Transportation

, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp 1209–1221 | Cite as

Ridership drivers of bus rapid transit systems

Article

Abstract

We have collected information on 46 bus rapid transit (BRT) systems throughout the world to investigate the potential patronage drivers. From a large number of candidate explanatory variables (quantitative and qualitative), 11 sources of systematic variation are identified which have a statistically significant impact on daily passenger-trip numbers. These sources are fare, headway, the length of the BRT network, the number of corridors, average distance between stations; whether there is: an integrated network of routes and corridors, modal integration at BRT stations, pre-board fare collection and fare verification, quality control oversight from an independent agency, at-level boarding and alighting, as well as the location of BRT. The findings of this paper offer important insights into features of BRT systems that are positive contributors to growing patronage and hence should be taken into account in designing and planning BRT systems.

Keywords

Bus rapid transit Daily passenger-trips Patronage drivers Systematic variation 

References

  1. Chatterjee, S., Price, B.: Regression Analysis by Example. Wiley, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  2. Deng, T., Nelson, J.D.: Recent developments in bus rapid transit: a review of the literature. Transp. Rev. 31(1), 69–96 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Goodwin, P.: A review of new demand elasticities with special reference to short and long run effects of price changes. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 26, 155–163 (1992)Google Scholar
  4. Hensher, D.A., Golob, T.F.: bus rapid transit systems: a comparative assessment. Transportation 34(4), 501–518 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hensher, D.A.: Assessing systematic sources of variation in public transport elasticities: some comparative warnings. Transp. Res. Part A 42(7), 1031–1042 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. Hidalgo, D., Graftieaux, P.: BRT systems in Latin America and Asia: results and difficulties in 11 cities, transportation research record. J. Transp. Res. Board 2072, 77–88 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holmgren, J.: Meta-analysis of public transport demand. Transp. Res. Part A 41(10), 1021–1035 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S., Clinger, J., Rutherford, S., Smith, R.L., Cracknell, J.: Bus rapid transit: case studies in bus rapid transit. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC (2003)Google Scholar
  9. Litman, T.: Transit price elasticities and cross-elasticities. J. Public Transp. 7(2), 37–58 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. Nijkamp, P., Pepping, G.: Meta-analysis for explaining the variance in public transport elasticities. J. Transp. Stat. 1, 1–14 (1998)Google Scholar
  11. Oum, T.H., Waters, W.G., Yong, J.: Concepts of price elasticities of transport demand and recent empirical estimates—an interpretative survey. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 26(2), 139–154 (1992)Google Scholar
  12. Tirachini, A., Hensher, D.A.: Bus congestion, optimal infrastructure investment and the choice of a fare collection system in dedicated bus corridors. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 45(5), 828–844 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Transport and Logistics StudiesThe University of Sydney Business School, The University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations