Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 263–289 | Cite as

The Impacts of Ict on leisure Activities and Travel: A Conceptual Exploration

  • Patricia L. Mokhtarian
  • Ilan Salomon
  • Susan L. Handy
Article

Abstract

This paper offers a conceptual exploration of the potential impacts of ICTs on leisure activities and the associated travel. We start by discussing what leisure is and is not. We point out that the boundaries between leisure, mandatory, and maintenance activities are permeable, for three reasons: the multi-attribute nature of a single activity, the sequential interleaving of activity fragments, and the simultaneous conduct of multiple activities (multitasking). We then discuss four kinds of ways by which ICT can affect leisure activities and travel: the replacement of a traditional activity with an ICT counterpart, the generation of new ICT activities (that may displace other activities), the ICT-enabled reallocation of time to other activities, and ICT as a facilitator of leisure activities. We suggest 13 dimensions of leisure activities that are especially relevant to the issue of ICT impacts: location (in)dependence, mobility-based versus stationary, time (in)dependence, planning horizon, temporal structure and fragmentation, possible multitasking, solitary versus social activity, active versus passive participation, physical versus mental, equipment/media (in)dependence, informal versus formal arrangements required, motivation, and cost. The primary impact of ICT on leisure is to expand an individual’s choice set; however whether or not the new options will be chosen depends on the attributes of the activity (such as the 13 identified dimensions), as well as those of the individual. The potential transportation impacts when the new options are chosen are ambiguous.

Keywords

information and communication technologies leisure telecommunication – travel 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albertson, LA 1977Telecommunications as a travel substitute: Some psychological, organizational, and social aspectsJournal of Communication273243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anable, J 2002Picnics, pets, and pleasant places: The distinguishing characteristics of leisure travel demandBlack William, RNijkamp, Peter eds. Social Change and Sustainable TransportIndiana University PressBloomington, Indiana181190Google Scholar
  3. Bennison, DJ 1988Transport/telecommunication interactions: Empirical evidence from a videoconferencing field trial in the United KingdomTransportation Research A22291300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhat, CR 1996A generalized multiple durations proportional hazard model with an application to activity behavior during the evening work-to-home commuteTransportation Research B30465480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhat, CR, Lockwood, A 2004On distinguishing between physically active and physically passive episodes and between travel and activity episodes: An analysis of weekend recreational participation in the San Francisco Bay AreaTransportation Research A38573592Google Scholar
  6. Brynjolfsson E & Smith MD (2000) Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Science 46(4) (April): 563–585. Available at ebusiness.mit.edu/papers/frictionGoogle Scholar
  7. Button, K, Maggi, R 1994Videoconferencing and its implications for transport: An Anglo-Swiss perspectiveTransport Reviews155975Google Scholar
  8. Choo S & Mokhtarian PL (2005) Does telecommunications affect passenger travel or vice versa? Structural equation models of aggregate U.S. time series data using composite indices. Transportation Research RecordGoogle Scholar
  9. Choo S & Mokhtarian PL (forthcoming) Telecommunications and travel demand and supply: Aggregate structural equation models for the U.S. Transportation Research AGoogle Scholar
  10. Choo, S,, Mokhtarian, PL, Salomon, I 2005Does telecommuting reduce vehicle-miles traveled? An aggregate time series analysis for the U.STransportation323764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Couclelis, H 2000From sustainable transportation to sustainable accessibility: Can we avoid a new “tragedy of the commons”?Janelle, Donald GHodge, David C eds. Information, Place, and Cyberspace: Issues in AccessibilitySpringer-VerlagBerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M, LeFevre, J 1989Optimal experience in work and leisureJournal of Personality and Social Psychology56815822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Day, LH 1973An assessment of travel/communications substitutability.Futures5559572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delespaul, PAEG, Reis, HT, DeVries, MW 2004Ecological and motivational determinants of activation: Studying compared to sports and watching TVSocial Indicators Research67129143Google Scholar
  15. Doherty ST (2003) Should we abandon activity type analysis? Paper presented at the 10th conference of the International Association for Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne, Switzerland, August 10–14. Available at http://www.ivt.baum.ethz.ch/allgemein/pdf/doherty.pdf, accessed April 15, 2005
  16. European Conference of Ministers of Transport (ECMT)2000Transport and Leisure: Round Table 111ECMTParisGoogle Scholar
  17. Farag, S,, Dijst, M, Lanzendorf, M 2003Exploring the use of e-shopping and its impact on personal travel behavior in the NetherlandsTransportation Research Record18584754Google Scholar
  18. Ferrell CE (2005) Home-based teleshopping and shopping travel: Where do we find the time? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January. #05–2686 on the conference CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  19. Götz K, Loose W, Schmied M & Schubert S (2002) Mobility Styles in Leisure Time. Final report for the project “Reduction of Environmental Damage Caused by Leisure and Tourism Traffic”. Conducted by Institute for Social Ecological Research (ISOE) GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany. Commissioned by the German Federal Environmental Agency, FKZ 298 54 109, June. Available at http://www.isoe.de/ftp/mobility_styles.pdf, accessed July 17, 2003
  20. Handy S & Yantis T (1997) The Impacts of Telecommunications Technologies on Nonwork Travel Behavior. Research Report SWUTC/97/721927–1F, Southwest Region University Transportation Center, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  21. Heinze, GW 2000Transport and leisure: Growth as opportunity. Transport and Leisure: Round Table 111ECMTParis751Google Scholar
  22. Hochschild, AR 1997The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes WorkMetropolitan BooksNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Howe, CZ, Rancourt, AM 1990The importance of definitions of selected concepts for leisure inquiryLeisure Sciences12395406Google Scholar
  24. Katz, E, Dayan, D 1985Media events, on the experience of not being thereReligion15305314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kelly, J 1978A revised paradigm of leisure choices.Leisure Sciences1345363Google Scholar
  26. Kernan, JB, Domzal, TJ 2000Playing on the post-modern edge: Action leisure as self-identityWoodside, AGCrouch, GIMazanec, JAOppermann, MSakai, MY eds. Consumer Psychology of Tourism, Hospitality and LeisureCABI PublishingOxon, UK91101Google Scholar
  27. Kraan, M 1997In search for limits to mobility growth with a model for the allocation of time and moneyEttema, DFTimmermans, HJP eds. Activity-Based Approaches to Travel AnalysisPergamon PressOxford, UK89116Google Scholar
  28. Lal, R, Sarvary, M 1999When and how is the Internet likely to decrease price competitionMarketing Science18485503Google Scholar
  29. Lanzendorf, M 2002Mobility styles and travel behavior: Application of a lifestyle approach to leisure travelTransportation Research Record1807163173Google Scholar
  30. Lewis S (2003) The integration of paid work and the rest of life: Is post-industrial work the new leisure? Leisure Studies 22(4) (October): 343–356Google Scholar
  31. Lu, X, Pas, EI 1999Socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behaviorTransportation Research33A118Google Scholar
  32. Madrigal, R 1995Personal values, traveler personality type, and leisure travel styleJournal of Leisure Research27125142Google Scholar
  33. McGuiggan, RL 2000The Myer-Briggs type indicator and leisure attribute preferenceWoodside, AGCrouch, GIMazanec, JAOppermann, MSakai, MY eds. Consumer Psychology of Tourism, Hospitality and LeisureCABI PublishingWallingford, Oxon, UK245267Google Scholar
  34. Meurs H & Kalfs N (2000) Leisure and vacation: A forgotten travel market? In Transport and Leisure, Report of the Hundred and Eleventh Round Table on Transport Economics on Transport and Leisure, European Conference of Ministers of Transport, ParisGoogle Scholar
  35. Mokhtarian, PL 1990A typology of relationships between telecommunications and transportationTransportation Research24A231242Google Scholar
  36. Mokhtarian, PL 1998A synthetic approach to estimating the impacts of telecommuting on travelUrban Studies35215241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mokhtarian, PL 2002Telecommunications and travel: The case for complementarityJournal of Industrial Ecology64357 (Special Issue on E-Commerce, the Internet, and the Environment)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mokhtarian, PL 2004A conceptual analysis of the transportation impacts of B2C e-commerceTransportation31257284 (August)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mokhtarian, PL, Salomon, I 1996Modeling the choice of telecommuting 3: Identifying the choice set and estimating binary choice models for technology-based alternativesEnvironment and Planning A2818771894Google Scholar
  40. Mokhtarian PL & Salomon I (2002) Emerging travel patterns: Do telecommunications make a difference? Chapter 7 in HS Mahmassani, ed., In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behaviour Research Opportunities and Application Challenges. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press/Elsevier, pp. 143–182Google Scholar
  41. Mokhtarian PL, Salomon I & Handy SL (2004) A Taxonomy of Leisure Activities: The Role of ICT. Research Report, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis. Available at http://www.its.ucdavis.edu/publications/2004/UCD-ITS-RR-04–44.pdf
  42. Mokhtarian, PL,, Salomon, I, Redmond, LS 2001Understanding the desire for travel: It’s not purely “derived”Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research14355380Google Scholar
  43. Nie, NH, Hillygus, DS, Erbring, L 2002Internet use, interpersonal relations, and sociability: A time diary studyWellman, BHaythornthwaite, C eds. The Internet in Everyday LifeBlackwell PublishingMalden MA215243Google Scholar
  44. Ory DT, Mokhtarian PL, Redmond LS, Salomon I, Collantes GO & Choo S (2004) When is commuting desirable to the individual? Growth and Change 35(3) (Summer), special issue on commuting, (Eds.) Jan Rouwendal and Peter Nijkamp, pp. 334–359Google Scholar
  45. Passmore, A, French, D 2001Development and administration of a measure to assess adolescents’ participation in leisure activitiesAdolescence366775Google Scholar
  46. Redmond, LS, Mokhtarian, PL 2001The positive utility of the commute: Modeling ideal commute time and relative desired commute amountTransportation28179205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reichman, S 1976Travel adjustments and life styles – a behavioral approachStopher Peter, RMeyburg Arnim, H eds. Behavioral Travel-Demand ModelsD.C. Heath and CompanyLexington, MA143152Google Scholar
  48. Reid, IS, Compton, JL 1993A taxonomy of leisure purchase decision paradigms based on level of involvementJournal of Leisure Research25182203Google Scholar
  49. Salomon, I 1986Telecommunications and travel relationships: A review.Transportation Research A20223238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salomon, I, Koppelman, FS 1988A framework for studying teleshopping versus store shoppingTransportation Research A22247255Google Scholar
  51. Salomon, I, Salomon, M 1983Telecommuting: The employee’s perspectiveTechnological Forecasting and Social Change251528Google Scholar
  52. Samdahl, DM 1988A symbolic interactionist model of leisure: Theory and empirical support.Leisure Sciences102739Google Scholar
  53. Schlich, R,, Schonfelder, S,, Hanson, S, Axhausen, KW 2004Structures of leisure travel: Temporal and spatial variabilityTransport Reviews24219237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shaw, SM 1984The measurement of leisure: A quality of life issue.Society and Leisure791107Google Scholar
  55. Shaw, SM 1985The meaning of leisure in everyday lifeLeisure Sciences7124Google Scholar
  56. Snir, R, Harpaz, I 2002Work-leisure relations: Leisure orientation and the meaning of workJournal of Leisure Research34178203Google Scholar
  57. Tauber, E 1972Why do people shop?Journal of Marketing364649Google Scholar
  58. Tschan, F, Semmer, NK, Inversin, L 2004Work related and “private” social interactions at workSocial Indicators Research67145182Google Scholar
  59. Tinsley, HEA, Eldredge, BD 1995Psychological benefits of leisure participation: A taxonomy of leisure activities based on their need-gratifying propertiesJournal of Counseling Psychology42123132Google Scholar
  60. Tinsley, HEA, Hinson, JA, Tinsley, DJ, Holt, MS 1993Attributes of leisure and work experiencesJournal of Counseling Psychology40447455Google Scholar
  61. U.S. Department of Transportation (2003) National Household Travel Survey: User’s Guide, Version 1.0 (Preliminary Release), JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  62. Williams, E, Tagami, T 2002Energy use in sales and distribution via e-commerce and conventional retailJournal of Industrial Ecology699114CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia L. Mokhtarian
    • 1
  • Ilan Salomon
    • 2
  • Susan L. Handy
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and Institute of Transportation StudiesUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.School of Public Policy and Department of GeographyHebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael
  3. 3.Department of Environmental Science and Policy, and Institute of Transportation StudiesUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations