, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 175–195 | Cite as

Weekly activity-travel behaviour in rural Northern Ireland: differences by context and socio-demographic



Despite a wide variation in access to goods and services between rural areas, common policy interventions are often proposed in Northern Ireland. Questions remain as to the level and form of policy differentiation that is required, if any, both within and between different rural areas. This issue is investigated in this paper through the analysis of activity-travel patterns of individuals living in two rural areas with different levels of area accessibility and area mobility. Three focus groups, 299 questionnaires and 89 activity-travel diaries for 7 days were collected for individuals from these areas. Regression analyses were employed to explore the degree to which different factors influence activity-travel behaviour. The results indicate that individuals from rural areas with a higher level of accessibility are more integrated within their local community and as a result, are potentially less at risk of being excluded from society due to immobility. Differences, however, were also found between different groups within an area (e.g. non-car owning individuals who were more reliant on walking, and low-income individuals who made trips of a shorter distance). Based on the study findings and a review of existing policies, this research highlights the need to tailor policy responses to reflect the particular sets of circumstances exhibited in different areas.


Travel behaviour Transport disadvantage Rural form Social exclusion Northern Ireland 



The authors would like to thank the Editor-in-Chief (Martin G. Richards) of this journal and the three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments. Base map: Land and Property Services, Permit No. 110017, © Crown copyright 2011.


  1. Banister, D.: Rural accessibilities and mobilities. In: Becker, U., Böhmer, J., Gerike, R. (eds.) How to Define and Measure Access and Need Satisfaction in Transport, pp. 165–178. Dresdner Institut für Verkehr und Umwelt e.V. (DIVU), Dresden (2008)Google Scholar
  2. Buliung, R.N., Kanaroglou, P.S.: Urban form and household activity-travel behavior. Growth Change 37, 172–199 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buliung, R.N., Roorda, M.J., Remmel, T.K.: Exploring spatial variety in patterns of activity-travel behaviour: initial results from the Toronto travel-activity panel survey (TTAPS). Transportation 35, 697–722 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burchardt, T., Grand, J.L., Piachaud, D.: Social exclusion in Britain 1991–1995. Soc. Policy Adm. 33, 227–244 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cass, N., Shove, E., Urry, J.: Social exclusion, mobility and access. Sociol. Rev. 53, 539–555 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cochran, W.G.: Sampling Techniques, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1963)Google Scholar
  7. Coevering, P.v.d., Schwanen, T.: Re-evaluating the impact of urban form on travel patterns in Europe and North-America. Transp. Policy 13, 229–239 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Department for Regional Development: Shaping Our Future: Regional Development Strategy for Northern Ireland 2025. Department for Regional Development, Belfast (2001)Google Scholar
  9. Department for Regional Development: Regional Transportation Strategy for Northern Ireland 2002–2012. Department for Regional Development, Belfast (2002)Google Scholar
  10. Department for Regional Development: An Accessible Transport Strategy for Northern Ireland. Department for Regional Development, Belfast, (2005a)Google Scholar
  11. Department for Regional Development: Planning Policy Statement 13 (PPS 13): Transportation and Land Use. Department for Regional Development, Belfast (2005b)Google Scholar
  12. Department for Regional Development: Rural Transport Fund. Department for Regional Development, Belfast (2008a)Google Scholar
  13. Department for Regional Development: Travel Survey for Northern Ireland 2005–2007. Department for Regional Development, Belfast (2008b)Google Scholar
  14. Department for Transport: Social inclusion: transport aspects, final report. Department for Transport, London (2006)Google Scholar
  15. Department of Agriculture and Rural Development: A Guide to Rural Proofing: Considering the Needs of Rural Areas and Communities. Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Belfast (2003)Google Scholar
  16. Dijst, M., Vidaković, V.: Travel time ratio: the key factor of spatial reach. Transportation 27, 179–199 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. EAFRD: Northern Ireland Rural Development Programme 2007–2013. The European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, Ireland (2007)Google Scholar
  18. Farrington, J.H.: The new narrative of accessibility: its potential contribution to discourses in (transport) geography. J. Transp. Geogr. 15, 319–330 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gray D.: How much of a problem is rural transport in Scotland? Policy paper series 1, The Centre for Transport Policy (2000)Google Scholar
  20. Handy S.: Does the built environment influence physical activity? TRB special report 282 (2005)Google Scholar
  21. Higgs, G., White, S.: Alternatives to census-based indicators of social disadvantage in rural communities. Prog. Plan. 53, 1–81 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hine, J., Mitchell, F.: The Role of Transport in Social Exclusion in Urban Scotland. Scottish Executive Central Research Unit, Edinburgh (2001)Google Scholar
  23. Ji, J., Gao, X.: Analysis of people’s satisfaction with public transportation in Beijing. Habitat Int. 34, 464–470 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kamruzzaman, M., Hine, J., Gunay, B., Blair, N.: Using GIS to visualise and evaluate student travel behaviour. J. Transp. Geogr. 19, 13–32 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kang, H., Scott, D.M.: Exploring day-to-day variability in time use for household members. Transp. Res. A 44, 609–619 (2010)Google Scholar
  26. Kawachi, I., Berkman, L.: Social cohesion, social capital, and health. In: Berkman, L., Kawachi, I. (eds.) Social Epidemiology, pp. 174–190. Oxford University Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  27. Kerr, J., Frank, L., Sallis, J.F., Chapman, J.: Urban form correlates of pedestrian in youth: differences by gender, race-ethnicity and household attributes. Transp. Res. D 12, 177–182 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Knowles, R.D.: Transport shaping space: differential collapse in time and space. J. Transp. Geogr. 14, 407–425 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loader, C., Stanley, J.: Growing bus patronage and addressing transport disadvantage—the Melbourne experience. Transp. Policy 16, 106–114 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Millward, H., Spinney, J.: Time use, travel behaviour, and the rural-urban continuum: results from the Halifax STAR project. J. Transp. Geogr. 19, 51–58 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morency, C., Paez, A., Roorda, M.J., Mercado, R., Farber, S.: Distance travelled in three Canadian cities: spatial analysis from the perspective of vulnerable population segments. J. Transp. Geogr. 19, 39–50 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. NISRA: Census population by age, sex and residency. Northern Ireland Statistics & Research Agency (NISRA), Belfast (2001)Google Scholar
  33. NISRA: The Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure. Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency (NISRA), Belfast (2005a)Google Scholar
  34. NISRA: Report of the Inter-Departmental Urban-Rural Definition Group: Statistical Classification and Delineation of Settlements. Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency (NISRA), Belfast (2005b)Google Scholar
  35. Northern Ireland Neighbourhood Information Service: Area Profile. Northern Ireland Neighbourhood Information Service (NINIS), Ireland (2007). Accessed 15 Feb 2008
  36. Nutley, S.: Indicators of transport and accessibility problems in rural Australia. J. Transp. Geogr. 11, 55–71 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nutley, S.: Monitoring rural travel behaviour: a longitudinal study in Northern Ireland 1979–2001. J. Transp. Geogr. 13, 247–263 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ornetzeder, M.G., Hertwich, E., Hubacek, K., Korytarovad, K., Haas, W.: The environmental effect of car-free housing: a case in Vienna. Ecol. Econ. 65, 516–530 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Páez, A.: Exploring contextual variations in land use and transport analysis using a probit model with geographical weights. J. Transp. Geogr. 14, 167–176 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Preston, J., Rajé, F.: Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion. J. Transp. Geogr. 15, 151–160 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Putnam, R.: Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Vintage Books, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  42. Research and Library Services: New Targeting Social Need. Northern Ireland Assembly, Belfast (2001)Google Scholar
  43. Research and Library Services: Measures of deprivation: Noble V Robson. Northern Ireland Assembly, Belfast (2002)Google Scholar
  44. Rose, G., Marfurt, H.: Travel behaviour change impacts of a major ride to work day event. Transp. Res. A 41, 351–364 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scheiner, J.: Social inequalities in travel behaviour: trip distances in the context of residential self-selection and lifestyles. J. Transp. Geogr. 18, 679–690 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Social Exclusion Unit: Making the Connections: Transport and Social Exclusion. Social Exclusion Unit, The Stationery Office, London (2003)Google Scholar
  47. Stanley, J., Lucas, K.: Social exclusion: what can public transport offer? Res. Transp. Econ. 22, 36–40 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stanley, J., Stanley, J.: Improving Public Transport to Meet Community Needs: A Warrnambool Case-study. Bus Association Victoria, Melbourne (2004)Google Scholar
  49. Timmermans, H., van der Waerden, P., Alves, M., Polak, J., Ellis, S., Harvey, A.S., Kurose, S., Zandee, R.: Spatial context and the complexity of daily travel patterns: an international comparison. J. Transp. Geogr. 11, 37–46 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wu, B.M., Hine, J.: A PTAL approach to measuring the changes in bus service accessibility. Transp. Policy 10, 307–320 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xing, Y., Handy, S.L., Mokhtarian, P.L.: Factors associated with proportions and miles of bicycling for transportation and recreation in six small US cities. Transp. Res. D 15, 73–81 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Built Environment Research InstituteUniversity of UlsterNorthern IrelandUK
  2. 2.School of Urban DevelopmentQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations