, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 519–536 | Cite as

One-way carsharing’s evolution and operator perspectives from the Americas

  • Susan A. Shaheen
  • Nelson D. Chan
  • Helen Micheaux


Roundtrip carsharing has been documented as a strategy to reduce car ownership and vehicle miles/kilometers traveled in urban areas. The expansion of carsharing and other forms of shared-use mobility have led to a growing interest in understanding the latest models. In recent years, one-way carsharing has gained momentum across the globe with 18 operators providing services in ten countries worldwide. One-way carsharing does not require its users to return the vehicle to the same location from which it was accessed (in contrast to roundtrip carsharing). Users typically pay by the minute versus the hour and do not require a reservation. There are two one-way models: free-floating and station-based. Free-floating carsharing allows vehicles to be picked up and left anywhere within a designated operating area, while station-based requires users to return vehicles to an available station. In Fall 2013, the authors conducted a survey of 26 roundtrip and five one-way carsharing operators in the Americas (U.S., Canada, Mexico, and Brazil) to understand their perspectives on one-way carsharing and its future. Almost 70 % of roundtrip operators viewed one-way carsharing as a complement to roundtrip carsharing, while 19 % viewed it as a competitor. Twelve percent perceived it as both a complement and competitor. Operators noted public transit, smartcard, and electric vehicle integration as key to this model’s expansion. Half of respondents believed one-way and roundtrip carsharing have similar social and environmental impacts. Given limited understanding of its impacts, more research is needed to document the benefits of one-way carsharing and to help inform policymaking and urban mobility.


Roundtrip carsharing One-way carsharing Free-floating Station-based Survey 



The authors would like to thank the Federal Highway Administration’s Value Pricing Pilot Program and the California Department of Transportation who generously funded this research. The authors thank Madonna Camel, Joerg Firnkorn, Karla Münzel, Flavia Fontana Giusti, and Adam Cohen of the Transportation Sustainability Research Center (TSRC) at the University of California, Berkeley for their help with survey development, analysis, and publication support. The authors also thank the numerous carsharing operators of the Americas who participated in this study. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily indicate acceptance by the sponsors.


  1. 6t: One-way carsharing: which alternative to private cars? 6t, Agence de l’Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l’Energie. (2014). Accessed 6 Aug 2014
  2. Barrios J.A.: On the performance of flexible carsharing - a simulation-based approach. (2012). Accessed 7 Aug 2014
  3. Barth, M., Shaheen, S., Fukuda, T., Fukuda, A.: Carsharing and station cars in Asia: an overview of Japan and Singapore. Transp. Res. Rec. 1986, 106–115 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barth, M., Todd, M., Murakami, H.: Intelligent transportation system technology in a shared electric vehicle program. Transp. Res. Rec. 1731, 88–95 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barth, M., Todd, M., Xue, L.: User based vehicle relocation techniques for multiple-station shared use vehicle systems. Presented at 83rd annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C, 2004Google Scholar
  6. Biau, V.: Montpellier 1971–1974: une expérience de “transport individuel public” Transports Urbains 72, 21–25 (1991)Google Scholar
  7. Boyacı, B., Geroliminis, N., Zografos, K.: An optimization framework for the development of efficient oneway car-sharing systems. Presented at 13th Swiss Transport Research Conference, STRC, 2013Google Scholar
  8. car2go UK Ltd: Withdrawal from UK market. car2go UK Ltd. (2014). Accessed 6 Aug 2014
  9. Carsharing.US: Innovative carsharing program in Singapore ends. Carsharing. US. (2008). Accessed 8 Aug 2014
  10. Cepolina, E.M., Farina, A.: A new shared vehicle system for urban areas. Transp. Res. C-Emer. 21(1), 230–243 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan, N., Shaheen, S.: Ridesharing in North America: past, present, and future. Transp. Rev. 32(1), 93–112 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Communauto: Auto-mobile arrives in Rosemont and Côte-des-Neiges-Notre-Dame-de-Grâce. Communauto, Press Release. (2013). Accessed 7 Aug 2014
  13. Comox: Comox. (2006). Accessed 7 Aug 2014
  14. de Almeida Correia, G.H., Antunes, A.P.: Optimization approach to depot location and trip selection in one-way carsharing systems. Trans. Res. E-Log 48(1), 233–247 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costain, C., Ardron, C., Habib, K.N.: Synopsis of users’ behaviour of a carsharing program: a case study in Toronto. Transp. Res. A 46(3), 421–434 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. Di Febbraro, A., Sacco, N., Saeednia, M.: One-way carsharing: solving the relocation problem. Transp. Res. Rec. 2319, 113–120 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fairley, P.: Car sharing could be the electric vehicle’s killer app. IEEE Spectrum. (2013). Accessed 7 Aug 2014
  18. Fan, W.D., Machemehl, R.B., Lownes, N.E.: Carsharing: dynamic decision-makingproblem for vehicle allocation. Transp. Res. Rec. 2063, 97–104 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fassi, A.E., Awasthi, A., Viviani, M.: Evaluation of carsharing network’s growth strategies through discrete event simulation. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(8), 6692–6705 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Firnkorn, J.: Triangulation of two methods measuring the impacts of a free-floating carsharing system in Germany. Transp. Res. A-Pol. 46(10), 1654–1672 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. Firnkorn, J., Müller, M.: What will be the environmental effects of new free-floating carsharing systems? The case of car2go in Ulm. Ecol. Econ. 70(8), 1519–1528 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Firnkorn, J., Müller, M.: Selling mobility instead of cars: new business strategies of automakers and the impact on private vehicle holding. Bus. Strategy Environ. 21(4), 264–280 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Georges, B.: Décryptage: Comment bolloré a pris de vitesse l’industrie automobile. (2013). Accessed 7 August 2014
  24. Honda, T.P.O.D.: Full story. Honda announces the development of intelligent community vehicle system (ICVS) management technology and vehicles. Honda Motor Company. (1998). Accessed 7 Aug 2014
  25. Honda Motor Company: Honda diracc revs up its car-sharing service. (2006). Accessed 7 Aug 2014
  26. IPC Building and Control Journals Limited: What about Witkar? Surveyor-public authority technology. IPC Build. Control J 143(4247), 30 (1974)Google Scholar
  27. Jorge, D., Correia, G., Barnhart, C.: Testing the validity of the MIP approach for locating carsharing stations in one-way systems. Presented at 15th edition of the Euro Working Group on Transportation. International Scientific Conference, EWGT, Paris 2012Google Scholar
  28. Jorge, D., Correia, G.: Carsharing systems demand estimation and defined operations: a literature review. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 13(3), 201–220 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. Kek, A.: Decision support tools for carsharing systems with flexible return time and stations. Thesis, National University of Singapore (2006)Google Scholar
  30. Le Vine, S., Adamou, S., Polak, J.: Predicting new forms of activity/mobility patterns enabled by shared-mobility systems through a needs-based stated-response method: case study of grocery shopping. Transp. Policy 32, 60–68 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin, E., Shaheen, S., Lidicker, J.: The impact of carsharing on household vehicle holdings: results from a North American shared-use vehicle survey. Transp. Res. Rec. 2143, 150–158 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin, E., Shaheen, S.: Greenhouse gas emission impacts of carsharing in North America. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 12(4), 1074–1086 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Massot, H.: Praxitèle, un concept, un service, une expérimentation, bilan d’un prototype. la revue française TEC(159) (2000)Google Scholar
  34. Nakayama, S., Yamamoto, T., Kitamura, R.: Simulation analysis for the management of an electric vehicle-sharing system. Transp. Res. Rec. 1791, 99–104 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Papanikolaou, D.: A New System Dynamics Framework for Modelling Behaviour of Vehicle Sharing Systems. SimAUD ’11: Proceedings of the 2011 symposium on simulation for architecture and urban design, pp. 126–133 (2011)Google Scholar
  36. Rogowsky, M.: Kandi crush: an electric-car vending machine from China could upend the auto industry. Forbes. (2013). Accessed 7 Aug 2014
  37. Rydén, C., Morin, E.: Mobility services for urban sustainability: environmental assessment. Report WP 6. Trivector Traffic AB. (2005). Accessed 7 Aug 2014
  38. Schaefers, T.: Exploring carsharing usage motives: a hierarchical means-end chain analysis. Transp. Res A-Policy 47, 69–77 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schönbeck, C., Schwoll, M., Linßen-Robertz, A.: Handbuch für AutoTeiler. Stadtteil Auto e.V, Aachen (1992)Google Scholar
  40. Schwieger, B., Wagner, C.: Second generation carsharing: Developing a new mobility services target groups and service characteristics. Südwestdeutscher Verlag für Hochschulschriften AG Company KG (2012)Google Scholar
  41. Shaheen, S., Meyn, M., Wipyewski, K.: U.S. shared-use vehicle survey findings on carsharing and station car growth: obstacles and opportunities. Transp. Res. Rec. 1841, 90–98 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shaheen, S.A., Cohen, A.P.: Growth in worldwide carsharing: an international comparison. Transp. Res. Rec. 1992, 81–89 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shaheen, S. A., Cohen, A. P.: Innovative mobility carsharing outlook: carsharing market overview, analysis, and trends: fall 2012. Transportation Sustainability Research Center, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley. (2012a). Accessed 7 Aug 2014
  44. Shaheen, S.A., Cohen, A.P.: Carsharing and personal vehicle services: worldwide market developments and emerging trends. Int. J. Sustain Transp. 7, 5–34 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shaheen, S.A., Sperling, D., Wagner, C.: Carsharing in Europe and North America: past, present, and future. Transp. Q. 52(3), 35–52 (1998)Google Scholar
  46. Shaheen, S.: Dynamics in behavioral adaptation to a transportation innovation: a case study of CarLink—a smart carsharing system. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, UCD-ITS-RR-99-16:232 (1999)Google Scholar
  47. Shaheen, S., Novick, L.: Framework for testing innovative transportation solutions: case study of CarLink, a commuter carsharing program. Transp. Res. Rec. 1927, 149–157 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shaheen, S., Wright, J., Dick, D., Novick, L.: CarLink - A smart carsharing system field test report. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis Publication UCD-ITS-RR-00-4:182 (2000)Google Scholar
  49. Swiatek, J.: Indy start BlueIndy, all electric ‘car-share’ program. IndyStar. (2014). Accessed 7 Aug 2014
  50. Takayama, M.: Transportation and safety in Japan—Introduction of the ITS/EV City Car System. ATSS Res. 26(2), 118–121 (2002)Google Scholar
  51. Trepanier, M., Robert, B., Viviani, M.: Electric one-way shared vehicles in Montreal. Presented at 2013 Carsharing Association Conference, Toronto. (2013). Accessed 7 Aug 2014
  52. UC Irvine News: UC Irvine’s car-sharing program charges ahead. University of California, Irvine. (2013). Accessed 7 Aug 2014
  53. Weikl, S., Bogenberger, K.: Relocation strategies and algorithms for free-floating car sharing systems. 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems Anchorage, Alaska, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  54. Welles, J.: A propos de circulation urbaine. Urbanisme (1951)Google Scholar
  55. WHO: Global health observatory. urban population growth. World Health Organization. (2013). Accessed 7 Aug 2014
  56. Yoon, B., Lee, S.: An operation model of carsharing service: application of simulation method. JTLE 1(1), 15–19 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. ZEV·NET: ZEV·NET. (2012). Accessed 7 Aug 2014

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan A. Shaheen
    • 1
  • Nelson D. Chan
    • 2
  • Helen Micheaux
    • 3
  1. 1.Transportation Sustainability Research CenterUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Transportation Sustainability Research CenterUniversity of California, BerkeleyRichmondUSA
  3. 3.Mines ParistechParisFrance

Personalised recommendations