Transportation (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9955-7 Google Scholar
  3. Belgiawan, P.F., Schmöcker, J.D., Abou-Zeid, M., Walker, J., Lee, T.C., Ettema, D.F., Fujii, S.: Car ownership motivations among undergraduate students in China, Indonesia, Japan, Lebanon, Netherlands, Taiwan, and USA. Transportation 41(6), 1227–1244 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bere, E., van der Horst, K., Oenema, A., Prins, R., Brug, J.: Socio-demographic factors as correlates of active commuting to school in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Prev. Med. 47, 412–416 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumenberg, E., Shiki, K.: Transportation assimilation: immigrants, race and ethnicity, and mode choice. In: Annual Conference of the Transportation Research Board. Washington (2007)Google Scholar
  6. Broeken, A.: Allochtone vrouwen in de rij voor fietslessen. AD, 14-02-18, https://www.ad.nl/rivierenland/allochtone-vrouwen-in-de-rij-voor-fietslessen~ab7ea008 (2018). Accessed 19 June 2018
  7. Carstensen, T.A., Ebert, A.-K.: Cycling cultures in northern Europe: from ‘golden age’ to ‘renaissance’. In: Parkin, J. (ed.) Cycling and Sustainability, pp. 23–58. Emerald Publishing Group Limited, Bingley (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chatman, D.G.: Explaining the “immigrant effect” on auto use: the influences of neighborhoods and preferences. Transportation 41(3), 441–461 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Contrino, H., McGuckin, N.: Demographics matter: travel demand, options, and characteristics among minority populations. Public Works Manag. Policy 13, 361–368 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dagevos, J.: Ruimtelijke concentratie van niet-westerse migranten: achtergronden, gevolgen en aangrijpingspunten voor het beleid. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, The Hague (2009)Google Scholar
  11. de Bruijn, G.J., Kremers, S.P., Schaalma, H., van Mechelen, W., Brug, J.: Determinants of adolescent bicycle use for transportation and snacking behavior. Prev. Med. 40, 658–667 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Haas, M.C., Scheepers, C.E., Harms, L.W.J., Kroesen, M.: Travel pattern transitions: applying latent transition analysis within the mobility biographies framework. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 107, 140–151 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Nazelle, A., Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J., Antó, J.M., Brauer, M., Briggs, D., Braun-Fahrlander, C., et al.: Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. Environ. Int. 37(4), 766–777 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Döring, L., Kroesen, M., Holz-Rau, C.: The role of parents’ mobility behavior for dynamics in car availability and commute mode use. Transportation (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9823-x Google Scholar
  15. European Commission 2013: Eurobarometer 79.4, May–June 2013.TNS OPINION, Brussels [Producer]; GESIS, Cologne: ZA5852, data set version 3.0.1,  https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11871
  16. Fietsplatform: National cycling route database. https://www.fietsplatform.nl/netwerkbeheer-en-promotie/landelijke-routedatabank (2018). Accessed 25 June 2018
  17. Furian, G., Brandstätter, C., Kaiser, S., Witzik, A.: Subjective safety and risk perception. ESRA thematic report no. 5. ESRA project (European Survey of Road users’ safety Attitudes). Vienna, Austria: Kuratorium für Verkehrssicherheit, Vienna (2016). https://www.esranet.eu/storage/minisites/esra2015thematicreportno5subjectivesafetyandriskperception.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2018
  18. Gijsberts, M., Vervoort, M., Havekes, E., Dagevos, J.: Maakt de buurt verschil? De relatie tussen de etnische samenstelling van de buurt, interetnisch contact en wederzijdse beeldvorming. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, The Hague (2010). https://www.scp.nl/Publicaties/Alle_publicaties/Publicaties_2010/Maakt_de_buurt_verschil
  19. Harms, L.: Mobility among ethnic minorities in the urban Netherlands. Urban Mobility and Social Inequity. https://difu.de/publikationen/mobility-among-ethnic-minorities-in-the-urban-netherlands.html (2007). Accessed 28 June 2018
  20. Haustein, S., Klöckner, C.A., Blöbaum, A.: Car use of young adults: the role of travel socialization. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 12(2), 168–178 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haustein, S., Kroesen, M., Mulalic, I.: Modelling the effect of foreign origin on mode choice in two different cycling cultures. Abstract accepted for presentation at hEART 2018—7th Symposium of the European Association for Research in Transportation conference, Athens, 5–7th September (2018)Google Scholar
  22. Haustein, S., Nielsen, T.A.S.: European mobility cultures: a survey-based cluster analysis across 28 European countries. J. Transp. Geogr. 54, 173–180 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heesch, K.C., Sahlqvist, S., Garrard, J.: Gender differences in recreational and transport cycling: a cross-sectional mixed-methods comparison of cycling patterns, motivators, and constraints. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Activity 9(1), 106 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heinen, E., Van Wee, B., Maat, K.: Commuting by bicycle: an overview of the literature. Trans. Rev. 30(1), 59–96 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hofstede, G.: National cultures in four dimensions: a research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. Int. Stud. Manag. Organ. 13(1–2), 46–74 (1983)Google Scholar
  26. Hofstede, G.: Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2001)Google Scholar
  27. Hook, W.: Improving conditions for non motorized transport in Surabya, Indonesia: a pilot project in two neighbourhoods. GTZ, Eschborn, Germany (2000)Google Scholar
  28. Ikram, U.Z., Malmusi, D., Juel, K., Rey, G., Kunst, A.E.: Association between integration policies and immigrants’ mortality: an explorative study across three European countries. PLoS ONE 10(6), e0129916 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johansson, C., Lövenheim, B., Schantz, P., Wahlgren, L., Almström, P., Markstedt, A., et al.: Impacts on air pollution and health by changing commuting from car to bicycle. Sci. Total Environ. 584, 55–63 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kasper, B., Schubert, S., Reutter, U.: Transport behaviour among immigrants: an equation with many unknowns. Urban Mobility and Social Inequity. https://difu.de/publikationen/transport-behaviour-among-immigrants-an-equation-with-many.html (2007). Accessed 28 June 2018
  31. Klinger, T., Lanzendorf, M.: Moving between mobility cultures: what affects the travel behavior of new residents? Transportation 43(2), 243–271 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koglin, T.: Organisation does matter–planning for cycling in Stockholm and Copenhagen. Transp. Policy 39, 55–62 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lanzendorf, M., Busch-Geertsema, A.: The cycling boom in large German cities—empirical evidence for successful cycling campaigns. Transp. Policy 36, 26–33 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu, C.Y., Painter, G.: Immigrant settlement and employment suburbanisation in the US: is there a spatial mismatch? Urban Stud. 49(5), 979–1002 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meer, N., Mouritsen, P., Faas, D., de Witte, N.: Examining ‘postmulticultural’ and civic turns in the Netherlands, Britain, Germany, and Denmark. Am. Behav. Sci. 59(6), 702–726 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ministry of Immigration, Integration and Housing. International Migration: Denmark. Report to the OECD. Copenhagen. http://uim.dk/publikationer/international-migration-denmark (2015). Accessed 14 June 2018
  37. Mueller, N., Rojas-Rueda, D., Cole-Hunter, T., de Nazelle, A., Dons, E., Gerike, R., et al.: Health impact assessment of active transportation: a systematic review. Prev. Med. 76, 103–114 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Møller, M., Haustein, S., Bohlbro, M.S.: Adolescents’ associations between travel behaviour and environmental impact: a qualitative study based on the Norm-Activation Model. Travel Behav. Soc. 11, 69–77 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nielsen, T.A.S., Mulalic, I., Christiansen, H.: Drivers of cycling mode-share: analysis of Danes’ travel behavior 1996–2013. Transp. Res. Proc. 14, 2284–2288 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nielsen, T.A.S., Skov-Petersen, H.: Bikeability-urban structures supporting cycling. Effects of local, urban and regional scale urban form factors on cycling from home and workplace locations in Denmark. J. Transp. Geogr. 69, 36–44 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nielsen, T.A.S., Senstius, J., Pedersen, S.H., Christiansen, H. Kortlægning af Danmarks cykelinfrastruktur. Vejforum 2015, Nyborg, Denmark (2015)Google Scholar
  42. Pojani, D., Bakija, D., Shkreli, E., Corcoran, J., Mateo-Babiano, I.: Do Northwestern and Southeastern Europe share a common “Cycling Mindset”? Comparative analysis of beliefs toward cycling in the Netherlands and the Balkans. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 17(1), 25–45 (2017)Google Scholar
  43. Pooley, C.G., Horton, D., Scheldeman, G., Mullen, C., Jones, T., Tight, M., Jopson, A., Chisholm, A.: Policies for promoting walking and cycling in England: a view from the street. Transp. Policy 27, 66–72 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pucher, J., Buehler, R.: Making cycling irresistible: lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Trans. Rev. 28(4), 495–528 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rietveld, P., Daniel, V.: Determinants of bicycle use: do municipal policies matter? Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 38(7), 531–550 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shin, E.J.: Ethnic neighborhoods, social networks, and inter-household carpooling: a comparison across ethnic minority groups. J. Transp. Geogr. 59, 14–26 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smart, M.: US immigrants and bicycling: two-wheeled in Autopia. Transp. Policy 17(3), 153–159 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smart, M.J.: A nationwide look at immigrant neighborhoods and travel mode choice. In: Annual conference of the transportation research board, Washington (2012)Google Scholar
  49. Statistics Netherlands: Composition of the Dutch population. Statistics Netherlands, The Hague (2018)Google Scholar
  50. Tal, G., Handy, S.: Travel behavior of immigrants: an analysis of the 2001 National Household Transportation Survey. Transp. Policy 17(2), 85–93 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thomsen-Mühlbrand, H., Skoubo, L.A., Lautrup, A. M.: Women bike for integration. The Cycling Embassy of Denmark, December 6, 2017 http://www.cycling-embassy.dk/2017/12/06/women-bike-integration/. Accessed 7 Jan 2019
  52. Underwood, S.K., Handy, S.L., Paterniti, D.A., Lee, A.E.: Why do teens abandon bicycling? A retrospective look at attitudes and behaviors. J. Trans. Health 1(1), 17–24 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van, H.T., Choocharukul, K., Fujii, S.: The effect of attitudes toward cars and public transportation on behavioral intention in commuting mode choice—a comparison across six Asian countries. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 69, 36–44 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. van der Kloof, A.: Lessons learned through training immigrant women in the Netherlands to cycle. In: P. Cox (ed.) Cycling Cultures, pp. 78–105. University of Chester, Chester (2015)Google Scholar
  55. Ward, J.: Denmark to immigrants: Let’s ride. Spiegel Online, 24 August 2007. http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/creative-integration-denmark-to-immigrants-let-s-ride-a-501869.html (2007). Accessed 14 June 2018
  56. Welsch, J., Conrad, K., Wittowsky, D.: Exploring immigrants travel behaviour: empirical findings from Offenbach am Main, Germany. Transportation 45(3), 733–750 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management Engineering, Division of TransportTechnical University of DenmarkKgs. LyngbyDenmark
  2. 2.Faculty of Technology, Policy and ManagementDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Kraks Fond – Institute for Urban Economic ResearchCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations