Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 45, Issue 5, pp 1559–1578 | Cite as

Passengers’ response to transit fare change: an ex post appraisal using smart card data

  • Zi-jia Wang
  • Feng ChenEmail author
  • Bo Wang
  • Jian-ling Huang
Article

Abstract

Fare change is an effective tool for public transit demand management. An automatic fare collection system not only allows the implementation of complex fare policies, but also provides abundant data for impact analysis of fare change. This study proposes an assessment approach for analyzing the influence when substituting a flat-fare policy with a distance-based fare policy, using smart card data. The method can be used to analyze the impact of fare change on demand, riding distances, as well as price elasticity of demand at different time and distance intervals. Taking the fare change of Beijing Metro implemented in 2014 as a case study, we analyze the change of network demand at various levels, riding distances, and demand elasticity of different distances on weekdays and weekends, using the method established and the smart card data a week before and after the fare change. The policy implication of the fare change was also addressed. The results suggest that the fare change had a significant impact on overall demand, but not so much on riding distances. The greatest sensitivity to fare change is shown by weekend passengers, followed by passengers in the evening weekday peak time, while the morning weekday peak time passengers show little sensitivity. A great variety of passengers’ responses to fare change exists at station level because stations serve different types of land usage or generate trips with distinct purposes at different times. Rising fares can greatly increase revenue, and can shift trips to cycling and walking to a certain extent, but not so much as to mitigate overcrowding at morning peak times. The results are compared with those of the ex ante evaluation that used a stated preference survey, and the comparison illustrates that the price elasticity of demand extracted from the stated preference survey significantly exaggerates passengers’ responses to fare increase.

Keywords

Smart card data Fare change Demand Trip distance Demand elasticity 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 51408029).

References

  1. Abrate, G., Piacenza, M., Vannoni, D.: The impact of integrated tariff systems on public transport demand: evidence from Italy. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 39(2), 120–127 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC): Passenger Demand Forecasting Handbook. Passenger Demand Forecasting Council, London (2002)Google Scholar
  3. Barry, J., Newhouser, R., Rahbee, A., Sayeda, S.: Origin and destination estimation in New York City with automated fare system data. Transp. Res. Rec. 1817, 183–187 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beijing Transportation Research Center: 2016 Beijing transport development annual report (2016) (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. Bresson, G., Dargay, J., Madre, J., Pirotte, A.: The main determinants of the demand for public transport: a comparative analysis of England and France using shrinkage estimators. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 37(7), 605–627 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chin, A., Lai, A., Chow, J.: Non-additive public transit fare pricing under congestion with policy lessons from toronto case study. In: Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting (No. 16-1710) (2016)Google Scholar
  7. Chen, F., Fang, J., Wu, Q.: Study of standing passenger density in subway cars based on passengers’ spatial comfort: case study of Beijing subway line 4. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2540, 84–91 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CityMetric: How much do Londoners spend on commuting. http://www.citymetric.com/transport/how-much-do-londoners-spend-commuting-1668 (2015). 19th Sep 2016
  9. Dargay, J., Hanly, M.: The demand for local bus services in England. Transp. Econ. Policy 36, 73–91 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. Devillaine, F., Munizaga, M., Trépanier, M.: Detection of activities of public transport users by analyzing smart card data. Transp. Res. Rec. 2276, 48–55 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans, J.E.I.V.: Transit pricing and fares: traveler response to transportation system changes. Transp. Res. Board 12, 1–59 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. Farber, S., Bartholomew, K., Li, X., Páez, A., Habib, K.M.N.: Assessing social equity in distance based transit fares using a model of travel behavior. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 67, 291–303 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finance Bureau of Beijing (FBB): Report on Budget Execution of 2013 and Budget Draft of 2014 of Beijing. http://www.mof.gov.cn/zhuantihuigu/2014yshb/201402/t20140219_1044590.html (2014). 19th Sep 2016
  14. Gkritza, K., Karlaftis, M.G., Mannering, F.L.: Estimating multimodal transit ridership with a varying fare structure. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 45(2), 148–160 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grange, L., González, F., Muñoz, J.C., Troncoso, R.: Aggregate estimation of the price elasticity of demand for public transport in integrated fare systems: the case of transantiago. Transp. Policy 29, 178–185 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hensher, D.: Assessing systematic sources of variation in public transport elasticities: some comparative warnings. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 42(7), 1031–1042 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hickey, R.: Impact of transit fare increase on ridership and revenue: metropolitan transportation authority, New York city. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1927, 239–248 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. Holmgren, J.: Meta-analysis of public transport demand. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 41(10), 1021–1035 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iseki H., Liu C., Knaap G.: Origin-Destination Land Use Ridership Model for Fare Policy Analysis for the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education, University of Maryland, College Park. http://smartgrowth.umd.edu/assets/documents/announcements/landuseridershipmodel_finalreport.pdf (2015). 19th Sep 2016
  20. Litman, T.: Transit price elasticities and cross-elasticities. J. Public Transp. 7(2), 37–58 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Litman, T.: Transportation elasticities: How prices and other factors affect travel behavior. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. http://www.vtpi.org/elasticities.pdf (2011)
  22. Munizaga, M., Palma, C.: Estimation of a disaggregate multimodal public transport origin–destination matrix from passive smartcard data from Santiago, Chile. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 24, 9–18 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Paulley, N., Balcombe, R., Mackett, R., Titheridge, H., Preston, J., Wardman, M., Shires, J., White, P.: The demand for public transport: the effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership. Transp. Policy 13, 295–306 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pelletier, M., Trépanier, M., Morency, C.: Smart card data use in public transit: a literature review. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 19(4), 557–568 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. People’s Daily Online: The annual operation cost of Beijing Subway in public release for the first time. http://bj.people.com.cn/n/2014/1013/c14540-22589431.html (2014). 19th Sep 2016
  26. Sharaby, N., Shiftan, Y.: The impact of fare integration on travel behavior and transit ridership. Transp. Policy 26, 63–70 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schimek, P.: Dynamic estimates of fare elasticity for US public transit. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Trans. Res. Board 2538, 96–101 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Webster, F., Bly, P.: The Demand for Public Transport. Report of an international collaborative study, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire (1980)Google Scholar
  29. Wang, C., Yang, X.: Analysis and suggestion of fare changes of Beijing urban rail transit–contrast between Beijing and other cities. China Econ. 1, 76–77 (2015). (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  30. Wang, Z., Li, X., Chen, F.: Impact evaluation of a mass transit fare change on demand and revenue utilizing smart card data. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 77, 213–224 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zi-jia Wang
    • 1
  • Feng Chen
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Bo Wang
    • 3
  • Jian-ling Huang
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringBeijing Jiaotong UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Beijing Engineering and Technology Research Center of Rail Transit Line Safety and Disaster PreventionBeijingChina
  3. 3.Beijing Transportation Information CenterBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations