Transportation

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 1081–1101 | Cite as

The multimodal majority? Driving, walking, cycling, and public transportation use among American adults

Article

Abstract

Multimodality, the use of more than one mode of transportation during a specified time period, is gaining recognition as an important mechanism for reducing automobile dependence by shifting trips from automobiles to walking, cycling, or public transportation. Most prior research on multimodality focuses on Western European countries. Based on the 2001 and 2009 National Household Travel Surveys, this paper analyzes trends and determinants of multimodal car use in the U.S. during a typical week by distinguishing between (1) monomodal car users who drive or ride in a car for all trips, (2) multimodal car users who drive or ride in a car and also use non-automobile modes, and (3) individuals who exclusively walk, cycle, and/or ride public transportation. We find that during a typical week a majority—almost two thirds—of Americans use a car and make at least one trip by foot, bicycle, or public transportation. One in four Americans uses a car and makes at least seven weekly trips by other modes of transportation. Results from multinomial and logistic regression analyses suggest there may be a continuum of mobility types ranging from monomodal car users to walk, bicycle, and/or public transportation only users—with multimodal car users positioned in-between the two extremes. Policy changes aimed at curtailing car use may result in movements along this spectrum with increasing multimodality for car users.

Keywords

Multimodality USA Trends 2001–2009 Multimodal and monomodal car users Walk, bicycle, and public transportation only users Individual travel behavior 

References

  1. Axhausen, K.W., Zimmermann, A., Schönfelder, S., Rindsfüser, G., Haupt, T.: Observing the rhythms of daily life: a six-week travel diary. Transportation 29, 95–124 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banister, D.: Unsustainable transport : city transport in the new century. Routledge, London (2005)Google Scholar
  3. Block-Schachter D.: The myth of the single mode man: how the mobility pass better meets actual travel demand. Master’s Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2009)Google Scholar
  4. Blumenberg, E., Waller, M.: The long journey to work: a federal transportation policy for working families. The Brookings Institution, Washington (2003)Google Scholar
  5. Brons, M., Givoni, M., Rietveld, P.: Access to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use. Transp. Res. Part A. 43, 136–149 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. Buehler, R., Hamre, A.: Multimodal travel behavior in the United States. Mid Atlantic University Transportation Center (MAUTC) (2013)Google Scholar
  7. Buehler, R., Pucher, J.: Demand for public transport: a comparison of Germany and the USA. Transp. Rev. 32(5), 541–567 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buehler, R., Pucher, J., Merom, D., Bauman, A.: Active travel in Germany and the US: contributions of daily walking and cycling to physical activity. Am. J. Prev. Med. 41, 241–250 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chlond, B.: Making people independent from the car-multimodality as a strategic concept to reduce CO2-emissions. In: Zachariadis, T. (ed.) Cars and Carbon: Automobiles and European Climate Policy in a Global Context, pp. 269–293. Springer, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clifton, K., Muhs, C.D.: Capturing and representing multimodal trips in travel surveys transportation research record. J. Transp. Res. Board 2285, 74–83 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diana, M., Mokhtarian, P.L.: Desire to change one’s multimodality and its relationship to the use of different transport means. Transp. Res. Part F. 12, 107–119 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forsyth, A., Krizek, K., Rodriguez, D.: Non-motorized travel research and contemporary planning initiatives. Prog. Plan. 71, 170–183 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. Garrard, J., Handy, S., Dill, J.: Women and cycling. In: Pucher, J., Buehler, R. (eds.) City Cycling, pp. 211–234. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)Google Scholar
  14. Givoni, M., Rietveld, P.: The access journey to the railway station and its role in passengers’ satisfaction with rail travel. Transp. Policy 14, 357–365 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goddard, T.B., Handy, S.L., Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L.: Voyage of the S.S. Minivan: women’s travel behavior in traditional and suburban neighborhoods. Transp. Res. Rec. 1956, 141–148 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gossen, R., Purvis, C.L.: Activities, time, and travel: changes in women’s travel time expenditures, 1990–2000. In: Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation, Conference Proceedings 35, TRB, pp. 21–29 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. IBM: IBM’s Smarter Cities Challenge: Nice Cote d’Azur Report. IBM (2011)Google Scholar
  18. Khattak, A., Wang, X., Son, S., Agnello, P.: Travel by University Students in Virginia: Is This Travel Different from Travel by the General Population? Transp. Res. Rec. 2255, 137–145 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Knaap, G.: The Determinants of Residential Property Values: Implications for Metropolitan Planning. Journal of Planning Literature 12, 267–282 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuhnimhof, T., Buehler, R., Wirtz, M., Kalinowska, D.: Travel trends among young adults in Germany: increasing multimodality and declining car use for men. J. Transp. Geogr. 24, 443–450 (2012a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuhnimhof, T., Chlond, B., von der Ruhren, S.: Users of transport modes and multimodal travel behavior steps toward understanding travelers’ options and choices. Transp. Res. Rec. 1985, 40–48 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuhnimhof, T., Wirtz, M., Manz, W.: Decomposing young Germans’ altered car use patterns. Transp. Res. Rec. 2320, 64–71 (2012b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Litman, T.: Introduction to multi-modal transportation planning: principles and planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2012)Google Scholar
  24. Lucas, K.: Driving to the breadline. In: Lucas, K., Blumenberg, E., Weinberger, R. (eds.) Auto Motives: Understanding Car Use Behaviours, pp. 209–224. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2011)Google Scholar
  25. McKenzie, B.S.: Neighborhood access to transit by race, ethnicity, and poverty in Portland, OR. City Community 12, 134–155 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Newman, P.W., Kenworthy, J.R.: the land use-transport connection: an overview. Land Use Policy 13, 1–22 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nobis, C.: Multimodality: facets and causes of sustainable mobility behavior. Transp. Res. Rec. 2010, 35–44 (2007)Google Scholar
  28. Oram, R.L., Stark, S.: Infrequent riders: one key to new transit ridership and revenue. Transp. Res. Rec. 1521, 37–41 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rietveld, P., Bruinsma, F., van Vuuren, D.J.: Coping with unreliability in public transport chains: a case study for Netherlands. Transp. Res. Part A. 35, 539–559 (2001)Google Scholar
  30. Schlich, R., Axhausen, K.W.: Habitual travel behaviour: evidence from a six-week travel diary. Transportation 30, 13–36 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schonfelder, S., Axhausen, K.W.: Urban rhythms and travel behaviour: spatial and temporal phenomena of daily travel. Ashgate Publishing, Surrey (2010)Google Scholar
  32. Sohn, D.W., Moudon, A.V., Lee, J.: The economic value of walkable neighborhoods. Urban Des. Int. 17, 115–128 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. TCRP: Transit pricing and fares. In: Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes, Chap 12, vol. 95, Report 95. Transit Cooperative Research Program (2004)Google Scholar
  34. TCRP: Car-sharing: In: Where and How It Succeeds, vol. 108. Report 108. Transit Cooperative Research Program (2005)Google Scholar
  35. TRB: Smart growth and transportation: issues and lessons learned. Transportation Research Board, Baltimore (2002)Google Scholar
  36. Turner, J., Grieco, M.: Gender and time poverty: the neglected social policy implications of gendered time transport and travel. Time Soc. 9, 129–136 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. USCB: American Community Survey 2005–2009 5-year estimates. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington (2009)Google Scholar
  38. USCB: American fact finder. U.S., vol. 2010. Department of Commerce, Washington (2010)Google Scholar
  39. USDOT: National Household Travel Survey (2001)Google Scholar
  40. USDOT: National Household Travel Survey 2009. Version 2.0/2010. Washington (2009)Google Scholar
  41. USDOT: The national bicycling and walking study: 15-year status report (2010)Google Scholar
  42. Vij, A., Carrel, A., Walker, J.L.: Capturing modality styles using behavioral mixture models and longitudinal data. Paper presented at the 2nd international choice modelling conference, Leeds (2011)Google Scholar
  43. Wang, X., Khattak, A., Sanghoon, S.: What can be learned from analyzing university student travel demand. Transp. Res. Rec. 2322, 129–137 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urban Affairs and Planning Program, School of Public and International AffairsVirginia TechAlexandriaUSA

Personalised recommendations