, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 201–218

Modeling children’s school travel mode and parental escort decisions

  • Amith K. Yarlagadda
  • Sivaramakrishnan Srinivasan


Understanding of the activity-travel patterns of children is becoming increasingly important to various policy makers. Further, there is also a growing recognition that intra-household interactions need to be explicitly accommodated in travel models for realistic forecasts and policy evaluation. In the light of these issues, this paper contributes towards an overall understanding of the school-travel behavior of children and the related interdependencies among the travel patterns of parents and children. An econometric model is formulated to simultaneously determine the choice of mode and the escorting person for children’s travel to and from school. The 2000 San Francisco Bay Area Travel Survey (BATS) data are used in the model estimation process. Empirical results indicate that the characteristics of child like age, gender, and ethnicity, and employment and work flexibility characteristics of the parents have strong impacts on the mode choice decisions. In addition, the impacts of some of these attributes on the choice of mode to school are different from the corresponding impacts on the choice of mode from school. The distance between home and school is found to strongly and negatively impact the choice of walking to and from school, with the impact being stronger for walking to school. Several land-use and built-environment variables were explored, but were found not to be statistically significant predictors.


Children’s school travel Mode choice Parental escort Household interactions 


  1. Black, C., Collins, A., Snell, M.: Encouraging walking: the case of journey-to-school trips in compact urban areas. Urban Stud. 38, 1121–1141 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boarnet, M.G., Anderson, C.L., Day, K., McMillan, T., Alfonzo, M.: Evaluation of the California safe routes to school legislation: urban form changes and children’s active transportation to school. Am. J. Prev. Med. 28(2S2), 134–140 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DiGuiseppi, C., Roberts, I., Li, L.: Influence of changing travel patterns on child death rates from injury: trend analysis. Br. Med. J. 314, 710–713 (1997)Google Scholar
  4. DiGuiseppi, C., Roberts, I., Li, L.: Determinants of car travel on daily journeys to school: cross sectional survey of primary school children. Br. Med. J. 316, 1426–1428 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. Evenson, K.R., Huston, S.L., McMillen, B.J., Bors, P., Ward, D.S.: Statewide prevalence and correlates of walking and biking to school. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 157(9), 887–892 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ewing, R., Schroeer, W., Greene, W.: School location and student travel: analysis of factors affecting mode choice. Transport. Res. Rec. 1895, 55–63 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fischbeck, P.S., Huey, B.M.: Relative risks of school travel: a national perspective and guidance for local community risk assessment. TR News 224, 39–42 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. Guo, J.Y., Srinivasan, S., Eluru, N., Pinjari, A., Copperman, R., Bhat, C.R.: Activity-Based Travel-Demand Modeling for metropolitan areas In Texas: Cemselts model estimations and prediction procedures, 4874 zone system cemdap model estimations and procedures, and the SPG software details, Research report 4080–7 for Research project 0–4080 “Activity-based travel-demand modeling for metropolitan areas in Texas”, (2005)Google Scholar
  9. McDonald, N.C.: Children’s travel: patterns and influences. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley (2005)Google Scholar
  10. McMillan, T.E.: Walking and urban form: modeling and testing parental decisions about children’s travel. Dissertation, University of California, Irvine (2003)Google Scholar
  11. MORPACE International, Inc (2002) Bay area travel survey final report.
  12. Rhoulac, T.D.: Bus or car: the classic choice in school transportation. Transport. Res. Rec. 1922, 98–104 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shin, H.B.: School enrollment—social and economic characteristics of students: October 2003 current population sSurvey reports, U.S. Census Bureau. (2005)
  14. Srinivasan S.: Modeling household interactions in daily activity generation. Dissertation, university of Texas, Austin (2004)Google Scholar
  15. Strathman, J.G., Dueker, K.J.: Understanding trip chaining. Special reports on trip and vehicle attributes, 1990 NPTS report series, U.S. Department of Transportation (1995)Google Scholar
  16. Taylor, B.D., Mauch, M.: Gender, race and travel behavior: An analysis of household-serving travel and commuting in the San Francisco Bay area. Women’s travel issues, Proceedings from the Second National Conference, Baltimore, USA (1996)Google Scholar
  17. Vovsha, P., Petersen, E., Donnelly, R.: Impact of intra-household interactions on individual daily activity-travel patterns. Transport. Res. Rec. 1898, 87–97 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vovsha, P., Petersen, E.: Escorting children to school: statistical analysis and applied modeling approach. Transport. Res. Rec. 1921, 131–140 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yarlagadda, A.: Modeling children’s mode choice and parental escort roles. Thesis, University of Florida (2006)Google Scholar
  20. Zwerts, E., Wets, G.: Children’s travel behavior: a world of difference. Presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amith K. Yarlagadda
    • 1
  • Sivaramakrishnan Srinivasan
    • 2
  1. 1.Parsons BrinckerhoffSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Coastal EngineeringUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations