, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 187–202 | Cite as

The rational locator reexamined: Are travel times still stable?

  • David LevinsonEmail author
  • Yao Wu


The rational locator hypothesis posits that individuals can, if they choose, maintain approximately steady journey-to-work travel times by adjusting their home and workplace. This hypothesis was coupled with the observation of long-term stability in drive alone journey-to-work times in metropolitan Washington (those times were unchanged from 1957 through 1968 to 1988). Despite the increase of average commuting distance and congestion, trip duration remained constant or even declined when controlling for travel purpose and travel mode because of shifting a share of traffic from slow urban routes to faster suburban routes. This observation has significance, as it is important to know for travel demand analysis if there is an underlying budget, or even a regularity, as this helps us determine whether our forecasts are reasonable. To re-test the underlying rationale for the hypothesis that travel times are stable, intra-metropolitan comparisons of travel times are made using Washington DC data from 1968, 1988, and 1994, and Twin Cities data from 1990 and 2000. The results depend upon geography. For the larger Washington DC region, keeping the same geography shows little change in commute times, but using the larger 1994 area suggests an increase in commute times. However, the Twin Cities, starting from a much shorter commute time, shows a marked increase over the decade, using either the smaller or the larger geography. Despite the remarkable continuing observation of stability in drive alone commuting times in metropolitan Washington, we reject the theory of personal commuting budgets, as we find that not only are commuting times not generally stable over time at the intra-metropolitan area, but that commuting time clearly depends on metropolitan spatial structure.


Travel Time Economic Geography Rational Locator Travel Demand Travel Mode 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barnes G & Davis G (1999) Understanding Urban Travel Demand: Problems, Solutions, and the Role of Forecasting. Report #2 in the Series: Transportation and Regional Growth Study CTS 99-02, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  2. Barr CL (2000) Testing for the Significance of Induced Highway Travel Demand in Metropolitan Areas. Transportation Research Board 79th Annual Meeting Preprint CD-ROM, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington DC, January 2000.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G 1965A theory of the allocation of timeThe Economic Journal75493517Google Scholar
  4. Clark, WAV, Burt, J 1980The impact of workplace on residential relocationAnnals of the Association of American Geographers795967Google Scholar
  5. Clark, WAV, Huang, Y, Withers, S 2003Does commuting distance matter.Commuting tolerance and residential change. Regional Science and Urban Economics33199221Google Scholar
  6. Clark, WAV, Kuijpers-Linde, M 1994Commuting in restructuring urban regionsUrban Studies31465483Google Scholar
  7. Clark, WAV, Withers, SD 1999Changing jobs and changing houses: Mobility outcomes of employment transitionsThe Journal of Regional Science39653673Google Scholar
  8. Douglas GB (1997) Urban Design, Urban Form, and Employee Travel Behavior. Sixth Transportation Research Board Conference on the Application of Transportation Planning Methods 1997.Google Scholar
  9. Dowling, RG, Colman, SB 1995Effects of increased highway capacity: Results of household travel behavior surveyTransportation Research Record1493143149Google Scholar
  10. Dowling RG & Colman, S.B. (1998) Effects of Increased Highway Capacity: results of a Household Travel Behavior Survey. Transportation Research Circular, no. 481: Highway Capacity Expansion and Induced Travel-Evidence and Implications, (pp. 21–32), Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington DC, February 1998.Google Scholar
  11. Dunne, JP 1984Elasticity measures and disaggregate choice modelsJournal of Transport Economics and Policy18189197Google Scholar
  12. Fulton LM, Meszler DJ, Noland RB & Thomas JV (2000) Statistical Analysis of Induced Travel Effects in the U.S. Mid-Atlantic Region . Transportation Research Board 79th Annual Meeting Preprint CD-ROM, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington DC, January 2000.Google Scholar
  13. Getis, A 1969Residential location and the journey to workProceedings of the Association of American Geographers205559Google Scholar
  14. Giuliano G (1995) The Weakening Transportation-Land Use Connection. Access. Spring: 3–11Google Scholar
  15. Giuliano, G, Small, KA 1993Is the journey-to-work explained by urban structureUrban Studies3014851500Google Scholar
  16. Goodwin, PB 1996Empirical evidence on induced trafficTransportation232354Google Scholar
  17. Hansen, M, Huang, Y 1997Road supply and traffic in California urban areasTransportation Research: Part A, Policy and Practice31205218Google Scholar
  18. Hupkes G (1982) The law of constant travel time and trip-rates. Futures 38–46.Google Scholar
  19. Jones P (1990) Developments in dynamic and activity-based approaches to travel analysis, Oxford Studies in Transport.Google Scholar
  20. Kain, JF, Fauth, GR 1977The effects of urban structure on automobile ownership and journey-to-work mode choicesTransportation Research Record658917Google Scholar
  21. Kölbl, R., Helbing, D 2003Energy laws in human travel behaviourNew Journal of Physics 548.148.12Google Scholar
  22. Kraan M (1997) In search for limits to mobility growth with a model for the allocation of time and money. Activity-based Approaches to Travel Analysis: 89–115.Google Scholar
  23. Levinson HS (1963) Effects of Density on Urban Transportation Requirements. Highway Research Record, Highway Research Board, 1963.Google Scholar
  24. Levinson, DM 1997Job and housing tenure and the journey to workThe Annals of Regional Science31451471Google Scholar
  25. Levinson, DM 1998Accessibility and the journey-to-workJournal of Transport Geography61121Google Scholar
  26. Levinson, D, Kanchi, S 2002Road capacity and the allocation of timeJournal of Transportation and Statistics52546Google Scholar
  27. Levinson, D, Kumar, A 1994The rational locator: Why travel times have remained stableJournal of the American Planning Association60319332Google Scholar
  28. Levinson, D, Kumar, A 1995Activity, travel, and the allocation of timeJournal of the American Planning Association61458469Google Scholar
  29. Loudon WR (1997) Census Journey-to-Work Long-form Survey: Does it support state and Metropolitan Transportation Planning? Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings 13, vol. 1.Google Scholar
  30. Luk, JYK, Chung, E 1997Induced Demand And Road Investment: An Initial AppraisalAustralian Road Research BoardVermont South, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  31. Mackie PJ, Jara-diaz S & Fowkes AS (2001) The value of travel time savings in evaluation.Transportation Research part E, 37.Google Scholar
  32. Marchetti, C 1994Anthropological invariants in travel behaviorTechnological Forecasting and Social Change477588Google Scholar
  33. Marshall NL (2000) Evidence of Induced Demand in the Texas Transportation Institute’s Urban Roadway Congestion Study Data Set. Transportation Research Board 79th Annual Meeting Preprint CD-ROM, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington DC, January 2000.Google Scholar
  34. McCarthy, PS 1997The role of captivity in aggregate share models of intercity passenger travelJournal of Transport Economics and Policy31293308Google Scholar
  35. Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Department of Transportation Regional Transit Board, Transportation Advisory Board (1997) Twin Cities metropolitan area travel behavior inventory, 1990 home interview survey methodology and results.Google Scholar
  36. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (1997) 1994 COG/TPB household travel study for the metropolitan Washington region, technical report and documentation.Google Scholar
  37. Milone RJ (1993) An Analysis of Income Stratified Work Trip Distributions for Washington DC. Fourth National Conference on Transportation Planning Methods Applications Compendium.Google Scholar
  38. Mokhtarian P & Chen C (2003) TTB or Not TTB, that is the Question: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature on Travel Time (and Money) Budgets. Presented at 2003 Transportation Research Board Conference, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  39. Noland RB (1999) Relationships Between Highway Capacity and Induced Vehicle Travel. Transportation Research Board 78th Annual Meeting Preprint CD-ROM, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington DC, January 1999.Google Scholar
  40. Noland RB & Cowart WA (2000) Analysis of Metropolitan Highway Capacity and the Growth in Vehicle Miles of Travel. Transportation Research Board 79th Annual Meeting Preprint CD-ROM. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington DC, January 2000.Google Scholar
  41. NuStats Partners (2001) Twin Cities metropolitan area travel behavior inventory, 2001 home interview survey technical report.Google Scholar
  42. Pisarski A (2002) Testimony For “Mobility, Congestion and Intermodalism” before the United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works March 19, 2002 Washington DC\sim epw/Pisarski_031902.htm.Google Scholar
  43. Prendergast, LS, Williams, RD 1981Individual travel time budgetsTransportation Research153946Google Scholar
  44. Purvis, C 1995Changes in regional travel characteristics and travel time expenditures in the San Francisco Bay Area:Transportation Research Record1466991101960–1990Google Scholar
  45. Redmond LS & Mokhtarian PL (1999) The positive utility of the commute: Modeling ideal commute time and relative desired commute amount. Transportation.Google Scholar
  46. Rossi, E 1997Speed in TransportReport EURESFreiburgGoogle Scholar
  47. Rouwendal, J, Rietveld, P 1994Changes in commuting distances of Dutch householdsUrban Studies3115451557Google Scholar
  48. Rouwendal, J 1999Spatial job search and commuting distancesRegional Science and Urban Economics29491517Google Scholar
  49. Shafer, A 2000Regularities in travel demand: An international perspective Journal of Transportation and Statistics3131Google Scholar
  50. Shunk, GA 1995Uses of census data for travel researchTransportation Research Board Conference Proceedings46874Google Scholar
  51. Tanner, JC 1981Expenditure of time and money on travelTransportation Research152538Google Scholar
  52. Texas Transportation Institute (2001) The 2001 Urban Mobility Report. The Texas A & M University System. Scholar
  53. United States Census Bureau (2002) 2000 Census Statistics Scholar
  54. van, Ommeren J 1998On the job search behavior: The importance of commuting timeLand Economics74526540Google Scholar
  55. Ommeren, JN 1999Job moving, residential moving and commuting: A search perspectiveJournal of Urban Economics46230253Google Scholar
  56. Ommeren, JN, Rietveld, P, Nijkamp, P 1996Residence and workplace relocation: A bivariate duration model approachGeographical Analysis38315329Google Scholar
  57. Ommeren, JN, Rietveld, P, Nijkamp, P 1997Commuting in search of jobs and residencesJournal of Urban Economics42402421Google Scholar
  58. Ommeren, JN, Rietveld, P, Nijkamp, P 1998Spatial moving behavior of two earner householdsJournal of Regional Science382341Google Scholar
  59. Vivier, J 2001Mobility and accessibility–complementary or contradictory objectivesPublic Transport International50411Google Scholar
  60. Wee B van, Rietveld P & Meurs H (2002) A constant travel time budget? In search for explanations for an increase in average travel time. Research Memorandum 2002-31 Free University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  61. Whyte, WH,Jr eds. 1957The Exploding MetropolisUniversity of California PressBerkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  62. Zahavi Y (1974)Travel Time Budget and Mobility in Urban Areas, Federal Highway Administration . Washington DC, U.S. Department of Transportation, May 1974, NTIS PB 234 145.Google Scholar
  63. Zahavi, Y, Ryan, J 1980Stability of travel components over timeTransportation Resarch Record7501926Google Scholar
  64. Zahavi, Y, Talvittie, A 1980Regularities in travel time and money expendituresTransportation Research Record7501319Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations