Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 587–604 | Cite as

Modelling commuting mode choice with explicit consideration of carpool in the choice set formation

  • Khandker M. Nurul Habib
  • Yuan Tian
  • Hamid Zaman
Article

Abstract

This article investigates the carpool mode choice option in the context of overall commuting mode choice preferences. The article uses a hybrid discrete choice modelling technique to jointly model the consideration of carpooling in the choice set formation as well as commuting mode choice together with the response bias corrections through the accommodation of measurement equations. A cross-nested error structure for the econometric formulation is used to capture correlations among various commuting modes and carpool consideration in the choice set. Empirical models are estimated using a data set collected through a week-long commuter survey in Edmonton, Alberta. The empirical model reveals many behavioural details of commuting mode choice and carpooling. Interestingly, it reveals that interactions between various Travel Demand Management (TDM) tools with the carpooling option can be different at different level of decision making (choice set formation level and final choice making level).

Keywords

Commuting Mode choice Choice set formation TDM Carpooling Hybrid choice model 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was partially funded by an NSERC (Natural Science and Engineering Research Council) Discovery Grant. The authors acknowledge the help of Audra Jones of the City of Edmonton for making the data set available for this study.

References

  1. Aptech Systems: Gauss user manual. Aptech Systems, Inc, Maple Valley Inc (2008)Google Scholar
  2. Ben-Akiva, M., Atherton, T.J.: Methodology for short-term travel demand predictions: analysis of carpooling incentives. J. Transp. Econ. Pol. 11(3), 224–261 (1977)Google Scholar
  3. Blumenberg E., Shiki K.: Immigrants and resource sharing: the case of carpooling. Paper presented at the 87th annual meeting of transportation research board, Washington (2008)Google Scholar
  4. Buliung, R., Soltys, K., Bui, R., Habel, C., Lanyon, R.: Driving factors behind successful carpool formation and use. Transp. Res. Rec. 2118, 31–38 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buliung R., Soltys K., Bui R., Habel C., Lanyon R.: Catching a ride on the information super-highway: toward an understanding of cyber-mediated carpool formation and use. Paper presented at the 89th annual meeting of transportation research board, Washington (2010)Google Scholar
  6. Cambridge Systematics Inc: Carpool incentives: analysis of transportation and energy impacts. Prepared for US Federal Energy Administration, Washington (1976)Google Scholar
  7. Cervero, R., Griesenbeck, B.: Factors influencing commuting choice in suburban labour market: a case analysis in Pleasanton, California. Transp. Res. A 22, 151–161 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cline, M.E., Sparks, C., Eshbach, K.: Understanding carpool use by Hispanics in Texas. Transp. Res. Rec. 2118, 39–46 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daniels, P.W.: Vehicle sharing for the journey to work by the office employees. Transp. Res. 15A, 391–398 (1981)Google Scholar
  10. Dumas, J.S., Dobson, R.: Linking consumer attitude to bus and carpool usage. Transp. Res. A 13, 417–423 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eash, R.W., Swanson, A., Kaplan, M.: An analysis and evaluation of alternate schemes to increase auto occupancy. Transp. Res. 8, 335–341 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferguson, E.: The rise and fall of the American carpool: 1970–1990. Transportation 24, 349–376 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferguson, E., Hodge, K., Berkovsky, K.: Psychological benefit from vanpooling and group composition. Transportation 21, 47–69 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Habib, K.M.N., Day, N., Miller, E.J.: An investigation of commuting trip timing and mode choice in the Greater Toronto Area: application of a joint discrete-continuous model. Transp. Res. A 43, 639–653 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. Habib K.M.N., Kattan L., Islam T.: Model of personal attitude toward transit service quality. J. Adv. Transp. forthcoming (2010)Google Scholar
  16. Huang, H.-J., Yang, H., Bell, M.G.H.: The models and economics of carpooling. Ann. Reg. Sci. 34, 55–68 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levin, I.P.: Measuring tradeoffs in carpool driving agreement preference. Transportation 11, 71–85 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li, J., Embry, P., Mattingly, S.P., Sadabadi, K.F., Rashmidatta, I., Burris, M.W.: Who chooses to carpool and why? Examination of Texas carpooler. Transp. Res. Rec. 2021, 110–117 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Litman T.: TDM encyclopedia. (http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm34.htm). (2010)
  20. McFadden, D.: Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In: Manski, C., McFadden, D. (eds.) Structural Analysis of Discrete Data, pp. 198–272. MIT Press, Cambridge (1981)Google Scholar
  21. McGeehan P (2005) As prices rise, carpooling begins to win out over privacy. New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  22. Minett P., Pearce J.: Estimating energy consumption impact of casual carpooling. Paper presented at the 89th annual meeting of transportation research board, Washington (2010)Google Scholar
  23. Pisarski A.: Commuting in America III, the third national report on commuting patterns and trends. NCHRP Report 550, TCRP Report 110, TRB, Washington (2006)Google Scholar
  24. Statistics Canada: Commuting patterns and places of works of Canadians, 2006 census: findings. www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/analysis/pow/index.cfm. (2009)
  25. Teal, R.F.: Carpooling: who, how and why. Transp. Res. A 21(3), 203–214 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tischer, M.L., Dobson, R.: An empirical analysis of behavioural intentions of single-occupant auto drivers to shift to high occupancy vehicle. Trans. Res. A 13, 143–158 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Train, K.: A validation test of disaggregate mode choice model. Transp. Res. 12, 167–174 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Train, K.: Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Walker J.: Extended discrete choice model. PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  30. Washbrook, E., Haider, W., Jaccard, M.: Estimating commuter mode choice: a discrete choice analysis of the impact of road pricing and parking charges. Transportation 33, 621–639 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Khandker M. Nurul Habib
    • 1
  • Yuan Tian
    • 1
  • Hamid Zaman
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Civil & Environmental EngineeringUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations