Demography in the Big Data Revolution: Changing the Culture to Forge New Frontiers

Original Research
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Despite the widespread and rapidly growing popularity of Big Data, researchers have yet to agree on what the concept entails, what tools are still needed to best interrogate these data, whether or not Big Data’s emergence represents a new academic field or simply a set of tools, and how much confidence we can place on results derived from Big Data. Despite these ambiguities, most would agree that Big Data and the methods for analyzing it represent a remarkable potential for advancing social science knowledge. In my Presidential address to the Southern Demographic Association, I argue that demographers have long collected and analyzed Big Data in a small way, by parsing out the points of information that we can manipulate with familiar models and restricting analyses to what typical computing systems can handle or restricted-access data disseminators will allow. In order to better interrogate the data we already have, we need to change the culture of demography to treat demographic microdata as Big. This includes shaping the definition of Big Data, changing how we conceptualize models, and re-evaluating how we silo confidential data.

Keywords

Big Data Population-generalizable data Data security Complex statistical modeling Big data demography 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Austin, P. C., & Stuart, E. A. (2015). Moving toward best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Statistics in Medicine, 34(28), 3661–3679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baek Choi, J., & Thomas, M. (2009). Predictive factors of acculturation attitudes and social support among Asian immigrants in the USA. International Journal of Social Welfare, 18(1), 76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, B. A., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Ferron, J. M., Jiao, Q. G., Hibbard, S. T., & Kromrey, J. D. (2012). Use of design effects and sample weights in complex health survey data: a review of published articles using data from 3 commonly used adolescent health surveys. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1399–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryant, A., & Raja, U. (2014). In the realm of Big Data. First Monday 19(2). http://firstmonday.org/article/view/4991/3822. Accessed 17 Jan 2018.
  5. Butler, D. (2008). Web data predict flu. Nature, 456, 287–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chantala, K., & Tabor, J. (1999). Strategies to perform a design-based analysis using the Add Health data. Resource document. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/documentation/guides/weight1.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2018.
  7. Chen, C. L. P., & Zhang, C. (2014). Data-intensive applications, challenges, techniques an technologies: a survey on Big Data. Information Sciences, 275, 314–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crowder, J. A., & Carbone, J. A. (2017). Abductive artificial intelligence learning models. In H. R. Arabnia, D. de la Fuente, E. B. Kozerenko, J. A. Olivas, & F. G. Tinetti (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 90–96). Las Vegas: CSREA Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cutter, S. L., Emrich, C. T., Mitchell, J. T., Boruff, B. J., Gall, M., Schmidtlein, M. C., et al. (2006). The long road home: race, class, and recovery from Hurricane Katrina. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 4(2), 8–20.Google Scholar
  10. Davenport, T. H., & Patil, D. J. (2012). Data scientist—the sexiest job of the 21st century: meet the people who can coax treasure out of messy, unstructured data. Harvard Business Review, 95(5), 70–76.Google Scholar
  11. Dinov, I. D. (2016). Methodological challenges and analytic opportunities for modeling and interpreting Big Healthcare Data. Gigascience, 5(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fiske, S. T., & Hauser, R. M. (2014). Protecting human research participants in the age of big data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(38), 13675–13676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fossett, M. (2006). Ethnic preferences, social distance dynamics, and residential segregation: theoretical explorations using simulation analysis. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 30(3–4), 185–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuchs, C., & Sandoval, M. (2013). The diamond model of open access publishing: why policy makers, scholars, universities, libraries, labour unions and the publishing world need to take non-commercial, non-profit open access serious. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 11(2), 428–443.Google Scholar
  15. Fussell, E., Curran, S. R., Dunbar, M. D., Babb, M. A., Thompson, L., & Meijer-Irons, J. (2017). Weather-related hazards and population change: a study of hurricanes and tropical storms in the United States, 1980-2012. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science., 669(1), 146–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gomes, R., Levinson, H. F., Tsiganis, K., & Morbidelli, A. (2005). Origin of the cataclysmic late heavy bombardment period of the terrestrial plants. Nature, 4353, 466–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grace, Kathryn, & Nagle, Nicholas. (2015). Using high resolution remotely sensed data to examine the relationship between agriculture and fertility in a pre-transitional setting: a case study of Mali. The Professional Geographer, 67(4), 641–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grace, Kathryn, Nagle, Nicholas N., & Husak, Greg. (2016). Can small-scale agricultural production improve children’s health? examining stunting vulnerability among very young children in Mali, West Africa. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 106(3), 722–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenough, G., McGeehin, M., Bernard, S. M., Trtanj, J., Riad, J., & Engelberg, D. (2001). The potential impacts of climate variability and change on health impacts of extreme weather events in the United States”. Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(Supp 2), 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayden, E. C. (2015). Genome researchers raise alarm over Big Data. Nature: International Weekly Journal of Science. http://www.nature.com/news/genome-researchers- raise-alarm-over-big-data-1.17912. Accessed 17 Jan 2018.
  21. Hayward, M. D., Hummer, R. A., Chiu, C., Gonzalez-Gonzalez, C., & Wong, R. (2014). Does the Hispanic paradox in mortality extend to disability? Population Research and Policy Review, 33, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015). The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science. PLOS Biology. http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106. Accessed 17 Jan 2018.
  23. HLG-PCCB (High-level group for partnership, coordination and capacity-building for statistics for the 20130 agenda for sustainable development). (2016). Global action plan for sustainable development data. Report. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/global-consultation-hlg-1/GAP_HLG-20161021.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2018.
  24. Horrigan, M. W. (2013). Big data and official statistics. presentation for the international year of statistics. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Office of Prices and Living Conditions Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Iceland, J., Weinberg, D. H., & Steinmetz, E. (2002). Racial and ethnic residential segregation in the United States: 1980–2000. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau, Series CENSR-3.Google Scholar
  26. King, G. (2016). Preface: big data is not about the data. In R. Michael Alvarez (Ed.), Computational social science: discovery and prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kitchin, R. (2014a). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kitchin, R. (2014b). The data revolution: big data, open data, data infrastructures & their consequences. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Kwan, M. (2012). The uncertain geographic context problem. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(5), 958–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lazer, D., Kennedy, R., King, G., & Vespignani, A. (2014). The parable of Google Flu: traps in big data analysis. Science, 343(6176), 1203–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Letouzé, E. (2015). Demography, meet big data; big data, meet demography: reflections on the data-rich future of population science. In Paper presented at the United Nations EGM on strengthening the demographic evidence base for the post-2015 development agenda. New York, October 5.Google Scholar
  32. Leung, M., & Takeuchi, D. T. (2011). Race, place, and health. In L. M. Burton, P. Kemp, M. Leung, S. A. Matthews, & D. T. Takeuchi (Eds.), Communities, neighborhoods, and health: expanding the boundaries of place (pp. 73–88). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lichter, D. T., & Johnson, K. M. (2009). Immigrant gateways and Hispanic migration to new destinations. International Migration Review, 43(3), 496–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manovich, L. (2011). Trending: the promises and the challenges of big social data. In M. K. Gold (Ed.), Debates in the Digital Humanities 2 (pp. 460–475). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  35. Maples, J. N. (2012). Changes in US Ethnic Niches, 2005-2010. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tennessee. http://trace.tennessee.edu/socioetds/. Accessed 17 Jan 2018.
  36. Martin, D. (1996). Geographic information systems: socioeconomic applications. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Osterman, M. J. K., Driscoll, A. K., & Matthews, T. J. (2017). Births: final data for 2015. National Vital Statistics Reports, 66, 1–70.Google Scholar
  38. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1988). The dimensions of residential segregation”. Social Forces, 67(2), 281–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCoach, D. B., & Adelson, J. L. (2010). Dealing with dependence (Part I): understanding the effects of clustered data. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(2), 152–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Metzler, K., Kim, D. A., Allum, N., & Denman, A. (2016). Who is doing computational social science? A white paper. Sage Publishing. https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/compsocsci.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2018.
  41. Minnesota Population Center. (2016). Terra populus: integrated data on population and environment: version 1. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  42. Moretti, S. (2002). Computer simulations in sociology: what contribution? Social Science Computer Review, 20(1), 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Murdoch, T. B., & Detsky, A. S. (2013). The inevitable application of Big Data to health care. JAMA, 309(13), 1351–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nuzzo, R. (2014). Statistical errors: p values, the “gold standard” of statistical validity, are not as reliable as many scientists assume. Nature, 506, 150–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pattengale, N. D., Alipour, M., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Moret, B. M. E., & Stamatakis, A. (2010). How many bootstrap replicates are necessary?”. Journal of Computational Biology, 17(3), 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Perreira, K. M., Harris, K. M., & Lee, D. (2006). Making it in America: high school completion by immigrant and native youth. Demography, 43(3), 511–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pokhriyal, N., Dong, W., & Govindaraju, V. (2015). Big data for improved diagnosis of poverty: a case study of Senegal. Washington, DC: A report for the brookings institution africa in focus series.Google Scholar
  48. Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2006). Immigrant America: a portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  49. Ramakrishnan, S. K. (2005). Democracy in Immigrant America: changing demographics and political participation. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Riosmena, F., & Massey, D. S. (2012). Pathways to El Norte: origins, destinations, and characteristics of Mexican migrants to the United States. International Migration Review, 46(1), 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ruggles, S. (2014). Big microdata for population research. Demography, 51(1), 287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schwirian, K. P. (1983). Models of neighborhood change. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Singer, A. (2004). The rise of new immigrant gateways. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.Google Scholar
  54. Tripathi, R., Sharma, P., Chakraborty, P., & Varadwaj, P. K. (2016). Next-generation sequencing revolution through big data analytics. Frontiers in Life Science, 9(2), 119–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tsiganis, K., Gomes, R., Morbidelli, A., & Levinson, H. F. (2005). Origin of the orbital architecture of the giant planets of the Solar system. Nature, 435(7041), 459–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Udry, J. R. (2003). The national longitudinal study of adolescent health (Add Health), Wave 1, 1994. Chapel Hill: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  57. Vilhuber, L. (2016). Census research nodes: a progress report. In Presentation at the 2016 FSRDC Research Conference. September 15. College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
  58. Vital Wave Consulting. (2012). Big data, big impact: new possibilities for international development. A report for the World Economic Forum. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  59. Waga, D., & Rabah, K. (2014). Environmental conditions’, big data management, and cloud computing analytics for sustainable agriculture. World Journal of Computer Application and Technology, 2(3), 73–81.Google Scholar
  60. Wilcox, R. R. (2010). Fundamentals of modern statistical methods: substantially improving power and accuracy. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations