Transportation

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 189–209 | Cite as

A nationwide look at the immigrant neighborhood effect on travel mode choice

Article

Abstract

Immigrants to the United States walk, bicycle, and use transit and carpools more than U.S.-born residents do. These differences persist over time and across income groups. The differences appear strongest when immigrants reside in immigrant neighborhoods with high concentrations of other immigrants. This analysis uses a large, geocoded national dataset to analyze these differences and finds that living in an immigrant neighborhood has a strong influence on mode choice for immigrant residents and a much weaker effect on non-immigrant residents of immigrant neighborhoods. These effects are strongest for walking and bicycling, and particularly for shopping-related travel, and they persist after controlling for a number of variables. That these effects are considerably stronger for immigrants than for their U.S.-born neighbors suggests that social factors of the neighborhoods may play a role in structuring travel decisions.

Keywords

Immigration Mode choice Neighborhood effects Built environment 

References

  1. Akresh, I.R.: U.S. immigrants’ labor market adjustment: additional human capital investment and earnings growth. Demography 44, 865–881 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alba, R.D., Logan, J.R., Stults, B.J., Marzan, G., Zhang, W.Q.: Immigrant groups in the suburbs: a reexamination of suburbanization and spatial assimilation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 64, 446–460 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, J., Turner, E.: Ethnic residential concentrations in United States metropolitan areas. The Geogr. Review 95, 267–285 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, J.P., Turner, E.: Spatial patterns of immigrant assimilation. Prof. Geogr. 48, 140 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. American Community Survey. 2012 American Commuunity Survey [Online]. Washington, DC.: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Available: http://www.census.gov/acs/www/ (2012). Accessed September 15 2010
  6. Axhausen, K.: Social networks and travel: some hypotheses. In: Social Dimensions of Sustainable Transport: Transatlantic Perspectives, pp. 90–108 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. Badoe, D.A., Miller, E.J.: Transportation-land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling. Transp. Res. Part D. Transp. Environ. 5, 235–263 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blumenberg, E.: Moving in and moving around: immigrants, travel behavior, and implications for transport policy. Transp. Letters. Int. J. Transp. Res. 1, 169–180 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blumenberg, E., Evans, A.E.: Growing the Immigrant Transit Market: Public Transit Use and California Immigrants (Paper #07-1678). Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2007)Google Scholar
  10. Blumenberg, E., Shiki, K.: Transportation Assimilation: Immigrants, Race and Ethnicity, and Mode Choice (Paper #07-2475). Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2007)Google Scholar
  11. Blumenberg, E., Smart, M.: Measuring the Effects of Ethnic Neighborhoods on Commute Mode: Implications for Immigrants and Mode Choice Modeling. 55th Annual North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association International, Brooklyn, NY (2008a)Google Scholar
  12. Blumenberg, E., Smart, M., Smart, M.: Travel in the ‘Hood: Ethnic Neighborhoods and Mode Choice (Paper #09-2179). Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2008b)Google Scholar
  13. Blumenberg, E., Smart, M.: Getting by with a little help from my friends and family: immigrants and carpooling. Transportation 37, 429–446 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blumenberg, E., Smart, M.: Migrating to driving: exploring the multiple dimensions of immigrants’ automobile use. In: Lucas, K., Weinberger, R., Blumenberg, E. (eds.) Auto Motives: Understanding Car Use Behaviours. Emerald, Bingley (2011)Google Scholar
  15. Blumenberg, E., Smart, M.: Brother can you Spare a Ride? Carpooling in Immigrant Neighbourhoods. Urban Studies. (2013)Google Scholar
  16. Blumenberg, E., Smart, M., Lee, A.: Commute Distance and Ethnic Neighborhoods in Southern California (Paper #10-3814). Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2010)Google Scholar
  17. Bohon, S., Stamps, K., Atiles, J.: Transportation and migrant adjustment in georgia. Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 27, 273–291 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Borjas, G.J.: To ghetto or not to ghetto: ethnicity and residential segregation. J. Urb. Econ. 44, 228–253 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Casas, J., Arce, C., Frye, C.: Latino Immigration and Its Impact on Future Travel Behavior, Washington. Transportation Research Board, DC (2004)Google Scholar
  20. Catanzarite, L., Aguilera, M.: Working with co-ethnics: earnings penalties for latino immigrants at latino jobsites. Soc. Probl. 49, 101–127 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cervero, R., Kockelman, K.: Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transp. Res. Part D 2, 199–219 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Charles, K.K., Kline, P.: Relational costs and the production of social capital: evidence from carpooling. Econ. J. 116, 581–604 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chatman, D.G.: Residential choice, the built environment, and nonwork travel: evidence using new data and methods. Environ. Plan. A 41, 1072–1089 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chatman, D.G.: Explaining the “immigrant effect” on auto use: the influences of neighborhoods and preferences. Transportation 41, 441–461 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chatman, D.G., Klein, N.J.: Why do immigrants drive less? Confirmations, complications, and new hypotheses from a qualitative study in New Jersey, USA. Transp. Policy 30, 336–344 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chen, C., Gong, H., Paaswell, R.: Role of the built environment on mode choice decisions: additional evidence on the impact of density. Transportation 35, 285–299 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chiang, L.-H., Hsu, J.-C.: Locational decisions and residential preferences of taiwanese immigrants in australia. GeoJournal 64, 75–89 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Clark, W.: Ethnic preferences and ethnic perceptions in multi-ethnic settings. Urb. Geogr. 23, 237–256 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Clark, W., Patel, S.: Residential choices of the newly arrived foreign born: Spatial patterns and the implications for assimilation. California Center for Population Research On-Line Working Paper Series. Los Angeles. (2004)Google Scholar
  30. Clark, W.A.V., Blue, S.A.: Race, class and segregation patterns in U.S. immigrant gateway cities. Urb. Aff. Rev. 39, 667–688 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cline, M., Sparks, C., Eschbach, K.: Understanding Carpool Use by Hispanics in Texas. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2118, 39–46 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Crane, R.: The influence of urban form on travel: an interpretive review. J. Plan. Lit. 15, 3–23 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Crane, R., Crepeau, R.: Does neighborhood design influence travel?: a behavioral analysis of travel diary and GIS data. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 3, 225–238 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dargay, J.M.: The effect of income on car ownership: evidence of asymmetry. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 35, 807–821 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Edin, P.A., Fredriksson, P., Aslund, O.: Ethnic enclaves and the economic success of immigrants-evidence from a natural experiment. Quart. J. Econ. 118, 329–357 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ellis, M., Wright, R., Parks, V.: Work together, live apart? geographies of racial and ethnic segregation at home and at work. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 94, 620–637 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ellis, M., Wright, R., Parks, V.: Geography and the immigrant division of labor. Econ. Geogr. 83, 255–281 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Esser, H.: Does the “new” immigration require a “new” theory of intergenerational integration? Int. Migrat. Rev. 38, 1126–1159 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gärling, T., Axhausen, K.: Introduction: habitual travel choice. Transportation 30, 1–11 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Handy, S.L.: Understanding the link between urban form and nonwork travel behavior. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 15, 183–198 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hanson, S., Pratt, G.: Job search and the occupational segregation of women. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 81, 229–253 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hanson, S., Pratt, G.: Gender, Work, and Space. Routledge, New York (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heisz, A., Schellenberg, G.: Public transit use among immigrants. Can. J. Urb. Res. 13, 170–192 (2004)Google Scholar
  44. Kaplan, D.: The spatial structure of urban ethnic economies. Urb. Geogr. 19, 489–501 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Levine, J., Inam, A., Torng, G.-W.: A choice-based rationale for land use and transportation alternatives: evidence from boston and atlanta. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 24, 317–330 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liu, C.Y., Painter, G.: Travel behavior among latino immigrants: the role of ethnic concentration and ethnic employment. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 32, 62–80 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Logan, J.R., Alba, R.D., Zhang, W.Q.: Immigrant enclaves and ethnic communities in New York and Los Angeles. Am. Sociol. Rev. 67, 299–322 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lu, X., Pas, E.I.: Socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behavior. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Prac. 33, 1–18 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Massey, D.: New faces in New Places: The Changing Geography of American Immigration. Russell Sage Foundation Publications, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  50. Mcfadden, D.: The measurement of urban travel demand. J. Pub. Econ. 3, 303–328 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mcguckin, N., Murakami, E.: Examining trip-chaining behavior: comparison of travel by men and women. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1693, 79–85 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mcguckin, N., Srinivasan, N.: Journey to Work Trends in the United States and its Major Metropolitan Areas 1960–2000, Publication F.H.W.A.-E.P.-03-058. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC (2003)Google Scholar
  53. Myers, D.: Changes over time in transportation mode for journey to work: effects of aging and immigration”. In: Decennial Census Data for Transportation Planning: Case Studies and Strategies for 2000. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (1997)Google Scholar
  54. Pamuk, A.: Geography of immigrant clusters in global cities: a case study of San Francisco. Int. J. Urb. Reg. Res. 28, 287–307 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Park, R. E., Burgess, E. W. Introduction to the science of sociology, Chicago, Ill.,, The University of Chicago Press (1924)Google Scholar
  56. Parks, V.: The gendered connection between ethnic residential and labor-market segregation in los angeles. Urb. Geogr. 25, 589–630 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pas, E.I.: The effect of selected sociodemographic characteristics on daily travel-activity behavior. Environ. Plan. A 16, 571–581 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Passel, J., Cohn, D.V.: U.S. Unauthorized Immigration Flows are Down Sharply Since Mid-Decade. Pew Hispanic Center, Washington, DC (2010)Google Scholar
  59. Pisarski, A.: Commuting in America 2: The Second National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends. Eno Transportation Foundation (1996)Google Scholar
  60. Purvis, C.: Commuting Patterns of Immigrants. CTPP 2000 Status Report. U.S. Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Washington, DC (2003)Google Scholar
  61. Rosenbloom, S.: T.C.R.P. Report 28: Transit Markets of the Future: The Challenge of Change. Transit Cooperative Research Program. National Research Council, Washington, DC (1998)Google Scholar
  62. Salon, D.: Neighborhoods, cars, and commuting in New York City: a discrete choice approach. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Prac. 43, 180–196 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Singer, A., Hardwick, S., Brettell, C.: Twenty-first Century Gateways: Immigrant Incorporation in Suburban America. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC (2008)Google Scholar
  64. Smart, M.: U.S. immigrants and bicycling: two-wheeled in Autopia. Transp. Policy 17, 153–159 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smart, M., Blumenberg, E.: Ethnic Enclaves and Commute Behavior in Los Angeles and New York City. 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC (2009)Google Scholar
  66. Smart, M.J., Klein, N.J.: Neighborhoods of affinity: social forces and travel in gay and lesbian neighborhoods. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 79, 110–124 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tal, G., Handy, S.: Travel behavior of immigrants: an analysis of the 2001 national household transportation survey. Transp. Policy 17, 85–93 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tilahun, N., Levinson, D.: Work and home location: possible role of social networks. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Prac. 45, 323–331 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Yearbook of Immigration Statistics. Washington, DC (2009)Google Scholar
  70. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Estimates of the Unauthorized Immigrant Population Residing in the United States: January 2009. Washington, DC (2010)Google Scholar
  71. Valenzuela, A., Schweitzer, L., Robles, A.: Camionetas: informal travel among immigrants. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Prac. 39, 895–911 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Waters, M.C., Jiménez, T.R.: Assessing immigrant assimilation: new empirical and theoretical challenges. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 31, 105–125 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wilson, F.D.: Ethnic niching and metropolitan labor markets. Soc. Sci. Res. 32, 429–466 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wilson, K.L., Portes, A.: Immigrant enclaves: an analysis of the labor market experiences of cubans in miami. Am. J. Sociol. 86, 295–319 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public PolicyRutgers, The State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations