Abstract
China is a major energy-consuming country and is under great pressure to improve its energy efficiency as well as reduce its carbon emissions. Hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), as an energy-efficient transport innovation, have the potential to reduce gasoline consumption, carbon emissions and alleviate environmental problems. Diffusion of HEVs’ adoption is a significant initiative. A sample of 433 respondents has been collected in China to predict the customers’ intention to adopt HEVs, using an extended model of the theory of planned behavior (TPB). The empirical results show that the attitude toward HEVs, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control (the three primary elements of the TPB model) and personal moral norm partially mediate the effect of consumers’ environmental concern on their intention to adopt HEVs. Consumers’ environmental concern affects the adoption intention indirectly and is significantly positively related to the attitude toward HEVs, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control and personal moral norm, which in turn influence the adoption intention positively. The results confirm the appropriateness of the TPB model and verify that the extended TPB model has good explanatory power in predicting consumers’ intention to adopt HEVs. Based on the empirical results, we discuss the implications for promoting the adoption of HEVs and provide suggestions for future study.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The ten cities are Beijing, Shenzhen, Shanghai, Jinan, Chongqing, Wuhan, Changchun, Hefei, Dalian, and Hangzhou.
See detail at http://www.auto-stats.org.cn/.
‘4S’ is the first letter of four English words: vehicle sales (Sale), spare parts supply, service, and information feedback (Survey). Auto 4S shops are authorized and established by the vehicle manufacturers to sell a single brand of automobile and to provide customers with the parts cheaper, more specialized technical support and more in-depth service. An auto 4S shop establishes a close relationship between production and marketing for vehicle manufacturers.
The reminder is the research team member.
A one-way ANOVA is a method to determine whether there are any significant differences between the means of three or more independent (unrelated) groups in different samples (Ajzen 1991).
HEVs Club is a professional organization for the owners. In the Club, owners can communicate with each other, talk about the HEVs technologies and their feelings about their own HEVs, and share their experiences.
According to the Word of Mouth Marketing Association, WOM marketing is ‘giving people a reason to talk about your products and services, and making it easier for that conversation to take place. It is the art and science of building active, mutually beneficial consumer-to-consumer and consumer-to-marketer communications’ (Word of Mouth Marketing Association 2006).
See detail at http://www.xgo.com.cn/2787/items.html?dis=1.8.
References
Abou-Zeid, M., Ben-Akiva, M.: The effect of social comparisons on commute well-being. Transp. Res. Part A 45(4), 345–361 (2011)
Achtnicht, M.: German car buyers’ willingness to pay to reduce CO2 emissions. Clim. Chang. 113, 679–697 (2012)
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1980)
Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)
Armstrong, J.S., Overton, T.S.: Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. J. Mark. Res. 14(3), 396–402 (1977)
Axsen, J., Kurani, K.S.: Social influence, consumer behavior, and low-carbon energy transitions. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37, 311–340 (2012)
Axsen, J., Kurani, K.S.: Hybrid, plug-in hybrid, or electric-What do car buyers want? Energy Policy 61, 532–543 (2013)
Bagozzi, R., Dholakia, U., Basuroy, S.: How effortful decisions get enacted: the motivating role of decision processes, desires, and anticipated emotions. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 16(4), 273–295 (2003)
Bamberg, S.: How does environmental concern influence specific environ-mentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. J. Environ. Psychol. 23(1), 21–32 (2003)
Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M., Blöbaum, A.: Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: two field studies. J. Environ. Psychol. 27(3), 190–203 (2007)
Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A.: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51(6), 1173–1182 (1986)
Beck, L., Ajzen, I.: Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. J. Res. Pers. 25(3), 285–301 (1991)
Castanier, C., Deroche, T., Woodmanb, T.: Theory of planned behavior and road violations: the moderating influence of perceived behavioral control. Transp. Res. Part F 18, 148–158 (2013)
Chen, M.F., Tung, P.J.: The moderating effect of perceived lack of facilities on consumers’ recycling intentions. Environ. Behav. 42(6), 824–844 (2010)
Chen, M.F., Tung, P.J.: Developing an extended theory of planned behavior model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotels. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 36, 221–230 (2014)
Chiu, C.M., Wang, E.T.G.: Understanding Web-based learning continuance intention: the role of subjective task value. Inf. Manag. 45, 194–201 (2008)
Coad, A., Haan, P.D., Woersdorfer, J.S.: Consumer support for environmental policies: an application to purchases of green cars. Ecol. Econ. 68, 2078–2086 (2009)
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35, 982–1003 (1989)
Daziano, R.A., Bolduc, D.: Incorporating pro-environmental preferences towards green automobile technologies through a Bayesian hybrid choice model. Transp. A 9(1), 74–106 (2013)
De Haan, P., Peters, A., Mueller, M.: Comparison of buyers of hybrid and conventional internal combustion engine automobiles: characteristics, preferences, and previously owned vehicles. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1983(1), 106–113 (2006)
de Winter, A.F., Oldehinkel, A.J., Veenstra, R., Brunnekreef, J.A., Verhulst, F.C., Ormel, J.: Evaluation of non-response bias in mental health determinants and outcomes in a large sample of pre-adolescents. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 20(2), 173–181 (2005)
Diamond, D.: The impact of government incentives for hybrid electric vehicles: evidence from US states. Energy Policy 37, 972–983 (2009)
Dickinger, A., Kleijnen, M.: Coupons going wireless: determinants of consumer intention to redeem mobile coupons. J. Interact. Mark. 22(3), 23–39 (2008)
Dittmar, H.: The social psychology of material possessions: to have is to be. St Martin’s Press, Harvester Wheatsheaf (1992)
Erdem, C., Senturk, I., Simsek, T.: Identifying the factors affecting the willingness to pay for fuel-efficient vehicles in Turkey: a case of hybrids. Energy Policy 38, 3038–3043 (2010)
Etter, J.F., Perneger, T.V.: Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 50(10), 1123–1128 (1997)
Fontaras, G., Pistikopoulos, P., Samaras, Z.: Experimental evaluation of hybrid vehicle fuel economy and pollutant emissions over real world simulation driving cycles. Atmos. Environ. 42, 4023–4035 (2008)
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50 (1981)
Fujii, S.: Environmental concern, attitude toward frugality, and ease of behavior as determinants of pro-environmental behavior intentions. J. Environ. Psychol. 26(4), 262–268 (2006)
Furnham, A., Tu, B.L., Swami, V.: Cross-cultural differences in self-assessed intelligence: a comparison of British and Chinese undergraduates. Psychologia 55(1), 21–27 (2012)
Gadenne, D., Sharma, B., Kerr, D., Smith, T.: The influence of consumers’ environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviors. Energy Policy 39(12), 7684–7694 (2011)
Gallagher, K.S., Muehlegger, E.: Giving green to get green? Incentives and consumer adoption of hybrid vehicle technology. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 61(1), 1–15 (2011)
Gong, H., Wang, M., Wang, H.: New energy vehicles in China: policies, demonstration, and progress. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 18, 207–228 (2013)
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C.: Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1998)
Han, H., Hsu, L.T., Sheu, C.: Application of the theory of planned behavior to green hotel choice: testing the effect of environmental-friendly activities. Tour. Manag. 31(3), 325–334 (2010)
Heffner, R.R., Kurani, K.S., Turrentine, T.S.: Effects of Vehicle Image in Gasonline-Hybrid Electric Vehicles. UC Davis Institute for Transportation Studies, Davis (2005)
Heffner, R.R., Kurani, K.S., Turrentine, T.S.: Symbolism in California’s early market for hybrid electric vehicles. Transp. Res. Part D 12, 396–413 (2007)
Hidrue, M.K., Parsons, G.R., Kempton, W., Gardner, M.P.: Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resour. Energy Econ. 33(3), 686–705 (2011)
Hill, A., Roberts, J., Ewings, P., Gunnell, D.: Non-response bias in a lifestyle survey. J. Public Health 19(2), 203–207 (1997)
Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H.R., Tomera, A.N.: Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: a meta-analysis. J. Environ. Educ. 18(2), 1–8 (1987)
International Energy Agency (IEA): World Energy Outlook 2009. IEA, Paris (2009)
Jakovcevic, A., Steg, L.: Sustainable transportation in Argentina: values, beliefs, norms and car use reduction. Transp. Res. Part F 20, 70–79 (2013)
Kahn, M.E.: Do greens drive Hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 54, 129–145 (2007)
Kaiser, F.G., Scheuthle, H.: Two challenges to a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: moral norms and just world beliefs in conservationism. Personal. Individ. Differ. 35(5), 1033–1048 (2003)
Kaiser, F.G.: A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: norms and anticipated feelings of regret in conservationism. Personal. Individ. Differ. 41(1), 71-1 (2006)
Kamakura, W.A.: Common methods bias. In: Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing. Wiley, New York (2010)
Kang, H., Hahn, M., Fortin, D.R., Hyun, Y.J., Eom, Y.: Effects of perceived behavioral control on the consumer usage intention of e-coupons. Psychol. Mark. 23, 841–864 (2006)
Kim, Y., Choi, S.M.: Antecedents of green purchase behavior: an examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and PCE. Adv. Consum. Res. 32, 592–599 (2005)
Kim, Y., Han, H.: Intention to pay conventional-hotel prices at a green hotel a modification of the theory of planned behavior. J. Sustain. Tour. 18(8), 997–1014 (2010)
Klöckner, C.A., Nayum, A., Mehmetoglu, M.: Positive and negative spillover effects from electric car purchase to car use. Transp. Res. Part D 21, 32–38 (2013)
Michael, R.T., Becker, G.S.: On the new theory of consumer behavior. Swed. J. Econ. 75(4), 378–396 (1973)
National Bureau of Statistics of China: China Statistical Yearbook 2012. National Bureau of Statistic of China, Beijing (2012)
Nordlund, A.M., Garvill, J.: Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. J. Environ. Psychol. 23, 339–347 (2003)
O’Garra, T., Mouratoa, S., Peter, P.: Analysing awareness and acceptability of hydrogen vehicles: a London case study. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 30, 649–659 (2005)
Oliver, J.D., Lee, S.H.: Hybrid car purchase intentions: a cross-cultural analysis. J. Consum. Mark. 27(2), 96–103 (2010)
Ozaki, R., Sevastyanova, K.: Going hybrid: an analysis of consumer purchase motivations. Energy Policy 39, 2217–2227 (2011)
Potoglou, D., Kanaroglou, P.S.: Household demand and willingness to pay for clean vehicles. Transp. Res. Part D 12, 264–274 (2007)
Ramayah, T., Lee, J.W.C., Lim, S.: Sustaining the environment through recycling: an empirical study. J. Environ. Manag. 102, 141–147 (2012)
Realo, A., Beilmann, M.: Individualism-collectivism and social capital at the individual level. Trames 3, 205–217 (2012)
Rivis, A., Sheeran, P.: Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analysis. Curr. Psychol. 22(3), 218–233 (2003)
Romm, J.: The car and the fuel of the future. Energy Policy 34, 2609–2614 (2006)
Rout, U.K., Voβ, A., Singh, A., Fahl, U., Blesl, M., Gallachóira, B.P.O.: Energy and emissions forecast of China over a long-time horizon. Energy 36, 1–11 (2011)
Santini, D.J., Vyas, A.D.: Suggestions for a New Vehicle Choice Model Simulating Advanced Vehicles Introduction Decisions (AVID): Structure and Coefficients. Center for Transportation Analysis, Argonne National Laboratory. ANL/ESD/05-1 (2005)
SCC: The Development Plan of Energy Saving and New Energy Automotive Industry (2012–2020). The State Council of the People’s Republic of China (SCC), Beijing (2012)
Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., Kinnear, N.: The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transp. Res. Part A 48, 39–49 (2013)
Schwarz, A., Schwarz, C., Rizzuto, T.: Examining the “urban legend” of common method bias: nine common errors and their impact. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Proceedings of the 41st Annual, pp. 441–441. IEEE (2008)
Sigurdardottir, S.B., Kaplan, S., Moller, M., Teasdale, T.W.: Understanding adolescents’ intentions to commute by car or bicycle as adults. Transp. Res. Part D 24, 1–9 (2013)
Tang, B.J., Wu, X.F.: The impact of government incentives for hybrid electric vehicles: evidence from China. In: The Third International Conference on Applied Energy (ICAE), Perugia, Italy (2011)
Thøgersen, J.: Norms for environmentally responsible behavior: an extended taxonomy. J. Environ. Psychol. 26(4), 247–261 (2006)
Turrentine, T., Kurani, K.: Car buyers and fuel economy? Energy Policy 35, 1213–1223 (2007)
Turrentine, T., Kurani, K., Heffner, R.: Fuel economy: what drives consumer choice? Access Mag. 31, 14–19 (2007)
Turrentine, T., Garas, D., Lentz, A., Woodjack, J.: The UC Davis MINI E Consumer Study. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, UC Davis Institute of Transportation Studies Research Report, 5 (2011)
Word of Mouth Marketing Association: Word of mouth 101: an introduction to word of mouth marketing http://www.womma.org/content/womma_wom101.pdf(2006). Accessed 4 May 2014
Zhang, X., Wang, K., Hao, Y., Fan, J.L., Wei, Y.M.: The impact of government policy on preference for NEVs: the evidence from China. Energy Policy 61, 382–393 (2013)
Ziegler, A.: Individual characteristics and stated preferences for alternative energy sources and propulsion technologies in vehicles: a discrete choice analysis for Germany. Transp. Res. Part A 46(8), 1372–1385 (2012)
Acknowledgments
The authors want to express our gratitude to the anonymous reviewers and the editor for their comments and suggestions for improving the paper. The authors also wish to thank Professor Glenda Crosling, Monash University, for her valuable assistance with editing this paper and are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71301157, 71171183) and China Postdoctoral Fellowship Fund (2013M531533) for their generous financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix 1: Demographic profile
Appendix 2: Constructs of the extended TPB model
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, S., Fan, J., Zhao, D. et al. Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation 43, 123–143 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9567-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9567-9