Transportation

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 521–537 | Cite as

Not driving alone? American commuting in the twenty-first century

Article

Abstract

This paper investigates recent commuting trends by American workers. Unlike most studies of commuting that rely on data from the American Community Survey this study utilizes the American Time Use Survey to detail the complex commuting patterns of modern-day workers. Changes in the price of gasoline in recent years suggest that the incidence of “driving alone” should be on the decline. Indeed, results show that the sensitivity of modal commuting with respect to changes in gasoline prices appears to be relatively large. We estimate the gasoline-price elasticity of driving alone to be 0.057 and the gasoline-price elasticity of carpooling to be 0.502. Additional factors also affect commuting, including socio-economic characteristics and social desires. However, it is changes in gasoline prices that appear to account for nearly all of the recent variation in the mode chosen for commuting.

Keywords

Ride sharing Carpooling Commuting Gasoline process Social capital 

References

  1. Bonsall, P.W.: Microsimulation of organized car sharing: description of the models and their calibration. Transp. Res. Rec. 767, 12–21 (1980)Google Scholar
  2. Bonsall, P.W., Spencer, A.H., Tang, W.S.: What makes a car-sharer? Transportation 12(2), 117–145 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bureau of Labor Statistics: American Time Use Survey 2003–2009. http://www.bls.gov/tus/ (2011a)
  4. Bureau of Labor Statistics: Consumer Price Index. http://www.bls.gov/cpi/home.htm (20011b)
  5. Charles, K.K., Kline, K.: Relational costs and the production of social capital: evidence from carpooling. Econ. J. 116(511), 581–604 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dueker, K.J., Bair, B.O., Levin, I.P.: Ride sharing: psychological factors. Transp. Eng. J. 103(6), 685–692 (1977)Google Scholar
  7. Energy Information Administration: Retail Gasoline Historical Prices. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/wrgp/mogas_history.html (2011)
  8. Fellows, N.T., Pitfield, D.E.: An economic and operational evaluation of urban car-sharing. Transp. Res. Part D 5(1), 1–10 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferguson, E.: The rise and fall of the American carpool: 1970–1990. Transportation 24(4), 349–376 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang, H., Yang, H., Bell, M.G.H.: The models and economics of carpools. Ann. Reg. Sci. 34(1), 55–68 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hartgen, D.T., Bullard, K.C.: What has happened to carpooling: trends in North Carolina, 1980 to 1990. Transp. Res. Rec. 1390, 50–59 (1993)Google Scholar
  12. Horowitz, A.D., Sheth, J.N.: Ride sharing to work: an attitudinal analysis. Transp. Res. Rec. 637, 1–8 (1977)Google Scholar
  13. McGuckin, N., Srinivasan, N.: The Journey-to-Work in the Context of Daily Travel. Presented at the Census Data for Transportation Planning Conference. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/conferences/2005/censusdata/Resource-Journey-to-Work.pdf. Accessed 23 Mar 2010 (2005)
  14. Putnam, R.: Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. J. Democr. 6(1), 65–78 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rosenbloom, S., Burns, E.: Gender differences in commuter travel in Tucson: implications for travel demand management programs. Transp. Res. Rec. 1404, 82–90 (1993)Google Scholar
  16. U.S. Census Bureau: Census 2000. Table GCT-PH1-R (2000)Google Scholar
  17. U.S. Census Bureau: Current Population Survey. http://www.census.gov/cps/ (2011b)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Elon UniversityElonUSA

Personalised recommendations