Advertisement

Sharing Parental Leave Among Dual-Earner Couples in Canada: Does Reserved Paternity Leave Make a Difference?

  • Molly Mayer
  • Céline Le Bourdais
Original Research

Abstract

In 2006, Quebec became the first Canadian province to offer non-transferable paternity leave to fathers. The availability of this five-week leave distinguishes the province from the rest of the country, where only maternity and parental leave are available. Using data from Statistics Canada’s 2011 General Social Survey, the authors investigate to what extent the availability of reserved paternity leave and couples’ conjugal union type affect the probability of fathers taking leave and the duration of leave. Among couples in which at least one parent took leave, descriptive analysis shows that 75% of Quebec fathers took leave, whereas only 50% of fathers elsewhere in Canada took leave. Both parents received wage replacement benefits in nearly 60% of cases in Quebec, but in only 8% of cases in other provinces. Multivariate analysis confirms that the availability of paternity leave is positively linked to the higher likelihood of Quebec fathers taking leave compared to fathers in other provinces. However, paternity leave is negatively associated with fathers’ duration of leave, as well as that of mothers. Married fathers were more likely than cohabiting fathers to take parental leave in provinces outside Quebec, but not in Quebec. Among other variables, we find that education levels of mothers, gender-role attitudes (approached through sharing of housework), number of children, and family type significantly affect the likelihood of fathers taking leave. Duration of leave appears more closely associated with differences between partners in terms of age and income for mothers, and of education for both parents.

Keywords

Parental leave Paternity leave Maternity leave Parental benefits Family policy Gender equality Canada 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful and insightful comments. Work on this article received support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the McGill Canada Research Chair on Social Statistics and Family Change. The analysis was conducted at the McGill Branch of the Quebec Interuniversity Centre for Social Statistics (QICSS) which is part of the Canadian Research Data Centre Network (CRDCN). The services and activities provided by the QICSS are made possible by the financial or in-kind support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), Statistics Canada, the Fonds de recherche du Québec—Société et culture (FRQSC) and Santé (FRQS), and the Quebec universities. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors.

References

  1. Aisenbrey, S., Evertsson, M., & Grunow, D. (2009). Is there a career penalty for mothers’ time out? A comparison of Germany, Sweden and the United States. Social Forces, 88(2), 573–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almqvist, A.-L. (2008). Why most Swedish fathers and few French fathers use paid parental leave: An exploratory qualitative study of parents. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice about Men as Fathers, 6(2), 192–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axelsson, T. (2014). Men’s parental leave in Sweden: Policies, attitudes and practices. Retrieved from Joanneum Research Policies, http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A717640&dswid=2642.
  4. Barg, K., & Beblo, M. (2012). Does ‘sorting into specialization’ explain the differences in time use between married and cohabiting couples? An empirical application for Germany. Annals of Economics and Statistics, 105(106), 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beaujot, R., Du, C. J., & Ravanera, Z. (2013). Family policies in Quebec and the rest of Canada: Implications for fertility, child-care, women’s paid work, and child development indicators. Canadian Public Policy, 39(2), 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beglaubter, J. (2017). Balancing the scales: Negotiating father’s parental leave use. Canadian Review of Sociology, 54(4), 476–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bianchi, S., Lesnard, L., Nazio, T., & Raley, S. (2014). Gender and time allocation of cohabiting and married women and men in France, Italy and the United States. Demographic Research, 31(8), 183–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2013). Female labor supply: Why is the United States falling behind? American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 103(3), 251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2017). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(3), 789–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boeckmann, I., Misra, J., & Budig, M. J. (2015). Cultural and institutional factors shaping mothers’ employment and working hours in postindustrial countries. Social Forces, 93(4), 1301–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boll, C., Leppin, J., & Reich, N. (2013). Paternal childcare and parental leave policies: Evidence from industrialized countries. Review of Economics of the Household, 12(1), 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bünning, M. (2015). What happens after the ‘Daddy Months’? Fathers’ involvement in paid work, childcare, and housework after taking parental leave in Germany. European Sociological Review, 31(6), 738–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Byker, T. S. (2016). Paid parental leave laws in the United States: Does short-duration leave affect women’s labor-force attachment? American Economic Review, 106(5), 242–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carlson, J. (2013). Sweden’s parental leave insurance: A policy analysis of strategies to increase gender equality. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 40(2), 63–76.Google Scholar
  15. Cools, S., Fiva, J. H., & Kirkebøen, L. J. (2015). Causal effects of paternity leave on children and parents. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 117(3), 801–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Datta Gupta, N., Smith, N., & Verner, M. (2006). Child care and parental leave in the Nordic countries: A model to aspire to? Review of Economic of the Household, 6(1), 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Domínguez-Folgueras, M. (2013). Is cohabitation more egalitarian? The division of household labor in five European countries. Journal of Family Issues, 34(12), 1623–1646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doucet, A., Lero, D. S., McKay, L., & Tremblay, D. G. (2015). Canada country note. In P. Moss (Ed.), International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research (pp. 82–95). London: Employment Relations Research.Google Scholar
  20. Duvander, A. Z. (2014). How long should parental leave be? Attitudes to gender equality, family, and work as determinants of women’s and men’s parental leave in Sweden. Journal of Family Issues, 35(7), 909–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duvander, A. Z., & Johansson, M. (2012). What are the effects of reforms promoting fathers’ parental leave use? Journal of European Social Policy, 22(3), 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Einarsóttir, T., & Pétursdóttir, G. M. (2009). Iceland: From reluctance to fast-track engineering. In S. Kamerman & P. Moss (Eds.), The politics of parental leave policies: Children, parenting, gender and the labour market (pp. 159–174). Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Escot, L., Fernández-Cornejo, J. A., & Poza, C. (2014). Fathers’ use of childbirth leave in Spain. The effects of the 13-day paternity leave. Population Research and Policy Review, 33(3), 419–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Esping-Anderson, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. Evans, P. M. (2007). Comparative perspectives on changes to Canada’s paid parental leave: Implications for class and gender. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16(2), 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Evertsson, M., & Duvander, A. Z. (2011). Parental leave-possibility or trap? Does family leave length affect Swedish women’s labor market opportunities? European Sociological Review, 27(4), 350–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Feldman, K., & Gran, B. K. (2016). Is what’s best for dads best for families? Paternity leave policies and equity across forty-four nations. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 43(1), 95–120.Google Scholar
  28. Galtry, J. (2005). Assessing the optimal length of parental leave for child and parental well-being: How can research inform policy? Journal of Family Issues, 26(2), 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Girard, C. (2012). Naissances et fécondité : Le bilan démographique du Québec, Édition 2012 [Birth and Fertility: Quebec Demographic Report, 2012 edition]. Québec: Institut de la statistique du Québec.Google Scholar
  30. Government of Canada. (2017). Budget 2017: Building a strong middle class. Retrieved from http://www.budget.gc.ca/2017/home-accueil-en.html.
  31. Halldén, K., Levanon, A., & Kricheli-Katz, T. (2016). Does the motherhood wage penalty differ by individual skill and country family policy? A longitudinal study of ten European countries. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 23(3), 363–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johansson, E-A. (2010). The effect of own and spousal parental leave on earnings. Working Paper No. 2010:4. Retrieved from Institute for Evaluation of Labor Market and Education Policy, http://www.ifau.se/en/Research/Publications/Working-papers/2010/The-effect-of-own-and-spousal-parental-leave-on-earnings/.
  33. Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2014). The design and analysis of data from dyads and groups. In C. M. Judd & H. T. Reis (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 589–607). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Keck, W., & Saraceno, C. (2013). The impact of different social-policy frameworks on social inequalities among women in the European Union: The labour-market participation of mothers. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 20(3), 297–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lammi-Taskula, J. (2008). Doing fatherhood: Understanding the gendered use of parental leave in Finland. Fathering, 6(2), 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laplante, B., & Fostik, A. L. (2016). Cohabitation and marriage in Canada: The geography, law and politics of competing views on gender equality. In A. Esteve & R. J. Lesthaeghe (Eds.), Cohabitation and marriage in the Americas: Geo-historical legacies and new trends (pp. 59–100). New York: Springer Open.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lappegård, T. (2012). Couples’ parental leave practices: The role of the workplace situation. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 33(3), 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Le Bourdais, C., & Lapierre-Adamcyk, É. (2004). Changes in conjugal life in Canada: Is cohabitation progressively replacing marriage? Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 929–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Le Bourdais, C., Lapierre-Adamcyk, É., & Roy, A. (2014). Instabilité des unions libres: Une analyse comparative des facteurs démographiques [Instability of cohabiting unions: A comparative analysis of demographic factors]. Recherches sociographiques, 55(1), 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Low, H., & Sánchez-Marcos, V. (2015). Female labor market outcomes and the impact of maternity leave policies. IZA Journal of Labor Economics, 4(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mandel, H. (2012). Winners and losers: The consequences of welfare state policies for gender wage inequality. European Sociological Review, 28(2), 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mandel, H., & Semynonv, M. (2006). A welfare state paradox: State interventions and women’s employment opportunities in 22 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 111(6), 1910–1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marshall, K. (2008). Fathers’ use of paid parental leave. Perspectives on Labour and Income. Statistics Canada Catalogue No. 75-001-X. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-001-x/2008106/pdf/10639-eng.pdf.
  44. McKay, L., & Doucet, A. (2010). “Without taking away her leave”: A Canadian case study of couple’s decisions on fathers’ use o paid parental leave. Fathering, 8(3), 300–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McKay, L., Marshall, K., & Doucet, A. (2012). Fathers and parental leave in Canada: Policies and practices. In J. Ball & K. Daly (Eds.), Father involvement in Canada (pp. 207–223). Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  46. Misra, J., Budig, M., & Boeckmann, I. (2011). Work-family policies and the effects of children on women’s employment hours and wages. Community, Work & Family, 14(2), 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Naz, G. (2010). Usage of parental leave by fathers in Norway. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(5/6), 313–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rege, M., & Solli, I. F. (2013). The impact of paternity leave on fathers’ future earnings. Demography, 50(6), 2255–2277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reich, N. (2011). Predictors of fathers’ use of parental leave in Germany. Population Review, 50(2), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schönberg, U., & Ludsteck, J. (2014). Expansion in maternity leave coverage and mothers’ labor market outcomes after childbirth. Journal of Labor Economics, 32(3), 469–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Service Canada. (2017). Employment insurance and parental benefits. Retrieved from http://www.servicecanada.gc.ca/eng/ei/types/maternity_parental.shtml#eligible.
  52. Shockley, K. M., & Shen, W. (2015). Couple dynamics: Division of labor. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and family (pp. 125–135). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Singley, S. G., & Hynes, K. (2005). Transitions to parenthood: Work-family policies, gender, and the couple context. Gender and Society, 19(3), 376–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Spiess, K. C., & Wrohlich, K. (2008). The parental leave benefit reform in Germany: Costs and labour market outcomes of moving towards the Nordic Model. Population Research and Policy Review, 27(5), 575–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Statistics Canada. (2011). General Social Survey, Cycle 25: Family (12M0025X) [Data file and code book].Google Scholar
  56. Statistics Canada. (2012). Portrait of families and living arrangements in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  57. Thebaud, S., & Pedulla, D. S. (2016). Masculinity and the stalled revolution: How gender ideologies and norms shape young mens responses to work-family policies. Gender & Society, 30(4), 590–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thomas, M. (2015). The impact of mandated maternity benefits on the gender differential in promotions: Examining the role of adverse selection. Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  59. Travail, Emploi et Solidarité sociale Québec. (2017). Québec parental insurance plan. Retrieved from http://www.rqap.gouv.qc.ca/services_en_ligne/faire_demande_prestations_en.asp.
  60. Tremblay, D.-G. (2014). Quebec’s policies for work-family balance: A model for Canada? In B. Fox (Ed.), Family patterns, gender relations (4th ed., pp. 541–553). Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press Canada.Google Scholar
  61. Valdimarsdóttir, F. R. (2006). Nordic experiences with parental leave and its impact on equality between women and men. Copenhagen: Norden.Google Scholar
  62. van den Berg, A., Plante, C., Raïq, H., Proulx, C., & Faustmann, S. (Eds.). (2017). Combating poverty: Quebec’s pursuit of a distinctive welfare state. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  63. Wu, Z. (2000). Cohabitation: An alternative form of family living. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Zhang, X. (2010). Can motherhood earnings losses be ever regained? Evidence from Canada. Journal of Family Issues, 31(12), 1671–1688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Policy and InterventionUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Department of SociologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations