, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 295–307 | Cite as

Utilization patterns of park and ride facilities among Kuala Lumpur commuters

  • Norlida Abdul HamidEmail author


A parking utilization survey was undertaken with the main objective of analyzing and comparing the daily workday utilization patterns of two main park and ride stations within the Kuala Lumpur conurbation. This study also aimed to gauge the level of usage of the park and ride facilities. The findings showed that the overall utilization pattern of the facilities was very high with a utilization rate of between 80 and 95%. The stations, however, recorded a contrasting accumulation pattern. The study further revealed that most of the rail-based suburban park and ride users were long term parkers. The results of this study are comparable to results of similar studies in Seoul, Calgary, Tyne and Wear and others. Since parking availability is an important factor that has influence on the behavior of a park and ride user, more accurate information relating to the supply and demand of the park and ride facility will assist in planning new transport infrastructure.


Park and ride Utilization Accumulation Duration Volume 



The author expressed her gratitude to both University of Technology MARA and University of Malaya for funding this research. Appreciation goes also to the staff of the rail operator, KTMB particularly KTM Komuter and KTM Car Park Sdn. Bhd. for their ever continuous support in this survey. A note of appreciation goes to Prof. Dr. Jamilah Mohamad and Prof. Ir. Mohamed Rehan Karim for their valuable comments. The author wish to thank three anonymous Transportation reviewers who have provided very useful comments on this paper.


  1. BinaFikir.: Restructuring Klang Valley’s urban public transportation system. Paper presented at the Conference on Public Transport Integration, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, September 2005Google Scholar
  2. Bolger, D., Colquhoun, D., Morrall, J.: Planning and design of park and ride facilities for the calgary light rail transit system. Transp. Res. Rec. 1361, 141–148 (1992)Google Scholar
  3. City Hall Kuala Lumpur: Structure plan Kuala Lumpur 2020. City Hall Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur (2005)Google Scholar
  4. Department for Transport.: Putting it all together—Chapter 6. Department of Transport, London. Available from: [Accessed on 18/2/2004]
  5. Dickins, I.J.: Park and ride facilities on light rail transit systems. Transportation 18, 23–36 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drake, P.G., Gerald, R., Mann, W.W.: Parking demand analysis for HOV facilities. ITE, Washington (1994)Google Scholar
  7. Federal Department of Town, Country Planning: National physical plan. Ministry of Housing and Local Government, Kuala Lumpur (2005)Google Scholar
  8. Fouracre, P., Dunkerly, C.: Mass rapid transit systems for cities in developing world. Transp. Rev. 23(3), 299–310 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghani, P.A., Hamid, N.A., Haron, H., Daud, N.: Proceedings of BRC seminar. Institut Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam (1999)Google Scholar
  10. Hamid, N.A., Mohamad, J., Karim, M.R.: Parking duration of fringe park-and-ride users and delineation of stations catchment area: case of the Kuala Lumpur conurbation. J. Eastern Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 7, 1296–1310 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. Hole, A.R.: Forecasting the demand for an employee park and ride service using commuters’ stated choices. Department of Economics Working Paper, University of St. Andrews, Scotland (2004)Google Scholar
  12. Jamilah, M.: Stage bus operations in Kuala Lumpur: a view before consolidation. Malaysian J. Trop. Geogr. 26(2), 111–120 (1995)Google Scholar
  13. Keretapi Tanah Melayu Berhad: KTM komuter statistics. KTMB, Kuala Lumpur (2004)Google Scholar
  14. Keretapi Tanah Melayu Berhad: KTM komuter statistics. KTMB, Kuala Lumpur (2006)Google Scholar
  15. Kwon, Y.: A study on the classification of park and ride facilities in the Seoul Metropolitan Areas. Paper presented at the 9th Conference on Transportation Research. Korea, The Korea Transport Institute (2001)Google Scholar
  16. Lam, W.H.K., Nicholas M.H., Lo, H.P.: How park-and-ride schemes can be successful in Eastern Asia. J. Urb. Plan. Dev. 63–78 (2001)Google Scholar
  17. Minderjeet, Kaur: Fewer people using public transport. New Straits Times, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2005)Google Scholar
  18. Papacostas, C.S., Prevedouros, P.D.: Transport engineering and planning. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2001)Google Scholar
  19. Pickett, M.W., Perrett, K.E., Charlton, J.W.: Park and ride at Tyne and Wear Metro Stations—a summary report. Research Report 40. Transport Road Research Laboratory, London (1986)Google Scholar
  20. Sarban, S.: It’s all to do with connection. New Straits Times, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2006)Google Scholar
  21. Seremban Municipal Council.: The early history of Seremban. Available from: [Accessed on 28 /1/2006]
  22. Spillar, R.J.: Park and ride planning and design guidelines. Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc., New York (1997)Google Scholar
  23. Turnbull, K.F.: Effective use of park–and–ride facilities. NCHRP synthesis 213. Transportation Research Board, Washington (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Transport, Logistics and Operations Management, Faculty of Business ManagementUniversity of Technology MARAShah AlamMalaysia

Personalised recommendations