Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 905–918 | Cite as

Measuring winners and losers from the new I-35W Mississippi River Bridge

  • Shanjiang Zhu
  • David Levinson
  • Henry Liu
Article

Abstract

The opening of the replacement for the I-35W Mississippi River Bridge on September 18th, 2008 provides a unique opportunity to evaluate the impacts generated by this additional link on network performance. Using detailed GPS data to estimate travel times on links and for origin-destination pairs, this research finds that while on average travel time improved with the reopening of the bridge, the subsequent restoration of parts of the rest of the network to their pre-collapse configuration worsened travel times significantly on average. In all cases, the distribution of winners and losers indicates clear spatial patterns associated with these network changes.

Keywords

Network disruption Travel time GPS data 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This material is based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0825768, BRIDGE: Behavioral Response to the I-35W Disruption: Gauging Equilibration; Minnesota Department of Transportation project Traffic Flow and Road User Impacts of the Collapse of the I-35W Bridge over the Mississippi River; Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium for the project Value of Reliability; and the University of Minnesota Metropolitan Consortium. We would also like to thank Kathleen Harder, John Bloomfield, Randy Guensler, and Shu Hong. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium or others.

References

  1. Cervero, R.: Road expansion, urban growth, and induced travel: a path analysis. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 69(2), 145–164 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chang, S.E., Nojima, N.: Measuring post-disaster transportation system performance: the 1995 kobe earthquake in comparative perspective. Transp. Res. Part A 35(6), 475–494 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. Craig, W.: White knights of spatial data infrastructure: the role and motivation of key individuals. URISA J. 16(2), 5–13 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. FHWA (2006). Longitudinal Employment and Household Dynamics (LEHD). http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/Census/lehd.htm
  5. Giuliano, G., Golob, J.: Impacts of the Northridge Earthquake on Transit and Highway Use. J. Transp. Stat. 1(2), 1–20 (1998)Google Scholar
  6. Handy, S.: Smart growth and the transportation-land use connection: what does the research tell us? Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 28(2), 146 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Marx, R.W.: The TIGER system: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 17(1), 89–97 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Noland, R., Lem, L.: A review of the evidence for induced travel and changes in transportation and environmental policy in the US and the UK. Transp. Res. Part D 7(1), 1–26 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Parthasarathi, P., Levinson, D., Karamalaputi, R.: Induced demand: a microscopic perspective. Urban Stud. 40(7), 1335 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Parthasarathi, P., Srivastava, A., Geroliminis, N., Levinson, D.: The importance of being early. Transportation 38(2), 227–247 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guensler, R., Yoon, S., Li, H., Elango, V.: (2007) Atlanta Commute Vehicle Soak and Start Distributions and Engine Starts per Day: Impact on Mobile Source Emission Rates. Report for Environmental Protection Agency EPA/600/R-07/075 April 2007Google Scholar
  12. Yang, H., Bell, M.: A capacity paradox in network design and how to avoid it. Transp. Res. Part A 32(7), 539–545 (1998)Google Scholar
  13. Zhu, S. (2010): The roads taken: Theory and evidence on route choice in the wake of the I-35W Mississippi River bridge collapse and reconstruction. Ph. D. thesis, University of MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhu, S., Levinson, D.: Disruptions to Transportation Networks: a Review. In Network Reliability in Practice, pp. 5–20. Springer, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  15. Zhu, S. and D. Levinson (2015, August). Do people use the shortest path? an empirical test of wardrop’s first principle. PLOS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134322 Google Scholar
  16. Zhu, S., Levinson, D., Liu, H., Harder, K.: The Traffic and Behavioral Effects of the I-35W Mississippi River Bridge collapse. Transp. Res. Part A 44(10), 771–784 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FairfaxUSA
  2. 2.MinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Ann ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations