Transportation

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 541–559 | Cite as

Comparing cities’ cycling patterns using online shared bicycle maps

Article

Abstract

Bicycle sharing systems are increasingly being deployed in urban areas around the world, alongside online maps that disclose the state (i.e., location, number of bicycles/number of free parking slots) of stations in each city. Recent work has demonstrated how regularly monitoring these online maps allows for a granular analysis of a city’s cycling trends; further, the literature indicates that different cities have unique spatio-temporal patterns, reducing the generalisability of any insights or models derived from a single system. In this work, we analyse 4.5 months of online bike-sharing map data from ten cities which, combined, have 996 stations. While an aggregate comparison supports the view of cities having unique usage patterns, results of applying unsupervised learning to the temporal data shows that, instead, only the larger systems display heterogeneous behaviour, indicating that many of these systems share intrinsic similarities. We further show how these similarities are reflected in the predictability of stations’ occupancy data via a cross-city comparison of the error that a variety of approaches achieve when forecasting the number of bicycles that a station will have in the near future. We close by discussing the impact of uncovering these similarities on how future bicycle sharing systems can be designed, built, and managed.

Keywords

Bicycle sharing Machine learning Predictive modelling Clustering Cities Commuters 

References

  1. Ahmed, N.K., Atiya, A.F., Gayar, N.E., El-Shishiny, H.: An empirical comparison of machine learning models for time series forecasting. Econom. Rev. 29(5–6), 594–621 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austwick, M.Z., O’Brien, O., Strano, E., Viana, M.: The structure of spatial networks and communities in bicycle sharing systems. PLoS One 8(9), e74685 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benchimol, M., Benchimol, P., Chappert, B., Taille, A.D.L., Laroche, F., Meunier, F., Robinet, L.: Balancing the stations of a self-service “bike hire” system. RAIRO Oper. Res. 45, 37–61 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berndt, D., Clifford, J.: Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. In: KDD Workshop, vol. 10, pp. 359–370, Seattle (1994)Google Scholar
  5. Borgnat, P., Abry, P., Flandrin, P., Rouquier, J.-B.: Studying lyon’s Ve´lo’V: a statistical cyclic model. In: European Conference on Complex Systems, Warwick University, Coventry, UK, September 2009Google Scholar
  6. Crone, S.F., Hibon, M., Nikolopoulos, K.: Advances in forecasting with neural networks? empirical evidence from the nn3 competition on time series prediction. Int. J. Forecast. 27(3), 635–660 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Department of Defense of United States of America: Global Positioning System Standard Positioning Service Performance Standard, 4th edn. Department of Defense, Washington (2008)Google Scholar
  8. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G.: Pattern classification and scene analysis. Part 1, pattern classification. Wiley, Chichester (2000)Google Scholar
  9. Froehlich, J., Neumann, J., Oliver, N.: Sensing and predicting the pulse of the city through shared bicycling. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1420–1426. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (2009)Google Scholar
  10. Girardin, F., Calabrese, F., Fiore, F.D., Ratti, C., Blat, J.: Digital footprinting: uncovering tourists with user-generated content. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 7(4), 36 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guenther, M.C., Bradley, J.T.: Journey data based arrival forecasting for bicycle hire schemes. Preprint (2010)Google Scholar
  12. Lathia, N., Ahmed, S., Capra, L.: Measuring the impact of opening the london shared bicycle scheme to casual users. Elsevier Transp. Res.—Part C (Emerg. Technol.) 22, 88 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. O’Brien, O., Cheshire, J., Batty, M.: Mining bicycle sharing data for generating insights into sustainable transport systems. J. Transp. Geogr. 34, 262–273 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Parkes, S., Marsden, G., Shaheen, S., Cohen, A.: Understanding the diffusion of public bikesharing systems: evidence from Europe and North America. J. Transp. Geogr. 31, 94–103 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shawcross, V., Pidgeon, C., Borwick, V., Cleverly, J., Jones, J., McCartney, J., O'Connell, S., Qureshi, M., Tracey, R.: Pedal Power: the Cycle Hire Scheme and Cycle Superhighways. Greater London Authority Transport Committee (Nov. 2010). Available at http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/FINAL%20REPORT.pdf (as of March 19, 2015)
  16. Quinlan, J.R.: C4. 5: Programs for Machine Learning, vol. 1. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)Google Scholar
  17. Randriamanamihaga, A., Côme, E., Oukhellou, L., Govaert, G. Clustering the Vélib’ Origin-Destinations flows by means of poisson mixture models—Draft (2013)Google Scholar
  18. Ripley, B.D.: Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  19. Robusto, C.: The cosine-haversine formula. Am. Math. Mon. 64(1), 38–40 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saez-Trumper, D., Quercia, D., Crowcroft, J.: Ads and the city: considering geographic distance goes a long way. In: ACM RecSys, Dublin, Ireland (2012)Google Scholar
  21. Sakoe, H., Chiba, S.: Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 26(1), 43–49 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shaw, B., Shea, J., Sinha, S., Hogue, A.: Learning to rank for spatiotemporal search. In: ACM WSDM, Rome, Italy (2013)Google Scholar
  23. Shu, J., Chou, M. C., Liu, Q., Teo, C.-P., Wang, I.-L.: Models for effective deployment and redistribution of bicycles within public bicycle-sharing systems. Submitted to Operations Research (2011)Google Scholar
  24. Vasconcelos, M., Ricci, S., Almeida, J., Benevenuto, F., Almeida, V.: Tips, dones, and todos: uncovering user profiles in foursquare. In: ACM WSDM, Seattle, Washington (2012)Google Scholar
  25. Venetis, P., Gonzalez, H., Jensen, C., Halevy, A.: Hyper-local, directions-based ranking of places. In: VLDB Endowment, Seattle, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  26. Yan, M., Ye, K.: Determining the number of clusters using the weighted gap statistic. Biometrics 63(4), 1031–1037 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer LaboratoryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations