Transportation

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 967–984 | Cite as

Potential changes to travel behaviors & patterns: a fuzzy cognitive map modeling approach

  • Rachel Vogt
  • Haizhong Wang
  • Brian Gregor
  • Alex Bettinardi
Article

Abstract

The future of travel will be affected by a number of disruptive changes, including advancements in vehicle technology, such as automated vehicles, changes in population demographics and the economy, and lifestyle changes. It is difficult to say just how much each change will affect the amount and type of travel in the future, especially given the amount of uncertainty there is regarding the trajectory of these changes and their effects. The authors examined changes that are likely to affect transportation behaviors in the future, developed a “fuzzy cognitive map” (FCM) of the relationships, and used the FCM model to investigate the effects of those relationships. The results of the study show that FCM models offer a promising method for transportation planners to enhance their ability to reason about system effects when quantitative information is limited and uncertain. More specifically, the results provide some initial guidance on the potential impacts of disruptive changes on future travel, which may help in targeting limited research funds on the most consequential potential changes.

Keywords

Travel behavior Fuzzy logic Demand modeling Modeling Cognitive map 

References

  1. American Public Transportation Association. A new partnership: rail transit and convention growth. Las Vegas, p. 36. http://www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/ATPA-UST-New-Partnership.pdf (2013)
  2. Bergbaum, A.: Distant peak car. Econ. Apr., 2: 1–2. http://www.economist.com/node/21576227/print (2013)
  3. Bertini, R., Borkowitz, T., Wang, H.: Preparing a Possible Oregon Road Map for Connected Vehicles/Cooperative Systems Deployment Scenarios, p. 51. Oregon Department of Transportation, Portland (2014)Google Scholar
  4. Buchholz, D., Cavazon-Wright, A., Cheney, J.: Consumers and Mobile Financial Services 2013, Washington, DC, p. 79. http://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/consumers-and-mobile-financial-services-report-201303.pdf (2013)
  5. Capital Area Metropoian Planning Organization. Multi-Use Pathways, Raleigh, p. 5. http://www.campo-nc.us/BPSG/docs/NCDOT_on_Multi_Use_Pathways.pdf (n.d.)
  6. Carvalho, J.P.: On the semantics and the use of fuzzy cognitive maps and dynamic cognitive maps in social sciences. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 214, 6–19 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.fss.2011.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng, R.: General Motors President sees self-driving cars 2020. CNET, pp. 1–4. http://www.cnet.com/news/general-motors-president-sees-self-driving-cars-by-2020/ (2014)
  8. Cisco: Gen Y.: New Dawn for Work, Play, Identity. The Third Annual Cisco Connected World Technology Report, 3: 1–18. http://newsroom.cisco.com/release/1114955 (2012)
  9. Divis, D.A.: GPS-Based Vehicle Crash-Prevention System Crafted to Protect Privacy. Inside GNSS, pp. 1–2. http://www.insidegnss.com/node/3628 (2013)
  10. Elmer, S.: BMW Targets 2020 for Self-Driving Cars. Auto Guide, p. 1. http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2013/02/bmw-targets-2020-for-self-driving-cars.html (2013)
  11. Falconer, J.: “Smart INSECT”: Toyota’s cloud-enabled, single-passenger electric vehicle. http://www.gizmag.com/toyota-smart-insect-ev/24406/ (2012)
  12. Garvin, G.: Automakers say self-driving cars are on the horizon. Tampa Bay Times, Tampa Bay, p. 4. http://www.tampabay.com/news/business/autos/automakers-say-self-driving-cars-are-on-the-horizon/2171386 (2014)
  13. Gibbons, G.: Safety Board Says Connected Vehicle Technology Should Be Required to Prevent Collisions. Inside GNSS, pp. 1–3. http://www.insidegnss.com/node/3654 (2013)
  14. Green, T.: New DOT Reserach Shows Drivers Support Connected Vehicle Technology, Appreciate Potential Safety Benefits. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, pp. 1–2. http://www.nhtsa.gov/About+NHTSA/Press+Releases/2012/New+DOT+Research+Shows+Drivers+Support+Connected+Vehicle+Technology,+Appreciate+Potential+Safety+Benefits (2012)
  15. Hagon, T.: Driverless cars possible by 2015. Drive, p. 1. http://www.drive.com.au/motor-news/driverless-cars-possible-by-2015-20130313-2fz96.html (2013)
  16. Hurst, D., Gartner, J.: Global Market Opportunities, Barriers, Technology Issues, and Demand Forecasts for E-Bicycles, Pedal-Assist Bicycles, and E-Bicycle Batteries and Motors, p. 14. http://www.navigantresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/EBIKE-13-Executive-Summary.pdf (2013)
  17. ICF International. Long Range Strategic Issues Facing the Transportation Industry Final Research Plan Framework. National Cooperative Highway Research Profram, Fiarfax, p. 38. http://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=2628 (2008)
  18. Jewell, P., Wyatt, E.: The impact of the suburbanization of employment on transit modal share: a Toronto region case study the impact of the suburbanization of employment on transit modal share: a Toronto region case study. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, pp. 1–18. http://docs.trb.org/prp/13-4261.pdf (2013)
  19. JobLinks.: Fixed-Route Services and the Trip to Work. Employment Transportation. Retrieved from http://web1.ctaa.org/webmodules/webarticles/articlefiles/FixedRouteServices.pdf (2011)
  20. Johnson, D.: Audi Predicts Self-Driving Cars by 2020. Left Lane News, p. 1. http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-predicts-self-driving-cars-by-2020.html (2013)
  21. Kirson, A.: Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium 1992 Digest, 3, 1272. doi: 10.1109/APS.1992.221770 (1992)
  22. Kittelson & Associates, Parsons Brinckerhoff, KFH Group, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, & ARUP. Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (3rd ed.). Washington, DC, p. 52. http://www.trb.org/main/blurbs/169437.aspx (2013)
  23. Kok, K.: The potential of fuzzy cognitive maps for semi-quantitative scenario development, with an example from Brazil. Glob. Environ. Change 19(1), 122–133 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lawrence, M.F., Interrante, E.: Next Generation of Travelers Literature Scan Draft Report, vol. 20590, p. 83 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. LeSage, J. Millennials Like Carsharing But Eventually Need To Have Their Own Cars. http://automotivedigest.com/2014/07/millennials-like-carsharing-eventually-need-car/ (n.d.)
  26. Millar, R.: Smart growth expert says bus rapid transit fits new development trends. http://www.ncbr.com/article/20131004/NEWS/131009931 (2013)
  27. Millard-Ball, A., Murray, G., Ter Schure, J., Fox, C., Burkhardt, J.: Car-Sharing: Where and How it Succeeds. Washington, DC, p. 264 http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_rpt_108.pdf (2005)
  28. Norris, N.: Why Generation Y is Causing the Great Migration of the 21st Century. http://www.placemakers.com/2012/04/09/generation-ys-great-migration/ (2012)
  29. Oregon Legislature: 2013 Regular Season: Oregon House Bill. https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2013R1/Measures/Overview/HB2428 (2013)
  30. Özesmi, U., Özesmi, S.L.: Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Ecol. Model. 176(1–2), 43–64 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.10.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ritter, G.T.: IVHS: sensing the future of transportation. SPITE 2344, 3–5 (1994)Google Scholar
  32. Rosenberg, M.: Google’s Sergey Brin joins California Gov. Jerry Brown to Sign New Driverless Car Law. San Jose Mercury News, San Jose, p. 4. http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_21627191/google-driverless-robot-car-law-jerry-brown-signs-law-sergey-brin (2012)
  33. Rosenbloom, S.: Meeting transportation needs in an aging-friendly community. J. Am. Soc. Aging 33(2): 33–43. http://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/livable-communities/learn/transportation/meeting-transportation-needs-in-an-aging-friendly-community-aarp.pdf (2009)
  34. Saisan, J., White, M., Robinson, L.: Older Driver Safety: Warning Signs and Knowing When to Stop. http://www.helpguide.org/elder/senior_citizen_driving.htm (2014)
  35. Schoettle, B., Sivak, M.: A Survey of Public Opinion about Autonomous and Self-driving Vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia, p. 42. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (2014)Google Scholar
  36. Schwartz, J.: Archives On the Pavement, A New Contender. The New York Times, New York. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/23/technology/on-the-pavement-a-new-contender.html (2003)
  37. Smith, A.: 46 % of American Adults are Smartphone Owners. Washington, DC, pp. 1–9. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2012/Smartphoneownership2012.pdf (2012)
  38. Tannert, C.: Will you ever be able to afford a self-driving car? Fast Company, p. 5. http://www.fastcompany.com/3025722/will-you-ever-be-able-to-afford-a-self-driving-car?partner=rss (2014)
  39. Taylor, P., Keeter, S.: Millennials: A Portrait of Generation Next, p. 149. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC (2010)Google Scholar
  40. Weinert, J.X., Ma, C., Yang, X.: Transition to electric bikes in China and its effect on travel behavior, transit use, and safety. Institute of Transportation Studies, p. 20. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/38b3q3jg#page-3 (2006)
  41. Zmud, J.P., Barabba, V.P., Bradley, M., Kuzmyak, J.R., Zmud, M., Orrell, D.: NCHRP Report 750: strategic issues facing transportation-volume 6: the effects of socio-demographics on future travel demand, Washington, DC, p. 140. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_750-v6.pdf (2014)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachel Vogt
    • 1
  • Haizhong Wang
    • 1
  • Brian Gregor
    • 2
  • Alex Bettinardi
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Civil and Construction EngineeringOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Oregon Systems Analytics LLCSalemUSA
  3. 3.Transportation Planning and Analysis UnitOregon Department of TransportationSalemUSA

Personalised recommendations