Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 643–679 | Cite as

The San Francisco Travel Quality Study: tracking trials and tribulations of a transit taker

  • Andre Carrel
  • Raja Sengupta
  • Joan L. Walker
Article

Abstract

In helping understand the dynamics of travel choice behavior and traveler satisfaction over time, multi-day panel data is invaluable (McFadden in Am Econ Rev 91(3): 351–378, 2001). The collection of such data has become increasingly feasible thanks to smartphones, which researchers can use to present surveys to travelers and to collect additional information through the phones’ location services and other sensors. This paper describes the design and implementation of the San Francisco Travel Quality Study, a multi-day research study conducted in autumn 2013 with 838 participants. The objective of the study was to investigate the link between transit service quality, the satisfaction and subjective well-being of transit riders, and travel choice behavior, with a particular interest in the influence of travelers’ choice history and personal experiences on future transit use. For that purpose, a rich panel data set was collected from multiple sources, including a number of mobile travel experience surveys capturing traveler satisfaction and emotions, two online surveys capturing demographics, attitudes and mode choice intentions, as well as high-resolution phone location data and transit vehicle location data. By fusing the phone location data with transit vehicle location data, individual-level transit travel diaries could be automatically created, and by fusing the location data with the survey responses, additional information about the context of the responses could be derived. While the behavioral and satisfaction-related findings of the study are detailed in other publications, this paper is intended to serve two purposes. First, it describes the study design, data collection effort and challenges faced in order to provide a learning opportunity for other researchers considering similar studies. Second, it discusses the key sociodemographic data and characteristics of the study population in order to provide a foundation and reference for further publications that make use of the data set described here. The authors would like to invite other researchers to collaborate with them on the evaluation of the data.

Keywords

Mode choice Public transportation Integrated choice and latent variable modeling Satisfaction Smartphone survey Panel data 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Science Foundation and the University of California Transportation Center for providing funding for this project, and the SFMTA for their support and collaboration in organizing it as well as for providing the incentives to participants. The authors would further like to thank the following individuals whose key contributions in enabling, designing, and executing the study were greatly appreciated (in alphabetical order): Jillian Anable, Sonali Bose, Andrew Campbell, John Canny, Angelo Guevara, Lynne Hollyer, Phuc-Hai Huynh, Carmen Lam, Peter Lau, Jason Lee, Robert Levenson, Kathryn Lewis, Rabi Mishalani, Leif Nelson, Hoang Nguyen, Elizabeth Sall, and of course all study participants. We apologize for any omissions; they are unintentional.

References

  1. Aarts, H., Verplanken, B., Knippenberg, A.: Predicting behavior from actions in the past: repeated decision making or a matter of habit? J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 25(15), 1355–1374 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abou-Zeid, M., Ben-Akiva, M.: A model of travel happiness and mode switching. In: Choice modelling: the state-of-the-art and the state-of-practice (Proceedings from the Inaugural International Choice Modelling Conference), pp. 289–306 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. Abou-Zeid, M., et al.: Happiness and travel mode switching: findings from a Swiss public transportation experiment. Transp. Policy 19(1), 93–104 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, E.W., Sullivan, M.W.: The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Mark. Sci. 12(2), 125–143 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Android Fragmentation Report, August 2015. http://opensignal.com/reports/2015/08/android-fragmentation/ (2015). Accessed 23 Feb 2016
  6. Asakura, Y., Hato, E.: Tracking survey for individual travel behaviour using mobile communication instruments. Transp. Res. Part C 12(3), 273–291 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Auld, J., et al.: An automated GPS-based prompted recall survey with learning algorithms. Transp. Lett. 1(1), 59–79 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Axhausen, K.W., Schmid, B., Weis, C.: Predicting response rates updated. Tech. rep. Zürich, Switzerland, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (1063) (2015)Google Scholar
  9. Axhausen, K.W., et al.: Observing the rhythms of daily life: a 6-week travel diary. Transportation 29(2), 95–124 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Axhausen, K.W., et al.: Fatigue in long-duration travel diaries. Transportation 34(2), 143–160 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolton, R.N.: A dynamic model of the duration of the customer’s relationship with a continuous service provider: the role of satisfaction. Mark. Sci. 17(1), 45–65 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brabham, D.C.: Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Plan Theory 8(3), 242–262 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brabham, D.C, Sanchez, T.W., Bartholomew, K.: Crowdsourcing public participation in transit planning: preliminary results from the next stop design case. In: TRB 89th Annual Meeting Compendium (2010)Google Scholar
  14. Bricka, S., Bhat, C.R.: Comparative analysis of global positioning system-based and travel survey-based data. Transp. Res. Rec. 1972, 9–20 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brög, W., Kahn, T.: Customer satisfaction as an element of strategic business decisions. In: 2nd UITP International Marketing Conference Paris (2003)Google Scholar
  16. Brunette, W. et al.: Open Data Kit 2.0: expanding and refining information services for developing regions. In: Proceedings of the 14th Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (2013)Google Scholar
  17. Carrel, A., Halvorsen, A., Walker, J.L.: Passengers’ perception of and behavioral adaptation to unreliability in public transportation. Transp. Res. Rec. 2351, 153–162 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carrel, A., Sengupta, R., Walker, J.L. Understanding future mode choice intentions of transit riders as a function of past experiences with travel quality. In: 14th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Windsor, United Kingdom (2015)Google Scholar
  19. Carrel, A., et al.: Quantifying transit travel experiences from the users’ perspective with high-resolution smartphone and vehicle location data: methodologies, validation, and example analyses. Transp. Res. Part C 58, 224–239 (2015b)Google Scholar
  20. Carrel, A., et al.: In pursuit of the happy transit rider: dissecting satisfaction using daily surveys and tracking data. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 20(4), 345–362 (2016)Google Scholar
  21. Carrus, G., Passafaro, P., Bonnes, M.: Emotions, habits and rational choices in ecological behaviours: the case of recycling and use of public transportation. J. Environ. Psychol. 28(1), 51–62 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cherchi, E., Cirillo, C.: A mixed logit mode choice model on panel data: accounting for systematic and random variations on responses and preferences. In: 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (2008)Google Scholar
  23. Cherchi, E., Cirill, C.: Validation and forecasts in models estimated from multiday travel survey. Transp. Res. Rec. 2175, 57–64 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Connor, T.S.: Experience sampling and ecological momentary assessment with mobile phones. http://www.otago.ac.nz/psychology/otago047475.pdf (2014)
  25. Cottrill, C., et al.: Future mobility survey. Transp. Res. Rec. 2354, 59–67 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R.: Validity and reliability of the experiencesampling method. J. Nerv. Mental Dis. 175(9), 526–536 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Davis, M.M., Heineke, J.: How disconfirmation, perception and actual waiting times impact customer satisfaction. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 9(1), 64–73 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Del Castillo, J.M., Benitez, F.G.: Determining a public transport satisfaction index from user surveys. Transportmetrica A 9(8), 713–741 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dillman, D.: Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method–2007 Update With New Internet, Visual, and Mixed-Mode Guide. Wiley, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  30. Dubé, Laurette, Menon, K.: Why would certain types of in-process negative emotions increase post-purchase consumer satisfaction with services. Adv. Serv. Mark. Manag. 7, 131–158 (1998)Google Scholar
  31. Eboli, L., Mazzulla, G.: A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger’s point of view. Transp. Policy 18(1), 172–181 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ettema, D., et al.: Out-of-home activities, daily travel, and subjective wellbeing. Transp. Res. Part A 44(9), 723–732 (2010)Google Scholar
  33. Evans, G.W., Wener, R.E., Phillips, D.: The morning rush hour predictability and commuter stress. Environ. Behav. 34(4), 521–530 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Friman, M., Edvardsson, B., Gärling, T.: Frequency of negative critical incidents and satisfaction with public transport services, part I. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 8(2), 95–104 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fujii, S., Kitamura, R.: What does a one-month free bus ticket do to habitual drivers? An experimental analysis of habit and attitude change. Transportation 30(1), 81–95 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gardner, B., Abraham, C.: What drives car use? A grounded theory analysis of commuters’ reasons for driving. Transp. Res. Part F 10(3), 187–200 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gatersleben, B., Uzzell, D.: Affective appraisals of the daily commute comparing perceptions of drivers, cyclists, walkers, and users of public transport. Environ. Behav. 39(3), 416–431 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Halpern, S.D., et al.: Lottery-based versus fixed incentives to increase clinicians’ response to surveys. Health Serv. Res. 46(5), 1663–1674 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hansen, F., Christensen, S.R.: Emotions, Advertising and consumer choice. Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen (2007)Google Scholar
  40. Hanson, S., Burnett, P.: Understanding complex travel behavior: measurement issues. In: Stopher, P., Meyburg, A., & Brög, W. (eds.) New Horizons in travel-behaviour research, pp. 207–230. Croom Helm, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  41. Hensher, D.A., Stopher, P., Bullock, P.: Service quality: developing a service quality index in the provision of commercial bus contracts. Transp. Res. Part A 37(6), 499–517 (2003)Google Scholar
  42. Homburg, C., Koschate, N., Hoyer, W.D.: The role of cognition and affect in the formation of customer satisfaction: a dynamic perspective. J. Mark. 70(3), 21–31 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Itsubo, S., Hato, E.: Effectiveness of household travel survey using GPSequipped cell phones and Web diary: comparative study with paper-based travel survey. In: Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting (2006)Google Scholar
  44. Jariyasunant, J., et al.: The quantified traveler: travel feedback meets the cloud to change behavior. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 19(2), 109–124 (2015)Google Scholar
  45. Kahneman, D., et al.: A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science 306(5702), 1776–1780 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Killingsworth, M.A., Gilbert, D.T.: A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science 330(6006), 932 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Klöckner, C.A., Matthies, E.: How habits interfere with normdirected behaviour: a normative decision-making model for travel mode choice. J. Environ. Psychol. 24(3), 319–327 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Labs, L.: Durchhaltetraining. In: c’t - Magazin für Computertechnik 12 (2012)Google Scholar
  49. Laros, F.J.M., Steenkamp, J.N.E.M.: Emotions in consumer behavior: a hierarchical approach. J. Bus. Res. 58(10), 1437–1445 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Li, T. et al.: Low-power pervasive wi-fi connectivity using WiScan. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  51. Löchl, M.: Stability of travel behaviour: Thurgau 2003  (Travel survey metadata series). Tech. rep. Zürich, Switzerland, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (16) (2005)Google Scholar
  52. Mann, E., Abraham, C.: The role of affect in UK commuters’ travel mode choices: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Br. J. Psychol. 97(2), 155–176 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McFadden, D.: Economic choices. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(3), 351–378 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mittal, V., Kumar, P., Tsiros, M.: Attribute-level performance, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions over time: a consumption-system approac. J. Mark. 63, 88–101 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mondschein, A.: Five-star transportation: using online activity reviews to examine mode choice to non-work destinations. Transportation 42(4), 707–722 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Montini, L. et al.: Comparison of travel diaries generated from smartphoen data and dedicated GPS devices. In: 10th International Conference on Transport Survey Methods, Leura, NSW, Australia (2014)Google Scholar
  57. Ohmori, N., Nakazato, M., Harata, N.: GPS mobile phone-based activity diary survey. Proc. Eastern Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 5, 1104–1115 (2005)Google Scholar
  58. Oliveira, M.G.S., et al.: Global positioning system-assisted prompted recall household travel survey to support development of advanced travel model in Jerusalem. Transp. Res. Rec. 2246, 16–23 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Oliver, R.L.: Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. J. Consum. Res. 20(3), 418–430 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. De Juan, D., et al.: Continuous mobility surveys: the state of practice. Transp. Rev. 31(3), 293–312 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pedersen, T., Friman, M., Kristensson, P.: The role of predicted, online experienced and remembered satisfaction in current choice to use public transport services. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 18(5), 471–475 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pender, B., et al.: Social media use during unplanned transit network disruptions: a review of literature. Transp. Rev. 34(4), 501–521 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Perk, V., Flynn, J., Volinski, J.M. Transit ridership, reliability and retention. Tech. rep. (2008)Google Scholar
  64. Perugini, M., Bagozzi, R.P.: The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviours: broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviour. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 40(1), 79–98 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Richins, M.L.: Measuring emotions in the consumption experience. J. Consum. Res. 24(2), 127–146 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rieser-Schüssler, N., Montini, L., Dobler, C.: Improving automatic postprocessing routines for GPS observations using prompted-recall data. In: 9th International Conference on Survey Methods in Transport, Termas de Puyehue (2011)Google Scholar
  67. Roorda, Matthew J. Miller, E.J.: Toronto activity panel survey: demonstrating the benefits of a multiple instrument panel survey. In: 7th International Conference on Travel Methods, Costa Rica (2004)Google Scholar
  68. Russell, J.A.: A circumplex model of affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39(6), 1161–1178 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Scheiner, J., Holz-Rau, C.: A comprehensive study of life course, cohort, and period effects on changes in travel mode use. Transp. Res. Part A 47, 167–181 (2013)Google Scholar
  70. Schlich, R., Axhausen, K.W.: Habitual travel behaviour: evidence from a 6-week travel diary. Transportation 30(1), 13–36 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schlich, R., Simma, A., Axhausen, K.W.: Determinanten des Freizeitverkehrs: Modellierung und empirische Befunde (2004)Google Scholar
  72. Schüssler, N., Axhausen, K.W.: Processing Raw Data from Global Positioning Systems Without Additional Information. Transp. Res. Rec. 2105, 28–36 (2009)Google Scholar
  73. Schweitzer, L.: Planning and social media: a case study of public transit and stigma on Twitter. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 80(3), 218–238 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sharmeen, F., Arentze, T., Timmermans, H.: An analysis of the dynamics of activity and travel needs in response to social network evolution and life-cycle events: a structural equation model. Transp. Res. Part A 59, 159–171 (2014)Google Scholar
  75. Simma, A., Axhausen, K.W.: Commitments and modal usage: analysis of German and Dutch panels. Transp. Res. Rec. 1854, 22–31 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Simmons, E., Wilmot, A.: Incentive payments on social surveys: a literature review. Soc. Surv. Methodol. Bull. 53, 1–11 (2004)Google Scholar
  77. Smith, A.: Smartphone ownership–2013 update. Tech. rep. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC (2013)Google Scholar
  78. Smith, A.K., Bolton, R.N.: The effect of customers’ emotional responses to service failures on their recovery effort evaluations and satisfaction judgments. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 30(1), 5–23 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stopher, P., Andrew, C.: Conducting a GPS prompted recall survey over the internet. In: 84th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2005)Google Scholar
  80. Stopher, P., Clifford, E., Montes, M.: Variability of travel over multiple days: analysis of three panel waves. Transp. Res. Rec. 2054, 56–63 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stopher, P., FitzGerald, C., Xu, M.: Assessing the accuracy of the Sydney household travel survey with GPS. Transportation 34(6), 723–741 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stradling, S.: Passenger perceptions and the ideal urban bus journey experience. Transp. Policy 14(4), 283–292 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Swanson, J., Ampt, L., Jones, P.: Measuring bus passenger preferences. Traffic Eng. Control 38(6), 330–336 (1997)Google Scholar
  84. Tooley, M.S.: Incentives and rates of return for travel surveys. Transp. Res. Rec. 1551, 67–73 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Verhoeven, M., et al.: Modeling the impact of key events on long-term transport mode choice decisions: decision network approach using event history data. Transp. Res. Rec. 1926, 106–114 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Vij, A., Carrel, A., Walker, J.L.: Incorporating the in uence of latent modal preferences on travel mode choice behavior. Transp. Res. Part A 54, 164–178 (2013)Google Scholar
  87. Wirtz, D., et al.: What to do on spring break? The role of predicted, on-line, and remembered experience in future choice. Psychol. Sci. 14(5), 520–524 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wolf, J. et al.: Applications of new technologies in travel surveys. In: 7th International Conference on Travel Survey Methods, Costa Rica (2004)Google Scholar
  89. Xiong, C., et al.: The analysis of dynamic travel mode choice: a heterogeneous hidden Markov approach. Transportation 42(6), 985–1002 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Yánez, M.F., Mansilla, P., De Dios Ortúuzar, J.: The Santiago Panel: measuring the effects of implementing Transantiago. Transportation 37(1), 125–149 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations