Public Organization Review

, 9:367 | Cite as

Sustaining Cross-Sector Collaborations: Lessons from New Orleans

Article

Abstract

This study examines the role of faith-based and nonprofit organizations in cross-sector collaborations and the outcomes of collaborative efforts in one poverty stricken New Orleans neighborhood. The study focuses on a particular one-stop human services center that was established in the target neighborhood post-Hurricane Katrina and was tested during the aftermath of Hurricanes Gustav and Ike. The Center was evaluated during the fall of 2008, to determine whether it held up in achieving relief, recovery and rebuilding efforts, especially in relation to additional needs generated by the more recent storms. Using the Bryson et al. (2006) model of cross-sector collaboration as a beginning framework, and the subsequent expanded model of that same framework from Simo and Bies (2007), the current study examines the successes and current challenges of this particular collaborative organization, analyzes the application of the identified cross-sector collaboration models, defines the role of faith-based organizations and explores the implications for future policy and practice, as well as directions for further research in this important and under-researched area.

Keywords

Cross-sector collaboration Faith-based organizations Faith-based collaborations and / or partnerships 

References

  1. Arganoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington: Georgetown University.Google Scholar
  2. Arganoff, R., & Pattakos, A. N. (1979). Dimensions of services integration: Service delivery, program linkages, policy management and organizational structure. Washington: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.Google Scholar
  3. Austin, J. E. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and business. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 69–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berke, P. R., & Campanella, T. J. (2006). Planning for postdisaster resiliency. The Annals of the American Academy, 604, 192–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryson, J. M., Crosby,B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review December, 2006 Special Edition: 44–55.Google Scholar
  6. Burns, P., & Thomas, M. (2006). Power, politics, and the New Orleans non-regime. Urban Affairs Review, 41(4), 517–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Comfort, L. K. (2002). Rethinking security: organizational fragility in extreme events. Public Administration Review, 62(s1), 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Comfort, L. K., & Haase, T. W. (2006). Communication, coherence, and collective action. Public Works Management & Policy, 10(4), 328–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donahue, A. K., & Joyce, P. G. (2001). A framework for analyzing emergency management with an application to federal budgeting. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 728–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Professional networks and the institutionalization of a single mind set. American Sociological Review, 50, 639–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Guo, C., & Acar, M. (2005). Understanding collaboration among nonprofit organizations: combining resource dependency, institutional, and network perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(3), 340–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ink, D. (2006). An analysis of the house select committee and White House reports on Hurricane Katrina. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 800–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jurkiewicz, C. L., & O'Keefe, S. (2008-9). A letter to the President-Elect regarding Katrina. Public Integrity, 11(1), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kapucu, N. (2005). Interorganizational coordination in dynamic context: networks in emergency response management. Connections, 26(2), 33–48.Google Scholar
  16. Kiefer, J. J., & Montjoy, R. S. (2006). Incrementalism before the storm: network perspectives for the evacuation of New Orleans. Public Administration Review, 62(s1), 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lawrence, T. B., Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2002). Institutional effects of interorganizational collaborations: the emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 281–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Light, P. (2005). Katrina’s Lesson in Readiness. The Washington Post, September 1.Google Scholar
  19. Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (1994). The age of the network: Organizing principles for the 21st Century. Essex Junction: Oliver Wight Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Mattox, K. L. (2005). Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: role of individuals and collaborative networks in mobilizing/coordinating societal and professional resources for major disasters. Critical Care, 10(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  21. McGuire, M. (2002). Managing networks: propositions on what managers do and why they do it. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 599–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66(Supplement to Volume 66), 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Menzel, D. C. (2006). The Katrina aftermath: a failure of federalism or leadership? Public Administration Review, 66(6), 808–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morris, J. C. (2006). Whither FEMA? Hurricane Katrina and FEMA’s response to the Gulf Coast. Public Works Management & Policy, 10(4), 328–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pipa, T. (2006). Weathering the storm: The role of local nonprofits in the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. Washington: The Aspen Institute. Nonprofit Sector Research Fund.Google Scholar
  26. Rathgeb Smith, Steven. (2006). Rebuilding Social Welfare Services after Katrina: Challenges and Opportunities. In E. T. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), In after Katrina: Public expectation and charities’ response (pp. 5–10). Washington: The Urban Institute, Emerging Issues in Philanthropy Seminar.Google Scholar
  27. Rethmeyer, R. K. (2005). Conceptualizing and measuring collaborative networks. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 117–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Robinson, S. E., Berrett, B., & Stone, K. (2006). The development of collaboration of response to Hurricane Katrina in the Dallas area. Public Works Management and Policy, 10(4), 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodriguez, H., Trainor, J., & Quarantelli, E. L. (2006). Rising to the challenges of a catastrophe: the emergent and prosocial behavior following Hurricane Katrina. The Annals of the American Academy, 604, 82–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schneider, S. K. (1990). FEMA, federalism, Hugo and ‘Frisco. Publius, 20(3), 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schneider, S. K. (1992). Governmental responses to disasters: the conflict between bureaucratic procedures and emergent norms. Public Administration Review, 52(2), 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simo, G., & Bies, A. L. (2007). The role of nonprofits in disaster response: an expanded model of cross-sector collaboration. Public Administration Review. December, Special Issue, 125–142.Google Scholar
  33. Walters, J., & Kettl, D. (2005). The Katrina Breakdown. Governing December. www.governing.com/articles/12disast.htm.
  34. Waugh, WL, & Streib, G. (2006). Collaboration and Leadership for Effective Emergency Management. Public Administration Review:131-140.Google Scholar
  35. Waugh, W. L., Jr., & Sylves, R. T. (2002). Organizing the war on terrorism. Public Administration Review, 62(1), 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wise, C. R. (2006). Organizing for homeland security after Katrina: is adaptive management what's missing? Public Administration Review, 66(3), 302–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public ServiceDePaul UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations