Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 623–645 | Cite as

Analysing the effect of trip satisfaction on satisfaction with the leisure activity at the destination of the trip, in relationship with life satisfaction

  • Jonas De VosEmail author
Article

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that positive (or negative) experiences of activity episodes are likely to correlate with positive (or negative) evaluations of a persons’ life. An accumulation of short-term experiences can positively or negatively affect life satisfaction, while it is also plausible that this long-term satisfaction affects emotions experienced during an activity. In this study we analyse how (1) satisfaction with a trip towards the most recent leisure activity, (2) satisfaction with that activity and (3) life satisfaction are correlated with each other, by executing a structural equation modelling approach. Results of this study—using data from a cross-sectional survey of 1213 respondents residing in the city of Ghent (Belgium)—suggest that life satisfaction has an important effect on both travel satisfaction and activity satisfaction. On the other hand, there seems to be a stronger effect from activity satisfaction on life satisfaction than from travel satisfaction on life satisfaction, suggesting that travel satisfaction mainly has an indirect effect on life satisfaction, through participation in—and satisfaction with—leisure activities.

Keywords

Travel satisfaction Activity satisfaction Life satisfaction Leisure activities Travel behaviour Subjective well-being 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper has benefited from the constructive comments and suggestions of three anonymous reviewers and the assigned editor. This research has been funded by the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO), grant 12F2516 N.

References

  1. Abou-Zeid, M.: Measuring and Modeling Activities and Travel Well-being (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  2. Abou-Zeid, M., Ben-Akiva, M.: Well-being and activity-based models. Transportation 39(6), 1189–1207 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. Archer, M., Paleti, R., Konduri, K.C., Pendyala, R.M., Bhat, C.R.: Modeling the connection between activity-travel patterns and subjective well-being. Transp. Res. Rec. 2382, 102–111 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. Bergstad, C.J., Gamble, A., Gärling, T., Hagman, O., Polk, M., Ettema, D., Friman, M., Olsson, L.E.: Subjective well-being related to satisfaction with daily travel. Transportation 38(1), 1–15 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. Bollen, K.A.: Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  6. Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L., Handy, S.L.: Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A structural equations modeling approach. Transportation 34(5), 535–556 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. Currie, G., Richardson, T., Smyth, P., Vella-Brodrick, D., Hine, J., Lucas, K., Stanley, J.R., Morris, J., Kinnear, R., Stanley, J.K.: Investigating links between transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being in Melbourne—Preliminary results. Transp. Policy 16(3), 97–105 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. De Vos, J., Mokhtarian, P.L., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., Witlox, F.: Travel mode choice and travel satisfaction: bridging the gap between decision utility and experienced utility. Transportation 43(5), 771–796 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. De Vos, J., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., Witlox, F.: Travel and Subjective Wellbeing: a Focus on Findings, Methods and Future Research Needs. Transport Reviews 33(4), 421–442 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. De Vos, J., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., Witlox, F.: How satisfying is the Scale for Travel Satisfaction? Transp. Res. Part F 29, 121–130 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. De Vos, J., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., Witlox, F.: Do satisfying walking and cycling trips result in more future trips with active travel modes? An exploratory study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. (2017, under review)Google Scholar
  12. Diener, E.: Subjective well-being. Psychol. Bull. 95(3), 542–575 (1984)Google Scholar
  13. Diener, E.: Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. Am. Psychol. 55(1), 34–43 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. Diener, E.: The Science of Well-Being: The Collected Works of Ed Diener, 1st edn. Springer, Dordrecht (2009)Google Scholar
  15. Diener, E., Diener, C.: Most people are happy. Psychol. Sci. 7(3), 181–185 (1996)Google Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., Griffen, S.: The satisfaction with life scale. J. Pers. Assess. 49(1), 71–75 (1985)Google Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Lucas, R.E., Scollon, C.N.: Beyond the hedonic treadmill: revising the adaptation theory of well-being. Am. Psychol. 61(4), 305–314 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. Duarte, A., Garcia, C., Giannarakis, G., Limão, S., Polydoropoulou, A., Litinas, N.: New approaches in transportation planning: happiness and transport economics. Netnomics 11(1), 5–32 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. Eid, M., Diener, E.: Global judgments of subjective well-being: situational variability and long-term stability. Soc. Indic. Res. 65(3), 245–277 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. Ettema, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., Olsson, L.E., Fujii, S.: How in-vehicle activities affect work commuters’ satisfaction with public transport. J. Transp. Geogr. 24, 215–222 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Eriksson, L., Friman, M., Olsson, L.E., Fujii, S.: Satisfaction with travel and subjective well-being: development and test of a measurement tool. Transp. Res. Part F 14(3), 167–175 (2011)Google Scholar
  22. Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Olsson, L.E., Friman, M.: Out-of-home activities, daily travel, and subjective well-being. Transp. Res. Part A 44(9), 723–732 (2010)Google Scholar
  23. Ettema, D., Schwanen, T.: A relational approach to analysing leisure travel. J. Transp. Geogr. 24, 173–181 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. Ettema, D., Smajic, I.: Walking, places and wellbeing. The Geographical Journal 181(2), 102–109 (2015)Google Scholar
  25. Ettema, D., Zwartbol, D.: The structure of joint leisure trips: analyzing two-person leisure trips of Dutch students. J. Transp. Geogr. 31, 216–225 (2013)Google Scholar
  26. Feist, G.J., Bodner, T.E., Jacobs, J.F., Miles, M., Tan, V.: Integrating top-down and bottom-up structural models of subjective well-being: a longitudinal investigation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68(1), 138–150 (1995)Google Scholar
  27. Fredrickson, B.L., Kahneman, D.: Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65(1), 45–55 (1993)Google Scholar
  28. Friman, M., Fujii, S., Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Olsson, L.E.: Psychometric analysis of the satisfaction with travel scale. Transp. Res. Part A 48, 132–145 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. Golob, T.F.: Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research. Transp. Res. Part B 37(1), 1–25 (2003)Google Scholar
  30. Groves, R.M.: Survey Errors and Survey Costs. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  31. Headey, B., Veenhoven, R., Wearing, A.: Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being. Soc. Indic. Res. 24(1), 81–100 (1991)Google Scholar
  32. Helliwell, J.F.: Well-being, social capital and public policy: what’s new? Econ. J. 116(510), C34–C45 (2006)Google Scholar
  33. Helliwell, J.F., Putnam, R.D.: The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 359(1449), 1435–1446 (2004)Google Scholar
  34. Jain, J., Lyons, G.: The gift of travel time. J. Transp. Geogr. 16, 81–89 (2008)Google Scholar
  35. Kahneman, D., Diener, E., Schwartz, N.: Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  36. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A.B.: Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(1), 3–24 (2006)Google Scholar
  37. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A.B., Schkade, D.A., Schwarz, N., Stone, A.A.: A survey for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science 306(5702), 1776–1780 (2004)Google Scholar
  38. Kahneman, D., Wakker, P.P., Sarin, R.: Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quart. J. Econ. 112(2), 375–405 (1997)Google Scholar
  39. Kline, R.B.: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  40. LaMondia, J.J., Bhat, C.R.: A conceptual and methodological framework of leisure activity loyalty accommodating the travel context. Transportation 39(2), 321–349 (2012)Google Scholar
  41. Lucas, K.: Transport and social exclusion: where are we now? Transp. Policy 20, 105–113 (2012)Google Scholar
  42. Lyons, G., Jain, J., Holley, D.: The use of travel time by rail passengers in Great Britain. Transp. Res. Part A 41(1), 107–120 (2007)Google Scholar
  43. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., Diener, E.: The benefits of frequent positive affect: does happiness lead to success? Psychol. Bull. 131(6), 803–855 (2005)Google Scholar
  44. Mokhtarian, P.L., Ory, D.T.: Structural Equations Models. In: Kitchin, R., Thrift, N. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, vol. 11, pp. 10–17. Elsevier, Oxford (2009)Google Scholar
  45. Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I.: How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transp. Res. Part A 35(8), 695–719 (2001)Google Scholar
  46. Morris, E.A., Guerra, E.: Are we there yet? Trip duration and mood during travel. Transp. Res. Part F 33, 38–47 (2015a)Google Scholar
  47. Morris, E.A., Guerra, E.: Mood and mode: does how we travel affect how we feel? Transportation 42(1), 25–43 (2015b)Google Scholar
  48. Newman, D.B., Tay, L., Diener, E.: Leisure and subjective well-being: a model of psychological mechanisms as mediating factors. J. Happiness Stud. 15(3), 555–578 (2014)Google Scholar
  49. Olsson, L.E., Gärling, T., Ettema, D., Friman, M., Fujii, S.: Happiness and satisfaction with work commute. Soc. Indic. Res. 111(1), 255–263 (2013)Google Scholar
  50. Ory, D.T., Mokhtarian, P.L.: When is getting there half the fun? Modeling the liking for travel. Transp. Res. Part A 39(2–3), 97–123 (2005)Google Scholar
  51. Ory, D.T., Mokhtarian, P.L.: Modeling the structural relationships among short-distance travel amounts, perceptions, affections, and desires. Transp. Res. Part A 43(1), 26–43 (2009)Google Scholar
  52. Passmore, A., French, D.: Development and administration of a measure to assess adolescents’ participations in leisure activities. Adolescence 36(141), 67–75 (2001)Google Scholar
  53. Pavot, W., Diener, E.: Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychol. Assess. 5(2), 164–172 (1993)Google Scholar
  54. Ravulaparthy, S., Yoon, S.Y., Goulias, K.G.: Linking elderly transport mobility and subjective well-Being: a multivariate latent modeling approach. Transp. Res. Rec. 2382, 28–36 (2013)Google Scholar
  55. Redmond, L.S., Mokhtarian, P.L.: The positive utility of the commute: modelling ideal commute time and relative desired commute amount. Transportation 28(2), 179–205 (2001)Google Scholar
  56. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52, 141–166 (2001)Google Scholar
  57. Ryff, C.D., Singer, B.H.: Know thyself and become what you are: a eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. J. Happiness Stud. 9(1), 13–39 (2008)Google Scholar
  58. Schimmack, U.: The structure of subjective well-being. In: Eid, M., Larsen, R.J. (eds.) The Science of Subjective Well-Being, pp. 97–123. Guilford Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  59. Schimmack, U., Oishi, S.: The influence of chronically and temporarily accessible information on life satisfaction judgments. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89(3), 395–406 (2005)Google Scholar
  60. Schlich, R., Axhausen, K.J.: Habitual travel behaviour: evidence from a six-week travel diary. Transportation 30(1), 13–36 (2003)Google Scholar
  61. Schwanen, T., Wang, D.: Well-being, context and everyday activities in space and time. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 104(4), 833–851 (2014)Google Scholar
  62. Schwarz, N., Strack, F.: Reports of subjective well-being: judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In: Kahneman, D., Diener, E., Schwarz, N. (eds.) Foundations of Hedonic Psychology: Scientific Perspectives on Enjoyment and Suffering, pp. 61–84. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  63. Spinney, J.E.L., Scott, D.M., Newbold, K.B.: Transport mobility benefits and quality of life: a time-use perspective of elderly Canadians. Transp. Policy 16(1), 1–11 (2009)Google Scholar
  64. Stutzer, A., Frey, B.S.: Stress that doesn’t pay: the commuting paradox. Scand. J. Econ. 110(2), 339–366 (2008)Google Scholar
  65. Tinsley, H.E.A., Eldredge, B.D.: Psycholigical benefits of leisure participation: a taxonomy of leisure activities based on their need-gratifying properties. J. Couns. Psychol. 42(2), 123–132 (1995)Google Scholar
  66. Tinsley, H.E.A., Hinson, J.A., Tinsley, D.J., Holt, M.S.: Attributes of leisure and work experienced. J. Couns. Psychol. 40(4), 447–455 (1993)Google Scholar
  67. Twisk, J.W.R.: Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis for Epidemiology: A Practical Guide, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  68. Van Acker, V., Witlox, F.: Car ownership as a mediating variable in car travel behaviour research using a structural equation moddeling approach to identify its dual relationship. J. Transp. Geogr. 18(1), 65–74 (2010)Google Scholar
  69. Västfjäll, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., Kleiner, M.: The measurement of core affect: a Swedish self-report measure. Scand. J. Psychol. 43(1), 19–31 (2002)Google Scholar
  70. Västfjäll, D., Gärling, T.: Validation of a Swedish short self-report measure. Scand. J. Psychol. 48(3), 233–238 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geography DepartmentGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations