Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Spatio-temporal analysis of rail station ridership determinants in the built environment

  • 927 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

The development of new routes and stations, as well as changes in land use, can have significant impacts on public transit ridership. Thus, transport departments and governments should seek to determine the level and spatio-temporal dependency of these impacts with the aim of adjusting services or improving planning. However, existing studies primarily focus on predicting ridership, and pay relatively little attention to analyzing the determinants of ridership from temporal and spatial perspectives. Consequently, no comprehensive cognition of the spatio-temporal relationship between station ridership and the built environment can be obtained from previous models, which makes them unable to facilitate the optimization of transportation demands and services. To rectify this problem, we have employed a Bayesian negative binomial regression model to identify the significant impact factors associated with entry/exit ridership at different periods of the day. Based on this model, we formulated geographically weighted models to analyze the spatial dependency of these impacts over different periods. The spatio-temporal relationship between station ridership and the built environment was analyzed using data from Beijing. The results reveal that the temporal impacts of most ridership determinants are related to the passenger trip patterns. Furthermore, the spatial impacts correspond with the determinants’ spatial distribution, and the results give some implications on urban and transportation planning. This analysis gives a common analytical framework analyzing impacts of urban characteristics on ridership, and extending researches on how we capture the impacts of urban and other factors on ridership from a comprehensive perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

References

  1. Baum-Snow, N., Brandt, L., Henderson, J.V., Turner, M.A., Zhang, Q.: Roads, railroads, and decentralization of Chinese cities. Rev. Econ. Stat. 99(3), 435–448 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00660

  2. Blainey, S., Mulley, C.: Using geographically weighted regression to forecast rail demand in the Sydney region. In: Australasian Transport Research Forum, Brisbane (2013)

  3. Blainey, S., Preston, J.: A geographically weighted regression based analysis of rail commuting around Cardiff, South Wales. In: 12th World Conference on Transportation Research, Portugal (2010)

  4. Blainey, S.P.: Forecasting the Use of New Local Railway Stations and Services Using GIS. University of Southampton, Southampton (2009)

  5. Blainey, S.P.: Trip end models of local rail demand in England and Wales. J. Transp. Geogr. 18(1), 153–165 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.11.002

  6. Blainey, S.P., Preston, J.M.: A GIS-based appraisal framework for new local railway stations and services. Transp. Policy 25, 41–51 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.008

  7. Brown, J.R., Thompson, G.L.: The relationship between transit ridership and urban decentralisation: insights from Atlanta. Urban Stud. 45(5–6), 1119–1139 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008089856

  8. Cameron, A.C., Trivedi, P.K.: Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press, New York (2013)

  9. Cardozo, O.D., García-Palomares, J.C., Gutiérrez, J.: Application of geographically weighted regression to the direct forecasting of transit ridership at station-level. Appl. Geogr. 34, 548–558 (2012)

  10. Cervero, R.: Alternative approaches to modeling the travel-demand impacts of smart growth. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 72(3), 285–295 (2006)

  11. Cervero, R., Kockelman, K.: Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 2(3), 199–219 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6

  12. Choi, J., Lee, Y.J., Kim, T., Sohn, K.: An analysis of Metro ridership at the station-to-station level in Seoul. Transportation 39(3), 705–722 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9368-3

  13. Chu, X.: Ridership models at the stop level. In: National Center for Transit Research, University of South Florida (2004)

  14. Deng, J.: Interactive Relationship Between Ridership Characteristics at Subway Station and Surrounding Land-Use: A Case Study in Beijing. Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing (2015)

  15. Estupiñán, N., Rodríguez, D.A.: The relationship between urban form and station boardings for Bogota’s BRT. Transp. Res. A Pol. 42(2), 296–306 (2008)

  16. Gregory, T., Jeffrey, B., Torsha, B.: What really matters for increasing transit ridership: understanding the determinants of transit ridership demand in Broward County, Florida. Urban Stud. 49(15), 3327–3345 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012443864

  17. Gutiérrez, J., Cardozo, O.D., García-Palomares, J.C.: Transit ridership forecasting at station level: an approach based on distance-decay weighted regression. J. Transp. Geogr. 19(6), 1081–1092 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.05.004

  18. Jun, M., Choi, K., Jeong, J., Kwon, K., Kim, H.: Land use characteristics of subway catchment areas and their influence on subway ridership in Seoul. J. Transp. Geogr. 48(Supplement C), 30–40 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.08.002

  19. Karduni, A., Kermanshah, A., Derrible, S.: A protocol to convert spatial polyline data to network formats and applications to world urban road networks. Sci. Data 3, 160046 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.46

  20. Kemp, M.A., Kiefer, M., Marca, J., Hickman, M., Keen, S., Campitelli, N., Cleghorn, D.: Building transit ridership: An exploration of transit’s market share and the public policies that Influence it. In: Prepared for Transit Cooperative Research Program, Report, vol. 27. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (1997)

  21. Kepaptsoglou, K., Stathopoulos, A., Karlaftis, M.G.: Ridership estimation of a new LRT system: direct demand model approach. J. Transp. Geogr. 58, 146–156 (2017)

  22. Litman, T.: Evaluating public transit benefits and costs. Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2015)

  23. Litman, T.: Land Use Impacts on Transport, p. 88. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria (2018)

  24. Long, Y., Liu, X., Zhou, J., Chai, Y.: Early birds, night owls, and tireless/recurring itinerants: an exploratory analysis of extreme transit behaviors in Beijing, China. Habitat Int. 57, 223–232 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.08.004

  25. Lord, D., Mannering, F.: The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives. Transp. Res. A Pol. 44(5), 291–305 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.02.001

  26. Ma, X., Zhang, J., Ding, C., Wang, Y.: A geographically and temporally weighted regression model to explore the spatiotemporal influence of built environment on transit ridership. Comput. Environ. Urban (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.03.001

  27. Marshall, S.: Streets and Patterns, 1st edn. Routledge, London (2004)

  28. Montgomery, D.C., Peck, E.A., Vining, G.G.: Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, 5th edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)

  29. Nakaya, T., Fotheringham, A.S., Brunsdon, C., Charlton, M.: Geographically weighted Poisson regression for disease association mapping. Stat. Med. 24(17), 2695–2717 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2129

  30. NRDC, N.R.D.C.: Report on urban walkability of China. Natural Resources Defense Council, Beijing, p. 44 (2014)

  31. Savolainen, P.T., Mannering, F.L., Lord, D., Quddus, M.A.: The statistical analysis of highway crash-injury severities: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives. Accid. Anal. Prev. 43(5), 1666–1676 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.025

  32. Schiller, P.L., Kenworthy, J.: An Introduction to Sustainable Transportation: Policy, Planning and Implementation, 2nd edn. Routledge, London (2010)

  33. Stanley, R.: Continuing examination of successful transit ridership initiatives. In: TCRP Research Results Digest, p. 68. Federal Transit Administration, Washington (1998)

  34. Sun, F., Chen, P.: Impact of built environment and temporal factors on public bikesharing. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC 2017

  35. Sung, H., Oh, J.: Transit-oriented development in a high-density city: identifying its association with transit ridership in Seoul, Korea. Cities 28(1), 70–82 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2010.09.004

  36. Taylor, B.D., Miller, D., Iseki, H., Fink, C.: Nature and/or nurture? Analyzing the determinants of transit ridership across US urbanized areas. Transp. Res. A Pol. 43(1), 60–77 (2009)

  37. Thompson, G., Brown, J.: Explaining variation in transit ridership in US metropolitan areas between 1990 and 2000: multivariate analysis. Transp. Res. Rec. 1986, 172–181 (2006)

  38. Transport, B.M.C.O.: The fifth comprehensive survey of urban traffic in Beijing. In: Beijing Transportation Research Center, Beijing (2016)

  39. TUPDI, T.U.P.A.D.I.: White paper on sharing bike and urban development of 2017. In: Tsinghua University Planning and Design Institute, Beijing Mobike Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, p. 24 (2017)

  40. Wang, Z., Chen, F., Wang, B., Huang, J.: Passengers’ response to transit fare change: an ex post appraisal using smart card data. Transportation (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9775-1

  41. Wang, Z., Chen, F., Xu, T.: Interchange between metro and other modes: access distance and catchment area. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 142(4), 04016012 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000330

  42. Xu, P., Huang, H., Dong, N., Abdel-Aty, M.: Sensitivity analysis in the context of regional safety modeling: identifying and assessing the modifiable areal unit problem. Accid. Anal. Prev. 70(Supplement C), 110–120 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.02.012

  43. Yao, X.: Where are public transit needed—examining potential demand for public transit for commuting trips. Comput. Environ. Urban 31(5), 535–550 (2007)

  44. Zhang, D., Wang, X.: Transit ridership estimation with network Kriging: a case study of Second Avenue Subway, NYC. J. Transp. Geogr. 41(Supplement C), 107–115 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.08.021

  45. Zhao, J., Deng, W., Song, Y., Zhu, Y.: What influences Metro station ridership in China? Insights from Nanjing. Cities 35(Supplement C), 114–124 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.07.002

  46. Zhong, C., Batty, M., Manley, E., Wang, J., Wang, Z., Chen, F., Schmitt, G.: Variability in regularity: mining temporal mobility patterns in London, Singapore and Beijing using smart-card data. PLoS ONE 11(2), e0149222 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149222

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award Nos. 71871027 and 51708021). The authors would like to thank Yuting Yang and Diankun Chen from Beijing Jiaotong University for data preprocessing support.

Author information

Yadi Zhu: Study design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing and revision. Feng Chen: Study conception and content planning, literature review, critical revision. Zijia Wang: Literature search and review, manuscript writing and editing. Jin Deng: Data acquisition and data analysis.

Correspondence to Feng Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 12 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 11 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Y., Chen, F., Wang, Z. et al. Spatio-temporal analysis of rail station ridership determinants in the built environment. Transportation 46, 2269–2289 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9928-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Urban rail transit
  • Station built environment
  • Spatio-temporal analysis
  • Negative binomial regression
  • Geographically weighted regression (GWR)