, Volume 41, Issue 5, pp 1041–1069 | Cite as

Travel time reliability: a review of late time valuations, elasticities and demand impacts in the passenger rail market in Great Britain



This paper provides an extensive review and reconciliation of British and European evidence relating to the value of, and demand responses to, rail reliability. In particular, we compare the elasticities implied by stated preference valuations of late time with directly estimated lateness elasticities. We find that the implied lateness elasticities are substantially greater than those directly estimated. A possible explanation for this is that lateness has been over-valued, but more sobering explanations would be to suggest that, whilst rail travellers dislike unreliability, they may be unwilling or unable to reduce their rail travel in response to experiences of poor performance, or else conventional economic approaches to deducing elasticities are not appropriate. The findings have been used to update the recommendations of the UK rail industry’s Passenger Demand Forecasting Handbook.


Rail reliability Valuations of late time Lateness elasticities 


  1. Abrantes, P.A.L., Wardman, M.: Meta-analysis of U.K. values of time: an update. Transp. Res. A 45(1), 1–17 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ARUP/OXERA: What are the findings from the econometric analysis? Findings report. Prepared for the Department for Transport, Transport Scotland and PDFC (2010)Google Scholar
  3. Association of Train Operating Companies: Passenger Demand Forecasting Handbook Version 5.1. London (2013)Google Scholar
  4. Bates, J., Polak, J., Jones, P., Cook, A.: The valuation of reliability for personal travel. Transp. Res. Part E 37, 191–229 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates, J.: Stock-take of Travel Time Variability. Prepared for Department for Transport. (2010)
  6. Batley, R.P., Dargay, J.M., Wardman, M.: Revealed Preference Study to Assess Impact of Reliability on Passenger Rail Demand. Deliverable 4: Report of Econometric Analysis. Final report to the Department for Transport (2008)Google Scholar
  7. Batley, R.P., Wardman, M., Ibanez, N., Shires, J. and Whelan, G. Revealed Preference Study to Assess Impact of Reliability on Passenger Demand. Deliverable 3: Report of Discrete Choice Analysis. Prepared for Department of Transport (2006)Google Scholar
  8. Batley, R.P., Dargay, J.M., Wardman, M.: The impact of lateness and reliability on passenger rail demand. Transp Res E 47, 61–72 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Batley, R., Ibáñez, J.N.: Randomness in preference orderings, outcomes and attribute tastes: an application to journey time risk. J Choice Model 5(3), 157–175 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benwell, M., Black, I.G.: User valuation of reliability in inter-urban travel: some problems of modelling and measurement. In: Proceedings of Seminar L, PTRC Summer Annual Meeting, PTRC, London (1984)Google Scholar
  11. Black, I.G. and Towriss, J.G. (1993) Demand Effects of Travel Time Reliability. Prepared for Department for TransportGoogle Scholar
  12. Burge, P, Rohr, C., Kim, C.: Modelling choice for long distance travel in the UK: an analysis of mode choice. In: Proceeding of European Transport Conference (2010)Google Scholar
  13. Carrion, C., Levinson, D.: Value of travel time reliability: a review of current evidence. Transp. Res. A 46(4), 720–741 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. Department for Transport and Office of Rail Regulation: Realising the potential of GB Rail—detailed report: final independent report of the Rail Value for Money Study (2012)Google Scholar
  15. Faber Maunsell: Outward facing research—journey time reliability stated preference survey. Final report to highways agency (2003)Google Scholar
  16. Faber Maunsell and Mott MacDonald: Rail overcrowding, reliability and frequency demand impacts project. Final report to Centro (2007)Google Scholar
  17. Fosgerau, M., Karlström, A.: The value of reliability. Transp. Res. Part B 44(1), 38–49 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hollander, Y.: Direct versus indirect models for the effects of unreliability. Transp. Res. A 40, 699–711 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. Hollander, Y.: What do we really know about travellers’ response to unreliability? In: Paper presented at the International Choice Modelling Conference, Harrogate, UK (2009)Google Scholar
  20. Jackson, B.W., Jucker, J.V.: An empirical study of travel time variability and travel choice behaviour. Transp. Sci. 16(4), 460–475 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, P., Polak, J., Bates, J.: The importance of punctuality and reliability: a review of evidence and recommendations for further work. Report to Passenger Demand Forecasting Subscription Service (1995)Google Scholar
  22. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263-291 (1979)Google Scholar
  23. London Transport: 1983 Rail priority survey (1983)Google Scholar
  24. Lu, H., Fowkes, A.S., Wardman, M.: Amending the incentive for strategic bias in stated preference studies: a case study in the users’ valuation of rolling stock. Transportation Research Record. J. Transp. Res. Board 2049, 128-135 (2008)Google Scholar
  25. Markowitz, H.M.: Portfolio selection, Wiley, New York (1959)Google Scholar
  26. MVA: Regional flows: regional rail demand elasticities. Report to Passenger Demand Forecasting Council (2009)Google Scholar
  27. MVA: Econometric analysis of long time series rail passenger demand aggregates. Prepared for Department for Transport (2008)Google Scholar
  28. MVA: Valuation of reliability and punctuality improvements on rail services. Final Report to Shadow Strategic Rail Authority (2000)Google Scholar
  29. MVA: Market research for ORCATS model. Prepared for InterCity, British Railways Board (1991)Google Scholar
  30. MVA: Network SouthEast quality of service phase III final report. Prepared for Network SouthEast, British Railways Board (1989)Google Scholar
  31. MVA and ITS Leeds, Demand impacts of recovery time. Report to Passenger Demand Forecasting Council, ATOC, London (2012)Google Scholar
  32. MVA, ITS Leeds University and TSU Oxford University: Value of travel time savings. Policy Journals, Newbury, Oxford (1987)Google Scholar
  33. Neumann, J.Von., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1947)Google Scholar
  34. Noland, R., Small, K.: Journey time uncertainty, departure time choice and the cost of the morning commute. Working paper UCI-ITS-WP-95-1, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Irvine (1995)Google Scholar
  35. OXERA: How do rail passengers respond to change? Prepared for Passenger Demand Forecasting Council (2005)Google Scholar
  36. Passenger Focus: Passenger focus response to the office of rail regulation consultation “Periodic Review 2013: consultation on incentives” (2012)Google Scholar
  37. Steer Davies Gleave: M1/A1(M) Corridor Study. Prepared for Department of Transport (1994)Google Scholar
  38. Steer Davies Gleave: The effect of road congestion on rail demand. Report to Passenger Demand Forecasting Council (2003)Google Scholar
  39. Steer Davies Gleave: New generation transport in leeds: SP Study. Metro and Leeds City Council (2008)Google Scholar
  40. TPA: Trans-Pennine rail strategy study: model calibration and validation report. Prepared for GMPTE, Merseytravel, SYPTE, WYPTE, Cheshire CC, Derbyshire CC, Humberside CC, Lancashire CC and Peak Park (1992)Google Scholar
  41. Tseng, Y.Y.: Valuation of travel time reliability in passenger transport. Research Series Tinbergen Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  42. Tobin, J.: Liquidity preferences as behaviour towards risk. Rev. Econ. stud. 25, 65–86 (1958)Google Scholar
  43. Tobin, J.: The theory of portfolio selection. In: Hahn, F.H., Brechling F.P.R. (eds.) The Theory of Interest Rates, pp. 3–51. MacMillan for the IEA, New York (1965)Google Scholar
  44. Vickrey, W.S.: Congestion theory and transport investment. Am. Econ. Rev. 59 1059 (2), 251–260 (1969)Google Scholar
  45. Wardman, M.: Price elasticities of surface travel demand: a meta-analysis of U.K. evidence. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 48(3), 367–384 (2014)Google Scholar
  46. Wardman, M.: Value of time multipliers: a review and meta-analysis of European-wide evidence. In: Presented at Annual Conference of the U.S. Transportation Research Board (2013)Google Scholar
  47. Wardman, M.: Review and meta-analysis of U.K. time elasticities of travel demand. Transportation 39, 465–490 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wardman, M.: The value of travel time: a review of British evidence. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 32(3), 285–315 (1998)Google Scholar
  49. WS Atkins: Bus Reliability Study: Stated Preference Research. Prepared for Department (1997)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Transport StudiesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations