Advertisement

Smoking and Variation in the Hispanic Paradox: A Comparison of Low Birthweight Across 33 US States

  • Samuel H. Fishman
  • S. Philip Morgan
  • Robert A. Hummer
Article

Abstract

The Hispanic Paradox in birth outcomes is well documented for the US as a whole, but little work has considered geographic variation underlying the national pattern. This inquiry is important given the rapid growth of the Hispanic population and its geographic dispersion. Using birth records data from 2014 through 2016, we document state variation in birthweight differentials between US-born white women and the three Hispanic populations with the largest numbers of births: US-born Mexican women, foreign-born Mexican women, and foreign-born Central and South American women. Our analyses reveal substantial geographic variation in Hispanic immigrant–white low-birthweight disparities. For example, Hispanic immigrants in Southeastern states and in some states from other regions have reduced risk of low birthweight relative to whites, consistent with a “Hispanic Paradox.” A significant portion of Hispanic immigrants’ birthweight advantage in these states is explained by lower rates of smoking relative to whites. However, Hispanic immigrants have higher rates of low birthweight in California and several other Western states. The different state patterns are largely driven by geographic variation in smoking among whites, rather than geographic differences in Hispanic immigrants’ birthweights. In contrast, US-born Mexicans generally have similar or slightly higher odds of low birthweight than whites across the US. Overall, we show that the Hispanic Paradox in birthweight varies quite dramatically by state, driven by geographic variation in low birthweight among whites associated with white smoking disparities across states.

Keywords

Birthweight Decomposition Hispanic Paradox Smoking States Vital statistics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development NICHD-funded P2C (HD050924) for general support; the NICHD-funded [T32] (HD007168) for training support; and the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) for making the birth cohort files available. The content of this manuscript is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NICHD or NCHS.

References

  1. Acevedo-Garcia, D., Soobader, M.-J., & Berkman, L. F. (2007). Low birthweight among US Hispanic/Latino subgroups: The effect of maternal foreign-born status and education. Social Science & Medicine, 65(12), 2503–2516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida, J., Mulready-Ward, C., Bettegowda, V. R., & Ahluwalia, I. B. (2014). Racial/ethnic and nativity differences in birth outcomes among mothers in New York City: The role of social ties and social support. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18(1), 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araújo, B. Y., & Borrell, L. N. (2006). Understanding the link between discrimination, mental health outcomes, and life chances among Latinos. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 28(2), 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Behrman, J. R., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (2004). Returns to birthweight. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 586–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brazil, N. (2015). Spatial variation in the Hispanic Paradox: Mortality rates in new and established Hispanic US destinations. Population, Space and Place, 23(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  6. Breen, R., Karlson, K. B., & Holm, A. (2013). Total, direct, and indirect effects in logit and probit models. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(2), 164–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunello, G., Fort, M., Schneeweis, N., & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2016). The causal effect of education on health: What is the role of health behaviors? Health Economics, 25(3), 314–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buekens, P., Notzon, F., Kotelchuck, M., & Wilcox, A. (2000). Why do Mexican Americans give birth to few low-birth-weight infants? American Journal of Epidemiology, 152(4), 347–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). User Guide to the 2014 Natality File. Department of Health and Human Services.  Google Scholar
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017a). User guide to the 2015 natality file. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017b). State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation (STATE) System. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from https://nccd.cdc.gov/STATESystem/rdPage.aspx?rdReport=OSH_State.CustomReports.
  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). User guide to the 2016 natality file. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  13. Conley, D., & Bennett, N. G. (2001). Birth weight and income: Interactions across generations. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(4), 450–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donahue, S. M., Kleinman, K. P., Gillman, M. W., & Oken, E. (2010). Trends in birth weight and gestational length among singleton term births in the United States: 1990–2005. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 115(2 Pt 1), 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fenelon, A. (2013a). Geographic divergence in mortality in the United States. Population and Development Review, 39(4), 611–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fenelon, A. (2013b). Revisiting the Hispanic mortality advantage in the United States: The role of smoking. Social Science & Medicine, 82, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fenelon, A. (2017). Rethinking the Hispanic Paradox: The mortality experience of Mexican immigrants in traditional gateways and new destinations. International Migration Review, 51(3), 567–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fenelon, A., & Preston, S. H. (2012). Estimating smoking-attributable mortality in the United States. Demography, 49(3), 797–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fichtenberg, C. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2002). Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: Systematic review. BMJ, 325(7357), 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frank, R., Akresh, I. R., & Lu, B. (2010). Latino immigrants and the US racial order how and where do they fit in? American Sociological Review, 75(3), 378–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frisbie, W. P. (2005). Infant mortality. In D.L. Poston, M. Micklin (eds.), Handbook of Population (pp. 251–282). Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuentes-Afflick, E., Hessol, N. A., & Pérez-Stable, E. J. (1999). Testing the epidemiologic paradox of low birth weight in Latinos. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 153(2), 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldman, N., Kimbro, R. T., Turra, C. M., & Pebley, A. R. (2006). Socioeconomic gradients in health for white and Mexican-origin populations. American Journal of Public Health, 96(12), 2186–2193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haas, S. A. (2006). Health selection and the process of social stratification: The effect of childhood health on socioeconomic attainment. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47(4), 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heaman, M., Bayrampour, H., Kingston, D., Blondel, B., Gissler, M., Roth, C., Alexander, S., Gagnon, A. (2013). Migrant women's utilization of prenatal care: a systematic review. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 17(5), 816–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hummer, R. A., Biegler, M., De Turk, P. B., Forbes, D., Frisbie, W. P., Hong, Y., et al. (1999). Race/ethnicity, nativity, and infant mortality in the United States. Social Forces, 77(3), 1083–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hummer, R. A., & Hernandez, E. M. (2013). The effect of educational attainment on adult mortality in the United States. Population Bulletin, 68(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  28. Hummer, R. A., Powers, D. A., Pullum, S. G., Gossman, G. L., & Frisbie, W. P. (2007). Paradox found (again): Infant mortality among the Mexican-origin population in the United States. Demography, 44(3), 441–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karlson, K. B., & Holm, A. (2011). Decomposing primary and secondary effects: A new decomposition method. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 29(2), 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karlson, K. B., Holm, A., & Breen, R. (2012). Comparing regression coefficients between same-sample nested models using logit and probit a new method. Sociological Methodology, 42(1), 286–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kenny, L. C., Lavender, T., McNamee, R., O’Neill, S. M., Mills, T., & Khashan, A. S. (2013). Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: Evidence from a large contemporary cohort. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e56583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kohler, U., Karlson, K. B., & Holm, A. (2011). Comparing coefficients of nested nonlinear probability models. Stata Journal, 11(3), 420–438.Google Scholar
  33. Kotelchuck, M. (1994). An evaluation of the Kessner adequacy of prenatal care index and a proposed adequacy of prenatal care utilization index. American Journal of Public Health, 84(9), 1414–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kozuki, N., Lee, A. C., Silveira, M. F., Sania, A., Vogel, J. P., Adair, L., et al. (2013). The associations of parity and maternal age with small-for-gestational-age, preterm, and neonatal and infant mortality: A meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 13(3), 1.Google Scholar
  35. Krans, E. E., & Davis, M. M. (2012). Preventing low birthweight: 25 years, prenatal risk, and the failure to reinvent prenatal care. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 206(5), 398–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lariscy, J. T., Hummer, R. A., & Hayward, M. D. (2015). Hispanic older adult mortality in the United States: New estimates and an assessment of factors shaping the Hispanic paradox. Demography, 52(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leslie, J. C., Galvin, S. L., Diehl, S. J., Bennett, T. A., & Buescher, P. A. (2003). Infant mortality, low birth weight, and prematurity among Hispanic, white, and African American women in North Carolina. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 188(5), 1238–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Levy, D. T., Chaloupka, F., & Gitchell, J. (2004). The effects of tobacco control policies on smoking rates: A tobacco control scorecard. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 10(4), 338–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lhila, A., & Long, S. (2012). What is driving the black–white difference in low birthweight in the US? Health Economics, 21(3), 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. (1995). Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. Journal of Health and Social Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2626958.Google Scholar
  41. Markides, K. S., & Coreil, J. (1986). The health of Hispanics in the southwestern United States: An epidemiologic paradox. Public Health Reports, 101(3), 253.Google Scholar
  42. Markides, K. S., & Eschbach, K. (2011). Hispanic paradox in adult mortality in the United States. In R. G. Rogers, E. M. Crimmins (Eds.), International Handbook of Adult Mortality (pp. 227–240). Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Osterman, M., Driscoll, A. K., & Mathews, T. (2017). Births: Final data for 2015. National Vital Statistics Reports: From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System, 66(1), 1.Google Scholar
  44. Moskowitz, J. M., Lin, Z., & Hudes, E. S. (2000). The impact of workplace smoking ordinances in California on smoking cessation. American Journal of Public Health, 90(5), 757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Landale, N. S., Oropesa, R. S., & Gorman, B. K. (1999). Immigration and infant health: Birth outcomes of immigrant and native-born women. In D. Hernandez (Ed.), Children of immigrants: Health, adjustment and public assistance (pp. 244–285). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.  Google Scholar
  46. Nielsen, S. S., Dills, R. L., Glass, M., & Mueller, B. A. (2014). Accuracy of prenatal smoking data from Washington State birth certificates in a population-based sample with cotinine measurements. Annals of Epidemiology, 24(3), 236–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Northam, S., & Knapp, T. R. (2006). The reliability and validity of birth certificates. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 35(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Palloni, A. (2006). Reproducing inequalities: Luck, wallets, and the enduring effects of childhood health. Demography, 43(4), 587–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Parrado, E. A. (2011). How high is Hispanic/Mexican fertility in the United States? Immigration and tempo considerations. Demography, 48(3), 1059–1080.Google Scholar
  50. Petrou, S., Sach, T., & Davidson, L. (2001). The long-term costs of preterm birth and low birth weight: Results of a systematic review. Child: Care, Health and Development, 27(2), 97–115.Google Scholar
  51. Pinto-Martin, J., Whitaker, A., Feldman, J., Cnaan, A., Zhao, H., Rosen-Bloch, J., et al. (2004). Special education services and school performance in a regional cohort of low-birthweight infants at age nine. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 18(2), 120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Powers, D. A. (2016). Erosion of Advantage: Decomposing Differences in Infant Mortality Rates Among Older Non-Hispanic White and Mexican-Origin Mothers. Population Research and Policy Review, 35(1), 23–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reeves, S., & Bernstein, I. (2014). Effects of maternal tobacco-smoke exposure on fetal growth and neonatal size. Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 3(6), 719–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reichman, N. E. (2005). Low birth weight and school readiness. The Future of Children, 15(1), 91–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reichman, N. E., Hamilton, E. R., Hummer, R. A., & Padilla, Y. C. (2008). Racial and ethnic disparities in low birthweight among urban unmarried mothers. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 12(2), 204–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Reichman, N. E., & Kenney, G. M. (1998). Prenatal care, birth outcomes and newborn hospitalization costs: Patterns among Hispanics in New Jersey. Family Planning Perspectives, 30(3), 182–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Riosmena, F., & Massey, D. S. (2012). Pathways to El Norte: Origins, destinations, and characteristics of Mexican migrants to the United States. International Migration Review, 46(1), 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sanchez-Vaznaugh, E. V., Braveman, P. A., Egerter, S., Marchi, K. S., Heck, K., & Curtis, M. (2016). Latina Birth Outcomes in California: Not so Paradoxical. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 20(9), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shah, P. S., & Knowledge Synthesis Group on determinants of preterm/low birthweight births. (2010). Paternal factors and low birthweight, preterm, and small for gestational age births: A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 202(2), 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shaw, R. J., & Pickett, K. E. (2013). The health benefits of Hispanic communities for non-Hispanic mothers and infants: Another Hispanic paradox. American Journal of Public Health, 103(6), 1052–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shaw, R. J., Pickett, K. E., & Wilkinson, R. G. (2010). Ethnic density effects on birth outcomes and maternal smoking during pregnancy in the US linked birth and infant death data set. American Journal of Public Health, 100(4), 707–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Siegel, M. (2002). The effectiveness of state-level tobacco control interventions: A review of program implementation and behavioral outcomes. Annual Review of Public Health, 23(1), 45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Silles, M. A. (2009). The causal effect of education on health: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Economics of Education Review, 28(1), 122–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Singh, G. K., & Yu, S. M. (1996). Adverse pregnancy outcomes: Differences between US-and foreign-born women in major US racial and ethnic groups. American Journal of Public Health, 86(6), 837–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sobel, M. E. (1987). Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Turra, C. M., & Goldman, N. (2007). Socioeconomic differences in mortality among US adults: Insights into the Hispanic paradox. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62(3), S184–S192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ventura, S. J. (1999). Using the birth certificate to monitor smoking during pregnancy. Public Health Reports, 114(1), 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ventura, S. J., Hamilton, B. E., Mathews, T., & Chandra, A. (2003). Trends and variations in smoking during pregnancy and low birth weight: Evidence from the birth certificate, 1990–2000. Pediatrics, 111(Supplement 1), 1176–1180.Google Scholar
  69. Vinikoor, L. C., Messer, L. C., Laraia, B. A., & Kaufman, J. S. (2010). Reliability of variables on the North Carolina birth certificate: A comparison with directly queried values from a cohort study. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 24(1), 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel H. Fishman
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Philip Morgan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert A. Hummer
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Carolina Population CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations