Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 46, Issue 6, pp 2151–2172 | Cite as

E-bikes among older adults: benefits, disadvantages, usage and crash characteristics

  • Jelle Van CauwenbergEmail author
  • Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
  • Peter Clarys
  • Bas de Geus
  • Benedicte Deforche
Article

Abstract

The promotion of sustainable and healthy mobility among older adults (≥ 65 years) is an important challenge. E-bikes may be part of the solution, but research about e-bike use among older adults is scarce. The current study aims to examine e-bikes’ purchase reasons, benefits and disadvantages, purposes and amount of use, substitution effects and crash characteristics among older e-bike users. Additionally, it examines differences between men and women. In Flanders (Belgium), 357 older e-bike users completed an online- or interview-version of the same questionnaire. Among men and women, the most prevalent reason for e-bike purchase was to bike with less effort (24.1%). The most important benefit of e-bike use was to be able to bike longer distances (35.0%). E-bikes’ heavy weight was the most frequently reported disadvantage (33.3%). Men more frequently reported battery issues, but also that they do not experience any disadvantage. Women more frequently reported fear of falling/injuries. Participants used their e-bikes for various purposes. Men more frequently reported to cycle for recreation alone while women used the e-bike more for social reasons. E-bikes predominantly replaced trips by conventional bike (72.0%) and car (50.7%). About one quarter (27.5%) had experienced an e-bike crash, most frequently caused by an uneven or slippery surface (26.5%). To promote active ageing, policy initiatives could include strategies aimed at stimulating e-bike use. These strategies should focus on emphasizing the identified benefits, reducing the disadvantages and increasing e-bike safety. Research in countries with less favorable cycling cultures is necessary to confirm current findings.

Keywords

Pedelecs Seniors Sustainable mobility Bicycling Active ageing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Grant No. 12I1117N).

Author’s contributions

JVC, conceptualization and study design, data collection, statistical analysis, manuscript writing; IDB, PC, BdG, BD, conceptualization and study design, critical revision of the article.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11116_2018_9919_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)

References

  1. Althoff, T., Sosic, R., Hicks, J.L., King, A.C., Delp, S.L., Leskovec, J.: Large-scale physical activity data reveal worldwide activity inequality. Nature 547(7663), 336 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baert, V., Gorus, E., Mets, T., Geerts, C., Bautmans, I.: Motivators and barriers for physical activity in the oldest old: a systematic review. Ageing Res. Rev. 10(4), 464–474 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2011.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belgian Federal Government Web Site [Internet]. Enquête naar de arbeidskrachten (EAK). In: Algemene Directie Statistiek—België [Employment Survey. General Direction of Statistics—Belgium]. http://statbel.fgov.be/nl/statistieken/gegevensinzameling/enquetes/eak/ (2013). Accessed 10 Nov 2017
  4. Berntsen, S., Malnes, L., Langaker, A., Bere, E.: Physical activity when riding an electric assisted bicycle. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0513-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buehler, R., Pucher, J.: Walking and cycling in Western Europe and the United States. TR News 280, 34–42 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. Cairns, S., Behrendt, F., Raffo, D., Beaumont, C., Kiefer, C.: Electrically-assisted bikes: potential impacts on travel behaviour. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 103, 327–342 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chodzko-Zajko, W.J., Proctor, D.N., Singh, M.A.F., Minson, C.T., Nigg, C.R., Salem, G.J., Skinner, J.S.: Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 41(7), 1510–1530 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a0c95c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CONEBI: European Bicycle Market 2016 Edition—Industry & Market Profile (2015 Statistics), p. 2016. Confederation of the European Bicycle Industry, Brussels (2016)Google Scholar
  9. de Geus, B., Degraeuwe, B., Vandenbulcke, G., Panis, L.I., Thomas, I., Aertsens, J., De Weerdt, Y., Torfs, R., Meeusen, R.: Utilitarian cycling in belgium: a cross-sectional study in a sample of regular cyclists. J. Phys. Act. Health 11(5), 884–894 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2012-0200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Declercq, K., Reumers, S., Polders, E., Janssens, D., Wets, G.: Onderzoek Verplaatsingsgedrag Vlaanderen 5.1 (2015–2016): Tabellenrapport. In: Instituut voor Mobiliteit (Universiteit Hasselt, in opdracht van de Vlaamse Overheid (2016)Google Scholar
  11. Field, A.: Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2005)Google Scholar
  12. Fishman, E., Cherry, C.: E-bikes in the mainstream: reviewing a decade of research. Transp. Rev. 36, 72–91 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. FOD Economie KMO, Middenstand en Energie Web Site [Internet]. Enquête ICT-gebruik bij de gezinnen [FPS Economy, S.M.E.s, Self-employed and Energy. Survey ICT-use among households]. http://statbel.fgov.be/nl/statistieken/cijfers/arbeid_leven/ict/ (2016). Accessed 10 Nov 2017
  14. Fyhri, A., Fearnley, N.: Effects of e-bikes on bicycle use and mode share. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 36, 45–52 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haustein, S., Moller, M.: E-bike safety: individual-level factors and incident characteristics. J. Transp. Health 3(3), 386–394 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haywood, K.L., Garratt, A.M., Fitzpatrick, R.: Quality of life in older people: a structured review of generic self-assessed health instruments. Qual. Life Res. 14(7), 1651–1668 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1743-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heinen, E., van Wee, B., Maat, K.: Commuting by bicycle: an overview of the literature. Transp. Rev. 30(1), 59–96 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640903187001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hendriksen, I., Engbers, L., Schrijver, J., Van Gijlswijk, R., Weltevreden, J., Wilting, J.: Elektrisch Fietsen. Marktonderzoek en verkenning toekomstmogelijkheden [E-bikes. Market Research and Exploration of Future Possibilities]. TNO Kwaliteit van Leven, Leiden (2008)Google Scholar
  19. Hurtig-Wennlof, A., Hagstromer, M., Olsson, L.A.: The international physical activity questionnaire modified for the elderly: aspects of validity and feasibility. Public Health Nutr. 13(11), 1847–1854 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980010000157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Janssens, D., Declercq, K., Wets, G.: Onderzoek Verplaatsingsgedrag Vlaanderen 4.4 (2011–2012). Instituut voor Mobiliteit (Universiteit Hasselt) in opdracht van de Vlaamse Overheid [Research Travel Behaviour Flanders. Hasselt (Belgium): Institute for Mobility (University of Hasselt) commissioned by the Flemish Government] (2013)Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, M., Rose, G.: Extending life on the bike: electric bike use by older Australians. J. Transp. Health 2(2), 276–283 (2015a).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2015.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson, M., Rose, G.: Safety Implications of e-Bikes. Institute of Transport Studies, Civil Engineering, Monash University, Victora (2015b)Google Scholar
  23. Jones, T., Chatterjee, K., Spinney, J., Street, E., Van Reekum, C., Spencer, B., Jones, H., Leyland, L., Mann, C., Williams, S., Beale, N.: Cycle BOOM Design for Lifelong Health and Wellbeing: Summary of Key Findings and Recommendations. Oxford Brookes University, Oxford (2016a)Google Scholar
  24. Jones, T., Harms, L., Heinen, E.: Motives, perceptions and experiences of electric bicycle owners and implications for health, wellbeing and mobility. J. Transp. Geogr. 53, 41–49 (2016b).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koninklijk Metereologisch Instituut: Klimatogram België. https://www.meteo.be/meteo/view/nl/6042865-Klimaat+in+de+wereld.html (2018). Accessed 30 May 2018
  26. Kroesen, M.: To what extent do e-bikes substitute travel by other modes? Evidence from the Netherlands. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 53, 377–387 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacArthur, J., Dill, J., Person, M.: E-bikes in the North America: results from an online survey. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2468, 123–130 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Minton, J., Clark, J.: Driving segregation: age, gender and emerging inequalities. In: Curl, A., Musselwhite, A. (eds.) Geographies of Transport and Ageing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
  29. Mueller, N., Rojas-Rueda, D., Cole-Hunter, T., de Nazelle, A., Dons, E., Gerike, R., Gotschi, T., Panis, L.I., Kahlmeier, S., Nieuwenhuijsen, M.: Health impact assessment of active transportation: a systematic review. Prev. Med. 76, 103–114 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nordbakke, S., Schwanen, T.: Transport, unmet activity needs and wellbeing in later life: exploring the links. Transportation 42(6), 1129–1151 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9558-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pachana, N.A., Leung, J.K., Gardiner, P.A., McLaughlin, D.: Moderating effects of social engagement on driving cessation in older women. Int. Psychogeriatr. 28(8), 1237–1244 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610216000211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Papoutsi, S., Martinolli, L., Braun, C.T., Exadaktylos, A.K.: E-bike injuries: experience from an urban emergency department-a retrospective study from Switzerland. Emerg. Med. Int. 2014, 850236 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/850236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Popovich, N., Gordon, E., Shao, Z., Xing, Y., Wang, Y., Handy, S.: Experiences of electric bicycle users in the Sacramento, California area. Travel Behav. Soc. 1, 37–44 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rissel, C., Passmore, E., Mason, C., Merom, D.: Two pilot studies of the effect of bicycling on balance and leg strength among older adults. J. Environ. Public Health 2013, 1–6 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rose, G.: E-bikes and urban transportation: emerging issues and unresolved questions. Transportation 39(1), 81–96 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9328-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosenbloom, S.: Sustainability and automobility among the elderly: an international assessment. Transportation 28(4), 375–408 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011802707259 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scheiman, S., Moghaddas, H.S., Bjornstig, U., Bylund, P.O., Saveman, B.I.: Bicycle injury events among older adults in Northern Sweden: a 10-year population based study. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42(2), 758–763 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schepers, J.P., Fishman, E., den Hertog, P., Wolt, K.K., Schwab, A.L.: The safety of electrically assisted bicycles compared to classic bicycles. Accid. Anal. Prev. 73, 174–180 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Siren, A., Hakamies-Blomqvist, L.: Private car as the grand equaliser? Demographic factors and mobility in Finnish men and women aged 65+. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 7(2), 107–118 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2004.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Siren, A., Haustein, S.: What are the impacts of giving up the driving licence? Ageing Soc. 35(9), 1821–1838 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x1400610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sperlich, B., Zinner, C., Hebert-Losier, K., Born, D.P., Holmberg, H.C.: Biomechanical, cardiorespiratory, metabolic and perceived responses to electrically assisted cycling. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 112(12), 4015–4025 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2382-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sundfor, H.B., Fyhri, A.: A push for public health: the effect of e-bikes on physical activity levels. BMC Public Health (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4817-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. SVR: Vlaanderen in cijfers 2015. Studiedienst Vlaamse Regering, Vlaamse Overheid, Brussels, Belgium (2015)Google Scholar
  44. Tsunoda, K., Kitano, N., Kai, Y., Tsuji, T., Soma, Y., Jindo, T., Yoon, J., Okura, T.: Transportation mode usage and physical, mental and social functions in older Japanese adults. J. Transp. Health 2(1), 44–49 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2014.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. United Nations: World population ageing 2015. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2015)Google Scholar
  46. U.S. Census Bureau: International data base. http://www.census.gov/population/international/data/idb/informationGateway.php (2017). Accessed 11 Oct 2017
  47. Van Cauwenberg, J., Clarys, P., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Van Holle, V., Verte, D., De Witte, N., De Donder, L., Buffel, T., Dury, S., Deforche, B.: Physical environmental factors related to walking and cycling in older adults: the Belgian aging studies. BMC Public Health 12, 142 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Cauwenberg, J., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Clarys, P., de Geus, B., Deforche, B.: E-bike use among older adults: relationships with demographics, health, access to motorized transport and cycling levels. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000001638. (Publish Ahead of Print) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Holle, V., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Deforche, B., Van Cauwenberg, J., Van Dyck, D.: Assessment of physical activity in older Belgian adults: validity and reliability of an adapted interview version of the long International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-L). BMC Public Health 15, 433 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1785-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vandenbulcke, G., Thomas, I., de Geus, B., Degraeuwe, B., Torfs, R., Meeusen, R., Panis, L.I.: Mapping bicycle use and the risk of accidents for commuters who cycle to work in Belgium. Transp. Policy 16(2), 77–87 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vanparijs, J., Int Panis, L., Meeusen, R., de Geus, B.: Exposure measurement in bicycle safety analysis: a review of the literature. Accid. Anal. Prev. 84, 9–19 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vlakveld, W.P., Twisk, D., Christoph, M., Boele, M., Sikkema, R., Remy, R., Schwab, A.L.: Speed choice and mental workload of elderly cyclists on e-bikes in simple and complex traffic situations: a field experiment. Accid. Anal. Prev. 74, 97–106 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.10.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ware, J., Kosinski, M., Keller, S.: SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User Manual and Interpretation Guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston (1994)Google Scholar
  54. Webber, S.C., Porter, M.M., Menec, V.H.: Mobility in older adults: a comprehensive framework. Gerontologist 50(4), 443–450 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weber, T., Scaramuzza, G., Schmitt, K.U.: Evaluation of e-bike accidents in Switzerland. Accid. Anal. Prev. 73, 47–52 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Winters, M., Davidson, G., Kao, D.N., Teschke, K.: Motivators and deterrents of bicycling: comparing influences on decisions to ride. Transportation 38(1), 153–168 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9284-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wolf, A., Seebauer, S.: Technology adoption of electric bicycles: a survey among early adopters. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 69, 196–211 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. World Health Organization: World Report on Ageing and Health. World Health Organization, Geneva (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO)BrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  4. 4.Physical Activity and Health Research Unit, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Physical TherapyVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
  5. 5.Human Physiology Research Group, Faculty of Physical Education and Physical TherapyVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations