Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp 1019–1033 | Cite as

Hot lane policies and their implications

  • Rahul Goel
  • Mark W. Burris
Article

Abstract

This research examined the major changes in a corridor due to high occupancy/toll (HOT) lane implementation. This was accomplished by comparing the impacts of HOT lanes on three pairs of HOT lanes with similar design and operational characteristics. These pairwise comparisons of similar HOT lanes reduced the impact of exogenous factors and removed the issue of comparing HOT lanes that were so dissimilar it would be impossible to isolate the reasons for difference in results from the lanes. With strict registration requirements for free high occupancy vehicle (HOV) 3+ travel on the I-95 Express Lanes (ELs) in Miami there were indications that some carpoolers switched to lower occupancy modes. Tolled access for HOV2s on I-95 and the SR-91 ELs near Los Angeles resulted in lower usage of those ELs by the HOV2s as compared to most HOV lanes where HOV2 access is free. On the SR167 (Seattle) and I-25 (Denver) HOT lanes, exogenous factors like the price of gas and the economic recession seemed to be the primary influence on the usage of those HOT lanes. In both cases, carpool usage increased along with the price of gas. On I-25, the increasing unemployment rate coincided with a decrease in toll paying travelers. On SR 167 there were also indications of mode shifts among the transit, carpool and toll paying SOVs due to the fluctuating price of gas.

Keywords

Managed lanes Policy Express Lanes HOT lanes 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors express their sincere thanks to the project sponsor, the Federal Highway Administration, and to the Contracting Officer Technical Manager (COTM), John Halkias, for his guidance and support. The authors would also like to thank the many people who supplied information regarding the HOT lanes around the U.S.—either through their research reports or via direct contacts. The authors would like to acknowledge Stacey Stegman, Colorado DOT for providing the I-25 survey data. Additionally, Dr. Katie Turnbull and Dr. David Ellis of the Texas Transportation Institute provided valuable insight and comments on this research effort. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting in January 2011.

References

  1. 95 Express website. http://www.95express.com/. Accessed 2 March 2010
  2. American Public Transportation Association: Potential impact of gasoline price increases on U.S. Public Transportation Ridership, 2011–2012, Washington, DC. http://www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/APTA_Effect_of_Gas_Price_Increase_2011.pdf (2011). Accessed 29 September 2011
  3. Cain, A.: Miami Urban Partnership Agreement (UPA) project, Phase 1A—transit evaluation. Prepared by the Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL. Prepared for Federal Transit Administration (FTA) (2009)Google Scholar
  4. Cambridge Systematics Inc.: I-394 MnPASS technical evaluation: final report. Prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation, Oakland, CA (2006)Google Scholar
  5. Chum, G.L., Burris, M.W.: Potential mode shift from transit to SOV on a HOT lane. Transport Res Rec: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2072, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 10–19 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. Colorado DOT: Summary of I-25 express lanes. Denver, Colorado (February 2007) (2007)Google Scholar
  7. Colorado DOT website: http://www.coloradodot.info/programs/hybrids(2011). Accessed October 2011
  8. Congressional Budget Office: Using Pricing to Reduce Traffic Congestion. http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/97xx/doc9750/AppendixA.8.2.shtml (2009). Accessed 27 February 2010
  9. Florida DOT: Final Report-95 express midyear report project status for urban partnership agreement. Prepared by the Florida Department of Transportation, Miami, FL (2009)Google Scholar
  10. iCommute website: http://www.icommutesd.com/Carpool.aspx. Accessed 13 March 2010
  11. Johns, B., Thompson, N., Sallman, D., Zmud, J., Munnich, L., Sheehan, S.: I-394 MnPASS–a new choice for commuters: how is it working? Rethinking Transportation, Hubert Humphrey Institute for Public Affairs. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (2006)Google Scholar
  12. Mastako, K. A., Rillet, L. R., Sullivan, E.C.: Commuter behavior on California state route 91 after introducing variable-toll express lanes. Transportation Research Board 1649, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 47–54 (1998)Google Scholar
  13. Minnesota DOT: I-394 HOV report including 2008-1st quarter January–March. Prepared by Regional Transport Management Centre (2008)Google Scholar
  14. Puget Sound Trends: http://psrc.org/data/trends (2009). Accessed March 2010
  15. San Diego Association of Governments: Report to the California legislature: San Diego’s Interstate 15 congestion pricing & transit development demonstration program as required by Section 149.1(g) of the Street & Highways code. San Diego, California (1999)Google Scholar
  16. Sullivan, E.: Evaluating the impacts of the SR91 variable toll express lane facility. Final report for State of California Department of Transportation, Sacramento (1998)Google Scholar
  17. Supernak, J., Golob, J., Golob, T.F., Kaschade, C., Kazimi, C., Schreffler, E., Steffey, D.: San Diego’s Interstate 15 congestion pricing project: traffic-related issues, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1812, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 43–51 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. Turnbull, K.F.: High occupancy toll lanes and public transportation. Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2065, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 36–40 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. Washington State DOT: SR 167 HOT Lane Pilot Project, First Annual performance Report (May 2008–April 2009), Olympia, Washington (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of TechnologyNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Zachry Department of Civil EngineeringTexas A & M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations