Public Organization Review

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 169–198

How Security Agencies Control Change: Executive Power and the Quest for Autonomy in the FBI and CIA

Article

Abstract

The US Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Central Intelligence Agency gain autonomy when they exercise executive power, performing tasks that are so urgent, secretive, or forceful that they cannot be anticipated by law. The FBI exhibited a clear instance of autonomy when, with a view to its long term responsibilities, it resisted remaking itself as a counterterrorism agency to the degree that politicians requested. The second case, involving the CIA, produced more mixed results. The agency appeared to exhibit autonomy by exercising its powerful security tasks, including control over information and covert operations, and by resisting a consensus for major organizational change. Nevertheless, its large number of administrative and analytical rather than executive tasks prevented the agency from developing the coherent, independent perspective necessary for a high degree of true autonomy.

Keywords

Intelligence National security Public administration Policy history Autonomy Organizational change 

References

  1. Ambrose, Myles. 2003. Phone interview. September 9.Google Scholar
  2. Andrew, C. 1996. For the President’s Eyes Only. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  3. Baer, R. 2005. See No Evil. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  4. Barnard, C. 1956. The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. 2004. Rules for the World: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barzelay, M., & Campbell, C. 2003. Preparing for the Future: Strategic Planning in the U.S. Air Force. Brookings Institution: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  7. Bawn, K. 1995. Political control versus expertise: congressional choices about administrative procedures. The American Political Science Review, 89: 62–73. doi:10.2307/2083075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Behn, R. 2001. Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  9. Best, Jr., R. A. 2004. “Proposals for Intelligence Reorganization, 1949–2004.” ed. C. R. Service: Library of Congress.Google Scholar
  10. Betts, R. K. 2007-08. Two faces of intelligence failure: September 11 and Iraq’s missing WMD. Political Science Quarterly, 112: 585–606.Google Scholar
  11. Boren, D. L. 1990. “New World, New CIA.” New York Times, June 17, E21.Google Scholar
  12. Boren, D. L. 1992. The intelligence community: how crucial? Foreign Affairs (Council on Foreign Relations), 71: 52–62.Google Scholar
  13. Carpenter, D. P. 2000. State building through reputation building: coalitions of esteem and program innovation in the national postal system, 1883–1913. Studies in American Political Development, 14: 121–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carpenter, D. P. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. CIA 2005. “World-Wide Threat Assessments” and “Global Intelligence Challenges,” speeches available from 1996–2001 at: https://www.cia.gov/news-information/speeches-testimony/, last accessed, 11/08/2005.
  16. Codevilla, A. 1992. Informing Statecraft. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Community, Commission on the Roles and Capabilities of the United States Intelligence 1996. An Appraisal of U.S. Intelligence. Preparing for the 21st Century:. Washington, DC: Commission on the Roles and Capabilities of the United States Intelligence Community.Google Scholar
  18. Congress, U.S. 1992. “To Reorganize the United States Intelligence Community, and for other purposes.”Google Scholar
  19. Congress, U.S. 1994. “Intelligence Authorization Act for FY 1995.” ed. H. P. S. C. o. Intelligence.Google Scholar
  20. Congress, U.S. 2002. “Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.” US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and US House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.Google Scholar
  21. Cooper, J. R. 2005. Curing Analytic Pathologies: Pathways to Improved Intelligence Analysis. Washington DC: Center for the Study of Intelligence.Google Scholar
  22. CRCUSIC 1996. An Appraisal of U.S. Intelligence. Preparing for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Commission on the Roles and Capabilities of the United States Intelligence Community.Google Scholar
  23. Darling, A. B. 1990. The Central Intelligence Agency. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Deutch, J. 1996. Worldwide Threat Assessment Brief. Testimony to the Select Committee on Intelligence. 22 February. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/news-information/speeches-testimony/1996/dci_speech_022296.html. Last Accessed: 24 February 2009.
  25. Durant, R. 2007. The Greening of the US Military. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Editorial 2006. “Doing the President’s Dirty Work.” New York Times, February 17, 2006.Google Scholar
  27. Eggen, D. 2003. “Congress Expands FBI Spying Power.” Wired.Google Scholar
  28. Eggen, D. 2006. “33 of 12,000 Have Some Proficiency.” Washington Post:A1, October 11, 2006.Google Scholar
  29. Emmerich, H. 1971. Federal Organization and Administrative Management. University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  30. Feaver, P. D. 2003. Armed Servants: Agency, Oversight, and Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. FoxNews 2004. [cited July 18, 2004. Available from http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,126115,00.html].
  32. Frydl, K. J. 2006. Kidnapping and US state development. Studies in American Political Development, 20: 18–44. (Spring 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gannon, J. C. 1996. Challenges of Intelligence Reform: The Case of Russia. Paper read at Speech to the Boston Committee on Foreign Relations, July 10, 1996, at Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  34. GAO 2003. “Better Management Oversight and Internal Controls Needed to Ensure Accuracy of Terrorism-Related Statistics.” ed. G. A. Office.Google Scholar
  35. Gates, R. 1992. “Testimony on Intelligence Reorganization.” Joint Hearing of the House and Senate Select Committees on Intelligence. 102nd Congress, 2nd session. 1 April.Google Scholar
  36. Goodman, A. E., & Berkowitz, B. D. 1992. The Need to Know: The Report of the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on Covert Action and American Democracy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
  37. Graham, B. 2004. Bob Graham, Congressional Record (Senate), February 3, 2004, S385–S388.Google Scholar
  38. Grassley, C. 2002. Christian Science Monitor, June 26, 2002.Google Scholar
  39. Hammond, T. 2005. “Why Is the Intelligence Community so Difficult to Redesign?” In Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting. Chicago.Google Scholar
  40. Hargrove, E. 1994. Prisoners of Myth: The Leadership of the Tennessee Valley Authority, 1933–1990. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hill, E. 2002. “Joint Inquiry Staff Statement, Part I.” Testimony to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI). The Intelligence Community’s Knowledge of the September 11 Hijackers Prior to September 11, 2001. September 20, 2002.Google Scholar
  42. Hilsman, R. 1995. Does the CIA still have a role. Foreign Affairs (Council on Foreign Relations), 74(5): 104–116.Google Scholar
  43. Huber, J. D., & Shipan, C. R. 2002. Deliberate Discretion: The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Ignatius, D. 1991. “Openness Is the Secret to Democracy.” Washington Post National Weekly Edition, 30 Sep.-6 Oct, 24–5.Google Scholar
  45. Intelligence, House and Senate Select Committees on. 2002a. “Counterterrorism Organizations within the Intelligence Community.” ed. Report by the Joint Inquiry Into the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 107th Cong, 2nd sess., 2. December 2002.Google Scholar
  46. Intelligence, House Permanent Select Committee on 1994. “Intelligence Authorization Act for FY 1995.”Google Scholar
  47. Jeffreys-Jones, R. 2002. Cloak and Dollar. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Johnson, L. K. 2004. The Aspin-Brown intelligence inquiry: behind the closed doors of a blue ribbon commission. Studies in Intelligence, 48(3): 1–20.Google Scholar
  49. Johnson, S. 2005. “Three Years of the Condor.” The Daily Standard. November 8, 2005, available at: http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/327jhrsr.asp, last accessed June 10, 2007.
  50. Kaplan, F. 2006. “Rumsfeld Surrenders.” Slate, February 3, 2006.Google Scholar
  51. Katz, R., & Devon, J. 2003. “Perilous Power Play: FBI vs. Homeland Security.” National Review Online.Google Scholar
  52. Kendall, W. 1949. The Function of Intelligence. World Politics, 1: 542–552. doi:10.2307/2008837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kent, S. 1949. Strategic Intelligence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Khademian, A. M. 1996. Checking on banks: autonomy and accountability in three federal agencies. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  55. Komarow, S. 1994. “In Turnabout, the CIA Finds Itself under a Microscope.” USA Today, 15 July 1994.Google Scholar
  56. Leverett, F. 2004. “Force Spies to Work Together.” New York Times, 7/9/04.Google Scholar
  57. Light, P. 1995. Thickening Government. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  58. Locke, J. 1988. “Two Treatises on Government.” ed. P. Laslett. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Loeb, V. 2001. “U.S. Intelligence Efforts to Get Major Review.” Washington Post, 5/12/01.Google Scholar
  60. Lord, C. 2003. The Modern Prince: What Leaders Need to Know Now. Harrisonburg, VA: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Mansfield, H. C. Jr. 1989. Taming the Prince. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Matthew, R. A. 2000. The environment as a national security issue. Journal of Policy History, 12(1): 101–122. doi:10.1353/jph.2000.0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Moynihan, D. P. 1991. “Do We Still Need the C.I.A? The State Dept. Can Do the Job.” New York Times, 19 May 1991, E17.Google Scholar
  64. Naftali, T. J. 2005. Blind Spot. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  65. Nartker, M. 2004. “Senate Chairman unveils intelligence reform proposal.” Government Executive, August 23, 2004.Google Scholar
  66. New, W. 2003. “Bipartisan group of senators bashes FBI, files oversight bill.” National Journal’s Technology Daily, February 25, 2003.Google Scholar
  67. Obey, D. 2006. “Military Quality of Life and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Act,.”Google Scholar
  68. Peters, B. G. 1996. The Future of Governing. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  69. Pincus, W. 1992. “Panels Continue Impasse on Intelligence.” Washington Post, June 7, 1996, A2.Google Scholar
  70. Pincus, W. 1996. “Untangling the Spy Network’s Webs: Rep. Combest Wants CIA Clandestine Operations Separate and NRO Split.” Washington Post, March 5, 1996, A13.Google Scholar
  71. Powell, C. 2003. “Iraq: Failing to Disarm,” US Secretary of State Colin Powell’s Presentation to the UN Security Council, February 5, 2003, available at http://www.gwu.edu/∼nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB80/wmd28.pdf, last accessed February 24, 2009.
  72. Ransom, C. J. 1993. New boxes for old tools? Considerations on reorganizing U.S. intelligence. The Ohio Journal of Economics and Politics, 8(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
  73. Risen, J., & Johnston, D. 2002. “Lawmakers Want Cabinet Post for an Intelligence Director.” New York Times, 8 Dec. 2002.Google Scholar
  74. Rudgers, D. R. 2000. Creating the Secret State: The Origins of the Central Intelligence Agency, 1943–1947. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  75. Scheuer, M. 2004. Imperial Hubris. Dulles, VA: Potomac Books.Google Scholar
  76. Select Committee on Intelligence, CIA 1977. The Pike Report. Nottingham: Spokesman Books.Google Scholar
  77. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing 2001. Oversight: Restoring Confidence in the FBI. Statement of Patrick Leahy. June 20, 2001.Google Scholar
  78. Shane, S., & Lewis, N. A. 2006. “At Sept. 11 Trial, Tale of Missteps and Management.” New York Times, March 31, 2006.Google Scholar
  79. Singel, R. 2003. “Congress Expands FBI Spying Power.” Wired.Google Scholar
  80. Smist, F. J. 1990. Congress Oversees the United States Intelligence Community, 1947–1989. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
  81. Smith, J. R., & Pincus, W. 1996. “Expert Panel Wants Intelligence Director to Hold More Power.” Washington Post, March 1, 1996, A15.Google Scholar
  82. Staffer, F. C. 2004. Personal Interview, December 16 2004, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  83. Tenet, G. 2001. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Wordwide Threat 2001: National Security in a Changing World. 7 February 2001. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/news-information/speeches-testimony/2001/UNCLASWWT_02072001.html. Last Accessed: 24 February 2009.
  84. US House 1996. “IC21 - Intelligence Community in the 21st Century.” ed. P. S. C. o I. House of Representative.Google Scholar
  85. USINT 1996. “An Appraisal of U.S. Intelligence. Preparing for the 21st Century.” Washington, DC: Commission on the Roles and Capabilities of the United States Intelligence Community.Google Scholar
  86. Warwick, D. P. 1975. A Theory of Public Bureaucracy: Politics, Personality, and Organization in the State Department. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Weiner, T. 1996a. “Commission Recommends Streamlined Spy Agencies.” New York Times, March 1, 1996, A13.Google Scholar
  88. Weiner, T. 1996b. “Proposal Would Reorganize U.S. Intelligence Agencies.” New York Times, March 5, 1996.Google Scholar
  89. Williamson, O. E. 1981. The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3): 548–577. doi:10.1086/227496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wilson, M. R. 2006. “The politics of procurement: military origins of bureaucratic autonomy.” Journal of Policy History.Google Scholar
  91. Wood, D. 2005a. “Pentagon’s ‘Black Budget’ Veils Contracting Shenanigans.” Newhouse News Service, November 30, 2005.Google Scholar
  92. Woolsey, J. 1995. “Intelligence in the 21st Century.” Testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. US House. 104th Congress. 1st sess. 19 December.Google Scholar
  93. Zegart, A. B. 1999. Flawed by Design: The Evolution of the CIA, JCS, and JSC. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Zegart, A. B. 2005. September 11 and the adaptation failure of US intelligence agencies. International Security, 29(4): 78–111. doi:10.1162/isec.2005.29.4.78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zegart, A. B. 2006. An empirical analysis of failed intelligence reforms before September 11. Political Science Quarterly, 121: 33–60.Google Scholar
  96. Zegart, A. B. 2007. Spying Blind. The CIA, the FBI, and the Origins of 9/11. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Zolo, D. 1992. Democracy and Complexity. State College, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Public Administration and Policy, School of Public and International AffairsVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations