Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 325–338 | Cite as

Examining the relationship between active travel, weather, and the built environment: a multilevel approach using a GPS-enhanced dataset

  • Andrew F. Clark
  • Darren M. Scott
  • Nikolaos Yiannakoulias
Article

Abstract

This study examines how the built environment and weather conditions influence the use of walking as a mode of transport. The Halifax Regional Municipality in Nova Scotia, Canada is the study area for this work. Data are derived from three sources: a socio-demographic questionnaire and a GPS-enhanced prompted recall time-use diary collected between April 2007 and May 2008 as part of the Halifax Space-Time Activity Research project, a daily meteorological summary from Environment Canada, and a comprehensive GIS dataset from the regional municipality. Two binary logit multilevel models are estimated to examine how the propensity to use walking is influenced by the built environment and weather while controlling for socio-demographic characteristics. The built environment is measured via five attributes in one model and a walkability index (derived from the five attributes) in the other. Weather conditions are shown to affect walking use in both models. Although the walkability index is significant, the results demonstrate that this significance is driven by specific attributes of the built environment—in the case of this study, population density and to a lesser extent, pedestrian infrastructure.

Keywords

Active travel Built environment GIS Walking Walkability Index Weather 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank three anonymous reviewers for providing insightful comments to improve our paper. The research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant number 410-2008-0820).

References

  1. Alfonzo, M.A.: To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs. Environ. Behav. 37, 808–836 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alton, D., Adab, P., Roberts, L., Barrett, T.: Relationship between walking levels and perceptions of the local neighbourhood environment. Arch. Dis. Child. 92, 29–33 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, K., Bauman, A.E., Leslie, E., Owen, N.: Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults. Am. J. Prev. Med. 33, 434–440 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boer, R., Zheng, Y., Overton, A., Ridgeway, G.K., Cohen, D.A.: Neighborhood design and walking trips in ten U.S. metropolitan areas. Am. J. Prev. Med. 32, 298–304 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braza, M., Shoemaker, W., Seeley, A.: Neighbourhood design and rates of walking and biking to elementary schools in 34 California communities. Am. J. Health Promot. 19, 128–136 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brownson, R.C., Hoehner, M.C., Day, K., Forsyth, A., Sallis, J.F.: Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. Am. J. Prev. Med. 36, S99–S123 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brownson, R.C., Housemann, R.A.: Promoting physical activity in rural communities: walking trail access, use, and effects. Am. J. Prev. Med. 18, 235–241 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute: Bulletin 2: physical activity levels of Canadians. 2008 physical activity monitor: facts and figures. Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute, Ottawa (2009)Google Scholar
  9. Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute: Costs of physical inactivity [Online]. Ottawa. http://www.cflri.ca/eng/provincial_data/information/cost_inactivity.php (2010). Accessed 29 Mar 2011
  10. Carver, A., Salmon, J., Campbell, K., Baur, L., Garnett, S., Crawford, D.: How do perceptions of local neighbourhood relate to adolescent’s walking and cycling? Am. J. Health Promot. 20, 138–147 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cervero, R., Duncan, M.: Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from San Francisco bay area. Am. J. Public Health 93, 1478–1483 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cragg, S., Cameron, C., Craig, C.L.: 2004 National transportation survey. Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute, Ottawa (2006)Google Scholar
  13. Craig, C.L., Russell, S.J., Cameron, C., Bauman, A.: Twenty-year trends in physical activity among Canadian adults. Can. J. Public Health 95, 59–63 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. Crane, R.: The influence of urban form on travel: an interpretive review. J. Plan. Lit. 15, 3–23 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Environment Canada: National climate data and information archive [Online]. Fredericton, NB. www.weatheroffice.gc.ca (2010). Accessed 25 Nov 2010
  16. Ewing, R., Schroeer, W., Greene, W.: School location and student travel: analysis of factors affecting mode choice. Transp. Res. Rec. 1895, 55–63 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forsyth, A., Schmitz, K.H., Oakes, M., Zimmerman, J., Koepp, J.: Standards for environmental measurement using GIS: toward a protocol for protocols. J. Phys. Act. Health 3, S241–S257 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. Frank, L.D., Engelke, P.O.: The built environment and human activity patterns: exploring the impacts of urban form on public health. J. Plan. Lit. 16, 202–218 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frank, L.D., Sallis, J.F., Conway, T.L., Chapman, J.E., Saelens, B.E., Bachman, W.: Many pathways from land use to health: associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 72, 75–87 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frank, L.D., Sallis, J.F., Saelens, B.E., Leary, L., Cain, K., Conway, T.L., Hess, P.M.: The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study. Br. J. Sports Med. 44, 924–933 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guo, J.Y., Bhat, C.R., Copperman, R.B.: Effect of the built environment on motorized and nonmotorized trip making: substitutive, complementary, or synergistic? Transp. Res. Rec. 2010, 1–11 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Handy, S.L.: Critical assessment of the literature on the relationships among transportation, land use, and physical activity. Does the built rnvironment influence physical activity? Examining the evidence. Washington, D.C., Transportation Research Board and the Institute of Medicine Committee on Physical Activity, Health, Transportation, and Land Use (2005)Google Scholar
  23. Kerr, J., Rosenberg, D., Sallis, J.F., Saelens, B.E., Frank, L., Conway, T.L.: Active commuting to school: associations with environment and parental concerns. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 38, 784–794 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kreft, I., De Leeuw, J.: Introducing multilevel modeling. SAGE Publications Ltd, London (1998)Google Scholar
  25. Krizek, K.J., Johnson, P.J.: The effect of neighborhood trails and retail on cycling and walking in an urban environment. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 72, 33–42 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leslie, E., Coffee, N., Frank, L., Owen, N., Bauman, A., Hugo, G.: Walkability of local communities: using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes. Health Place 13, 111–122 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Manaugh, K., El-Geneidy, A.: Validating walkability indices: how do different households respond to the walkability of their neighborhood? Transp. Res. Part D 16, 309–315 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Millward, H., Spinney, J.: Time use, travel behavior, and the rural–urban continuum: results from the Halifax STAR project. J. Transp. Geogr. 19, 51–58 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Owen, N., Cerin, E., Leslie, E., Dutoit, L., Coffee, N., Frank, L.D., Bauman, A.E., Hugo, G., Saelens, B.E., Sallis, J.F.: Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults. Am. J. Prev. Med. 33, 387–395 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pinheiro, J.C., Chao, E.C.: Efficient laplacian and adaptive gaussian quadrature algorithms for multilevel generalized linear mixed models. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 15, 58–81 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rodriguez, D.A., Joo, J.: The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment. Transp. Res. Part D 9, 151–173 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rutt, C.D., Coleman, K.J.: The impact of the built environment on walking as a leisure-time activity along the U.S./Mexico border. J. Phys. Act. Health 3, 257–271 (2005)Google Scholar
  33. Saelens, B., Handy, S.L.: Built enivornment correlates of walking: a review. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 40, S550–S566 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spinney, J., Millward, H., Scott, D.: Walking for transport versus recreation: a comparison of participants, locations, and timing. J. Phys. Act. Health 9, 153–162 (2012)Google Scholar
  35. Spinney, J.E.L., Millward, H.: Weather impacts on leisure activities in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Int. J. Biometeorol. 55, 133–145 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Statacorp STATA Statistics/Data Analysis. 11.0 SE ed. College Station, TX (2009)Google Scholar
  37. Winston, E., Ewing, R., Handy, S.L., Brownson, R.C.: The built environment and active travel: developing measures of perceptual urban design qualities. 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew F. Clark
    • 1
  • Darren M. Scott
    • 1
  • Nikolaos Yiannakoulias
    • 2
  1. 1.TransLAB (Transportation Research Lab)School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations