Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 399–422 | Cite as

A tour-based model of travel mode choice

  • Eric J. MillerEmail author
  • Matthew J. Roorda
  • Juan Antonio Carrasco
Article

Abstract

This paper presents a new tour-based mode choice model. The model is agent-based: both households and individuals are modelled within an object-oriented, microsimulation framework. The model is household-based in that inter-personal household constraints on vehicle usage are modelled, and the auto passenger mode is modelled as a joint decision between the driver and the passenger(s) to ride-share. Decisions are modelled using a random utility framework. Utility signals are used to communicate preferences among the agents and to make trade-offs among competing demands. Each person is assumed to choose the “best” combination of modes available to execute each tour, subject to auto availability constraints that are determined at the household level. The household’s allocations of resources (i.e., cars to drivers and drivers to ride-sharing passengers) are based on maximizing overall household utility, subject to current household resource levels. The model is activity-based: it is designed for integration within a household-based activity scheduling microsimulator. The model is both chain-based and trip-based. It is trip-based in that the ultimate output of the model is a chosen, feasible travel mode for each trip in the simulation. These trip modes are, however, determined through a chain-based analysis. A key organizing principle in the model is that if a car is to be used on a tour, it must be used for the entire chain, since the car must be returned home at the end of the tour. No such constraint, however, exists with respect to other modes such as walk and transit. The paper presents the full conceptual model and estimation results for an initial empirical prototype. Because of the complex nature of the model decision structure, choice probabilities are simulated from direct generation of random utilities rather than through an analytical probability expression.

Keywords

household-based microsimulation mode choice simulated random utilities tour-based vehicle allocation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Algers, S, Daly, AJ, Widlert, S 1997Modelling travel behaviour to support policy makingStockholm, PStopher, Lee-Gosselin, M eds. Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change.PergamonOxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Arentze, T, Timmermans, H 2000ALBATROSS: A Learning Based Transportation Oriented Simulation SystemEuropean Institute of Retailing and Services StudiesDen HaagGoogle Scholar
  3. Asensio, J 2002Transport mode choice by commuters to Barcelona’s CBDUrban Studies3918811895Google Scholar
  4. Ben-Akiva, M, Bolduc, D, Walker, J 2001Specification, identification, and estimation of the logit kernel (or Continuous Mixed Logit) model, Working PaperDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, MITCambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Ben-Akiva, M, Bowman, J, Ramming, S, Walker, J 1998Behavioral realism in urban transportation planning models. In: Transportation Models in the Policy-Making Process: A Symposium in Memory of Greig Harvey.Asilomar Conference CenterCaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  6. Beser, M, Algers, S 2002SAMPERS–The new Swedish national travel demand forecasting toolLundqvist, LMattsson, L-G eds. National Transport Models: Recent Developments and Prospects.SpringerStockholmGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowman J, Bradley M, Shiftan Y, Lawton TK & Ben-Akiva M (1998) Demonstration of an activity based model system for portland. In: 8th World Conference on Transport Research, July 12–17, Antwerp. Google Scholar
  8. Bowman, J, Ben-Akiva, M 2000Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedulesTransportation Research A35128Google Scholar
  9. Bradley M, Outwater ML, Jonnalagadda N & Ruiter ER (2001) Estimation of activity-based mocrosimulation model for San Francisco. In: Proceedings of the 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington D.C. Google Scholar
  10. Bunch, D 1991Estimability in the multinomial probit modelTransportation Research B25112Google Scholar
  11. Cirillo, C, Axhausen, KW 2002Mode choice of complex tours: A panel analysis. In: Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs- und Raumplanung, 142Institut fúr Verkehrsplanung, Transporttechnik, Strassenund Eisenbahnbau (IVT), ETH ZurichZurichGoogle Scholar
  12. Coleman J (2002) An Improved Mode Choice Model for the Greater Toronto Travel Demand Modelling System, Research Report, Toronto: Joint Program in Transportation. Google Scholar
  13. DMG (1997) TTS Version 3: Data Guide, Research Report, Toronto: Data Management Group, University of Toronto Joint Program in Transportation. Google Scholar
  14. Eberhard, L 2002A 24-Hour Household-Level Activity-Based Travel Demand Model for the GTADepartment of Civil Engineering, University of TorontoTorontoMASc Thesis.Google Scholar
  15. Fosgerau, M 2002PETRA–an activity-based approach to travel demand analysisLundqvist, LMattsson, L-G eds. National Transport Models: Recent Developments and Prospects.SpringerStockholmGoogle Scholar
  16. Group, Hague Consulting 1992The Netherlands National Model, 1990: The National Model System for Traffic and TransportMinistry of Transport and Public WorksThe NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  17. INRO 1999EMME/2 User’s Manual, Software Release: 9.0INRO Consultants Inc.MontrealGoogle Scholar
  18. Jonnalagadda, N, Freedman, J, Davidson, WA, Hunt, JD 2001Development of microsimulation activity-based model for San Francisco: Destination and mode choice modelsTransportation Research Record17772535Google Scholar
  19. Kitamura, R, Chen, C, Pendyala, R, Narayana, R 2000Micro-simulation of daily activity-travel patterns for travel demand forecastingTransportation272551Google Scholar
  20. Lerman, SR, Manski, C 1981On the use of simulated frequencies to approximate choice probabilitiesManski, CFMcFadden, D eds. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data and Econometric ApplicationsCambridge, MAMIT Press305319Google Scholar
  21. Miller, EJ 2001The Greater Toronto Area Travel Demand Modelling System, Version 2.0, Volume I: Model OverviewJoint Program in Transportation, University of TorontoTorontoResearch ReportGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller EJ (2004) Propositions for modelling household decision-making, submitted for publication. In: Lee-Gosselin M and Doherty ST (eds) Proceedings of the International Colloquium on The Behavioural Foundations of Integrated Land-use and Transportation Models: Assumptions and New Conceptual Frameworks. Google Scholar
  23. Miller, EJ, Roorda, MJ 2003A prototype model of household activity/travel schedulingTransportation Research Record1831114121Google Scholar
  24. Ortúzar, J de D 1983Nested logit models for mixed-mode travel in urban corridorsTransportation Research17A283299Google Scholar
  25. Ortúza, J de D, Willumsen, L 2001Modelling TransportWileyChichester NYGoogle Scholar
  26. Train K (2002) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, preprint available at http://else.berkeley.edu/books/train1201.pdf Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric J. Miller
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matthew J. Roorda
    • 1
  • Juan Antonio Carrasco
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations